【摘要】 目的 比較鉆孔引流尿激酶溶解術和小骨窗開顱術治療高血壓腦出血的療效。 方法 2008年9月-2009年12月分別接受鉆孔引流尿激酶溶解術(A組,n=34)和小骨窗開顱術(B組,n=30)的高血壓腦出血患者共64例(出血量30~50 mL,無腦疝),兩組患者術前基線指標(如出血量、手術時機、昏迷程度等)比較無統計學意義。比較接受不同術式的兩組患者手術時間、術后1個月的近期療效、術后6個月遠期療效及死亡率。 結果 A組手術時間短于B組,兩組比較,有統計學意義(P lt;0.05)。術后1、6個月,A組療效優于B組,兩組比較,有統計學意義(P lt;0.05)。A、B組術后近期和遠期死亡率比較,無統計學意義(P gt;0.05)。 結論 對出血部位在基底節區、出血量在30~50 mL,無腦疝的高血壓腦出血患者,鉆孔引流尿激酶溶解術的療效明顯優于小骨窗開顱術。
【Abstract】 Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of drill drainage-urokinase perfusion (group A) and small bone flap craniotomy on hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods A total of 64 patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage (about 30-50 mL) from September 2008 to December 2009 were collected. The patients underwent drill drainage-urokinase perfusion (group A,n=34) and small bone flap craniotomy (group B,n=30). The therapeutic effects, including operating time, short-term effect within one month, long-term effect six months after operation, operation time, and the rate of rehaemorrhagia and mortality were observed and the results of the two groups were compared. Results The operation time was shorter in group A than that in group B (P lt;0.05); one month and six months after the operation, the therapeutic effects were better in group A than those in group B (P lt;0.05); the difference in mortality between the two groups was not significant (P gt;0.05). Conclusion The therapeutic effect of drill draiage-urokinase perfusion is better than that of small bone flap craniotomy on the patients with hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage in basal unclei with bleeding amount of 30-50 mL and without cerebralhern.
Citation: ZHU Chengming,YAO Wenhua,WANG Guifu,ZHANG Deming. Comparison between Skull Drill Drainage-urokinase Perfusion and Small Bone Flap Craniotomy for Removing the Hematoma in Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage. West China Medical Journal, 2010, 25(11): 2035-2038. doi: Copy
Copyright ? the editorial department of West China Medical Journal of West China Medical Publisher. All rights reserved

