Effectiveness of robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in the elderly_West China Medical Journal

Authors：

YANG Nan , WANG Shengbao , LIU Shuangfu , WANG Cong , HE Qiang ,  CAO Yun

Spine Surgery Department, Sichuan Science City Hospital, Mianyang, Sichuan 621000, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

CAO Yun, Email: cdcaoyun@126.com

Keywords：

Robot; percutaneous vertebroplasty; osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture; minimally invasive surgery

DOI：

10.7507/1002-0179.202108283

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) in the elderly. Methods The clinical data of 90 elderly patients with OVCF treated in Sichuan Science City Hospital between June 2019 and March 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into robot-assisted group (40 cases) and C-arm-assisted group (50 cases). The pre- and post-operative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, pre- and post-operative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, intraoperative cement leakage, intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, operation time, and the loss of hemoglobin were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results The incidence of intraoperative cement leakage (5% vs. 20%), intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency [(18.3±3.2) vs. (41.3±7.8) times], operation time [(28.3±4.6) vs. (43.2±7.3) min] and the loss of hemoglobin [(7.2±2.0) vs. (15.2±4.4) g/L] of the robot-assisted group were less than those of the C-arm-assisted group (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in the decrease of VAS score or ODI score (3.63±1.64 vs. 3.40±1.65, P>0.05; 50.70±4.95 vs. 52.10±6.69, P>0.05). Conclusions Robot-assisted PVP for elderly patients with OVCF can significantly reduce the risk of cement leakage, shorten the operation time, reduce the intraoperative fluoroscopy frequency, and reduce the surgical hidden blood loss. It can be used for clinical promotion and application.

Citation： YANG Nan, WANG Shengbao, LIU Shuangfu, WANG Cong, HE Qiang, CAO Yun. Effectiveness of robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in the elderly. West China Medical Journal, 2022, 37(10): 1471-1475. doi: 10.7507/1002-0179.202108283 Copy

1.	中國康復醫學會骨質疏松預防與康復專業委員會. 骨質疏松性椎體壓縮骨折診治專家共識(2021 版). 中華醫學雜志, 2021, 101(41): 3371-3379.
2.	Wong X, Reiley M, Garfin S. Vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty. J Women Imaging, 2000, 2: 117-124.
3.	Wang B, Cao J, Chang J, et al. Effectiveness of Tirobot-assisted vertebroplasty in treating thoracolumbar osteoporotic compression fracture. J Orthop Surg Res, 2021, 16(1): 65.
4.	袁偉, 孟小童, 劉欣春, 等. 機器人輔助經皮椎體后凸成形術治療單/雙節段骨質疏松性椎體壓縮骨折臨床療效. 中國修復重建外科雜志, 2021, 35(8): 1000-1006.
5.	Mitchell BD, Streeten EA. Clinical impact of recent genetic discoveries in osteoporosis. Appl Clin Genet, 2013, 6: 75-85.
6.	Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, et al. Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J, 2011, 20(6): 860-868.
7.	Keric N, Doenitz C, Haj A, et al. Evaluation of robot-guided minimally invasive implantation of 2067 pedicle screws. Neurosurg Focus, 2017, 42(5): E11.
8.	Kuo KL, Su YF, Wu CH, et al. Assessing the intraoperative accuracy of pedicle screw placement by using a bone-mounted miniature robot system through secondary registration. PLoS One, 2016, 11(4): e0153235.
9.	Schatlo B, Molliqaj G, Cuvinciuc V, et al. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a matched cohort comparison. J Neurosurg Spine, 2014, 20(6): 636-643.
10.	Kim HJ, Jung WI, Chang BS, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery. Int J Med Robot, 2017, 13(3): e1779.
11.	Baker JD, Sayari AJ, Basques BA, et al. Robotic-assisted spine surgery: application of preoperative and intraoperative imaging. Semin Spine Surg, 2020, 32(2): 100789.
12.	Mroz TE, Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP, et al. Radiation exposure to the surgeon during percutaneous pedicle screw placement. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2011, 24(4): 264-267.
13.	van Dijk JD, van den Ende RP, Stramigioli S, et al. Clinical pedicle screw accuracy and deviation from planning in robot-guided spine surgery: robot-guided pedicle screw accuracy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2015, 40(17): E986-E991.
14.	Solomiichuk V, Fleischhammer J, Molliqaj G, et al. Robotic versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for metastatic spinal disease: a matched-cohort comparison. Neurosurg Focus, 2017, 42(5): E13.
15.	Han XG, Tian W, Liu YJ, et al. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg Spine, 2019, 30(5): 615-622.
16.	Roser F, Tatagiba M, Maier G. Spinal robotics: current applications and future perspectives. Neurosurgery, 2013, 72(Suppl 1): 12-18.
17.	Wu YS, Zhang H, Zheng WH, et al. Hidden blood loss and the influential factors after percutaneous kyphoplasty surgery. Eur Spine J, 2017, 26(7): 1878-1883.
18.	田野, 張嘉男, 陳浩, 等. 脊柱機器人與傳統透視輔助下微創經皮復位內固定術治療單節段無神經癥狀胸腰椎骨折對比研究. 中國修復重建外科雜志, 2020, 34(1): 69-75.
19.	王翔宇, 譚倫, 林旭, 等. 光電導航引導單側穿刺椎體后凸成形術治療胸腰椎骨質疏松性椎體壓縮骨折. 中國修復重建外科雜志, 2018, 32(2): 203-209.
20.	林書, 胡豇, 萬侖, 等. 骨科機器人輔助經皮椎體后凸成形治療多節段脊柱轉移瘤. 中國組織工程研究, 2020, 24(33): 5249-5254.
21.	Shi B, Jiang T, Du H, et al. Application of spinal robotic navigation technology to minimally invasive percutaneous treatment of spinal fractures: a clinical, non-randomized, controlled study. Orthop Surg, 2021, 13(4): 1236-1243.
22.	宗路杰, 干旻峰, 楊惠林, 等. 脊柱外科機器人及其臨床應用進展. 中國脊柱脊髓雜志, 2021, 31(8): 754-758.
23.	Hu X, Scharschmidt TJ, Ohnmeiss DD, et al. Robotic assisted surgeries for the treatment of spine tumors. Int J Spine Surg, 2015, 9: 1.

1. 中國康復醫學會骨質疏松預防與康復專業委員會. 骨質疏松性椎體壓縮骨折診治專家共識(2021 版). 中華醫學雜志, 2021, 101(41): 3371-3379.
2. Wong X, Reiley M, Garfin S. Vertebroplasty/kyphoplasty. J Women Imaging, 2000, 2: 117-124.
3. Wang B, Cao J, Chang J, et al. Effectiveness of Tirobot-assisted vertebroplasty in treating thoracolumbar osteoporotic compression fracture. J Orthop Surg Res, 2021, 16(1): 65.
4. 袁偉, 孟小童, 劉欣春, 等. 機器人輔助經皮椎體后凸成形術治療單/雙節段骨質疏松性椎體壓縮骨折臨床療效. 中國修復重建外科雜志, 2021, 35(8): 1000-1006.
5. Mitchell BD, Streeten EA. Clinical impact of recent genetic discoveries in osteoporosis. Appl Clin Genet, 2013, 6: 75-85.
6. Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, et al. Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J, 2011, 20(6): 860-868.
7. Keric N, Doenitz C, Haj A, et al. Evaluation of robot-guided minimally invasive implantation of 2067 pedicle screws. Neurosurg Focus, 2017, 42(5): E11.
8. Kuo KL, Su YF, Wu CH, et al. Assessing the intraoperative accuracy of pedicle screw placement by using a bone-mounted miniature robot system through secondary registration. PLoS One, 2016, 11(4): e0153235.
9. Schatlo B, Molliqaj G, Cuvinciuc V, et al. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for degenerative diseases of the lumbar spine: a matched cohort comparison. J Neurosurg Spine, 2014, 20(6): 636-643.
10. Kim HJ, Jung WI, Chang BS, et al. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery. Int J Med Robot, 2017, 13(3): e1779.
11. Baker JD, Sayari AJ, Basques BA, et al. Robotic-assisted spine surgery: application of preoperative and intraoperative imaging. Semin Spine Surg, 2020, 32(2): 100789.
12. Mroz TE, Abdullah KG, Steinmetz MP, et al. Radiation exposure to the surgeon during percutaneous pedicle screw placement. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2011, 24(4): 264-267.
13. van Dijk JD, van den Ende RP, Stramigioli S, et al. Clinical pedicle screw accuracy and deviation from planning in robot-guided spine surgery: robot-guided pedicle screw accuracy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2015, 40(17): E986-E991.
14. Solomiichuk V, Fleischhammer J, Molliqaj G, et al. Robotic versus fluoroscopy-guided pedicle screw insertion for metastatic spinal disease: a matched-cohort comparison. Neurosurg Focus, 2017, 42(5): E13.
15. Han XG, Tian W, Liu YJ, et al. Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion in thoracolumbar spinal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg Spine, 2019, 30(5): 615-622.
16. Roser F, Tatagiba M, Maier G. Spinal robotics: current applications and future perspectives. Neurosurgery, 2013, 72(Suppl 1): 12-18.
17. Wu YS, Zhang H, Zheng WH, et al. Hidden blood loss and the influential factors after percutaneous kyphoplasty surgery. Eur Spine J, 2017, 26(7): 1878-1883.
18. 田野, 張嘉男, 陳浩, 等. 脊柱機器人與傳統透視輔助下微創經皮復位內固定術治療單節段無神經癥狀胸腰椎骨折對比研究. 中國修復重建外科雜志, 2020, 34(1): 69-75.
19. 王翔宇, 譚倫, 林旭, 等. 光電導航引導單側穿刺椎體后凸成形術治療胸腰椎骨質疏松性椎體壓縮骨折. 中國修復重建外科雜志, 2018, 32(2): 203-209.
20. 林書, 胡豇, 萬侖, 等. 骨科機器人輔助經皮椎體后凸成形治療多節段脊柱轉移瘤. 中國組織工程研究, 2020, 24(33): 5249-5254.
21. Shi B, Jiang T, Du H, et al. Application of spinal robotic navigation technology to minimally invasive percutaneous treatment of spinal fractures: a clinical, non-randomized, controlled study. Orthop Surg, 2021, 13(4): 1236-1243.
22. 宗路杰, 干旻峰, 楊惠林, 等. 脊柱外科機器人及其臨床應用進展. 中國脊柱脊髓雜志, 2021, 31(8): 754-758.
23. Hu X, Scharschmidt TJ, Ohnmeiss DD, et al. Robotic assisted surgeries for the treatment of spine tumors. Int J Spine Surg, 2015, 9: 1.

West China Medical Journal

Effectiveness of robot-assisted percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in the elderly

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content