【摘要】 目的 確定在不同濃度七氟醚復合瑞芬太尼誘導無肌松氣管插管時瑞芬太尼的半數有效量（ED50）。 方法 2009年7月-2009年11月擇期手術患者60例，ASA I~II，年齡20~59歲，按照入室的順序隨機分為Ⅰ組（2%七氟醚組）和Ⅱ組（3%七氟醚組），預沖8%七氟醚誘導，眼瞼反射消失后，調節七氟醚呼氣末濃度分別維持在2%或3%，同時按照序貫法注入瑞芬太尼，瑞芬太尼注射90 s后氣管插管。記錄麻醉誘導前、患者意識消失時、插管前1 min、插管后1 min及插管后3 min心率、平均動脈壓的變化。 結果 2%、3%的七氟醚復合瑞芬太尼誘導氣管插管時瑞芬太尼的半數有效量（ED50）及其相對應的95%可信區間分別為0.585 μg/kg及0.533～0.626 μg/kg和0.492 μg/kg及0.451～0.572 μg/kg。 結論 2%、3%的七氟醚復合瑞芬太尼誘導氣管插管時瑞芬太尼的半數有效量及其相對應的95%可信區間分別為0.585 μg/kg及0.533～0.626 μg/kg和0.492 μg/kg及0.451～0.572 μg/kg。【Abstract】 Objective To determine the half effective dose (ED50) of remifentanil dose for tracheal intubation without neuromuscular relaxant in adult when combined with different concentration of sevoflurane. Methods Sixty ASA Ⅰ to Ⅱ adult aged 20 to 59 years old, scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled in this study between July 2009 to November 2009. All patients were ranged randomly into Group Ⅰ (2% sevoflurane) and Group Ⅱ (3% sevoflurane).Anesthesia was induced with 8% sevoflurane in 100% oxygenat at 6 L/min.After the loss of eyelash reflex, remifentanil was injected over 30 s, end-tidal sevoflurane concentration 2% or 3% was maitained. The dose of remifentanil was determined by up-and-down method. In 90 s after the end of bolus administration of remifentanil, the trachea was intubated. Mean blood pressure and heart rate were recorded at anaesthetic induction, the loss of eyelash reflex, before, in 1 min and 3 min after intubation. Results ED50 values (95% confidence intervals)of remifentanil for tracheal intubation during 2% and 3% sevoflurane induction without neuromuscular relaxant were 0.585 μg/kg and 0.533 - 0.626 μg/kg, and 0.492 μg/kg and 0.451 - 0.572 μg/kg, respectively. Conclusion ED50 values (95% confidence intervals)of remifentanil for tracheal intubation 2% and 3% sevoflurane induction without neuromuscular relaxant are 0.585 μg/kg (0.533 - 0.626 μg/kg) and 0.492 μg/kg (0.451 - 0.572 μg/kg), respectively.
摘要:目的:分析與比較七氟醚吸入麻醉和丙泊酚靜脈復合麻醉應用于三聚氰胺致嬰幼兒輸尿管結石手術的麻醉效果。方法:60例輸尿管結石患兒隨機分為七氟醚(Sev)組(n=30)和丙泊酚(Pro)組(n=30)。觀察并記錄誘導時間、氣管內插管時間、蘇醒時間、拔除氣管插管時間、PACU滯留時間。記錄麻醉誘導和蘇醒期的不良反應。另外記錄兩組病人誘導前、插管前、插管后3 min、5 min、15 min、30 min時點的血壓、心率、脈搏血氧飽和度(SPO2)。結果:七氟醚組誘導時間(63.2±6.9)s長于丙泊酚組(38.2±12.7)s,七氟醚組拔除氣管插管時間(11.9±4.7)min短于丙泊酚組(15.6±8.2)min,兩組相比有統計學意義(Plt;0.05)。七氟醚組躁動發生率53.3%顯著高于丙泊酚組13.3%(Plt;0.01)。七氟醚組在插管前、插管后各時點的血壓、心率與誘導前相比,差異無統計學意義(Pgt;0.05),丙泊酚組插管前、插管后3 min、5 min與誘導前相比血壓、心率顯著降低(Plt;0.05),與同時間點七氟醚組相比血壓顯著降低(Plt;0.05)。結論:兩種麻醉方法均可安全有效用于嬰幼兒輸尿管結石手術,七氟醚組血流動力學更平穩,但躁動發生率較高。Abstract: Objective: To analyze and compare sevoflurane with propofol for anesthesia in infants with Melamineinduced ureteral stone surgery. Methods: Sixty infants who were to undergo Melamineinduced ureteral stone surgery were randomly divided into sevoflurane (Sev) group (n=30) and propofol (Pro) group (n=30). Observe and record the induction of anesthesia time, intubation time, awakening time, time to extubation, time to stay at PACU. Record adverse effects during induction of anesthesia and the awake period. In addition, recorded BP, HR, SPO2 of two groups before induction and intubation, after 3min、5min、15min、30min after intubation. Results: Induction time ［（63.2 ± 6.9） s］ in sevoflurane group was longer than propofol group ［(38.2±12.7） s］,but extubation time ［（11.9 ± 4.7） min］ was shorter than propofol group ［(15.6 ± 8.2） min］, there was significantly different between two groups (Plt;0.05). The incidence of restlessness in sevoflurane group 53.3% was significantly higher than propofol group 13.3% (Plt;001). In sevoflurane group the BP, HR before intubation compare with after intubation has no significant difference (Pgt;0.05). Compared with before induction,the BP, HR before induction, after intubation 3 min, 5 min, decreased significantly (Plt;0.05) in propofol group.when compared the same point with sevoflurane group, blood pressure decreased significantly (Plt;0.05). Conclusion: Both propofol and sevoflurane can be used effectively and safely for anesthesia of ureteral calculi stone surgery in pediatric. The hemodynamics is more stable but restlessness is more common in sevoflurane group.
Objective To systematically review the impacts of general anesthesia using sevoflurane versus propofol on the incidence of emergence agitation in pediatric patients. Methods Such databases as PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2012), CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data and VIP were electronically searched from inception to December 2012, for comprehensively collecting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the impacts of general anesthesia using sevoflurane versus propofol on the incidence of emergence agitation in pediatric patients. References of included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 9 RCTs involving 692 children were included, of which, six were pooled in the meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) after anesthesia induction using sevoflurane, intravenous propofol maintenance was associated with a lower incidence of emergence agitation compared with sevoflurane maintenance (RR=0.57, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.84, P=0.004); and b) patients anesthetized with total intravenous propofol had a lower incidence of emergence agitation compared with total inhalation of sevoflurane (RR=0.16, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.39, Plt;0.000 1). Conclusion The incidence of emergence agitation after general anesthesia using sevoflurane is higher than that using propofol. Due to the limited quantity and quality, the application of sevoflurane should be chosen based on full consideration into patients’ conditions in clinic.
