• 1. West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P. R. China;
  • 2. Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, P. R. China;
  • 3. Mental Health Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610044, P. R. China;
SHEN Cheng, Email: shencheng568_hx@163.com
Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Objective  To investigate the impact of shared decision-making (SDM) intervention on treatment expectations, decisional conflict, and satisfaction in patients with lung cancer and mediastinal tumors, aiming to provide a basis for optimizing personalized diagnosis and treatment models for oncology patients. Methods Patients with lung cancer and mediastinal tumors who met the inclusion criteria, admitted by a single medical team in the Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, from November 2024 to May 2025, were randomly assigned to either a SDM group or a control group using a random number table method. The control group received conventional diagnostic and treatment interventions, while the SDM group received SDM-assisted interventions in addition to the conventional care. Baseline characteristics, treatment expectations, decisional conflict, and satisfaction were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 137 patients were included (69 patients in the SDM group, 68 patients in the control group). In the SDM group, there were 30 males and 39 females, with a mean age of (53.17±15.13) years. In the control group, there were 22 males and 46 females, with a mean age of (53.19±15.91) years. After intervention, the change score for treatment expectations in the SDM group was significantly lower than that in the control group [–9.0 (–9.0, –8.0) points vs. –2.0 (–3.0, –2.0) points, P<0.001]. The change score for decisional conflict in the SDM group was also significantly lower than that in the control group [–21.0 (–29.0, –12.0) points vs. –4.5 (–14.5, 1.0) points, P<0.001]. However, there was no statistically significant difference in satisfaction between the two groups [SDM group: 10.0 (10.0, 10.0) points vs. control group: 10.0 (10.0, 10.0) points, P=0.552]. Conclusion SDM intervention can effectively reduce the deviation in treatment expectations and decisional conflict in patients with lung cancer and mediastinal tumors. It holds important clinical value for enhancing patient engagement in care and optimizing personalized diagnosis and treatment processes.

Copyright ? the editorial department of Chinese Journal of Clinical Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved