1. <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"></ol></div>

        <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
      2. <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
        <em id="8sgz1"></em>
        <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"><mark id="8sgz1"></mark></ol></div>

        <button id="8sgz1"></button>
        west china medical publishers
        Keyword
        • Title
        • Author
        • Keyword
        • Abstract
        Advance search
        Advance search

        Search

        find Keyword "二孔法" 3 results
        • 二孔法腹腔鏡膽囊切除術的臨床應用體會

          【摘要】 目的 探討二孔法腹腔鏡膽囊切除術(laparoscopic cholecystectomy,LC)的臨床應用價值。 方法 2006年6月-2010年3月,采用二孔法LC治療450例結石性膽囊炎及膽囊息肉病變患者。其中男82例,女368例;年齡15~78歲,中位年齡52歲。反復右上腹痛及隱痛不適3個月~20年。所有患者均于術前經多次B超檢查確診,包括膽囊結石419例(急性炎癥期25例)、膽囊息肉樣病變31例;膽總管無擴張。 結果 450例手術均成功。無術后出血、膽漏、膽管損傷、膽管殘余結石、穿刺孔感染等并發癥發生。術后第1天開始進食,住院5 d拆線,均康復出院。隨訪時間為1~45個月,末次隨訪時患者均恢復正常飲食,無腹痛、發熱及黃疸等癥狀,生活質量良好。 結論 二孔法LC治療結石性膽囊炎及膽囊息肉病變患者安全可行。

          Release date:2016-08-26 02:21 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Clinical Analysis of Laparoscopic Appendectomy (Report of 109Cases)

          目的 探討腹腔鏡闌尾切除術的臨床經驗和應用價值。方法 回顧性分析腹腔鏡二孔法闌尾切除術 39例(二孔法組)和三孔法闌尾切除術70例(三孔法組)的臨床資料。結果 順利完成手術107例; 中轉開腹2例,其中闌尾嚴重粘連1例,腹膜后闌尾1例。術后發生粘連性腸梗阻1例,經保守治療痊愈出院。住院時間2~9 d,平均3 d。隨訪全部患者2~24個月,平均12個月,未發生其他并發癥。結論 腹腔鏡闌尾切除術具有創傷少、并發癥發生率低及恢復快的優點,將成為闌尾切除術的首選術式。腹腔鏡二孔法闌尾切除術操作簡單,易于推廣; 三孔法則具有處理復雜闌尾切除術的優勢。

          Release date:2016-09-08 10:57 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Clinical Research on the Combined Video-assisted Thoracic Surgery with Two Trocars and Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Treatment of Esophageal Leiomyoma

          Objective To explore the minimal invasiveness and practability of combined video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) with two trocars and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the treatment of esophageal leiomyoma. Methods Between February 2007 and February 2012, we retrospectively analysed the clinical data of 166 patients who underwent various surgeries for the treatment of esophageal leiomyoma. Among them, 62 received routine thoracotomy (group A), 49 accepted conventional VATS surgery with three trocars (group B), and 55 underwent combined VATS surgery with two trocars and EUS (group C). Then, we summarized the clinical indexes of patients in all the three groups for further comparative analysis. Results There was no significant difference among the three groups in age, gender, and lesion location, origin level and size (P > 0.05). There were significant differences between group A and C in blood loss, surgery time, intraoperative localization, postoperative incision pain, hospitalization expenses, length of hospital stay, fasting time, pulmonary infection, and the complications during the follow-up (P < 0.05). There were significant differences between group C and B in blood loss, surgery time, intraoperative localization, fasting time and pulmonary infection (P < 0.05). Conclusion Combined VATS surgery with two trocars and EUS is safe, minimally invasive, thorough with few complications, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

          Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
        1 pages Previous 1 Next

        Format

        Content

          1. <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"></ol></div>

            <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
          2. <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
            <em id="8sgz1"></em>
            <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"><mark id="8sgz1"></mark></ol></div>

            <button id="8sgz1"></button>
            欧美人与性动交α欧美精品