ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of No. 8 blood collection needles in connecting broken balloon tubes.
MethodsThirty-six patients who underwent mechanical ventilation in the Intensive Care Unit between January 2010 and December 2013 were included as the study subjects. We divided them into two groups. Patients who had accidental rupture of balloon tube during intubation were regarded as the trial group, while those with normal ventilation were regarded as the control group, with each group having 18 patients. The trial group used No. 8 disposable blood collection needles to connect the balloon tubes. Pressure gauge produced in Germany was used to measure the balloon pressure continuously for four hours. Balloon pressure level, balloon leakage and tube dislocation within 24 hours were observed.
ResultsThe balloon pressure at different time periods was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05). The leakage rate and complication rate were also not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05).
ConclusionsUsing No. 8 blood collection needles for connecting broken balloon tubes is effective, easy, and convenient, and the balloon can be maintained at a constant pressure. It solved many previous clinical problems such as high cost, high complication rate, high death rate and medical disputes.
The quality of disinfectant, disinfection devices and disposable medical devices is closely related to the patients' safety. Hospital infection management department must carry out the audit responsibilities for qualification documents of disinfectant, disinfection devices and disposable medical devices, to guarantee legality, safety and effectiveness of products used in hospital. This paper mainly introduces the implementation of qualification documents audit in West China Hospital, Sichuan University, including system construction, process reengineering, documents audit scope and key points, and document management.
【摘要】 目的 探討一次性麻醉穿刺包與普通腹腔穿刺包在腹腔化療中應用效果。 方法 將2008年6月-2009年4月住院的胃癌和卵巢癌行腹腔化療的患者53例，隨機分為兩組。實驗組29例，用一次性麻醉穿刺包行腹腔穿刺化療；對照組24例，用普通腹腔穿刺包行腹腔穿刺化療；比較兩組患者應用不同穿刺包行腹腔穿刺化療的并發癥比較。 結果 實驗組并發癥發生率明顯低于對照組(Plt;0.05)。 結論 一次性麻醉穿刺包應用于腹腔化療中操作簡便、創傷小、并發癥少，患者樂于接受等優點，值得在臨床上推廣使用。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the effects of one-off anesthesia paracentesis kit and ordinary peritoneal paracentesis kit in intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Methods A total of 53 patients with gastric cancer or ovarian cancer from June 2008 to April 2009 were randomly divided into two groups: 29 patients in trial group underwent intra-peritoneal chemotherapy with one-off anesthesia paracentesis kit, and 24 patients in the control group underwent intra-peritoneal chemotherapy with ordinary peritoneal paracentesis kit. The complications in two groups were compared. Results The incidence of complications in trial group was much lower than that in the control group (Plt;0.05). Conclusion One-off anesthesia paracentesis kit in intra-peritoneal chemotherapy has several advantages including simple manipulation, small injuries, and few complications, which is well accepted by the patients.
ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of disposable tissue on blood pressure measurement, in order to prevent the sphygmomanometer cuff to be polluted.
MethodsA total of 120 subjects including 60 patients with hypertension and 60 normal blood pressure subjects, treated between July 1 and July 31, 2012, were divided equally into two groups. Each group had 30 normal pressure and 30 high pressure subjects. Subjects in group A took blood pressure measurement without disposable tissue first, 1 to 2 minutes before another measurement with disposable tissue. Group B subjects took the measurement with disposable tissue at first, and then without it. We analyzed the influence of the use of disposable tissue and the sequence of tissue usage on the measurement result.
ResultsNo significant difference was found in the systolic and diastolic blood pressure between measuring with and without tissue (P> 0.05). Diastolic blood pressure was not significantly influenced by the order of tissue usage (P>0.05), while systolic pressure was significantly influenced (P<0.05). Between the subjects with and without hypertension, the differences of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure measured with bare arms and disposable tissues were not statistically significant (P>0.05).
ConclusionUsing disposable tissue or not does not affect blood pressure measurements whether the patient suffers from hypertension, but the order of disposable tissue usage may affect systolic blood pressure in non-hypertensive patients.
Objective To evaluate the effect and safety of infantile femoral vein blood sampling with vacuum versus disposable needle. Methods Such databases as VIP, CNKI, CBM, Google Academic and Wanfang data were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about infantile femoral vein blood sampling with vacuum versus disposable needle published from January 2000 to July 2010. The studies were screened according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, the data were extracted, the methodology quality was assessed, and meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 15 RCTs were included. Of 3 490 patients in all, 1 770 were in the treatment group and 1 726 were in the control group. The baseline conditions were reported in 14 studies, and the random methods were mentioned in 11 RCTs. All studies didn’t report the allocation concealment and blind method. Only 2 RCTs reported separately that, the degree of neonatal pain was lower in the treatment group (Plt;0.01), and the satisfaction of parents was higher in the treatment group (Plt;0.01). Four RCTs compared the sampling time between the two groups without meta-analysis mentioned due to the disunity of standard, only the descriptive outcomes showed a shorter time in the treatment group. The meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, the reject rate of sample quality was lower (RR=0.20, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.26), the success rate of one time sampling was higher (RR=1.20, 95%CI 1.16 to 1.24), the injury of local tissue was slighter (RR=0.62, 95%CI 0.45 to 0.86), and the iatrogenic contamination was lower (RR=0.62, 95%CI 0.45 to 0.86) in the treatment group. Conclusion This review shows that the vacuum sampling is superior to the disposable needle sampling for domestic infantile femoral vein blood collection. Due to the low quality of the included studies with high possibility of bias, this conclusion needs to be further verified by performing more high-quality studies.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and advantages of modified Bacon one-time operation in laparoscopic radical resection for ultra-low rectal cancer.MethodsThe medical records of all patients who underwent laparoscopic modified Bacon procedure for ultra-low rectal cancer treated by Professor SONG Junmin Medical Group of our department from August 2018 to June 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. According to the different methods during the operation, the patients were divided into a modified Bacon one-time operation group (modified Bacon group, n=26) and a Bacon secondary operation group (traditional Bacon group, n=33). The perioperative period data and follow-up results were observed and compared.ResultsA total of 59 ptients were collected, including 26 cases in the modified Bacon group and 33 cases in the traditional Bacon group. There were no significant differences in gender composition, age, etc. baseline data between the two groups (P>0.05). All surgery were successfully completed. There were no conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative or postoperative massive bleeding, severe infection and other serious complications and perioperative period death. The incidence of anastomotic leakage in the modified Bacon group was lower than that of the traditional Bacon group [0.0% (0/26) versus 18.2% (6/33), P=0.030]. There were no significant differences in the incidences of postoperative anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic stricture, rectal irritation, and external intestinal necrosis between the two groups (P>0.05). And the number of dissected lymph nodes, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, the first exhaust time, and postoperative hospital stay had no significant differences between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the severity degree and total score of low anterior rectectomy syndrome (LARS) between the two groups at 3 and 6 months after operation (P>0.05). However, the total LARS score at 6 months after operation was lower than that at 3 months in the same group (P<0.001). By the end of the last follow-up (January 2021), there was no obvious difference in the anal shape between the two kinds of surgery. There was no recurrence or death during the follow-up period.ConclusionModified Bacon one-time operation for ultra-low rectal cancer is safe and feasible, which could achieve natural orififice specimen extraction surgery and ultra-low limit sphincter preservation, reduce occurrence of postoperative anastomotic leakage and external intestinal necrosis, times of operation, and shorten total length of stay and reduce total cost of hospitalization.
