Development of Evidence-based Medicine: Focus on the Abstracts of the Cochrane Colloquium_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

 LIUYu ^1,2 , SONGXu-ping ³ , PENGLi-xia ¹ , WANGZi-xia ^1,2 , GAOCai-yun ^1,2 , TIANJin-hui ² ,  DINGGuo-wu ¹

1. School of Public Health of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
2. Evidence-based Medicine Center of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;
3. College of Atmospheric Science of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China;

Corresponding?author：

DINGGuo-wu, Email: dinggw@lzu.edu.cn

Keywords：

Cochrane Colloquium; Abstracts; Evidence-based medicine; Progress

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.20160128

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objects To retrospectively analyze the accepted abstracts by the Cochrane Colloquiums in recent 5 years, so as to learn the advances and development trend for next stage in evidence-based medicine field. Methods Abstracts accepted by the 19th to 23rd Cochrane Colloquiums were collected, and relevant information was extracted. Then, a descriptive analysis was conducted. Outcomes A total of 2088 abstracts were accepted in recent five Cochrane Colloquiums. Europe contributed the most abstracts, in the top 10 contribution countries, five countries were located in Europe. Colleges/Universities were the major contributing institutes, McMaster University of Canada (165, 7.90%) and Lanzhou University of China (118, 5.65%) were the top two contributing institutions. The number of authors of most accepted abstracts were 3 to 5(1011, 48.42%). The top three topics focused by these abstracts were evidence (417, 19.97%), methodology (412, 19.73%) and risk of bias (220, 10.54%). Conclusions European countries are major contributing countries of abstracts of the Cochrane Colloquium, and colleges/universities are the major contributing institutions. Retrieval and methodology are research hot in recent 5 years. Attention should be paid to breakthrough progress in methodology in future.

Citation： LIUYu, SONGXu-ping, PENGLi-xia, WANGZi-xia, GAOCai-yun, TIANJin-hui, DINGGuo-wu. Development of Evidence-based Medicine: Focus on the Abstracts of the Cochrane Colloquium. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2016, 16(7): 842-846. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.20160128 Copy

1.	李幼平, 李靜, 孫鑫, 等. 循證醫學在中國的發展:回顧與展望. 蘭州大學學報(醫學版) 2016, 42(1):25-28.
2.	唐金陵. 循證醫學:醫學實踐的新模式. 中華醫學雜志, 2005, 85(4):64-66.
3.	楊克虎, 陳耀龍. 寫在循證醫學誕生20周年. 中國循證兒科雜志, 2011, 6(3):161-164.
4.	Levin A. The Cochrane collaboration. Ann Intern Med, 2001, 135(4):309-312.
5.	Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, et al. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research:reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med, 2010, 8(1):24.
6.	Hill J, Bullock I, Alderson P. A summary of the methods that the National Clinical Guideline Centre uses to produce clinical guidelines for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Ann Intern Med, 2011, 154(11):752-757.
7.	Horsley T, Hyde C, Santesso N, et al. Teaching critical appraisal skills in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011, (11):CD001270.
8.	McCormack L, Sheridan S, Lewis M, et al. Communication and dissemination strategies to facilitate the use of health-related evidence. Evid Rep Technol Assess, 2013, (213):1-520.
9.	張鳴明, 李幼平, 劉鳴. Cochrane協作網與循證醫學. 中國循證醫學, 2001, 1(1):50-52.
10.	Allen C, Clarke M, 刁驤. Cochrane系統評價小組的全球合作及中國的突出貢獻. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2006, 6(8):546-549.
11.	沈建通, 姚樂野, 李幼平, 等. 循證醫學學科知識可視化研究之二:循證醫學作者關系結構圖. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2011,11(7):743-752.
12.	馬光志, 張曉祥, 周彬, 等. 大數據時代的循證醫學. 世界復合醫學, 2015, 1(2):120-124.
13.	賈文琴, 楊克虎, 田金徽, 等. Cochrane系統評價發表狀況調查. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2009, 9(6):635-639.
14.	張鳴明, 李幼平, 李靜, 等. 提供高質量科學證據,改進醫療質量,促進病人安全-第十九屆國際Cochrane年會簡介. 中國循證醫學雜志 2012, 12(1):1-2.
15.	蔡羽嘉, 沈建通. 第20屆國際Cochrane年會在新西蘭奧克蘭市召開. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2012, 12(10):1154.
16.	喻佳潔, 李幼平, 張鳴明, 等. 知識促進健康-第二十一屆國際Cochrane年會紀實. 中國循證醫學雜志. 2013, 13(10):1160-1161.
17.	張鳴明, 孫鑫, 李幼平, 等. 知證衛生保健:機遇與挑戰-第22屆國際Cochrane年會紀實. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2014, 14(11):1289-1290.

1. 李幼平, 李靜, 孫鑫, 等. 循證醫學在中國的發展:回顧與展望. 蘭州大學學報(醫學版) 2016, 42(1):25-28.
2. 唐金陵. 循證醫學:醫學實踐的新模式. 中華醫學雜志, 2005, 85(4):64-66.
3. 楊克虎, 陳耀龍. 寫在循證醫學誕生20周年. 中國循證兒科雜志, 2011, 6(3):161-164.
4. Levin A. The Cochrane collaboration. Ann Intern Med, 2001, 135(4):309-312.
5. Simera I, Moher D, Hirst A, et al. Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research:reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR Network. BMC Med, 2010, 8(1):24.
6. Hill J, Bullock I, Alderson P. A summary of the methods that the National Clinical Guideline Centre uses to produce clinical guidelines for the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Ann Intern Med, 2011, 154(11):752-757.
7. Horsley T, Hyde C, Santesso N, et al. Teaching critical appraisal skills in healthcare settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2011, (11):CD001270.
8. McCormack L, Sheridan S, Lewis M, et al. Communication and dissemination strategies to facilitate the use of health-related evidence. Evid Rep Technol Assess, 2013, (213):1-520.
9. 張鳴明, 李幼平, 劉鳴. Cochrane協作網與循證醫學. 中國循證醫學, 2001, 1(1):50-52.
10. Allen C, Clarke M, 刁驤. Cochrane系統評價小組的全球合作及中國的突出貢獻. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2006, 6(8):546-549.
11. 沈建通, 姚樂野, 李幼平, 等. 循證醫學學科知識可視化研究之二:循證醫學作者關系結構圖. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2011,11(7):743-752.
12. 馬光志, 張曉祥, 周彬, 等. 大數據時代的循證醫學. 世界復合醫學, 2015, 1(2):120-124.
13. 賈文琴, 楊克虎, 田金徽, 等. Cochrane系統評價發表狀況調查. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2009, 9(6):635-639.
14. 張鳴明, 李幼平, 李靜, 等. 提供高質量科學證據,改進醫療質量,促進病人安全-第十九屆國際Cochrane年會簡介. 中國循證醫學雜志 2012, 12(1):1-2.
15. 蔡羽嘉, 沈建通. 第20屆國際Cochrane年會在新西蘭奧克蘭市召開. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2012, 12(10):1154.
16. 喻佳潔, 李幼平, 張鳴明, 等. 知識促進健康-第二十一屆國際Cochrane年會紀實. 中國循證醫學雜志. 2013, 13(10):1160-1161.
17. 張鳴明, 孫鑫, 李幼平, 等. 知證衛生保健:機遇與挑戰-第22屆國際Cochrane年會紀實. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2014, 14(11):1289-1290.

Previous Article
Models of the Selection, Organization and Promotion of Appropriate Health Technology in China: A Systematic Review
Next Article
Model-based Meta-analysis: Method and Evaluation

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Development of Evidence-based Medicine: Focus on the Abstracts of the Cochrane Colloquium

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content