Guidelines for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in neonates (2023)_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

HUANG Yi ¹ , ZHAO Jing ^1,2 , HUA Xintian ^1,2 , LUO Keren ^1,2 , SHI Yuan ³ , LIN Zhenlang ⁴ ,  TANG Jun ^1,2 ,  FENG Zhichun ^5,6,7,8 ,  MU Dezhi ^1,2 , Evidence-Based Medicine Group, Neonatologist Society, Chinese Medical Doctor Association

1. Department of Neonatology, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
2. Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Chengdu 610041, P. R. China;
3. Department of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400014, P. R. China;
4. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325000, P. R. China;
5. Faculty of Pediatrics, the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100007, P. R. China;
6. Research Institute of Pediatric Medicine Department, the 7th Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing 100007, P. R. China;
7. National Engineering Laboratory for Birth Defects Prevention and Control of Key Technology, Beijing 100007, P. R. China;
8. Beijing Key Laboratory of Pediatric Organ Failure, Beijing 100007, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

TANG Jun, Email: tj1234753@sina.com; FENG Zhichun, Email: zhjfengzc@126.com; MU Dezhi, Email: mudz@scu.edu.cn

Keywords：

Oxygen inhalation therapy; Nasal cannula; High-flow; Guideline; Infant, newborn

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202309076

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy, which is important in noninvasive respiratory support, is increasingly being used in critically ill neonates with respiratory failure because it is comfortable, easy to set up, and has a low incidence of nasal trauma. The advantages, indications, and risks of HFNC have been the focus of research in recent years, resulting in the development of the application. Based on current evidence, we developed guidelines for HFNC in neonates using the grading of recommendations assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE). The guideline was formulated after extensive consultations with neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurse specialists, and evidence-based medicine experts. We have proposed 24 recommendations for 9 key questions. This guideline aims to be a source of evidence and references of HFNC oxygen therapy in clinical practice, and so that more neonates and their families will benefit from HFNC.

Citation： HUANG Yi, ZHAO Jing, HUA Xintian, LUO Keren, SHI Yuan, LIN Zhenlang, TANG Jun, FENG Zhichun, MU Dezhi, Evidence-Based Medicine Group, Neonatologist Society, Chinese Medical Doctor Association. Guidelines for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in neonates (2023). Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2024, 24(4): 385-404. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202309076 Copy

1.	Wang H, Gao X, Liu C, et al. Morbidity and mortality of neonatal respiratory failure in China: surfactant treatment in very immature infants. Pediatrics, 2012, 129(3): e731-e740.
2.	Qian L, Liu C, Zhuang W, et al. Neonatal respiratory failure: a 12-month clinical epidemiologic study from 2004 to 2005 in China. Pediatrics, 2008, 121(5): e1115-e1124.
3.	Alallah J. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. J Clin Neonatol, 2012, 1(1): 12-13.
4.	Lissauer T, Duke T, Mellor K, et al. Nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory support in low and middle-income countries. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2017, 102(3): F194-F196.
5.	Jatana KR, Oplatek A, Stein M, et al. Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure and cannula use in the neonatal intensive care unit setting. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2010, 136(3): 287-291.
6.	Manley BJ. Nasal high-flow therapy for preterm infants: review of neonatal trial data. Clin Perinatol, 2016, 43(4): 673-691.
7.	Motojima Y, Ito M, Oka S, et al. Use of high-flow nasal cannula in neonates: nationwide survey in Japan. Pediatr Int, 2016, 58(4): 308-310.
8.	Hosheh O, Edwards CT, Ramnarayan P. A nationwide survey on the use of heated humidified high flow oxygen therapy on the paediatric wards in the UK: current practice and research priorities. BMC Pediatr, 2020, 20(1): 109.
9.	Petrillo F, Gizzi C, Maffei G, et al. Neonatal respiratory support strategies for the management of extremely low gestational age infants: an Italian survey. Ital J Pediatr, 2019, 45(1): 44.
10.	Eklund WM, Scott PA. High-flow nasal cannula practice patterns reported by neonatologists and neonatal nurse practitioners in the United States. Adv Neonatal Care, 2018, 18(5): 400-412.
11.	Schmid F, Olbertz DM, Ballmann M. The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as respiratory support in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units in Germany - A nationwide survey. Respir Med, 2017, 131: 210-214.
12.	Mukerji A, Shah PS, Shivananda S, et al. Survey of noninvasive respiratory support practices in Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr, 2017, 106(3): 387-393.
13.	Roberts CT, Owen LS, Manley BJ, et al. Australian & New Zealand Neonatal Network (ANZNN). High-flow support in very preterm infants in Australia and New Zealand. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2016, 101(5): F401-F403.
14.	韋當, 王聰堯, 肖曉娟, 等. 指南研究與評價(AGREE Ⅱ)工具實例解讀. 中國循證兒科雜志, 2013, 8(4): 316-319.
15.	蔣朱明, 詹思延, 賈曉巍, 等. 制訂/修訂《臨床診療指南》的基本方法及程序. 中華醫學雜志, 2016, 96: 250-253.
16.	Chen Y, Yang K, Maru?i? A, et al. A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT statement. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes, 2017, 11: 127-128.
17.	Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE Ⅱ: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ, 2010, 182(18): E839-E842.
18.	WHO. WHO handbook for guideline development. 2020.
19.	Schünemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G, et al. GRADE handbook. 2020.
20.	GRADEpro GDT. GRADE your evidence and improve your guideline development in health care. 2020.
21.	Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology, 2013, 13(4 Suppl 2): e1-e15.
22.	Guyatt GH, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, et al. Guideline panels should seldom make good practice statements: guidance from the GRADE Working Group. J Clin Epidemiol, 2016, 80: 3-7.
23.	Chao KY, Chen YL, Tsai LY, et al. The role of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula as noninvasive respiratory support in neonates. Pediatr Neonatol, 2017, 58(4): 295-302.
24.	Farley RC, Hough JL, Jardine LA. Strategies for the discontinuation of humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, (6): CD011079.
25.	Fleeman N, Mahon J, Bates V, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with usual care for preterm infants: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess, 2016, 20(30): 1-68.
26.	Roberts CT, Hodgson KA. Nasal high flow treatment in preterm infants. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol, 2017, 3: 15.
27.	Spence KL, Murphy D, Kilian C, et al. High-flow nasal cannula as a device to provide continuous positive airway pressure in infants. J Perinatol, 2007, 27(12): 772-775.
28.	Hasan RA, Habib RH. Effects of flow rate and airleak at the nares and mouth opening on positive distending pressure delivery using commercially available high-flow nasal cannula systems: a lung model study. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2011, 12(1): e29-e33.
29.	Kubicka ZJ, Limauro J, Darnall RA. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula therapy: yet another way to deliver continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics, 2008, 121(1): 82-88.
30.	Al-Alaiyan S, Dawoud M, Al-Hazzani F. Positive distending pressure produced by heated, humidified high flow nasal cannula as compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants. J Neonatal Perinatal Med, 2014, 7(2): 119-124.
31.	Hough JL, Shearman AD, Jardine L, et al. Effect of randomization of nasal high flow rate in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2019, 54(9): 1410-1416.
32.	Iyer NP, Mhanna MJ. Association between high-flow nasal cannula and end-expiratory esophageal pressures in premature infants. Respir Care, 2016, 61(3): 285-290.
33.	Nielsen KR, Ellington LE, Gray AJ, et al. Effect of high-flow nasal cannula on expiratory pressure and ventilation in infant, pediatric, and adult models. Respir Care, 2018, 63(2): 147-157.
34.	Hodgson KA, Davis PG, Owen LS. Nasal high flow therapy for neonates: current evidence and future directions. J Paediatr Child Health, 2019, 55(3): 285-290.
35.	Dysart K, Miller TL, Wolfson MR, et al. Research in high flow therapy: mechanisms of action. Respir Med, 2009, 103(10): 1400-1405.
36.	Jay P, Goldsmith EH, Karotkin MK. Assisted ventilation of the NEONATE (6nd etition). Philadelphia PA: Elsevier, 2017.
37.	Frizzola M, Miller TL, Rodriguez ME, et al. High-flow nasal cannula: impact on oxygenation and ventilation in an acute lung injury model. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2011, 46(1): 67-74.
38.	Sivieri EM, Foglia EE, Abbasi S. Carbon dioxide washout during high flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP support: an in vitro study. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2017, 52(6): 792-798.
39.	Woodhead DD, Lambert DK, Clark JM, et al. Comparing two methods of delivering high-flow gas therapy by nasal cannula following endotracheal extubation: a prospective, randomized, masked, crossover trial. J Perinatol, 2006, 26(8): 481-485.
40.	Egan DF, Wilkins RL, Stoller JK, et al. Egan’s fundamentals of respiratory care. The CVMosby Co, 2013.
41.	Saslow JG, Aghai ZH, Nakhla TA, et al. Work of breathing using high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants. J Perinatol, 2006, 26(8): 476-480.
42.	de Waal CG, Hutten GJ, Kraaijenga JV, et al. Electrical activity of the diaphragm during nCPAP and high flow nasal cannula. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2017, 102(5): F434-F438.
43.	Shetty S, Hickey A, Rafferty GF, et al. Work of breathing during CPAP and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2016, 101(5): F404-F407.
44.	Lavizzari A, Veneroni C, Colnaghi M, et al. Respiratory mechanics during NCPAP and HHHFNC at equal distending pressures. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2014, 99(4): F315-F320.
45.	de Jongh BE, Locke R, Mackley A, et al. Work of breathing indices in infants with respiratory insufficiency receiving high-flow nasal cannula and nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Perinatol, 2014, 34(1): 27-32.
46.	張志華. 兩種無創正壓通氣在新生兒呼吸窘迫綜合征治療中的應用研究. 中國醫學創新, 2019, 16(20): 119-122.
47.	于曉萍. 不同輔助通氣方式預防極低出生體重早產兒拔管失敗的臨床分析. 智慧健康, 2018, 4(14): 37-38,41.
48.	李文英, 喬愛琴, 王曉嬌, 等. 三種輔助通氣聯合肺表面活性物質治療早產低出生體質量兒呼吸窘迫綜合征臨床觀察. 兒科藥學雜志, 2014, 20(7): 19-22.
49.	馮琳, 李燕, 蒙丹華, 等. 早產兒高流量鼻導管給氧臨床療效及安全性研究. 中國保健營養, 2016, 26(3): 16-17.
50.	Mostafa-Gharehbaghi M, Mojabi H. Comparing the effectiveness of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in prevention of postextubation assisted ventilation. Zahedan J Res Med Sci, 2015, 17(6): e984.
51.	Ciuffini F, Pietrasanta C, Lavizzari A, et al. Comparison between two different modes of non-invasive ventilatory support in preterm newborn infants with respiratory distress syndrome mild to moderate: preliminary data. Pediatr Med Chir, 2014, 36(4): 88.
52.	姚帆, 肖貝如, 林石思, 等. 經鼻持續氣道正壓通氣與經鼻導管高流量通氣對早產兒呼吸窘迫綜合征的臨床療效對比. 中國醫藥科學, 2019, 9(22): 72-75.
53.	Sharma PK, Poonia AK, Bansal RK. Comparison of efficacy of nasal continuous positive airway pressure and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula as a primary mode of respiratory support in preterm infants. J Clin Neonatol, 2019, 8(2): 102-105.
54.	?ktem A, Yi?it ?, ?elik HT, et al. Comparison of four different non-invasive respiratory support techniques as primary respiratory support in preterm infants. Turk J Pediatr, 2021, 63(1): 23-30.
55.	翟敬芳, 吳杰斌, 金寶, 等. 加溫濕化高流量鼻導管通氣與經鼻持續氣道正壓通氣對輕度新生兒呼吸窘迫綜合征初始呼吸支持治療比較. 中華婦幼臨床醫學雜志(電子版), 2019, 15(6): 632-638.
56.	Farhat AS, Mohammadzadeh A, Mamuri GA, et al. Comparison of nasal non-invasive ventilation methods in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. Iran J Neonatol, 2018, 9(4): 53-60.
57.	Shirvani TE, Nayeri FS, Shariat M, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure or humidified high flow nasal cannula for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized control trial among premature neonates. Iran J Neonatol, 2020, 11(4): 50-56.
58.	王越, 高薇薇, 陳運彬, 等. 種經鼻通氣方式早期應用于早產極低出生體質量兒的臨床效果比較. 中國婦幼衛生雜志, 2013, 4(4): 13-14.
59.	王靜, 萬曉莉, 劉俊麗, 等. 加溫濕化高流量鼻導管吸氧在早產兒呼吸窘迫綜合征治療中的臨床研究. 中國醫學工程, 2021, 29(3): 76-81.
60.	Shokouhi M, Basiri B, Sabzehei MK, et al. Efficacy and complications of humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome after surfactant therapy. Iran Red Crescent Med J, 2019.
61.	Armanian AM, Iranpour R, Parvaneh M, et al. Heated humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) is not an effective method for initial treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) versus nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). J Res Med Sci, 2019, 24: 73.
62.	Yoder BA, Stoddard RA, Li M, et al. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates. Pediatrics, 2013, 131(5): e1482-e1490.
63.	Lavizzari A, Colnaghi M, Ciuffini F, et al. Notice of duplicate publication: heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome of prematurity: a randomized clinical noninferiority trial. JAMA Pediatr, 2016, 170(12): 1228.
64.	Demirel G, Vatansever B, Tastekin A. High flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for primary respiratory support in preterm infants: a prospective randomized study. Am J Perinatol, 2021, 38(3): 237-241.
65.	Kadivar M, Mosayebi Z, Razi N, et al. High flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome managed with insure method: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci, 2016, 41(6): 494-500.
66.	Murki S, Singh J, Khant C, et al. High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for primary respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. Neonatology, 2018, 113(3): 235-241.
67.	Shin J, Park K, Lee EH, et al. Humidified high flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as an initial respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress: a randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial. J Korean Med Sci, 2017, 32(4): 650-655.
68.	Manley BJ, Arnolda GRB, Wright IMR, et al. Nasal high-flow therapy for newborn infants in special care nurseries. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380(21): 2031-2040.
69.	Roberts CT, Owen LS, Manley BJ, et al. Nasal high-flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants. N Engl J Med, 2016, 375(12): 1142-1151.
70.	張紀華, 閆俊梅, 丁玉紅. 兩種輔助通氣方式治療極低出生體重兒呼吸窘迫綜合征臨床療效分析. 臨床和實驗醫學雜志. 2017, 16(23): 2375-2378.
71.	顏惠宇, 楊遠胡. 加溫濕化高流量鼻導管通氣用于早產兒呼吸窘迫綜合征治療中的價值分析. 世界復合醫學, 2020, 6(6): 98-100.
72.	陳佳, 高薇薇, 許芳, 等. 兩種輔助通氣方式治療極低出生體重兒呼吸窘迫綜合征臨床療效分析. 中國當代兒科雜志, 2015, (8): 847-851.
73.	Manley BJ, Roberts CT, Fr?island DH, et al. Refining the use of nasal high-flow therapy as primary respiratory support for preterm infants. J Pediatr, 2018, 196: 65-70.
74.	McKimmie-Doherty M, Arnolda GRB, Buckmaster AG, et al. Predicting nasal high-flow treatment success in newborn infants with respiratory distress cared for in nontertiary hospitals. J Pediatr, 2020, 227: 135-141.
75.	Roberts CT, Owen LS, Fr?island DH, et al. Predictors and outcomes of early intubation in infants born at 28-36 weeks of gestation receiving noninvasive respiratory support. J Pediatr, 2020, 216: 109-116.
76.	Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ. Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2003, (2): CD000143.
77.	Collins CL, Holberton JR, Barfield C, et al. A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure postextubation in premature infants. J Pediatr, 2013, 162(5): 949-954.
78.	Elkhwad M, Dako JA, Jennifer G, et al. Randomized control trial: heated humidity high flow nasal cannula in comparison with NCPAP in the management of RDS in extreme low birth infants in immediate postextubation period. Neonatal Pediatr Med, 2017.
79.	Manley BJ, Owen LS, Doyle LW, et al. High-flow nasal cannulae in very preterm infants after extubation. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(15): 1425-1433.
80.	Soonsawad S, Swatesutipun B, Limrungsikul A, et al. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula for prevention of extubation failure in preterm infants. Indian J Pediatr, 2017, 84(4): 262-266.
81.	Yengkhom R, Suryawanshi P, Gupta B, et al. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure for post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. J Trop Pediatr, 2021, 67(1): fmaa082.
82.	河北省新生兒加溫濕化高流量鼻導管通氣研究協作組. 應用加溫濕化高流量鼻導管通氣預防新生兒拔管失敗的臨床研究. 中華兒科雜志, 2014, 52(4): 271-276.
83.	康文清, 許邦禮, 劉大鵬, 等. 加溫濕化高流量鼻導管吸氧在32周以下早產兒撤機中的療效比較. 中國當代兒科雜志, 2016, 18(6): 488-491.
84.	Chen J, Lin Y, Du L, et al. The comparison of HHHFNC and NCPAP in extremely low-birth-weight preterm infants after extubation: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Front Pediatr, 2020, 8: 250.
85.	Cummings JJ, Polin RA, Committee on Fetus and Newborn, et al. Noninvasive respiratory support. Pediatrics, 2016, 137(1): 2015-3758.
86.	Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome - 2019 update. Neonatology, 2019, 115(4): 432-450.
87.	Roehr CC, Yoder BA, Davis PG, et al. Evidence support and guidelines for using heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannulae in neonatology: Oxford nasal high-flow therapy meeting, 2015. Clin Perinatol, 2016, 43(4): 693-705.
88.	中國醫師協會新生兒科醫師分會呼吸專業委員會. 加溫濕化高流量鼻導管通氣的臨床應用建議. 發育醫學電子雜志, 2017, 5(3): 132-135.
89.	Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson-Mason A, et al. High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics, 2001, 107(5): 1081-1083.
90.	Lampland AL, Plumm B, Meyers PA, et al. Observational study of humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Pediatr, 2009, 154(2): 177-182.
91.	Sett A, Noble EJ, Forster DE, et al. Cerebral oxygenation is stable in preterm infants transitioning to heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula therapy. Acta Paediatr, 2021, 110(7): 2059-2064.
92.	Sasi A, Malhotra A. High flow nasal cannula for continuous positive airway pressure weaning in preterm neonates: a single-centre experience. J Paediatr Child Health, 2015, 51(2): 199-203.
93.	Abdel-Hady H, Shouman B, Aly H. Early weaning from CPAP to high flow nasal cannula in preterm infants is associated with prolonged oxygen requirement: a randomized controlled trial. Early Hum Dev, 2011, 87(3): 205-208.
94.	Tang J, Reid S, Lutz T, et al. Randomised controlled trial of weaning strategies for preterm infants on nasal continuous positive airway pressure. BMC Pediatr, 2015, 15: 147.
95.	Badiee Z, Eshghi A, Mohammadizadeh M. High flow nasal cannula as a method for rapid weaning from nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Int J Prev Med, 2015, 6: 33.
96.	Soonsawad S, Tongsawang N, Nuntnarumit P. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula for weaning from continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Neonatology, 2016, 110(3): 204-209.
97.	Reynolds P, Leontiadi S, Lawson T, et al. Stabilisation of premature infants in the delivery room with nasal high flow. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2016, 101(4): F284-F287.
98.	Edit M, Nicola H, Peter R. Admission to NICU in air is more likely if nasal high flow is used for stabilisation in preterm babies compared to face mask CPAP. Signa Vitae, 2017, 13(2): 29-32.
99.	Siva NV, Reynolds PR. Stabilisation of the preterm infant in the delivery room using nasal high flow: a 5-year retrospective analysis. Acta Paediatr, 2021, 110(7): 2065-2071.
100.	Boyle MA, Dhar A, Chaudhary R, et al. Introducing high-flow nasal cannula to the neonatal transport environment. Acta Paediatr, 2017, 106(3): 509-512.
101.	Abraham V, Manley BJ, Owen LS, et al. Nasal high-flow during neonatal and infant transport in Victoria, Australia. Acta Paediatr, 2019, 108(4): 768-769.
102.	Muniyappa B, Honey G, Yoder BA. Efficacy and safety of nasal high-flow therapy for neonatal transport. Air Med J, 2019, 38(4): 298-301.
103.	Trevisanuto D, Cavallin F, Loddo C, et al. Trends in neonatal emergency transport in the last two decades. Eur J Pediatr, 2021, 180(2): 635-641.
104.	Hodgson KA, Owen LS, Kamlin COF, et al. Nasal high-flow therapy during neonatal endotracheal intubation. N Engl J Med, 2022, 386(17): 1627-1637.
105.	Foglia EE, Ades A, Sawyer T, et al. Neonatal intubation practice and outcomes: an international registry study. Pediatrics, 2019, 143(1): e20180902.
106.	O'Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, et al. Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: success rates, duration, and adverse effects. Pediatrics, 2006, 117(1): e16-e21.
107.	Wallenstein MB, Birnie KL, Arain YH, et al. Failed endotracheal intubation and adverse outcomes among extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol, 2016, 36(2): 112-115.
108.	黃盼盼, 胡曉靜. 新生兒濕化高流量鼻導管通氣的應用與研究進展. 上海護理, 2015, 15(4): 61-63.
109.	Yoder BA, Manley B, Collins C, et al. Consensus approach to nasal high-flow therapy in neonates. J Perinatol, 2017, 37(7): 809-813.
110.	Uchiyama A, Okazaki K, Kondo M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants after extubation. Pediatrics, 2020, 146(6): e20201101.
111.	Chikata Y, Ohnishi S, Nishimura M. Humidity and inspired oxygen concentration during high-flow nasal cannula therapy in neonatal and infant lung models. Respir Care, 2017, 62(5): 532-537.
112.	Abobakr M, Abdalla A, Barakat T, et al. Implementation of a protocol-based strategy for weaning nasal high flow therapy in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2020, 55(12): 3319-3327.
113.	Sivieri EM, Gerdes JS, Abbasi S. Effect of HFNC flow rate, cannula size, and nares diameter on generated airway pressures: an in vitro study. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2013, 48(5): 506-514.
114.	Collins CL, Holberton JR, K?nig K. Comparison of the pharyngeal pressure provided by two heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannulae devices in premature infants. J Paediatr Child Health, 2013, 49(7): 554-556.
115.	Chinese Society of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (2013). Chin J Intern Med, 2013, 52(6): 524-543.
116.	Onodera M, Nakataki E, Nakanishi N, et al. Bacterial contamination of circuit inner surfaces after high-flow oxygen therapy. Respir Care, 2019, 64(5): 545-549.
117.	Ramaswamy VV, More K, Roehr CC, et al. Efficacy of noninvasive respiratory support modes for primary respiratory support in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2020, 55(11): 2940-2963.
118.	Hebet Province Neonatal Noninvasive High Frequency Oscillation Ventilation Research Group. Noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation vs. heated humidified high flow nasal cannula to prevent premature extubation failure: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Chin J Neonatol. 2019, 34(4): 247-253.
119.	Piastra M, Morena TC, Antonelli M, et al. Uncommon barotrauma while on high-flow nasal cannula. Intensive Care Med, 2018, 44(12): 2288-2289.
120.	Jasin LR, Kern S, Thompson S, et al. Subcutaneous scalp emphysema, pneumo-orbitis and pneumocephalus in a neonate on high humidity high flow nasal cannula. J Perinatol, 2008, 28(11): 779-781.
121.	Iglesias-Deus A, Pérez-Mu?uzuri A, López-Suárez O, et al. Tension pneumocephalus induced by high-flow nasal cannula ventilation in a neonate. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2017, 102(2): F173-F175.
122.	Hough JL, Shearman AD, Jardine LA, et al. Humidified high flow nasal cannulae: current practice in Australasian nurseries, a survey. J Paediatr Child Health, 2012, 48(2): 106-113.
123.	Klingenberg C, Pettersen M, Hansen EA, et al. Patient comfort during treatment with heated humidified high flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomised cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2014, 99(2): F134-F137.
124.	Osman M, Elsharkawy A, Abdel-Hady H. Assessment of pain during application of nasal-continuous positive airway pressure and heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannulae in preterm infants. J Perinatol, 2015, 35(4): 263-267.
125.	Roberts CT, Manley BJ, Dawson JA, et al. Nursing perceptions of high-flow nasal cannulae treatment for very preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health, 2014, 50(10): 806-810.
126.	Jia Y, Wenbin L. Comparison of comfort between diferent auxiliary airway techniques on neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Chin J Woman Child Health Res, 2016, 27(12): 1447-1449.
127.	Miller AG, Gentle MA, Tyler LM, et al. High-flow nasal cannula in pediatric patients: a survey of clinical practice. Respir Care, 2018, 63(7): 894-899.
128.	Li J, Fink JB, MacLoughlin R, et al. A narrative review on trans-nasal pulmonary aerosol delivery. Crit Care, 2020, 24(1): 506.
129.	Ari A. Aerosol drug delivery through high flow nasal cannula. Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 2017, 18(11): 877-882.
130.	Dugernier J, Hesse M, Jumetz T, et al. Aerosol delivery with two nebulizers through high-flow nasal cannula: a randomized cross-over single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography study. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv, 2017, 30(5): 349-358.
131.	Ari A. Effect of nebulizer type, delivery interface, and flow rate on aerosol drug delivery to spontaneously breathing pediatric and infant lung models. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2019, 54(11): 1735-1741.
132.	Sunbul FS, Fink JB, Harwood R, et al. Comparison of HFNC, bubble CPAP and SiPAP on aerosol delivery in neonates: an in-vitro study. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2015, 50(11): 1099-1106.
133.	Dugernier J, Reychler G, Vecellio L, et al. Nasal high-flow nebulization for lung drug delivery: theoretical, experimental, and clinical application. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv, 2019, 32(6): 341-351.
134.	Ari A, Harwood R, Sheard M, et al. In vitro comparison of heliox and oxygen in aerosol delivery using pediatric high flow nasal cannula. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2011, 46(8): 795-801.
135.	Li J, Gong L, Fink JB. The ratio of nasal cannula gas flow to patient inspiratory flow on trans-nasal pulmonary aerosol delivery for adults: an in vitro study. Pharmaceutics, 2019, 11(5): 225.
136.	Réminiac F, Vecellio L, Loughlin RM, et al. Nasal high flow nebulization in infants and toddlers: an in vitro and in vivo scintigraphic study. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2017, 52(3): 337-344.
137.	Fernandez-Alvarez JR, Gandhi RS, Amess P, et al. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus low-flow nasal cannula as weaning mode from nasal CPAP in infants ≤28 weeks of gestation. Eur J Pediatr, 2014, 173(1): 93-98.

1. Wang H, Gao X, Liu C, et al. Morbidity and mortality of neonatal respiratory failure in China: surfactant treatment in very immature infants. Pediatrics, 2012, 129(3): e731-e740.
2. Qian L, Liu C, Zhuang W, et al. Neonatal respiratory failure: a 12-month clinical epidemiologic study from 2004 to 2005 in China. Pediatrics, 2008, 121(5): e1115-e1124.
3. Alallah J. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. J Clin Neonatol, 2012, 1(1): 12-13.
4. Lissauer T, Duke T, Mellor K, et al. Nasal CPAP for neonatal respiratory support in low and middle-income countries. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2017, 102(3): F194-F196.
5. Jatana KR, Oplatek A, Stein M, et al. Effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure and cannula use in the neonatal intensive care unit setting. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2010, 136(3): 287-291.
6. Manley BJ. Nasal high-flow therapy for preterm infants: review of neonatal trial data. Clin Perinatol, 2016, 43(4): 673-691.
7. Motojima Y, Ito M, Oka S, et al. Use of high-flow nasal cannula in neonates: nationwide survey in Japan. Pediatr Int, 2016, 58(4): 308-310.
8. Hosheh O, Edwards CT, Ramnarayan P. A nationwide survey on the use of heated humidified high flow oxygen therapy on the paediatric wards in the UK: current practice and research priorities. BMC Pediatr, 2020, 20(1): 109.
9. Petrillo F, Gizzi C, Maffei G, et al. Neonatal respiratory support strategies for the management of extremely low gestational age infants: an Italian survey. Ital J Pediatr, 2019, 45(1): 44.
10. Eklund WM, Scott PA. High-flow nasal cannula practice patterns reported by neonatologists and neonatal nurse practitioners in the United States. Adv Neonatal Care, 2018, 18(5): 400-412.
11. Schmid F, Olbertz DM, Ballmann M. The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as respiratory support in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units in Germany - A nationwide survey. Respir Med, 2017, 131: 210-214.
12. Mukerji A, Shah PS, Shivananda S, et al. Survey of noninvasive respiratory support practices in Canadian neonatal intensive care units. Acta Paediatr, 2017, 106(3): 387-393.
13. Roberts CT, Owen LS, Manley BJ, et al. Australian & New Zealand Neonatal Network (ANZNN). High-flow support in very preterm infants in Australia and New Zealand. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2016, 101(5): F401-F403.
14. 韋當, 王聰堯, 肖曉娟, 等. 指南研究與評價(AGREE Ⅱ)工具實例解讀. 中國循證兒科雜志, 2013, 8(4): 316-319.
15. 蔣朱明, 詹思延, 賈曉巍, 等. 制訂/修訂《臨床診療指南》的基本方法及程序. 中華醫學雜志, 2016, 96: 250-253.
16. Chen Y, Yang K, Maru?i? A, et al. A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care: the RIGHT statement. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes, 2017, 11: 127-128.
17. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE Ⅱ: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ, 2010, 182(18): E839-E842.
18. WHO. WHO handbook for guideline development. 2020.
19. Schünemann H, Brozek J, Guyatt G, et al. GRADE handbook. 2020.
20. GRADEpro GDT. GRADE your evidence and improve your guideline development in health care. 2020.
21. Working Group IAP/APA Acute Pancreatitis Guidelines. IAP/APA evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology, 2013, 13(4 Suppl 2): e1-e15.
22. Guyatt GH, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, et al. Guideline panels should seldom make good practice statements: guidance from the GRADE Working Group. J Clin Epidemiol, 2016, 80: 3-7.
23. Chao KY, Chen YL, Tsai LY, et al. The role of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula as noninvasive respiratory support in neonates. Pediatr Neonatol, 2017, 58(4): 295-302.
24. Farley RC, Hough JL, Jardine LA. Strategies for the discontinuation of humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHFNC) in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2015, (6): CD011079.
25. Fleeman N, Mahon J, Bates V, et al. The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with usual care for preterm infants: systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess, 2016, 20(30): 1-68.
26. Roberts CT, Hodgson KA. Nasal high flow treatment in preterm infants. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol, 2017, 3: 15.
27. Spence KL, Murphy D, Kilian C, et al. High-flow nasal cannula as a device to provide continuous positive airway pressure in infants. J Perinatol, 2007, 27(12): 772-775.
28. Hasan RA, Habib RH. Effects of flow rate and airleak at the nares and mouth opening on positive distending pressure delivery using commercially available high-flow nasal cannula systems: a lung model study. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2011, 12(1): e29-e33.
29. Kubicka ZJ, Limauro J, Darnall RA. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula therapy: yet another way to deliver continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics, 2008, 121(1): 82-88.
30. Al-Alaiyan S, Dawoud M, Al-Hazzani F. Positive distending pressure produced by heated, humidified high flow nasal cannula as compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure in premature infants. J Neonatal Perinatal Med, 2014, 7(2): 119-124.
31. Hough JL, Shearman AD, Jardine L, et al. Effect of randomization of nasal high flow rate in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2019, 54(9): 1410-1416.
32. Iyer NP, Mhanna MJ. Association between high-flow nasal cannula and end-expiratory esophageal pressures in premature infants. Respir Care, 2016, 61(3): 285-290.
33. Nielsen KR, Ellington LE, Gray AJ, et al. Effect of high-flow nasal cannula on expiratory pressure and ventilation in infant, pediatric, and adult models. Respir Care, 2018, 63(2): 147-157.
34. Hodgson KA, Davis PG, Owen LS. Nasal high flow therapy for neonates: current evidence and future directions. J Paediatr Child Health, 2019, 55(3): 285-290.
35. Dysart K, Miller TL, Wolfson MR, et al. Research in high flow therapy: mechanisms of action. Respir Med, 2009, 103(10): 1400-1405.
36. Jay P, Goldsmith EH, Karotkin MK. Assisted ventilation of the NEONATE (6nd etition). Philadelphia PA: Elsevier, 2017.
37. Frizzola M, Miller TL, Rodriguez ME, et al. High-flow nasal cannula: impact on oxygenation and ventilation in an acute lung injury model. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2011, 46(1): 67-74.
38. Sivieri EM, Foglia EE, Abbasi S. Carbon dioxide washout during high flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP support: an in vitro study. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2017, 52(6): 792-798.
39. Woodhead DD, Lambert DK, Clark JM, et al. Comparing two methods of delivering high-flow gas therapy by nasal cannula following endotracheal extubation: a prospective, randomized, masked, crossover trial. J Perinatol, 2006, 26(8): 481-485.
40. Egan DF, Wilkins RL, Stoller JK, et al. Egan’s fundamentals of respiratory care. The CVMosby Co, 2013.
41. Saslow JG, Aghai ZH, Nakhla TA, et al. Work of breathing using high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants. J Perinatol, 2006, 26(8): 476-480.
42. de Waal CG, Hutten GJ, Kraaijenga JV, et al. Electrical activity of the diaphragm during nCPAP and high flow nasal cannula. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2017, 102(5): F434-F438.
43. Shetty S, Hickey A, Rafferty GF, et al. Work of breathing during CPAP and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2016, 101(5): F404-F407.
44. Lavizzari A, Veneroni C, Colnaghi M, et al. Respiratory mechanics during NCPAP and HHHFNC at equal distending pressures. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2014, 99(4): F315-F320.
45. de Jongh BE, Locke R, Mackley A, et al. Work of breathing indices in infants with respiratory insufficiency receiving high-flow nasal cannula and nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Perinatol, 2014, 34(1): 27-32.
46. 張志華. 兩種無創正壓通氣在新生兒呼吸窘迫綜合征治療中的應用研究. 中國醫學創新, 2019, 16(20): 119-122.
47. 于曉萍. 不同輔助通氣方式預防極低出生體重早產兒拔管失敗的臨床分析. 智慧健康, 2018, 4(14): 37-38,41.
48. 李文英, 喬愛琴, 王曉嬌, 等. 三種輔助通氣聯合肺表面活性物質治療早產低出生體質量兒呼吸窘迫綜合征臨床觀察. 兒科藥學雜志, 2014, 20(7): 19-22.
49. 馮琳, 李燕, 蒙丹華, 等. 早產兒高流量鼻導管給氧臨床療效及安全性研究. 中國保健營養, 2016, 26(3): 16-17.
50. Mostafa-Gharehbaghi M, Mojabi H. Comparing the effectiveness of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) in prevention of postextubation assisted ventilation. Zahedan J Res Med Sci, 2015, 17(6): e984.
51. Ciuffini F, Pietrasanta C, Lavizzari A, et al. Comparison between two different modes of non-invasive ventilatory support in preterm newborn infants with respiratory distress syndrome mild to moderate: preliminary data. Pediatr Med Chir, 2014, 36(4): 88.
52. 姚帆, 肖貝如, 林石思, 等. 經鼻持續氣道正壓通氣與經鼻導管高流量通氣對早產兒呼吸窘迫綜合征的臨床療效對比. 中國醫藥科學, 2019, 9(22): 72-75.
53. Sharma PK, Poonia AK, Bansal RK. Comparison of efficacy of nasal continuous positive airway pressure and heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula as a primary mode of respiratory support in preterm infants. J Clin Neonatol, 2019, 8(2): 102-105.
54. ?ktem A, Yi?it ?, ?elik HT, et al. Comparison of four different non-invasive respiratory support techniques as primary respiratory support in preterm infants. Turk J Pediatr, 2021, 63(1): 23-30.
55. 翟敬芳, 吳杰斌, 金寶, 等. 加溫濕化高流量鼻導管通氣與經鼻持續氣道正壓通氣對輕度新生兒呼吸窘迫綜合征初始呼吸支持治療比較. 中華婦幼臨床醫學雜志(電子版), 2019, 15(6): 632-638.
56. Farhat AS, Mohammadzadeh A, Mamuri GA, et al. Comparison of nasal non-invasive ventilation methods in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. Iran J Neonatol, 2018, 9(4): 53-60.
57. Shirvani TE, Nayeri FS, Shariat M, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure or humidified high flow nasal cannula for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized control trial among premature neonates. Iran J Neonatol, 2020, 11(4): 50-56.
58. 王越, 高薇薇, 陳運彬, 等. 種經鼻通氣方式早期應用于早產極低出生體質量兒的臨床效果比較. 中國婦幼衛生雜志, 2013, 4(4): 13-14.
59. 王靜, 萬曉莉, 劉俊麗, 等. 加溫濕化高流量鼻導管吸氧在早產兒呼吸窘迫綜合征治療中的臨床研究. 中國醫學工程, 2021, 29(3): 76-81.
60. Shokouhi M, Basiri B, Sabzehei MK, et al. Efficacy and complications of humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome after surfactant therapy. Iran Red Crescent Med J, 2019.
61. Armanian AM, Iranpour R, Parvaneh M, et al. Heated humidified high flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) is not an effective method for initial treatment of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) versus nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation (NIMV) and nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). J Res Med Sci, 2019, 24: 73.
62. Yoder BA, Stoddard RA, Li M, et al. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates. Pediatrics, 2013, 131(5): e1482-e1490.
63. Lavizzari A, Colnaghi M, Ciuffini F, et al. Notice of duplicate publication: heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome of prematurity: a randomized clinical noninferiority trial. JAMA Pediatr, 2016, 170(12): 1228.
64. Demirel G, Vatansever B, Tastekin A. High flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for primary respiratory support in preterm infants: a prospective randomized study. Am J Perinatol, 2021, 38(3): 237-241.
65. Kadivar M, Mosayebi Z, Razi N, et al. High flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome managed with insure method: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci, 2016, 41(6): 494-500.
66. Murki S, Singh J, Khant C, et al. High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for primary respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. Neonatology, 2018, 113(3): 235-241.
67. Shin J, Park K, Lee EH, et al. Humidified high flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as an initial respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress: a randomized, controlled non-inferiority trial. J Korean Med Sci, 2017, 32(4): 650-655.
68. Manley BJ, Arnolda GRB, Wright IMR, et al. Nasal high-flow therapy for newborn infants in special care nurseries. N Engl J Med, 2019, 380(21): 2031-2040.
69. Roberts CT, Owen LS, Manley BJ, et al. Nasal high-flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants. N Engl J Med, 2016, 375(12): 1142-1151.
70. 張紀華, 閆俊梅, 丁玉紅. 兩種輔助通氣方式治療極低出生體重兒呼吸窘迫綜合征臨床療效分析. 臨床和實驗醫學雜志. 2017, 16(23): 2375-2378.
71. 顏惠宇, 楊遠胡. 加溫濕化高流量鼻導管通氣用于早產兒呼吸窘迫綜合征治療中的價值分析. 世界復合醫學, 2020, 6(6): 98-100.
72. 陳佳, 高薇薇, 許芳, 等. 兩種輔助通氣方式治療極低出生體重兒呼吸窘迫綜合征臨床療效分析. 中國當代兒科雜志, 2015, (8): 847-851.
73. Manley BJ, Roberts CT, Fr?island DH, et al. Refining the use of nasal high-flow therapy as primary respiratory support for preterm infants. J Pediatr, 2018, 196: 65-70.
74. McKimmie-Doherty M, Arnolda GRB, Buckmaster AG, et al. Predicting nasal high-flow treatment success in newborn infants with respiratory distress cared for in nontertiary hospitals. J Pediatr, 2020, 227: 135-141.
75. Roberts CT, Owen LS, Fr?island DH, et al. Predictors and outcomes of early intubation in infants born at 28-36 weeks of gestation receiving noninvasive respiratory support. J Pediatr, 2020, 216: 109-116.
76. Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ. Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2003, (2): CD000143.
77. Collins CL, Holberton JR, Barfield C, et al. A randomized controlled trial to compare heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with nasal continuous positive airway pressure postextubation in premature infants. J Pediatr, 2013, 162(5): 949-954.
78. Elkhwad M, Dako JA, Jennifer G, et al. Randomized control trial: heated humidity high flow nasal cannula in comparison with NCPAP in the management of RDS in extreme low birth infants in immediate postextubation period. Neonatal Pediatr Med, 2017.
79. Manley BJ, Owen LS, Doyle LW, et al. High-flow nasal cannulae in very preterm infants after extubation. N Engl J Med, 2013, 369(15): 1425-1433.
80. Soonsawad S, Swatesutipun B, Limrungsikul A, et al. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula for prevention of extubation failure in preterm infants. Indian J Pediatr, 2017, 84(4): 262-266.
81. Yengkhom R, Suryawanshi P, Gupta B, et al. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula vs. nasal continuous positive airway pressure for post-extubation respiratory support in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. J Trop Pediatr, 2021, 67(1): fmaa082.
82. 河北省新生兒加溫濕化高流量鼻導管通氣研究協作組. 應用加溫濕化高流量鼻導管通氣預防新生兒拔管失敗的臨床研究. 中華兒科雜志, 2014, 52(4): 271-276.
83. 康文清, 許邦禮, 劉大鵬, 等. 加溫濕化高流量鼻導管吸氧在32周以下早產兒撤機中的療效比較. 中國當代兒科雜志, 2016, 18(6): 488-491.
84. Chen J, Lin Y, Du L, et al. The comparison of HHHFNC and NCPAP in extremely low-birth-weight preterm infants after extubation: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Front Pediatr, 2020, 8: 250.
85. Cummings JJ, Polin RA, Committee on Fetus and Newborn, et al. Noninvasive respiratory support. Pediatrics, 2016, 137(1): 2015-3758.
86. Sweet DG, Carnielli V, Greisen G, et al. European consensus guidelines on the management of respiratory distress syndrome - 2019 update. Neonatology, 2019, 115(4): 432-450.
87. Roehr CC, Yoder BA, Davis PG, et al. Evidence support and guidelines for using heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannulae in neonatology: Oxford nasal high-flow therapy meeting, 2015. Clin Perinatol, 2016, 43(4): 693-705.
88. 中國醫師協會新生兒科醫師分會呼吸專業委員會. 加溫濕化高流量鼻導管通氣的臨床應用建議. 發育醫學電子雜志, 2017, 5(3): 132-135.
89. Sreenan C, Lemke RP, Hudson-Mason A, et al. High-flow nasal cannulae in the management of apnea of prematurity: a comparison with conventional nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Pediatrics, 2001, 107(5): 1081-1083.
90. Lampland AL, Plumm B, Meyers PA, et al. Observational study of humidified high-flow nasal cannula compared with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Pediatr, 2009, 154(2): 177-182.
91. Sett A, Noble EJ, Forster DE, et al. Cerebral oxygenation is stable in preterm infants transitioning to heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula therapy. Acta Paediatr, 2021, 110(7): 2059-2064.
92. Sasi A, Malhotra A. High flow nasal cannula for continuous positive airway pressure weaning in preterm neonates: a single-centre experience. J Paediatr Child Health, 2015, 51(2): 199-203.
93. Abdel-Hady H, Shouman B, Aly H. Early weaning from CPAP to high flow nasal cannula in preterm infants is associated with prolonged oxygen requirement: a randomized controlled trial. Early Hum Dev, 2011, 87(3): 205-208.
94. Tang J, Reid S, Lutz T, et al. Randomised controlled trial of weaning strategies for preterm infants on nasal continuous positive airway pressure. BMC Pediatr, 2015, 15: 147.
95. Badiee Z, Eshghi A, Mohammadizadeh M. High flow nasal cannula as a method for rapid weaning from nasal continuous positive airway pressure. Int J Prev Med, 2015, 6: 33.
96. Soonsawad S, Tongsawang N, Nuntnarumit P. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula for weaning from continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. Neonatology, 2016, 110(3): 204-209.
97. Reynolds P, Leontiadi S, Lawson T, et al. Stabilisation of premature infants in the delivery room with nasal high flow. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2016, 101(4): F284-F287.
98. Edit M, Nicola H, Peter R. Admission to NICU in air is more likely if nasal high flow is used for stabilisation in preterm babies compared to face mask CPAP. Signa Vitae, 2017, 13(2): 29-32.
99. Siva NV, Reynolds PR. Stabilisation of the preterm infant in the delivery room using nasal high flow: a 5-year retrospective analysis. Acta Paediatr, 2021, 110(7): 2065-2071.
100. Boyle MA, Dhar A, Chaudhary R, et al. Introducing high-flow nasal cannula to the neonatal transport environment. Acta Paediatr, 2017, 106(3): 509-512.
101. Abraham V, Manley BJ, Owen LS, et al. Nasal high-flow during neonatal and infant transport in Victoria, Australia. Acta Paediatr, 2019, 108(4): 768-769.
102. Muniyappa B, Honey G, Yoder BA. Efficacy and safety of nasal high-flow therapy for neonatal transport. Air Med J, 2019, 38(4): 298-301.
103. Trevisanuto D, Cavallin F, Loddo C, et al. Trends in neonatal emergency transport in the last two decades. Eur J Pediatr, 2021, 180(2): 635-641.
104. Hodgson KA, Owen LS, Kamlin COF, et al. Nasal high-flow therapy during neonatal endotracheal intubation. N Engl J Med, 2022, 386(17): 1627-1637.
105. Foglia EE, Ades A, Sawyer T, et al. Neonatal intubation practice and outcomes: an international registry study. Pediatrics, 2019, 143(1): e20180902.
106. O'Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, et al. Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: success rates, duration, and adverse effects. Pediatrics, 2006, 117(1): e16-e21.
107. Wallenstein MB, Birnie KL, Arain YH, et al. Failed endotracheal intubation and adverse outcomes among extremely low birth weight infants. J Perinatol, 2016, 36(2): 112-115.
108. 黃盼盼, 胡曉靜. 新生兒濕化高流量鼻導管通氣的應用與研究進展. 上海護理, 2015, 15(4): 61-63.
109. Yoder BA, Manley B, Collins C, et al. Consensus approach to nasal high-flow therapy in neonates. J Perinatol, 2017, 37(7): 809-813.
110. Uchiyama A, Okazaki K, Kondo M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of high-flow nasal cannula in preterm infants after extubation. Pediatrics, 2020, 146(6): e20201101.
111. Chikata Y, Ohnishi S, Nishimura M. Humidity and inspired oxygen concentration during high-flow nasal cannula therapy in neonatal and infant lung models. Respir Care, 2017, 62(5): 532-537.
112. Abobakr M, Abdalla A, Barakat T, et al. Implementation of a protocol-based strategy for weaning nasal high flow therapy in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2020, 55(12): 3319-3327.
113. Sivieri EM, Gerdes JS, Abbasi S. Effect of HFNC flow rate, cannula size, and nares diameter on generated airway pressures: an in vitro study. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2013, 48(5): 506-514.
114. Collins CL, Holberton JR, K?nig K. Comparison of the pharyngeal pressure provided by two heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannulae devices in premature infants. J Paediatr Child Health, 2013, 49(7): 554-556.
115. Chinese Society of Critical Care Medicine. Guidelines for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia (2013). Chin J Intern Med, 2013, 52(6): 524-543.
116. Onodera M, Nakataki E, Nakanishi N, et al. Bacterial contamination of circuit inner surfaces after high-flow oxygen therapy. Respir Care, 2019, 64(5): 545-549.
117. Ramaswamy VV, More K, Roehr CC, et al. Efficacy of noninvasive respiratory support modes for primary respiratory support in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2020, 55(11): 2940-2963.
118. Hebet Province Neonatal Noninvasive High Frequency Oscillation Ventilation Research Group. Noninvasive high frequency oscillatory ventilation vs. heated humidified high flow nasal cannula to prevent premature extubation failure: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. Chin J Neonatol. 2019, 34(4): 247-253.
119. Piastra M, Morena TC, Antonelli M, et al. Uncommon barotrauma while on high-flow nasal cannula. Intensive Care Med, 2018, 44(12): 2288-2289.
120. Jasin LR, Kern S, Thompson S, et al. Subcutaneous scalp emphysema, pneumo-orbitis and pneumocephalus in a neonate on high humidity high flow nasal cannula. J Perinatol, 2008, 28(11): 779-781.
121. Iglesias-Deus A, Pérez-Mu?uzuri A, López-Suárez O, et al. Tension pneumocephalus induced by high-flow nasal cannula ventilation in a neonate. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2017, 102(2): F173-F175.
122. Hough JL, Shearman AD, Jardine LA, et al. Humidified high flow nasal cannulae: current practice in Australasian nurseries, a survey. J Paediatr Child Health, 2012, 48(2): 106-113.
123. Klingenberg C, Pettersen M, Hansen EA, et al. Patient comfort during treatment with heated humidified high flow nasal cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomised cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed, 2014, 99(2): F134-F137.
124. Osman M, Elsharkawy A, Abdel-Hady H. Assessment of pain during application of nasal-continuous positive airway pressure and heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannulae in preterm infants. J Perinatol, 2015, 35(4): 263-267.
125. Roberts CT, Manley BJ, Dawson JA, et al. Nursing perceptions of high-flow nasal cannulae treatment for very preterm infants. J Paediatr Child Health, 2014, 50(10): 806-810.
126. Jia Y, Wenbin L. Comparison of comfort between diferent auxiliary airway techniques on neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. Chin J Woman Child Health Res, 2016, 27(12): 1447-1449.
127. Miller AG, Gentle MA, Tyler LM, et al. High-flow nasal cannula in pediatric patients: a survey of clinical practice. Respir Care, 2018, 63(7): 894-899.
128. Li J, Fink JB, MacLoughlin R, et al. A narrative review on trans-nasal pulmonary aerosol delivery. Crit Care, 2020, 24(1): 506.
129. Ari A. Aerosol drug delivery through high flow nasal cannula. Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 2017, 18(11): 877-882.
130. Dugernier J, Hesse M, Jumetz T, et al. Aerosol delivery with two nebulizers through high-flow nasal cannula: a randomized cross-over single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography study. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv, 2017, 30(5): 349-358.
131. Ari A. Effect of nebulizer type, delivery interface, and flow rate on aerosol drug delivery to spontaneously breathing pediatric and infant lung models. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2019, 54(11): 1735-1741.
132. Sunbul FS, Fink JB, Harwood R, et al. Comparison of HFNC, bubble CPAP and SiPAP on aerosol delivery in neonates: an in-vitro study. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2015, 50(11): 1099-1106.
133. Dugernier J, Reychler G, Vecellio L, et al. Nasal high-flow nebulization for lung drug delivery: theoretical, experimental, and clinical application. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv, 2019, 32(6): 341-351.
134. Ari A, Harwood R, Sheard M, et al. In vitro comparison of heliox and oxygen in aerosol delivery using pediatric high flow nasal cannula. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2011, 46(8): 795-801.
135. Li J, Gong L, Fink JB. The ratio of nasal cannula gas flow to patient inspiratory flow on trans-nasal pulmonary aerosol delivery for adults: an in vitro study. Pharmaceutics, 2019, 11(5): 225.
136. Réminiac F, Vecellio L, Loughlin RM, et al. Nasal high flow nebulization in infants and toddlers: an in vitro and in vivo scintigraphic study. Pediatr Pulmonol, 2017, 52(3): 337-344.
137. Fernandez-Alvarez JR, Gandhi RS, Amess P, et al. Heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus low-flow nasal cannula as weaning mode from nasal CPAP in infants ≤28 weeks of gestation. Eur J Pediatr, 2014, 173(1): 93-98.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Guidelines for high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy in neonates (2023)

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content