Analysis of time-frequency characteristics and coherence of local field potentials during working memory task of rats after high-frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation_Journal of Biomedical Engineering

Authors：

XU Guizhi ^1,2 , WANG Ning ^1,2 ,  GUO Miaomiao ^1,2 , ZHANG Tianheng ^1,2 , TONG Yuming ^1,2

1. State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, P.R.China;
2. Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Field and Electrical Apparatus Reliability of Hebei Province, School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, P.R.China;

Corresponding?author：

GUO Miaomiao, Email: gmm@hebut.edu.cn

Keywords：

repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; working memory; local field potentials; coherence

DOI：

10.7507/1001-5515.201912083

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation(rTMS) is a painless and non-invasive method for stimulation and modulation in the field of cognitive neuroscience research and clinical neurological regulation. In this paper, adult Wistar rats were divided into the rTMS group and control group randomly. Rats in the rTMS group were stimulated with 5 Hz rTMS for 14 days, while the rats in the control group did not accept any stimulation. Then, the behavior and local field potentials (LFPs) were recorded synchronously when the rats perform a working memory (WM) task with T-maze. Finally, the time-frequency distribution and coherence characteristics of the LFPs signal in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) during working memory task were analyzed. The results showed that the rats in the rTMS group needed less training days to reach the task correction criterion than the control group (P < 0.05). Compared with the control group, the rTMS group has higher energy (P < 0.01) in θ band (4~12 Hz) and γ band (30~80 Hz). The coherence between the channel pairs decreases as the spatial distance of the channel pairs increases, and the rTMS group exhibits a higher coherence than the control group (P < 0.01). It is concluded that 5 Hz rTMS can improve the excitability of rat prefrontal cortical neurons to a certain extent, and has a positive effect on the working memory ability of normal rats. The results of this paper may provide important theoretical support for further research on the mechanism of action of rTMS on WM.

Citation： XU Guizhi, WANG Ning, GUO Miaomiao, ZHANG Tianheng, TONG Yuming. Analysis of time-frequency characteristics and coherence of local field potentials during working memory task of rats after high-frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 2020, 37(5): 756-764. doi: 10.7507/1001-5515.201912083 Copy

1.	Ziemann U. Thirty years of transcranial magnetic stimulation: where do we stand?. Exp Brain Res, 2017, 235(4): 973-984.
2.	Abrahamyan A, Clifford C W, Arabzadeh E, et al. Low intensity TMS enhances perception of visual stimuli. Brain Stimul, 2015, 8(6): 1175-1182.
3.	Perera T, George M S, Grammer G, et al. The clinical TMS society consensus review and treatment recommendations for TMS therapy for major depressive disorder. Brain Stimul, 2016, 9(3): 336-346.
4.	靳靜娜, 金芳, 王欣, 等. 低頻重復經顱磁刺激刺激初級運動皮層對大腦功能連接影響的研究. 生物醫學工程學雜志, 2017, 34(4): 493-499.
5.	Sasaki N, Abo M, Hara T, et al. High-frequency rTMS on leg motor area in the early phase of stroke. Acta Neurol Belg, 2017, 117(1): 189-194.
6.	靳靜娜, 王欣, 林雨, 等. rTMS 聯合運動訓練對靜息態腦網絡影響的研究. 中國生物醫學工程學報, 2018, 37(3): 290-296.
7.	Kamp D, Brinkmeyer J, Agelink M W, et al. High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) reduces EEG-hypofrontality in patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res, 2016, 236: 199-201.
8.	Lee J, Sohn E H, Oh E, et al. Cognitive effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with cognitive training: long-term mitigation neurodegenerative effects of mild Alzheimer's disease. Int J Gerontol, 2020, 14(2): 133-137.
9.	Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu rev psychol, 2013, 64: 135-168.
10.	Buzsáki G. Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nat Neurosci, 2004, 7(5): 446-451.
11.	Canolty R T, Knight R T. The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends Cogn Sci, 2010, 14(11): 506-515.
12.	Funahashi S. Working memory in the prefrontal cortex. Brain Sci, 2017, 7(5): 49.
13.	Antonio H L, Jonathan D W. The role of prefrontal cortex in working memory: a mini review. Front Syst Neurosci, 2015, 9: 1-7.
14.	Roux F, Uhlhaas P J. Working memory and neural oscillations: alpha-gamma versus theta-gamma codes for distinct WM information?. Trends Cogn Sci, 2014, 18(1): 16-25.
15.	徐佳敏, 王策群, 林龍年. 多通道在體記錄技術——動作電位與場電位信號處理. 生理學報, 2014, 66(3): 349-357.
16.	李雙燕, 溫雪晗, 桑浩鈞, 等. 工頻電磁場長期作用影響工作記憶中局部場電位因果網絡連接特征. 生物醫學工程學雜志, 2018, 35(6): 829-836.
17.	Crouch B, Sommerlade L, Veselcic P, et al. Detection of time-, frequency- and direction-resolved communication within brain networks. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 1825.
18.	Earl K, Mikael L, Andre M. Working memory 2.0. Neuron, 2018, 100(02): 463-475.
19.	Wang X, Mao Zhiqi, Ling Zhipei, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neurol, 2020, 267(3): 791-801.
20.	Ahmed M A, Darwish E S, Khedr E M, et al. Effects of low versus high frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive function and cortical excitability in Alzheimer's dementia. J Neurol, 2012, 259(1): 83-92.
21.	Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates-the new coronal set 5th edition. Salt Lake City: Academic Press, 2004.
22.	Yu C, Fan D, Lopez A, et al. Dynamic changes in single unit activity and γ oscillations in a thalamocortical circuit during rapid instrumental learning. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11): e50578.
23.	Jones M W, Wilson M A. Theta rhythms coordinate hippocampal-prefrontal interactions in a spatial memory task. PLoS Biol, 2005, 3(12): 2187-2199.
24.	Liu T, Bai Wenwen, Xia Mi, et al. Directional hippocampal-prefrontal interactions during working memory. Behav Brain Res, 2018, 338: 1-8.
25.	Liu T, Bai Wenwen, Wang J, et al. An aberrant Link between gamma oscillation and functional connectivity in Aβ1-42-mediated memory deficits in rats. Behav Brain Res, 2016, 297: 51-58.
26.	Biskamp J, Bartos M, Sauer J F. Organization of prefrontal network activity by respiration-related oscillations. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 45508.
27.	Beynel L, Davis S W, Crowell C A, et al. Online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation during working memory in younger and older adults: a randomized within-subject comparison. PLoS One, 2019, 14(3): e0213707.
28.	Guo Z, Jiang Zhijun, Jiang Binghu, et al. High-Frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation could improve impaired working memory induced by sleep deprivation. Neural Plast, 2019, 2019: 7030286.
29.	Yang Huiyun, Liu Yang, Xie Jiacun, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on synaptic plasticity and apoptosis in vascular dementia rats. Behav Brain Res, 2015, 281: 149-155.
30.	Zhang N, Xing M, Wang Y, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances spatial learning and synaptic plasticity via the VEGF and BDNF–NMDAR pathways in a rat model of vascular dementia. Neuroscience, 2015, 311: 284-291.
31.	王玲, 楊佳佳, 王發頎, 等. 經顱磁刺激對抑郁模型動物的作用研究進展. 中國生物醫學工程學報, 2018, 37(4): 498-507.
32.	Bai W, Liu Tiaotiao, Dou Mengmeng, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reverses Aβ1-42-induced dysfunction in gamma oscillation during working memory. Curr Alzheimer Res, 2018, 15(6): 570-577.
33.	Sharma G, Annetta N, Friedenberg D, et al. Time stability and coherence analysis of multiunit, Single-Unit and local field potential neuronal signals in chronically implanted brain electrodes. Bioelectron Med, 2015, 2(1): 63-71.
34.	Bowyer S M. Coherence a measure of the brain networks: past and present. Neuropsychiatr Electrophysiol, 2016, 2(1): 1-12.
35.	Bygrave A M, Jahans-Price T, Wolff A R, et al. Hippocampal-prefrontal coherence mediates working memory and selective attention at distinct frequency bands and provides a causal Link between schizophrenia and its risk gene GRIA1. Transl Psychiatry, 2019, 9(1): 142.

1. Ziemann U. Thirty years of transcranial magnetic stimulation: where do we stand?. Exp Brain Res, 2017, 235(4): 973-984.
2. Abrahamyan A, Clifford C W, Arabzadeh E, et al. Low intensity TMS enhances perception of visual stimuli. Brain Stimul, 2015, 8(6): 1175-1182.
3. Perera T, George M S, Grammer G, et al. The clinical TMS society consensus review and treatment recommendations for TMS therapy for major depressive disorder. Brain Stimul, 2016, 9(3): 336-346.
4. 靳靜娜, 金芳, 王欣, 等. 低頻重復經顱磁刺激刺激初級運動皮層對大腦功能連接影響的研究. 生物醫學工程學雜志, 2017, 34(4): 493-499.
5. Sasaki N, Abo M, Hara T, et al. High-frequency rTMS on leg motor area in the early phase of stroke. Acta Neurol Belg, 2017, 117(1): 189-194.
6. 靳靜娜, 王欣, 林雨, 等. rTMS 聯合運動訓練對靜息態腦網絡影響的研究. 中國生物醫學工程學報, 2018, 37(3): 290-296.
7. Kamp D, Brinkmeyer J, Agelink M W, et al. High frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) reduces EEG-hypofrontality in patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res, 2016, 236: 199-201.
8. Lee J, Sohn E H, Oh E, et al. Cognitive effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with cognitive training: long-term mitigation neurodegenerative effects of mild Alzheimer's disease. Int J Gerontol, 2020, 14(2): 133-137.
9. Diamond A. Executive functions. Annu rev psychol, 2013, 64: 135-168.
10. Buzsáki G. Large-scale recording of neuronal ensembles. Nat Neurosci, 2004, 7(5): 446-451.
11. Canolty R T, Knight R T. The functional role of cross-frequency coupling. Trends Cogn Sci, 2010, 14(11): 506-515.
12. Funahashi S. Working memory in the prefrontal cortex. Brain Sci, 2017, 7(5): 49.
13. Antonio H L, Jonathan D W. The role of prefrontal cortex in working memory: a mini review. Front Syst Neurosci, 2015, 9: 1-7.
14. Roux F, Uhlhaas P J. Working memory and neural oscillations: alpha-gamma versus theta-gamma codes for distinct WM information?. Trends Cogn Sci, 2014, 18(1): 16-25.
15. 徐佳敏, 王策群, 林龍年. 多通道在體記錄技術——動作電位與場電位信號處理. 生理學報, 2014, 66(3): 349-357.
16. 李雙燕, 溫雪晗, 桑浩鈞, 等. 工頻電磁場長期作用影響工作記憶中局部場電位因果網絡連接特征. 生物醫學工程學雜志, 2018, 35(6): 829-836.
17. Crouch B, Sommerlade L, Veselcic P, et al. Detection of time-, frequency- and direction-resolved communication within brain networks. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 1825.
18. Earl K, Mikael L, Andre M. Working memory 2.0. Neuron, 2018, 100(02): 463-475.
19. Wang X, Mao Zhiqi, Ling Zhipei, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Neurol, 2020, 267(3): 791-801.
20. Ahmed M A, Darwish E S, Khedr E M, et al. Effects of low versus high frequencies of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive function and cortical excitability in Alzheimer's dementia. J Neurol, 2012, 259(1): 83-92.
21. Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates-the new coronal set 5th edition. Salt Lake City: Academic Press, 2004.
22. Yu C, Fan D, Lopez A, et al. Dynamic changes in single unit activity and γ oscillations in a thalamocortical circuit during rapid instrumental learning. PLoS One, 2012, 7(11): e50578.
23. Jones M W, Wilson M A. Theta rhythms coordinate hippocampal-prefrontal interactions in a spatial memory task. PLoS Biol, 2005, 3(12): 2187-2199.
24. Liu T, Bai Wenwen, Xia Mi, et al. Directional hippocampal-prefrontal interactions during working memory. Behav Brain Res, 2018, 338: 1-8.
25. Liu T, Bai Wenwen, Wang J, et al. An aberrant Link between gamma oscillation and functional connectivity in Aβ1-42-mediated memory deficits in rats. Behav Brain Res, 2016, 297: 51-58.
26. Biskamp J, Bartos M, Sauer J F. Organization of prefrontal network activity by respiration-related oscillations. Sci Rep, 2017, 7: 45508.
27. Beynel L, Davis S W, Crowell C A, et al. Online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation during working memory in younger and older adults: a randomized within-subject comparison. PLoS One, 2019, 14(3): e0213707.
28. Guo Z, Jiang Zhijun, Jiang Binghu, et al. High-Frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation could improve impaired working memory induced by sleep deprivation. Neural Plast, 2019, 2019: 7030286.
29. Yang Huiyun, Liu Yang, Xie Jiacun, et al. Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on synaptic plasticity and apoptosis in vascular dementia rats. Behav Brain Res, 2015, 281: 149-155.
30. Zhang N, Xing M, Wang Y, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation enhances spatial learning and synaptic plasticity via the VEGF and BDNF–NMDAR pathways in a rat model of vascular dementia. Neuroscience, 2015, 311: 284-291.
31. 王玲, 楊佳佳, 王發頎, 等. 經顱磁刺激對抑郁模型動物的作用研究進展. 中國生物醫學工程學報, 2018, 37(4): 498-507.
32. Bai W, Liu Tiaotiao, Dou Mengmeng, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reverses Aβ1-42-induced dysfunction in gamma oscillation during working memory. Curr Alzheimer Res, 2018, 15(6): 570-577.
33. Sharma G, Annetta N, Friedenberg D, et al. Time stability and coherence analysis of multiunit, Single-Unit and local field potential neuronal signals in chronically implanted brain electrodes. Bioelectron Med, 2015, 2(1): 63-71.
34. Bowyer S M. Coherence a measure of the brain networks: past and present. Neuropsychiatr Electrophysiol, 2016, 2(1): 1-12.
35. Bygrave A M, Jahans-Price T, Wolff A R, et al. Hippocampal-prefrontal coherence mediates working memory and selective attention at distinct frequency bands and provides a causal Link between schizophrenia and its risk gene GRIA1. Transl Psychiatry, 2019, 9(1): 142.

Journal of Biomedical Engineering

Analysis of time-frequency characteristics and coherence of local field potentials during working memory task of rats after high-frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content