A Survey on Awareness of the ARRIVE Guideline and GSPC in Researchers Field in Animal Experiments Field in Lanzhou City_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

 FANGZe-ping ¹ , LENGXi ¹ ,  LIUYa-li ² , LIUWen-bo ² , HUWen-jie ³ , ZHANGZheng-jing ⁴ , MABin ² , LIDong-mei ⁵

1. School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. Evidence-Based Medicine Center, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
3. Pathogenic Biology Department, Jining Medical College Jining 272067, China;
4. Gansu Province Health School, Lanzhou 730000, China;
5. Gansu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, China;

Corresponding?author：

LIUYa-li, Email: lyl_201006@126.com

Keywords：

ARRIVE guideline; GSPC; Awareness rate; Survey

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20150135

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To investigate the awareness situation on the ARRIVE guideline and the Gold Standard Publication Checklist (GSPC) of animal experiments in researchers in animal experiments field in Lanzhou city, in order to improve the promotion of the two reporting guidelines in China. Methods A self-designed questionnaire was used to investigate the clinical graduate students and teachers in medical college in Lanzhou city. The investigation contents mainly included the basic information of the respondents, the awareness situation on the ARRIVE guideline, GSPC and other medical reporting guidelines. SPSS 21.0 software was used for data analysis. Results A total of 329 questionnaires (40 were from teachers and 289 were from graduate students) were issued, of which, 287 questionnaires were effective. The results showed that the awareness rate on the ARRIVE guideline and GSPC in clinical graduate students and teachers in medical college in Lanzhou city were 11.8% and 12.5%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between students and teachers in awareness rate (P=0.903). The survey approaches, the age, education, job, and the organization of the respondents were all not the influence factors of awareness rate (P>0.05). The respondents knew about the reporting guidelines mainly through the website (33.4%), related studies (21.2%) and academic reports (17.4%). Conclusion The awareness rate on the ARRIVE guideline and GSPC is relative low in researchers in animal experiments field in Lanzhou city, and it needed to take purposeful measures to promote and popularize them.

Citation： FANGZe-ping, LENGXi, LIUYa-li, LIUWen-bo, HUWen-jie, ZHANGZheng-jing, MABin, LIDong-mei. A Survey on Awareness of the ARRIVE Guideline and GSPC in Researchers Field in Animal Experiments Field in Lanzhou City. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2015, 15(7): 797-801. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20150135 Copy

1.	熊瑋,魏強,劉雪梅.動物實驗研究的系統評價簡介.中國循證醫學雜志,2005,5(2):161-163,173.
2.	劉雅莉,張鵬,賀萬斌,等.提高動物實驗報告質量促進動物實驗系統評價發展.中國循證兒科雜志,2011,6(3):233-236.
3.	李堯,謝琰臣.如何撰寫規范的動物實驗報告.中國神經免疫學和神經病學雜志,2013,20(5):380-381.
4.	牛軍強,王亞楠,朱芊各,等.動物實驗方法學和報告質量評估工具的橫斷面研究.中國循證醫學雜志,2015,15(2):223-229.
5.	Pound P,Roberts I.對動物實驗進行系統評價的必要性.中國循證醫學雜志,2005,5(1):3-5.
6.	曾憲濤,莊麗萍,楊宗國,等.Meta分析系列之七:非隨機實驗性研究、診斷性試驗及動物實驗的質量評價工具.中國循證心血管醫學雜志,2012,4(6):496-499.
7.	Kilkenny C,Browne W,Cuthill IC,et al.Animal research:reporting in vivo experiments--the ARRIVE guidelines.J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,2011,31(4):991-993.
8.	Hooijmans C,de Vries R,Leenaars M,et al.The Gold Standard Publication Checklist (GSPC) for improved design,reporting and scientific quality of animal studies GSPC versus ARRIVE guidelines.Lab Anim,2011,45(1):61.
9.	Kilkenny C,Browne WJ,Cuthill IC,et al.Improving Bioscience Research Reporting:The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research.PLoS Biol,2010,8(6):e1000412.
10.	Hooijmans CR,Leenaars M,Ritskes-Hoitinga M.A gold standard publication checklist to improve the quality of animal studies,to fully integrate the Three Rs,and to make systematic reviews more feasible.Altern Lab Anim,2010,38(2):167-182.
11.	Moher D,Schulz KF,Altman D.The CONSORT statement:revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.JAMA,2001,285(15):1987-1991.
12.	Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J,et al.Reprint--Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses:The PRISMA Statement.Phys Ther,2009,89(9):873-880.
13.	劉玉秀,章丹,盛梅.隨機對照試驗Meta分析的統一報告格式:QUOROM聲明.中國臨床藥理學與治療學,2003,8(5):591-595.
14.	von Elm E,Altman DG,Egger M,et al.Strengthening the Repo rting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement:guidelines for reporting observational studies.BMJ,2007,335(7624):806-808.
15.	MacPherson H,Altman DG,Hammerschlag R,et al.針刺臨床試驗干預措施報告標準修訂版:CONSORT聲明的擴展.中國循證醫學雜志,2010,10(10):1228-1239.
16.	Mcgrath JC,Drummond GB,Mclachlan EM,et al.Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals:the ARRIVE guidelines.Br J Pharmacol,2010,160(7):1573-1576.
17.	劉雪梅,張凌之,李幼平,等.我國醫學期刊實施發表倫理舉措之一:應用報告指南.中國科技期刊研究,2012,23(5):759-762.
18.	Li XQ,Tao KM,Zhou QH,et al.Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high-impact medical journals in China:A survey of instructions for authors and published papers.PLoS One,2012,7(2):e30683.
19.	19王小琴,韋當,劉雅莉,等.PRISMA聲明應用現狀調查.中國循證醫學雜志,2014,14(9):1160-1164.
20.	National Centre for the Replacement,Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research.ARRIVE guidelines.Available at:http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/page.asp?id=1357.
21.	杜亮,陳耀龍,陳敏,等.從CONSORT到GPP:醫學研究報告規范簡介.編輯學報,2008,20(4):367-370.

1. 熊瑋,魏強,劉雪梅.動物實驗研究的系統評價簡介.中國循證醫學雜志,2005,5(2):161-163,173.
2. 劉雅莉,張鵬,賀萬斌,等.提高動物實驗報告質量促進動物實驗系統評價發展.中國循證兒科雜志,2011,6(3):233-236.
3. 李堯,謝琰臣.如何撰寫規范的動物實驗報告.中國神經免疫學和神經病學雜志,2013,20(5):380-381.
4. 牛軍強,王亞楠,朱芊各,等.動物實驗方法學和報告質量評估工具的橫斷面研究.中國循證醫學雜志,2015,15(2):223-229.
5. Pound P,Roberts I.對動物實驗進行系統評價的必要性.中國循證醫學雜志,2005,5(1):3-5.
6. 曾憲濤,莊麗萍,楊宗國,等.Meta分析系列之七:非隨機實驗性研究、診斷性試驗及動物實驗的質量評價工具.中國循證心血管醫學雜志,2012,4(6):496-499.
7. Kilkenny C,Browne W,Cuthill IC,et al.Animal research:reporting in vivo experiments--the ARRIVE guidelines.J Cereb Blood Flow Metab,2011,31(4):991-993.
8. Hooijmans C,de Vries R,Leenaars M,et al.The Gold Standard Publication Checklist (GSPC) for improved design,reporting and scientific quality of animal studies GSPC versus ARRIVE guidelines.Lab Anim,2011,45(1):61.
9. Kilkenny C,Browne WJ,Cuthill IC,et al.Improving Bioscience Research Reporting:The ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research.PLoS Biol,2010,8(6):e1000412.
10. Hooijmans CR,Leenaars M,Ritskes-Hoitinga M.A gold standard publication checklist to improve the quality of animal studies,to fully integrate the Three Rs,and to make systematic reviews more feasible.Altern Lab Anim,2010,38(2):167-182.
11. Moher D,Schulz KF,Altman D.The CONSORT statement:revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials.JAMA,2001,285(15):1987-1991.
12. Moher D,Liberati A,Tetzlaff J,et al.Reprint--Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses:The PRISMA Statement.Phys Ther,2009,89(9):873-880.
13. 劉玉秀,章丹,盛梅.隨機對照試驗Meta分析的統一報告格式:QUOROM聲明.中國臨床藥理學與治療學,2003,8(5):591-595.
14. von Elm E,Altman DG,Egger M,et al.Strengthening the Repo rting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement:guidelines for reporting observational studies.BMJ,2007,335(7624):806-808.
15. MacPherson H,Altman DG,Hammerschlag R,et al.針刺臨床試驗干預措施報告標準修訂版:CONSORT聲明的擴展.中國循證醫學雜志,2010,10(10):1228-1239.
16. Mcgrath JC,Drummond GB,Mclachlan EM,et al.Guidelines for reporting experiments involving animals:the ARRIVE guidelines.Br J Pharmacol,2010,160(7):1573-1576.
17. 劉雪梅,張凌之,李幼平,等.我國醫學期刊實施發表倫理舉措之一:應用報告指南.中國科技期刊研究,2012,23(5):759-762.
18. Li XQ,Tao KM,Zhou QH,et al.Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high-impact medical journals in China:A survey of instructions for authors and published papers.PLoS One,2012,7(2):e30683.
19. 19王小琴,韋當,劉雅莉,等.PRISMA聲明應用現狀調查.中國循證醫學雜志,2014,14(9):1160-1164.
20. National Centre for the Replacement,Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research.ARRIVE guidelines.Available at:http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/page.asp?id=1357.
21. 杜亮,陳耀龍,陳敏,等.從CONSORT到GPP:醫學研究報告規范簡介.編輯學報,2008,20(4):367-370.

Previous Article
A Survey and Influence Factors Analysis for Activity of Daily Living Conditions of Hospitalized Elderly Patients
Next Article
An Evidence-based Evaluation on Orphan Drug Policies

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

A Survey on Awareness of the ARRIVE Guideline and GSPC in Researchers Field in Animal Experiments Field in Lanzhou City

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content