循證決策是衛生決策者最常用的、客觀的、也是最重要的一種衛生政策研究方法。其目的是改變傳統的主觀臆斷衛生決策,促進衛生政策和系統研究知識的應用與傳播,以改進國家和地區衛生系統的績效。影響循證衛生決策效果的三個要素是:研究證據,可利用的衛生資源以及政策的價值取向。本文介紹了一些實用的循證決策方法,特別是系統評價、優先重點的選擇和CAM矩陣分析方法。
引用本文:
胡善聯. 循證衛生決策研究方法介紹. 中國循證醫學雜志, 2007, 07(2): 142-146. doi:
復制
1. |
Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research: Newsletter. No.12, October, 2006.
|
2. |
WHO/AHPSR: Knowledge for Better Health Systems and Better Health: The Alliance Strategic Plan: 10-Year Outlook and 2006-2008 Plan. WHO 2006.
|
3. |
Schouwstra M, Ellman M: A New Explanatory Model for Policy Analysis and Evaluation. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. http://www.tinbergen.nl.
|
4. |
Ghaffar A: Three Pillars of Priority Setting for Health Research: Process, Tools and Values. Global Forum Update on Research for Health. 3:117-121. edited by Stephen Matlin. 2006.
|
5. |
Ghaffar et al: The Combined Approach Matrix: A Priority-setting Tool for Health Research. Global Forum for Health Research. Geneva. Switzerland. 2004.
|
- 1. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research: Newsletter. No.12, October, 2006.
- 2. WHO/AHPSR: Knowledge for Better Health Systems and Better Health: The Alliance Strategic Plan: 10-Year Outlook and 2006-2008 Plan. WHO 2006.
- 3. Schouwstra M, Ellman M: A New Explanatory Model for Policy Analysis and Evaluation. Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. http://www.tinbergen.nl.
- 4. Ghaffar A: Three Pillars of Priority Setting for Health Research: Process, Tools and Values. Global Forum Update on Research for Health. 3:117-121. edited by Stephen Matlin. 2006.
- 5. Ghaffar et al: The Combined Approach Matrix: A Priority-setting Tool for Health Research. Global Forum for Health Research. Geneva. Switzerland. 2004.