| 1. |
Lederle FA, Freischlag JA, Kyriakides TC, et al. Long-term comparison of endovascular and open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(21): 1988-1997.
|
| 2. |
Stather PW, Sidloff D, Dattani N, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the early and late outcomes of open and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg, 2013, 100(7): 863-872.
|
| 3. |
United Kingdom EVAR Trial Investigators, Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, et al. Endovascular versus open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(20): 1863-1871.
|
| 4. |
De Bruin JL, Baas AF, Buth J, et al. Long-term outcome of open or endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. N Engl J Med, 2010, 362(20): 1881-1889.
|
| 5. |
Becquemin JP, Pillet JC, Lescalie F, et al. A randomized controlled trial of endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgery for abdominal aortic aneurysms in low- to moderate-risk patients. J Vasc Surg, 2011, 53(5): 1167-1173.
|
| 6. |
Dangas G, O’Connor D, Firwana B, et al. Open versus endovascular stent graft repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2012, 5(10): 1071-1080.
|
| 7. |
Sidloff DA, Gokani V, Stather PW, et al. Type Ⅱ endoleak: conservative management is a safe strategy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2014, 48(4): 391-399.
|
| 8. |
Gelfand DV, White GH, Wilson SE. Clinical significance of type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg, 2006, 20(1): 69-74.
|
| 9. |
Choke E, Thompson M. Endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair: current concepts. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 2004, 45(4): 349-366.
|
| 10. |
Sidloff DA, Stather PW, Choke E, et al. Type Ⅱ endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. Br J Surg, 2013, 100(10): 1262-1270.
|
| 11. |
Wyss TR, Brown LC, Powell JT, et al. Rate and predictability of graft rupture after endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: data from the EVAR Trials. Ann Surg, 2010, 252(5): 805-812.
|
| 12. |
van Marrewijk CJ, Fransen G, Laheij RJ, et al. Is a type Ⅱ endoleak after EVAR a harbinger of risk? Causes and outcome of open conversion and aneurysm rupture during follow-up. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2004, 27(2): 128-137.
|
| 13. |
Andersen RM, Henriksen DP, Mafi HM, et al. A long-time follow-up study of a single-center endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) endoleak outcomes. Vasc Endovascular Surg, 2018, 52(7): 505-511.
|
| 14. |
Jones JE, Atkins MD, Brewster DC, et al. Persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is associated with adverse late outcomes. J Vasc Surg, 2007, 46(1): 1-8.
|
| 15. |
Haq IU, Kelay A, Davis M, et al. Ten-year single-centre experience with type Ⅱ endoleaks: Intervention versus observation. Vasc Med, 2017, 22(4): 316-323.
|
| 16. |
Bryce Y, Schiro B, Cooper K, et al. Type Ⅱ endoleaks: diagnosis and treatment algorithm. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther, 2018, 8: S131-S137.
|
| 17. |
Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Golden MA, et al. Treatment of type 2 endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison of transarterial and translumbar techniques. J Vasc Surg, 2002, 35(1): 23-29.
|
| 18. |
Haulon S, Tyazi A, Willoteaux S, et al. Embolization of type Ⅱ endoleaks after aortic stent-graft implantation: technique and immediate results. J Vasc Surg, 2001, 34(4): 600-605.
|
| 19. |
Bosiers MJ, Schwindt A, Donas KP, et al. Midterm results of the transarterial use of Onyx in the treatment of persisting type Ⅱ endoleaks after EVAR. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 2013, 54(4): 469-475.
|
| 20. |
Abularrage CJ, Patel VI, Conrad MF, et al. Improved results using Onyx glue for the treatment of persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg, 2012, 56(3): 630-636.
|
| 21. |
Sarac TP, Gibbons C, Vargas L, et al. Long-term follow-up of type Ⅱ endoleak embolization reveals the need for close surveillance. J Vasc Surg, 2012, 55(1): 33-40.
|
| 22. |
Uthoff H, Katzen BT, Gandhi R, et al. Direct percutaneous sac injection for postoperative endoleak treatment after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg, 2012, 56(4): 965-972.
|
| 23. |
Chung R, Morgan RA. Type 2 endoleaks post-EVAR: current evidence for rupture risk, intervention and outcomes of treatment. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2015, 38(3): 507-522.
|
| 24. |
Giles KA, Fillinger MF, De Martino RR, et al. Results of transcaval embolization for sac expansion from type Ⅱ endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg, 2015, 61(5): 1129-1136.
|
| 25. |
Richardson WS, Sternbergh WC 3rd, Money SR. Laparoscopic inferior mesenteric artery ligation: an alternative for the treatment of type Ⅱ endoleaks. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2003, 13(6): 355-358.
|
| 26. |
Touma J, Coscas R, Javerliat I, et al. A technical tip for total laparoscopic type Ⅱ endoleak repair. J Vasc Surg, 2015, 61(3): 817-820.
|
| 27. |
Kolvenbach R, Pinter L, Raghunandan M, et al. Laparoscopic remodeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms after endovascular exclusion: a technical description. J Vasc Surg, 2002, 36(6): 1267-1270.
|
| 28. |
Wee I, Marjot T, Patel K, et al. Laparoscopic ligation of type Ⅱ endoleaks following endovascular aneurysm repair: A systematic review. Vascular, 2018, 26(6): 657-669.
|
1/5
WeChat