Developing the indicator system for evaluating health in all policies in earthquake-stricken areas with Delphi method_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

WANG Junman ^1,2 ,  WEN Jin ²

1. West China School of Public Health, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R.China;
2. Institute of Hospital Management, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P.R.China;

Corresponding?author：

WEN Jin, Email: huaxiwenjin@163.com

Keywords：

Health in all policies; Earthquake-stricken area; Delphi method; Index system; Analytic hierarchy process

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202104154

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To construct a health in all policies (HiAP) evaluation index system for earthquake-stricken areas based on national health policies.Methods From April to December 2020, this study combined the methods of comprehensive review of relevant literature, on the foundation of the evaluation indicators pool was preliminarily constructed. The Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process were adopted to construct the evaluation indicators system in earthquake-stricken areas and analyzed the weights of indicators.Results A total of 5 first-level indicators (investment, action, short-term effect, medium-term effect, long-term effect), 15 second-level indicators, and 44 third-level indicators with satisfactory logical consistency of HiAP evaluation indicators system in earthquake-stricken areas had been constructed.Conclusions The HiAP evaluation indicators system constructed in this study can be used to comprehensively evaluate the implementation of HiAP earthquake-stricken areas.

Citation： WANG Junman, WEN Jin. Developing the indicator system for evaluating health in all policies in earthquake-stricken areas with Delphi method. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2021, 21(7): 754-759. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202104154 Copy

1.	中共中央, 國務院. “健康中國 2030”規劃綱要, 2016. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-10/25/content_5124174.htm.
2.	World Health Organization, Ministry for Foreign affairs of Finland. Health in all policies - Seizing opportunities, implementing policies, 2013. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242330265_Health_in_All_Policies_seizing_opportunities_implementing_policies.
3.	汪志豪. 基于政策變遷分析的“將健康融入所有政策”實施策略研究. 合肥: 安徽醫科大學, 2019.
4.	鯤鵬. 地震災后醫療救助評估與政策研究. 武漢: 華中科技大學, 2010.
5.	陳竺, 沈驥, 康均行, 等. 特大地震應急醫學救援: 來自汶川的經驗. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2012, 12(4): 383-392.
6.	李國平, 彭思奇, 楊凌. 汶川地震災后恢復重建政策的效應評價—基于四川省地震災區受災群眾的視角. 軟科學, 2013, 27(8): 132-135.
7.	侯水平. 汶川大地震災后恢復重建相關重大問題研究. 成都: 四川人民出版社, 2010.
8.	劉林霞. 新生兒危重癥護理質量評價指標體系的構建. 上海: 復旦大學, 2014.
9.	曹茂林. 層次分析法確定評價指標權重及 Excel 計算. 江蘇科技信息, 2012, (2): 39-40.
10.	鄧雪, 李家銘, 曾浩健, 等. 層次分析法權重計算方法分析及其應用研究. 數學的實踐與認識, 2012, 42(7): 93-100.
11.	Beretta R. A critical review of the Delphi technique. Nurse Res, 1996, 3(4): 79-89.
12.	王春枝, 斯琴. 德爾菲法中的數據統計處理方法及其應用研究. 內蒙古財經學院學報(綜合版), 2011, 9(4): 92-96.
13.	田梅梅, 葉文琴. 腫瘤患者入住康復護理床位評價指標權重研究. 中國護理管理, 2012, 12(1): 38-42.
14.	李文英. 層次分析法(AHP 法)在工程項目風險管理中的應用. 北京化工大學學報(社會科學版), 2009, (1): 46-48, 66.
15.	吳殿廷, 李東方. 層次分析法的不足及其改進的途徑. 北京師范大學學報(自然科學版), 2004, 40(2): 264-268.
16.	Board, World Health Organization. Formulating strategies for health for all by the year 2000, 1979. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/154286/EB64_2_eng.pdf;jsessionid=54EB9FB0F135644A86F291D488292AED?sequence=1.
17.	World Health Organization, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health of Finland. Health in all policies: Helsinki statement. Framework for country action, 2014. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506908.
18.	盧中南, 毛潔, 盧偉. “健康融于所有政策”在美國加州的實踐和啟示. 現代預防醫學, 2018, 45(6): 1060-1062, 1075.
19.	St?hl T. Health in All Policies: From rhetoric to implementation and evaluation - the Finnish experience. Scand J Public Health, 2018, 46(20_suppl): 38-46.
20.	Kranzler Y, Davidovich N, Fleischman Y, et al. A health in all policies approach to promote active, healthy lifestyle in Israel. Isr J Health Policy Res, 2013, 2(1): 16.
21.	Newman L, Ludford I, Williams C, et al. Applying health in all policies to obesity in South Australia. Health Promot Int, 2016, 31(1): 44-58.
22.	Gase LN, Schooley T, Lee M, et al. A Practice-grounded approach for evaluating health in all policies initiatives in the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract, 2017, 23(4): 339-347.
23.	Kershaw P. A "health in all policies" review of Canadian public finance. Can J Public Health, 2020, 111(1): 8-20.
24.	World Health Organization. Finland curbs childhood obesity by integrating health in all policies, 2015. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/finland-curbs-childhood-obesity-by-integrating-health-in-all-policies.
25.	華曉剛. 構建甘肅省“將健康融入所有政策”策略實施監測評價體系研究. 蘭州: 蘭州大學, 2017.
26.	Stevenson A, Humphrey A, Brinsdon S. A health in all policies response to disaster recovery. Perspect Public Health, 2014, 134(3): 125-126.

1. 中共中央, 國務院. “健康中國 2030”規劃綱要, 2016. Available at: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2016-10/25/content_5124174.htm.
2. World Health Organization, Ministry for Foreign affairs of Finland. Health in all policies - Seizing opportunities, implementing policies, 2013. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242330265_Health_in_All_Policies_seizing_opportunities_implementing_policies.
3. 汪志豪. 基于政策變遷分析的“將健康融入所有政策”實施策略研究. 合肥: 安徽醫科大學, 2019.
4. 鯤鵬. 地震災后醫療救助評估與政策研究. 武漢: 華中科技大學, 2010.
5. 陳竺, 沈驥, 康均行, 等. 特大地震應急醫學救援: 來自汶川的經驗. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2012, 12(4): 383-392.
6. 李國平, 彭思奇, 楊凌. 汶川地震災后恢復重建政策的效應評價—基于四川省地震災區受災群眾的視角. 軟科學, 2013, 27(8): 132-135.
7. 侯水平. 汶川大地震災后恢復重建相關重大問題研究. 成都: 四川人民出版社, 2010.
8. 劉林霞. 新生兒危重癥護理質量評價指標體系的構建. 上海: 復旦大學, 2014.
9. 曹茂林. 層次分析法確定評價指標權重及 Excel 計算. 江蘇科技信息, 2012, (2): 39-40.
10. 鄧雪, 李家銘, 曾浩健, 等. 層次分析法權重計算方法分析及其應用研究. 數學的實踐與認識, 2012, 42(7): 93-100.
11. Beretta R. A critical review of the Delphi technique. Nurse Res, 1996, 3(4): 79-89.
12. 王春枝, 斯琴. 德爾菲法中的數據統計處理方法及其應用研究. 內蒙古財經學院學報(綜合版), 2011, 9(4): 92-96.
13. 田梅梅, 葉文琴. 腫瘤患者入住康復護理床位評價指標權重研究. 中國護理管理, 2012, 12(1): 38-42.
14. 李文英. 層次分析法(AHP 法)在工程項目風險管理中的應用. 北京化工大學學報(社會科學版), 2009, (1): 46-48, 66.
15. 吳殿廷, 李東方. 層次分析法的不足及其改進的途徑. 北京師范大學學報(自然科學版), 2004, 40(2): 264-268.
16. Board, World Health Organization. Formulating strategies for health for all by the year 2000, 1979. Available at: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/154286/EB64_2_eng.pdf;jsessionid=54EB9FB0F135644A86F291D488292AED?sequence=1.
17. World Health Organization, Ministry of Social Affairs and Health of Finland. Health in all policies: Helsinki statement. Framework for country action, 2014. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506908.
18. 盧中南, 毛潔, 盧偉. “健康融于所有政策”在美國加州的實踐和啟示. 現代預防醫學, 2018, 45(6): 1060-1062, 1075.
19. St?hl T. Health in All Policies: From rhetoric to implementation and evaluation - the Finnish experience. Scand J Public Health, 2018, 46(20_suppl): 38-46.
20. Kranzler Y, Davidovich N, Fleischman Y, et al. A health in all policies approach to promote active, healthy lifestyle in Israel. Isr J Health Policy Res, 2013, 2(1): 16.
21. Newman L, Ludford I, Williams C, et al. Applying health in all policies to obesity in South Australia. Health Promot Int, 2016, 31(1): 44-58.
22. Gase LN, Schooley T, Lee M, et al. A Practice-grounded approach for evaluating health in all policies initiatives in the United States. J Public Health Manag Pract, 2017, 23(4): 339-347.
23. Kershaw P. A "health in all policies" review of Canadian public finance. Can J Public Health, 2020, 111(1): 8-20.
24. World Health Organization. Finland curbs childhood obesity by integrating health in all policies, 2015. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/detail/finland-curbs-childhood-obesity-by-integrating-health-in-all-policies.
25. 華曉剛. 構建甘肅省“將健康融入所有政策”策略實施監測評價體系研究. 蘭州: 蘭州大學, 2017.
26. Stevenson A, Humphrey A, Brinsdon S. A health in all policies response to disaster recovery. Perspect Public Health, 2014, 134(3): 125-126.

Previous Article
Tuina for children with acute diarrhea: an evidence-based clinical guideline
Next Article
The value of three triage methodologies for critically ill patients in earthquake mass casualty

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Developing the indicator system for evaluating health in all policies in earthquake-stricken areas with Delphi method

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content