【摘要】 目的 探討一次性麻醉穿刺包與普通腹腔穿刺包在腹腔化療中應用效果。 方法 將2008年6月-2009年4月住院的胃癌和卵巢癌行腹腔化療的患者53例，隨機分為兩組。實驗組29例，用一次性麻醉穿刺包行腹腔穿刺化療；對照組24例，用普通腹腔穿刺包行腹腔穿刺化療；比較兩組患者應用不同穿刺包行腹腔穿刺化療的并發癥比較。 結果 實驗組并發癥發生率明顯低于對照組(Plt;0.05)。 結論 一次性麻醉穿刺包應用于腹腔化療中操作簡便、創傷小、并發癥少，患者樂于接受等優點，值得在臨床上推廣使用。【Abstract】 Objective To explore the effects of one-off anesthesia paracentesis kit and ordinary peritoneal paracentesis kit in intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Methods A total of 53 patients with gastric cancer or ovarian cancer from June 2008 to April 2009 were randomly divided into two groups: 29 patients in trial group underwent intra-peritoneal chemotherapy with one-off anesthesia paracentesis kit, and 24 patients in the control group underwent intra-peritoneal chemotherapy with ordinary peritoneal paracentesis kit. The complications in two groups were compared. Results The incidence of complications in trial group was much lower than that in the control group (Plt;0.05). Conclusion One-off anesthesia paracentesis kit in intra-peritoneal chemotherapy has several advantages including simple manipulation, small injuries, and few complications, which is well accepted by the patients.
Objective To evaluate the effect and safety of infantile femoral vein blood sampling with vacuum versus disposable needle. Methods Such databases as VIP, CNKI, CBM, Google Academic and Wanfang data were searched to collect the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about infantile femoral vein blood sampling with vacuum versus disposable needle published from January 2000 to July 2010. The studies were screened according to the inclusive and exclusive criteria, the data were extracted, the methodology quality was assessed, and meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.0 software. Results A total of 15 RCTs were included. Of 3 490 patients in all, 1 770 were in the treatment group and 1 726 were in the control group. The baseline conditions were reported in 14 studies, and the random methods were mentioned in 11 RCTs. All studies didn’t report the allocation concealment and blind method. Only 2 RCTs reported separately that, the degree of neonatal pain was lower in the treatment group (Plt;0.01), and the satisfaction of parents was higher in the treatment group (Plt;0.01). Four RCTs compared the sampling time between the two groups without meta-analysis mentioned due to the disunity of standard, only the descriptive outcomes showed a shorter time in the treatment group. The meta-analysis showed that, compared with the control group, the reject rate of sample quality was lower (RR=0.20, 95%CI 0.15 to 0.26), the success rate of one time sampling was higher (RR=1.20, 95%CI 1.16 to 1.24), the injury of local tissue was slighter (RR=0.62, 95%CI 0.45 to 0.86), and the iatrogenic contamination was lower (RR=0.62, 95%CI 0.45 to 0.86) in the treatment group. Conclusion This review shows that the vacuum sampling is superior to the disposable needle sampling for domestic infantile femoral vein blood collection. Due to the low quality of the included studies with high possibility of bias, this conclusion needs to be further verified by performing more high-quality studies.
Objective To observe the effectiveness of disposable skin stretch closure in the treatment of wounds with skin and soft tissue defects that were difficult to close. Methods The clinical data of 13 patients with skin and soft tissue defects that were difficult to close treated with disposable skin stretch closure and met the selection criteria between July 2021 and February 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. There were 9 males and 4 females, the age ranged from 15 to 71 years with a mean of 39.8 years. The causes of injury included falling injury in 5 patients, traffic accident injury in 5 patients, and falling from height injury in 3 patients. The causes of skin soft tissue defects included open fractures in 4 patients, wound infection in 4 patients, osteomyelitis in 3 patients, degloving injury in 1 patient, and necrosis of skin graft in 1 patient. The injury was located at calf in 8 patients, calcaneus in 3 patients, pelvis in 1 patient, and plantar in 1 patient. The skin and soft tissue defects ranged from 5.0 cm×2.0 cm to 10.5 cm×6.5 cm. Wound conditions (wound closure and wound healing) and the presence or absence of complications were recorded. Results All 13 patients were followed up 32-225 days with a median of 164 days. The wound closure time ranged from 5 to 14 days, with a mean of 8.8 days. The wound closure speed ranged from 0.7 to 13.7 cm2/day, with a mean of 3.6 cm2/day. All wounds healed at grade A, and no complication such as skin edge injury, wound necrosis, infection, dehiscence, and edema occurred. No patient complained of pain or discomfort, and no obvious scarring was found during follow-up. The wound healing time ranged from 17 to 28 days, with a mean of 21.7 days. One of them was transferred to other department due to lung cancer condition changes after using disposable skin stretch closure, and the wound had directly healed without suturing at 17 days after operation. Conclusion The effectiveness of disposable skin stretch closure in the treatment of wounds with skin and soft tissue defects that were difficult to close was exact, with short wound closure time, few complications, and easy operation.
ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of disposable tissue on blood pressure measurement, in order to prevent the sphygmomanometer cuff to be polluted.
MethodsA total of 120 subjects including 60 patients with hypertension and 60 normal blood pressure subjects, treated between July 1 and July 31, 2012, were divided equally into two groups. Each group had 30 normal pressure and 30 high pressure subjects. Subjects in group A took blood pressure measurement without disposable tissue first, 1 to 2 minutes before another measurement with disposable tissue. Group B subjects took the measurement with disposable tissue at first, and then without it. We analyzed the influence of the use of disposable tissue and the sequence of tissue usage on the measurement result.
ResultsNo significant difference was found in the systolic and diastolic blood pressure between measuring with and without tissue (P> 0.05). Diastolic blood pressure was not significantly influenced by the order of tissue usage (P>0.05), while systolic pressure was significantly influenced (P<0.05). Between the subjects with and without hypertension, the differences of systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure measured with bare arms and disposable tissues were not statistically significant (P>0.05).
ConclusionUsing disposable tissue or not does not affect blood pressure measurements whether the patient suffers from hypertension, but the order of disposable tissue usage may affect systolic blood pressure in non-hypertensive patients.
