Construction of reporting standard research on rapid health technology assessment_Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Authors：

WU Yanan ^1,2,3 , WANG Hanbin ^1,2,3 , E Fenfen ⁴ , XU Meng ⁵ , ZHOU Liying ⁶ , SHANG Xue ⁷ , LIANG Shanshan ^1,2,3 , WANG Ziyi ^1,2,3 , DENG Xinxin ^1,2,3 ,  YANG Kehu ^1,2,3 ,  LI Xiuxia ^1,2,3

1. Health Technology Assessment Center /Evidence Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
2. Evidence Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
3. Key Laboratory of Evidence Based Medicine and Knowledge Translation of Gansu Province, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, P. R. China;
4. Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital, Xining 810001, P. R. China;
5. The Second Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Medical University, Xi’an 710038, P. R. China;
6. School of Public Health, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310016, P. R. China;
7. College of Public Administration, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, P. R. China;

Corresponding?author：

YANG Kehu, Email: kehuyangebm2006@126.com; LI Xiuxia, Email: lixiuxia@lzu.edu.cn

Keywords：

Health technology assessment; Rapid health technology assessment; Reporting standard; Methodology

DOI：

10.7507/1672-2531.202406179

Video：

Export PDF Favorites Scan Get Citation

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Objective To construct rapid health technology assessment (RHTA) reporting norms, with a view to providing methodological references for RHTA research and reporting. Methods Based on the preliminary pool of entries constructed by the literature research results, and taking into account the characteristics of RHTA, a Delphi expert correspondence questionnaire was designed, and 25 experts in the field of HTA were selected to conduct multiple rounds of expert correspondence. By calculating the expert authority coefficient and opinion coordination coefficient, combined with the average value of the entry score, coefficient of variation and full score ratio, the entries were selected to form the list of RHTA report specifications. Results The positive coefficient of experts in both rounds of investigation was 100%, the expert authority coefficient in the first round was 0.858, and the expert authority coefficient in the second round was 0.838. The Kendall coordination coefficient in the first round was 0.169, and in the second round it was 0.081. According to the correspondence of 2 rounds of investigation, the final formation included 8 aspects, 26 first-level entries and 18 second-level entries in the list of RHTA report specifications. Conclusion This study constructed the RHTA report specification, which is both scientific and operable, providing a reference for RHTA report writing.

Citation： WU Yanan, WANG Hanbin, E Fenfen, XU Meng, ZHOU Liying, SHANG Xue, LIANG Shanshan, WANG Ziyi, DENG Xinxin, YANG Kehu, LI Xiuxia. Construction of reporting standard research on rapid health technology assessment. Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine, 2025, 25(4): 395-400. doi: 10.7507/1672-2531.202406179 Copy

1.	李苗苗, 吳雪, 徐思敏, 等. 快速衛生技術評估的概況性綜述. 中國中藥雜志, 2022, 47(12): 3125-3135.
2.	唐惠林, 門鵬, 翟所迪. 藥物快速衛生技術評估方法及應用. 臨床藥物治療雜志, 2016, 14(2): 1-4.
3.	楊宗霞, 沈建通, 李幼平, 等. 螺旋斷層放療系統治療腫瘤的快速衛生技術評估. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2014, 14(9): 1052-1069.
4.	劉夢娜, 吳斌, 艾丹丹, 等. 藥物快速衛生技術評估方法學研究—以抗腫瘤用藥為例. 中國藥房, 2022, 33(11): 1386-1391.
5.	翟所迪. 快速衛生技術評估與醫院新藥遴選. 2016年北京藥學年會論文集, 2016: 169-173.
6.	郭武棟, 劉夢娜, 潘偉, 等. 快速衛生技術評估國際經驗介紹. 中國醫療保險, 2022, (9): 124-127.
7.	羅太敏, 李少強, 李婷, 等. 骨化三醇預防和治療骨質疏松癥的快速衛生技術評估. 中國醫院用藥評價與分析, 2020, 20(8): 965-968.
8.	云榮榮, 李琳杰, 蔡閔敏, 等. 重癥加強護理病房護士人工氣道氣囊管理知—信—行現狀調查問卷編制及評價. 蘭州大學學報(醫學版), 2019, 45(3): 97-102.
9.	陳勃昊, 薛城, 任俊, 等. 基于德爾菲法的公共衛生事件中家庭服務需求指標體系構建. 復旦學報(醫學版), 2022, 49(1): 60-65, 72.
10.	管慧, 戴國華, 高武霖, 等. 中醫藥臨床研究中應用德爾菲法的系統評價. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2021, 21(2): 186-190.
11.	陳希, 蔡名敏, 陳紅, 等. 基于德爾菲法的臨床試驗質量控制協同度評價指標構建. 中國新藥與臨床雜志, 2021, 42(2): 123-127.
12.	丁晉飛, 談立峰, 湯在祥, 等. 德爾菲法及其在公共衛生領域的應用和展望. 環境與職業醫學, 2012, 29(11): 727-730.
13.	梁旭, 牟昀輝, 那麗, 等. 基于德爾菲法的衛生健康高質量發展指標評價體系構建研究. 中國衛生經濟, 2022, 41(4): 70-73.
14.	文曉慧, 張強, 崔旭, 等. 基于德爾菲法構建冠心病患者心臟康復依從性評價量表. 中國康復醫學雜志, 2023, 38(3): 348-355.
15.	劉曉花. 基于系統評價與德爾菲法對神經根型頸椎病保守治療患者康復護理方案的研究. 蘭州: 甘肅中醫藥大學, 2022.
16.	Stretch L, Amend E. A guide to health technology assessment in the Palliser health region. Canada: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR), 2005.
17.	Moshi MR, Tooher R, Merlin T. Development of a health technology assessment module for evaluating mobile medical applications. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2020, 36(3): 252-261.
18.	Lampe K, M?kel? M, Garrido MV, et al. The HTA core model: a novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2009, 25(Suppl 2): 9-20.
19.	Chugh Y, Bahuguna P, Sohail A, et al. Development of a health technology assessment quality appraisal checklist (HTA-QAC) for India. Appl Health Econ Health Policy, 2023, 21(1): 11-22.

1. 李苗苗, 吳雪, 徐思敏, 等. 快速衛生技術評估的概況性綜述. 中國中藥雜志, 2022, 47(12): 3125-3135.
2. 唐惠林, 門鵬, 翟所迪. 藥物快速衛生技術評估方法及應用. 臨床藥物治療雜志, 2016, 14(2): 1-4.
3. 楊宗霞, 沈建通, 李幼平, 等. 螺旋斷層放療系統治療腫瘤的快速衛生技術評估. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2014, 14(9): 1052-1069.
4. 劉夢娜, 吳斌, 艾丹丹, 等. 藥物快速衛生技術評估方法學研究—以抗腫瘤用藥為例. 中國藥房, 2022, 33(11): 1386-1391.
5. 翟所迪. 快速衛生技術評估與醫院新藥遴選. 2016年北京藥學年會論文集, 2016: 169-173.
6. 郭武棟, 劉夢娜, 潘偉, 等. 快速衛生技術評估國際經驗介紹. 中國醫療保險, 2022, (9): 124-127.
7. 羅太敏, 李少強, 李婷, 等. 骨化三醇預防和治療骨質疏松癥的快速衛生技術評估. 中國醫院用藥評價與分析, 2020, 20(8): 965-968.
8. 云榮榮, 李琳杰, 蔡閔敏, 等. 重癥加強護理病房護士人工氣道氣囊管理知—信—行現狀調查問卷編制及評價. 蘭州大學學報(醫學版), 2019, 45(3): 97-102.
9. 陳勃昊, 薛城, 任俊, 等. 基于德爾菲法的公共衛生事件中家庭服務需求指標體系構建. 復旦學報(醫學版), 2022, 49(1): 60-65, 72.
10. 管慧, 戴國華, 高武霖, 等. 中醫藥臨床研究中應用德爾菲法的系統評價. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2021, 21(2): 186-190.
11. 陳希, 蔡名敏, 陳紅, 等. 基于德爾菲法的臨床試驗質量控制協同度評價指標構建. 中國新藥與臨床雜志, 2021, 42(2): 123-127.
12. 丁晉飛, 談立峰, 湯在祥, 等. 德爾菲法及其在公共衛生領域的應用和展望. 環境與職業醫學, 2012, 29(11): 727-730.
13. 梁旭, 牟昀輝, 那麗, 等. 基于德爾菲法的衛生健康高質量發展指標評價體系構建研究. 中國衛生經濟, 2022, 41(4): 70-73.
14. 文曉慧, 張強, 崔旭, 等. 基于德爾菲法構建冠心病患者心臟康復依從性評價量表. 中國康復醫學雜志, 2023, 38(3): 348-355.
15. 劉曉花. 基于系統評價與德爾菲法對神經根型頸椎病保守治療患者康復護理方案的研究. 蘭州: 甘肅中醫藥大學, 2022.
16. Stretch L, Amend E. A guide to health technology assessment in the Palliser health region. Canada: Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR), 2005.
17. Moshi MR, Tooher R, Merlin T. Development of a health technology assessment module for evaluating mobile medical applications. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2020, 36(3): 252-261.
18. Lampe K, M?kel? M, Garrido MV, et al. The HTA core model: a novel method for producing and reporting health technology assessments. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2009, 25(Suppl 2): 9-20.
19. Chugh Y, Bahuguna P, Sohail A, et al. Development of a health technology assessment quality appraisal checklist (HTA-QAC) for India. Appl Health Econ Health Policy, 2023, 21(1): 11-22.

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Construction of reporting standard research on rapid health technology assessment

Abstract Full text Figures/Tables Video References Cited by

Previous Article

Next Article

Format

Content