Current Status of da Vinci Surgical System in Vascular Surgery_CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY

Authors：

 WUZhi-yuan ,  LIYong-jun

Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China;

Corresponding?author：

LIYong-jun, Email: yongj_93@hotmail.com

Keywords：

da Vinci surgical system; Vascular surgery; Application; Review

DOI：

10.7507/1007-9424.20160292

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To review the current status of da Vinci surgical system in vascular surgery. Methods Recent literatures published in Chinese or English about the application of da Vinci surgical system in vascular surgery were reviewed and analyzed. Results da Vinci surgical system was mainly applied in diseases such as aortoiliac occlusive disease, aneurysm, typeⅡ endoleak after endovascular aortic repair, celiac artery compression syndrome, and so on. It was used to expose arteries, or assist to ligate and dissect arteries. da Vinci surgical system showed apparent advantages in shorting the time of aortic clamping, however, the high cost, the loss of tactile feedback, and the long learning curve may be its shortcomings. Conclusion da Vinci surgical system is safe and effective in vascular surgery, while much more experience is required to evaluate its long-term effect and complication.

Citation： WU Zhi-yuan, LI Yong-jun. Current Status of da Vinci Surgical System in Vascular Surgery. CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY, 2016, 23(9): 1142-1145. doi: 10.7507/1007-9424.20160292 Copy

1.	Reynolds W Jr. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS, 2001, 5(1):89-94.
2.	Fujita T, Hata H, Shimahara Y, et al. Initial experience with internal mammary artery harvesting with the da Vinci Surgical System for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. Surg Today, 2014, 44(12):2281-2286.
3.	高長青, 楊明, 王剛, 等.全機器人不開胸心臟手術4例.中華胸心血管外科雜志, 2007, 23(1):19-21.
4.	楊明, 高長青.機器人心臟手術的應用現狀.中國微創外科雜志, 2012, 12(7):586-589, 593.
5.	任崇雷, 高長青, 肖蒼松, 等.我國機器人手術文獻計量學分析.中華腔鏡外科雜志:電子版, 2015, 8(1):11-13.
6.	高長青.機器人微創心臟外科的發展及現狀.中華胸心血管外科雜志, 2011, 27(7):385-386.
7.	Kumar A, Asaf BB. Robotic thoracic surgery:the state of the art. J Minim Access Surg, 2015, 11(1):60-67.
8.	Ng AT, Tam PC. Current status of robot-assisted surgery. Hong Kong Med J, 2014, 20(3):241-250.
9.	Seo IY. Urologic robotic surgery in Korea:past and present. Korean J Urol, 2015, 56(8):546-552.
10.	丁曉萍, 侯慶香, 劉蕊, 等.機器人手術系統輔助婦科手術60例報告.腹腔鏡外科雜志, 2012, 17(10):784-786.
11.	杜峻峰, 李世擁, 于波, 等.達芬奇手術機器人系統在普通外科的應用.醫學與哲學:臨床決策論壇版, 2010, 31(5):49, 61.
12.	Obama K, Sakai Y. Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Today, 2016, 46(5):528-534.
13.	Fakhoury R, Prasad VM, Sayin I, et al. The da Vinci robotic system in head and neck surgery. B-ENT, 2015, Suppl 24:1-6.
14.	Onen MR, Naderi S. Robotic systems in spine surgery. Turk Neurosurg, 2014, 24(3):305-311.
15.	Desgranges P, Bourriez A, Javerliat I, et al. Robotically assisted aorto-femoral bypass grafting:lessons learned from our initial experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2004, 27(5):507-511.
16.	Lin JC, Reddy DJ, Eun D, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dissection of the infrarenal aorta and iliac artery:a technical description and early results. Ann Vasc Surg, 2009, 23(3):298-302.
17.	Lin JC, Kaul SA, Rogers CG. Successful total robotic-assisted aortobifemoral bypass for treatment of complicated aortoiliac occlusive disease. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2011, 45(4):340-344.
18.	Martinez BD, George PM, Ameer A, et al. Laparoscopically assisted total da Vinci aorto bifemoral graft bypass with a unique system of graft delivery. Ann Vasc Surg, 2009, 23(2):255.e1-255.e5.
19.	Stádler P, Matous P, Vitásek P, et al. Robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstruction:a review of 30 cases. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44(5):915-919.
20.	Stádler P, Dvorácek L, Vitásek P, et al. Is robotic surgery appropriate for vascular procedures? Report of 100 aortoiliac cases. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2008, 36(4):401-404.
21.	Stádler P, Dvoracek L, Vitasek P, et al. Robotic vascular surgery, 150 cases. Int J Med Robot, 2010, 6(4):394-398.
22.	Luke P, Knudsen BE, Nguan CY, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic renal artery aneurysm reconstruction. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44(3):651-653.
23.	Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Addeo P, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of renal artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 51(4):842-849.
24.	Giulianotti PC, Buchs NC, Coratti A, et al. Robot-assisted treatment of splenic artery aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg, 2011, 25(3):377-383.
25.	Wu T, Prema J, Zagaja G, et al. Total laparorobotic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with sac exclusion obliteration and aortobifemoral bypass. Ann Vasc Surg, 2009, 23(5):686.e11-686.e16.
26.	Lin JC, Eun D, Shrivastava A, et al. Total robotic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg, 2009, 23(2):255.e19-255.e21.
27.	Jaik NP, Stawicki SP, Weger NS, et al. Celiac artery compression syndrome:successful utilization of robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 2007, 16(1):93-96.
28.	Meyer M, Gharagozloo F, Nguyen D, et al. Robotic-assisted treatment of celiac artery compression syndrome:report of a case and review of the literature. Int J Med Robot, 2012, 8(4):379-383.
29.	Thoolen SJ, van der Vliet WJ, Kent TS, et al. Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted median arcuate ligament release for celiac artery compression syndrome. J Vasc Surg, 2015, 61(5):1278-1284.
30.	Relles D, Moudgill N, Rao A, et al. Robotic-assisted median arcuate ligament release. J Vasc Surg, 2012, 56(2):500-503.
31.	Do MV, Smith TA, Bazan HA, et al. Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted surgery for median arcuate ligament syndrome. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(11):4060-4066.
32.	Tsuda S, Oleynikov D, Gould J, et al. SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis:da Vinci^? Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(10):2873-2884.
33.	Yu J, Wang Y, Li Y, et al. The safety and effectiveness of da Vinci surgical system compared with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery:a rapid assessment. J Evid Based Med, 2014, 7(2):121-134.
34.	?tádler P, Dvo?á?ek L, Vitásek P, et al. The application of robotic surgery in vascular medicine. Innovations (Phila), 2012, 7(4):247-253.
35.	Lin JC. The role of robotic surgical system in the management of vascular disease. Ann Vasc Surg, 2013, 27(7):976-983.
36.	Mehrabi A, Yetimoglu CL, Nickkholgh A, et al. Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(9):1376-1382.
37.	Jongkind V, Diks J, Yeung KK, et al. Mid-term results of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Vascular, 2011, 19(1):1-7.

1. Reynolds W Jr. The first laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS, 2001, 5(1):89-94.
2. Fujita T, Hata H, Shimahara Y, et al. Initial experience with internal mammary artery harvesting with the da Vinci Surgical System for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. Surg Today, 2014, 44(12):2281-2286.
3. 高長青, 楊明, 王剛, 等.全機器人不開胸心臟手術4例.中華胸心血管外科雜志, 2007, 23(1):19-21.
4. 楊明, 高長青.機器人心臟手術的應用現狀.中國微創外科雜志, 2012, 12(7):586-589, 593.
5. 任崇雷, 高長青, 肖蒼松, 等.我國機器人手術文獻計量學分析.中華腔鏡外科雜志:電子版, 2015, 8(1):11-13.
6. 高長青.機器人微創心臟外科的發展及現狀.中華胸心血管外科雜志, 2011, 27(7):385-386.
7. Kumar A, Asaf BB. Robotic thoracic surgery:the state of the art. J Minim Access Surg, 2015, 11(1):60-67.
8. Ng AT, Tam PC. Current status of robot-assisted surgery. Hong Kong Med J, 2014, 20(3):241-250.
9. Seo IY. Urologic robotic surgery in Korea:past and present. Korean J Urol, 2015, 56(8):546-552.
10. 丁曉萍, 侯慶香, 劉蕊, 等.機器人手術系統輔助婦科手術60例報告.腹腔鏡外科雜志, 2012, 17(10):784-786.
11. 杜峻峰, 李世擁, 于波, 等.達芬奇手術機器人系統在普通外科的應用.醫學與哲學:臨床決策論壇版, 2010, 31(5):49, 61.
12. Obama K, Sakai Y. Current status of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Today, 2016, 46(5):528-534.
13. Fakhoury R, Prasad VM, Sayin I, et al. The da Vinci robotic system in head and neck surgery. B-ENT, 2015, Suppl 24:1-6.
14. Onen MR, Naderi S. Robotic systems in spine surgery. Turk Neurosurg, 2014, 24(3):305-311.
15. Desgranges P, Bourriez A, Javerliat I, et al. Robotically assisted aorto-femoral bypass grafting:lessons learned from our initial experience. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2004, 27(5):507-511.
16. Lin JC, Reddy DJ, Eun D, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dissection of the infrarenal aorta and iliac artery:a technical description and early results. Ann Vasc Surg, 2009, 23(3):298-302.
17. Lin JC, Kaul SA, Rogers CG. Successful total robotic-assisted aortobifemoral bypass for treatment of complicated aortoiliac occlusive disease. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2011, 45(4):340-344.
18. Martinez BD, George PM, Ameer A, et al. Laparoscopically assisted total da Vinci aorto bifemoral graft bypass with a unique system of graft delivery. Ann Vasc Surg, 2009, 23(2):255.e1-255.e5.
19. Stádler P, Matous P, Vitásek P, et al. Robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstruction:a review of 30 cases. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44(5):915-919.
20. Stádler P, Dvorácek L, Vitásek P, et al. Is robotic surgery appropriate for vascular procedures? Report of 100 aortoiliac cases. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2008, 36(4):401-404.
21. Stádler P, Dvoracek L, Vitasek P, et al. Robotic vascular surgery, 150 cases. Int J Med Robot, 2010, 6(4):394-398.
22. Luke P, Knudsen BE, Nguan CY, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic renal artery aneurysm reconstruction. J Vasc Surg, 2006, 44(3):651-653.
23. Giulianotti PC, Bianco FM, Addeo P, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair of renal artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 51(4):842-849.
24. Giulianotti PC, Buchs NC, Coratti A, et al. Robot-assisted treatment of splenic artery aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg, 2011, 25(3):377-383.
25. Wu T, Prema J, Zagaja G, et al. Total laparorobotic repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with sac exclusion obliteration and aortobifemoral bypass. Ann Vasc Surg, 2009, 23(5):686.e11-686.e16.
26. Lin JC, Eun D, Shrivastava A, et al. Total robotic ligation of inferior mesenteric artery for type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Ann Vasc Surg, 2009, 23(2):255.e19-255.e21.
27. Jaik NP, Stawicki SP, Weger NS, et al. Celiac artery compression syndrome:successful utilization of robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 2007, 16(1):93-96.
28. Meyer M, Gharagozloo F, Nguyen D, et al. Robotic-assisted treatment of celiac artery compression syndrome:report of a case and review of the literature. Int J Med Robot, 2012, 8(4):379-383.
29. Thoolen SJ, van der Vliet WJ, Kent TS, et al. Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted median arcuate ligament release for celiac artery compression syndrome. J Vasc Surg, 2015, 61(5):1278-1284.
30. Relles D, Moudgill N, Rao A, et al. Robotic-assisted median arcuate ligament release. J Vasc Surg, 2012, 56(2):500-503.
31. Do MV, Smith TA, Bazan HA, et al. Laparoscopic versus robot-assisted surgery for median arcuate ligament syndrome. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(11):4060-4066.
32. Tsuda S, Oleynikov D, Gould J, et al. SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis:da Vinci^? Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA). Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(10):2873-2884.
33. Yu J, Wang Y, Li Y, et al. The safety and effectiveness of da Vinci surgical system compared with open surgery and laparoscopic surgery:a rapid assessment. J Evid Based Med, 2014, 7(2):121-134.
34. ?tádler P, Dvo?á?ek L, Vitásek P, et al. The application of robotic surgery in vascular medicine. Innovations (Phila), 2012, 7(4):247-253.
35. Lin JC. The role of robotic surgical system in the management of vascular disease. Ann Vasc Surg, 2013, 27(7):976-983.
36. Mehrabi A, Yetimoglu CL, Nickkholgh A, et al. Development and evaluation of a training module for the clinical introduction of the da Vinci robotic system in visceral and vascular surgery. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(9):1376-1382.
37. Jongkind V, Diks J, Yeung KK, et al. Mid-term results of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Vascular, 2011, 19(1):1-7.

Previous Article
Status of Minimally Invasive Step-Up Approach in Treatment of Severe Acute Pancreatitis
Next Article
Research Status of Normocalcemic Parathormone Elevation after Parathyroidectomy

CHINESE JOURNAL OF BASES AND CLINICS IN GENERAL SURGERY

Current Status of da Vinci Surgical System in Vascular Surgery

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content