Key questions on reporting of acupuncture network meta-analysis_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

WANG Yan ^1,2,3 , WANG Ziyi ^1,2,3 , XU Zihan ⁴ , LIU Wendi ^1,2,3 , XU Meng ^1,2,3 ,  LI Xiuxia ^1,2,3 ,  YANG Kehu ^2,3

1. Evidence Based Social Science Research Center/Health Technology Assessment Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
2. Evidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
3. Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
4. School of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Clinical Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

LI Xiuxia, Email: lixiuxia@lzu.edu.cn; YANG Kehu, Email: yangkh-ebm@lzu.edu.cn

Keywords：

Acupuncture therapy; Network meta-analysis; Reporting guideline; Delphi method

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202305130

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To select the key questions of the reporting quality of acupuncture therapy network meta-analysis. Methods A question pool about reporting quality of acupuncture therapy network meta-analysis was conducted by preliminary literature research and qualitative systematic review. A correspondence questionnaire was designed and the selection of key questions was carried out through two rounds of expert consultation using the Delphi method. Results A total of 21 key questions were selected for the network meta-analysis report standard of acupuncture, including whether to report details of acupuncture interventions (e.g., needle type, acupoints used, number of needles inserted, depth of needle insertion, retention time, needling techniques, and treatment duration), diagnostic criteria for diseases or traditional Chinese medicine syndromes, and qualifications of acupuncture practitioners. Of these, the only three key questions answered by the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and network meta-analysis (PRISMA-NMA) were summary, protocol and registration, and source of funding, while the remaining 19 were specific to acupuncture-related report standards. Conclusion The conducted key question on reporting guideline of acupuncture network meta-analysis can improve the standardization and rigor of relevant research and better utilize its academic and clinical value.

Citation： WANG Yan, WANG Ziyi, XU Zihan, LIU Wendi, XU Meng, LI Xiuxia, YANG Kehu. Key questions on reporting of acupuncture network meta-analysis. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2023, 23(12): 1442-1448. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202305130 Copy

1.	Corbett MS, Rice SJ, Madurasinghe V, et al. Acupuncture and other physical treatments for the relief of pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: network meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2013, 21(9): 1290-1298.
2.	Liu Y, Zhang R, Huang J, et al. Reporting quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture. PLoS One, 2014, 9(11): e113172.
3.	雷從杰, 黃依杰, 鐘冬靈, 等. 針刺治療失眠的系統評價報告質量的評價. 中國中西醫結合雜志, 2021, 41(8): 1010-1016.
4.	Bae K, Shin IS. Critical evaluation of reporting quality of network meta-analyses assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture. Complement Ther Clin Pract, 2021, 45: 101459.
5.	王瑞奇, 吳清忠, 黃春華, 等. 4種針刺療法治療中風后肩手綜合征的網狀Meta分析. 中國針灸, 2021, 41(5): 563-569.
6.	袁龍, 劉鵬, 李冰融, 等. 針灸相關療法治療卵巢早衰療效的網狀Meta分析. 上海中醫藥雜志, 2022, 56(1): 19-27.
7.	王小琴. 針刺系統評價與Meta分析報告指南的循證研究. 蘭州: 蘭州大學, 2019.
8.	Wang X, Chen Y, Liu Y, et al. Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist. BMC Complement Altern Med, 2019, 19(1): 208.
9.	Hutton B, Catalá-López F, Moher D. The PRISMA statement extension for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: PRISMA-NMA. Med Clin (Barc), 2016, 147(6): 262-266.
10.	葉子, 魏緒強, 馮壽全, 等. 針刺治療術后腸梗阻的系統評價再評價. 世界科學技術-中醫藥現代化, 2022, 24(2): 867-877.
11.	羅月紅, 劉慶, 金芮玉, 等. 針刺治療癌性疼痛的系統評價再評價. 按摩與康復醫學, 2022, 13(9): 40-45.
12.	韓富華, 孫林娟, 張允嶺, 等. 針刺治療血管性認知障礙的系統評價再評價. 中國針灸, 2022, 42(1): 109-115.
13.	劉銳芮, 高靜, 柏丁兮, 等. 不同針灸療法治療尋常痤瘡的網狀Meta分析. 世界科學技術-中醫藥現代化, 2022, 24(2): 878-889.
14.	梁吉, 韓名媛, 羅錚, 等. 8種針灸療法治療原發性痛經的網狀Meta分析. 世界科學技術-中醫藥現代化, 2021, 23(12): 4593-4605.
15.	王圖南, 趙珈宇, 楊易陳, 等. 針灸治療干眼的網狀Meta分析. 針刺研究, 2021, 46(12): 1057-1066.
16.	付盈悅, 羅明鴻, 向開維. 不同針刺療法對比康復療法治療中風后肩手綜合征: 網狀Meta分析. 中醫臨床研究, 2021, 13(30): 46-51.
17.	黎曉靜, 張志玲, 黃培穎, 等. 針灸相關療法治療糖尿病神經源性膀胱貝葉斯網狀Meta分析. 陜西中醫, 2021, 42(7): 967-973.
18.	孫忠人, 王承斌, 尹洪娜, 等. 針灸治療變應性鼻炎網狀Meta分析. 中國針灸, 2021, 41(11): 1295-1302.
19.	李秀霞, 郭康樂, 商雪, 等. 針刺臨床有效性優勢病癥的系統評價再評價. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2021, 21(6): 703-709.
20.	Jünger S, Payne SA, Brine J, et al. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med, 2017, 31(8): 684-706.
21.	練璐, 李心怡, 鄒慕蓉, 等. 應用改良德爾菲法構建我國家庭醫生衛生服務能力指標體系. 中國衛生資源, 2021, 24(4): 448-452.
22.	Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ, 1995, 311(7001): 376-380.
23.	de Villiers MR, de Villiers PJ, Kent AP. The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach, 2005, 27(7): 639-643.
24.	周坤, 車國衛. 肺癌患者術后癥狀量表的建立和評價. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2020, 20(10): 1157-1163.
25.	任玲, 何竟. 運用德爾菲法構建腦外傷康復醫學數據庫核心條目. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2019, 19(5): 609-613.
26.	Zhang D, Yan Y, Liao MX, et al. How to evaluate surgical tourism service organizations in China: indicators system development and a pilot application. Glob Health Res Policy, 2022, 7(1): 26.
27.	李建生, 謝洋, 李宣霖, 等. 新型冠狀病毒肺炎患者出院時狀態評估的專家問卷分析. 中醫學報, 2020, 35(6): 1131-1136.
28.	劉曉, 彭滟, 張巾英, 等. 促進社區居民腦健康的運動干預方案的構建. 中國全科醫學, 2023, 26(13): 1590-1597.
29.	魏巍, 荊魯, 徐鳳芹. 利用德爾菲法確立心血瘀阻證診斷標準. 中國中西醫結合雜志, 2010, 30(6): 585-588.
30.	曾光. 現代流行病學方法與應用. 北京: 北京醫科大學、中國協和醫科大學聯合出版社, 1994.
31.	馮貞貞, 李建生, 謝洋, 等. 基于德爾菲法的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者療效滿意度問卷的修訂. 中國中西醫結合急救雜志, 2020, (1): 60-63.
32.	杜曉菲, 景麗偉, 王晴, 等. 醫養院服務質量評價指標體系的構建. 中國全科醫學, 2019, 22(2): 194-198.
33.	劉貝貝, 柳楨, 許志遠, 等. 基于德爾菲法的城市社區老年人健康綜合評估量表的構建. 中國慢性病預防與控制, 2023, 31(1): 60-65.
34.	Zhang L, Guo X, Yang S, et al. Application of the Delphi method in the construction of an evaluating and grading scale for evidence of disease prevention and treatment in ancient books of traditional Chinese medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2022, 2022: 3674663.
35.	Li J, Xu M, Jiang Y. Building a personalized patient education model for general practice by Delphi method. Fam Pract, 2023, 40(1): 105-112.
36.	Tan X, Ning N, Hua N, et al. Determining the core competencies for international postgraduate nursing students in internship programs: a delphi study. Nurse Educ Pract, 2023, 70: 103654.
37.	黃迪. 臨床路徑報告量表的制訂. 蘭州: 蘭州大學, 2016.
38.	尹森林, 劉雪梅, 何林, 等. 對系統評價/Meta分析報告規范的系統評價. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2011, 11(8): 971-977.
39.	王艷, 姚仁斌. 淺議國內應建立規范的Meta分析中文注冊平臺. 中國傳媒科技, 2021, (7): 94-96.

1. Corbett MS, Rice SJ, Madurasinghe V, et al. Acupuncture and other physical treatments for the relief of pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee: network meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2013, 21(9): 1290-1298.
2. Liu Y, Zhang R, Huang J, et al. Reporting quality of systematic reviews/meta-analyses of acupuncture. PLoS One, 2014, 9(11): e113172.
3. 雷從杰, 黃依杰, 鐘冬靈, 等. 針刺治療失眠的系統評價報告質量的評價. 中國中西醫結合雜志, 2021, 41(8): 1010-1016.
4. Bae K, Shin IS. Critical evaluation of reporting quality of network meta-analyses assessing the effectiveness of acupuncture. Complement Ther Clin Pract, 2021, 45: 101459.
5. 王瑞奇, 吳清忠, 黃春華, 等. 4種針刺療法治療中風后肩手綜合征的網狀Meta分析. 中國針灸, 2021, 41(5): 563-569.
6. 袁龍, 劉鵬, 李冰融, 等. 針灸相關療法治療卵巢早衰療效的網狀Meta分析. 上海中醫藥雜志, 2022, 56(1): 19-27.
7. 王小琴. 針刺系統評價與Meta分析報告指南的循證研究. 蘭州: 蘭州大學, 2019.
8. Wang X, Chen Y, Liu Y, et al. Reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses of acupuncture: the PRISMA for acupuncture checklist. BMC Complement Altern Med, 2019, 19(1): 208.
9. Hutton B, Catalá-López F, Moher D. The PRISMA statement extension for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: PRISMA-NMA. Med Clin (Barc), 2016, 147(6): 262-266.
10. 葉子, 魏緒強, 馮壽全, 等. 針刺治療術后腸梗阻的系統評價再評價. 世界科學技術-中醫藥現代化, 2022, 24(2): 867-877.
11. 羅月紅, 劉慶, 金芮玉, 等. 針刺治療癌性疼痛的系統評價再評價. 按摩與康復醫學, 2022, 13(9): 40-45.
12. 韓富華, 孫林娟, 張允嶺, 等. 針刺治療血管性認知障礙的系統評價再評價. 中國針灸, 2022, 42(1): 109-115.
13. 劉銳芮, 高靜, 柏丁兮, 等. 不同針灸療法治療尋常痤瘡的網狀Meta分析. 世界科學技術-中醫藥現代化, 2022, 24(2): 878-889.
14. 梁吉, 韓名媛, 羅錚, 等. 8種針灸療法治療原發性痛經的網狀Meta分析. 世界科學技術-中醫藥現代化, 2021, 23(12): 4593-4605.
15. 王圖南, 趙珈宇, 楊易陳, 等. 針灸治療干眼的網狀Meta分析. 針刺研究, 2021, 46(12): 1057-1066.
16. 付盈悅, 羅明鴻, 向開維. 不同針刺療法對比康復療法治療中風后肩手綜合征: 網狀Meta分析. 中醫臨床研究, 2021, 13(30): 46-51.
17. 黎曉靜, 張志玲, 黃培穎, 等. 針灸相關療法治療糖尿病神經源性膀胱貝葉斯網狀Meta分析. 陜西中醫, 2021, 42(7): 967-973.
18. 孫忠人, 王承斌, 尹洪娜, 等. 針灸治療變應性鼻炎網狀Meta分析. 中國針灸, 2021, 41(11): 1295-1302.
19. 李秀霞, 郭康樂, 商雪, 等. 針刺臨床有效性優勢病癥的系統評價再評價. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2021, 21(6): 703-709.
20. Jünger S, Payne SA, Brine J, et al. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliat Med, 2017, 31(8): 684-706.
21. 練璐, 李心怡, 鄒慕蓉, 等. 應用改良德爾菲法構建我國家庭醫生衛生服務能力指標體系. 中國衛生資源, 2021, 24(4): 448-452.
22. Jones J, Hunter D. Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ, 1995, 311(7001): 376-380.
23. de Villiers MR, de Villiers PJ, Kent AP. The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach, 2005, 27(7): 639-643.
24. 周坤, 車國衛. 肺癌患者術后癥狀量表的建立和評價. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2020, 20(10): 1157-1163.
25. 任玲, 何竟. 運用德爾菲法構建腦外傷康復醫學數據庫核心條目. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2019, 19(5): 609-613.
26. Zhang D, Yan Y, Liao MX, et al. How to evaluate surgical tourism service organizations in China: indicators system development and a pilot application. Glob Health Res Policy, 2022, 7(1): 26.
27. 李建生, 謝洋, 李宣霖, 等. 新型冠狀病毒肺炎患者出院時狀態評估的專家問卷分析. 中醫學報, 2020, 35(6): 1131-1136.
28. 劉曉, 彭滟, 張巾英, 等. 促進社區居民腦健康的運動干預方案的構建. 中國全科醫學, 2023, 26(13): 1590-1597.
29. 魏巍, 荊魯, 徐鳳芹. 利用德爾菲法確立心血瘀阻證診斷標準. 中國中西醫結合雜志, 2010, 30(6): 585-588.
30. 曾光. 現代流行病學方法與應用. 北京: 北京醫科大學、中國協和醫科大學聯合出版社, 1994.
31. 馮貞貞, 李建生, 謝洋, 等. 基于德爾菲法的慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者療效滿意度問卷的修訂. 中國中西醫結合急救雜志, 2020, (1): 60-63.
32. 杜曉菲, 景麗偉, 王晴, 等. 醫養院服務質量評價指標體系的構建. 中國全科醫學, 2019, 22(2): 194-198.
33. 劉貝貝, 柳楨, 許志遠, 等. 基于德爾菲法的城市社區老年人健康綜合評估量表的構建. 中國慢性病預防與控制, 2023, 31(1): 60-65.
34. Zhang L, Guo X, Yang S, et al. Application of the Delphi method in the construction of an evaluating and grading scale for evidence of disease prevention and treatment in ancient books of traditional Chinese medicine. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med, 2022, 2022: 3674663.
35. Li J, Xu M, Jiang Y. Building a personalized patient education model for general practice by Delphi method. Fam Pract, 2023, 40(1): 105-112.
36. Tan X, Ning N, Hua N, et al. Determining the core competencies for international postgraduate nursing students in internship programs: a delphi study. Nurse Educ Pract, 2023, 70: 103654.
37. 黃迪. 臨床路徑報告量表的制訂. 蘭州: 蘭州大學, 2016.
38. 尹森林, 劉雪梅, 何林, 等. 對系統評價/Meta分析報告規范的系統評價. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2011, 11(8): 971-977.
39. 王艷, 姚仁斌. 淺議國內應建立規范的Meta分析中文注冊平臺. 中國傳媒科技, 2021, (7): 94-96.

Previous Article
Research on the overlap between Chinese systematic reviews and Cochrane reviews
Next Article
Evidence reporting norms for acupuncture therapy research: a structural analysis

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Key questions on reporting of acupuncture network meta-analysis

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content