• Department of Emergency, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, P. R. China;
HU Hai, Email: 492550263@qq.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

目的  探討修正創傷評分(RTS)、CRAMS評分及院前傷情評分(PHI)對于群體傷患者死亡的評估作用。 方法  回顧性分析2011年8月-2012年8月就診且記錄完整的45例群體傷患者的病歷資料,根據病歷記錄計算RTS、CRAMS及PHI評分,并記錄患者是否死亡。繪制受試者工作特征曲線并計算出曲線下面積;根據約登指數篩選出各個評分適宜的截斷值,據此計算3種創傷評分的靈敏度、特異度、陽性似然比、陰性似然比、陽性預測值、陰性預測值并進行比較。將患者按照性別、年齡分為亞組進行對比分析。 結果  RTS曲線下面積最大,且與參考線下面積對比差異有統計學意義(P=0.016),與另外兩種評分比較其差異有統計學意義。 結論  RTS較CRAMS及PHI評分對于群體傷患者死亡預測具有更高的價值。

Citation: CHEN Xiaohong,HU Hai,CAO Yu.. Value of Three Trauma Scaling Systems in Predicting Death for Patients in Mass Casualties. West China Medical Journal, 2013, 28(9): 1329-1332. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.20130417 Copy

Copyright ? the editorial department of West China Medical Journal of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved

  • Previous Article

    Expert Consensus Statement on Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment of Bee Sting in Sichuan
  • Next Article

    Consistency Analysis of JumpSTART Triage System and Injury Severity Score for Mass Casualties Including Children