Motor function was investigated by constant perfusion manometry in the Roux limb of ten patients who had undergone total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Results showed that in the fasting state, the migrating motor complex (MMC) was comletely absent, retrograde in direction or bursts of nonphasic pressure activity. Reduced motor activity patterns occurred after the meal in some patients. Four patients failed to convert fasting state into the feeding state. Total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y anastomoses provakes a relatively severe distubance in motor function, which could contribute to postoperative upper abdominal distress.
Objective To investigate the influence on the postoperative recovery for giving either total parenteral nutrition （TPN） or early enteral nutrition (EEN) to patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy. Methods Eighty-six patients with gastric cancer undergone total gastrectomy were divided into TPN group (n=31) and EEN group (n=55). Patients in TPN group received TPN support via vena cava (internal jugular vein or subclavian vein), while patients in EEN group received early feeding through the naso-intestinal tube, which was placed during operation, and volume of enteral nutrition (fresubin) was increased daily, full enteral nutrition was expected on day 3-5. Nutrition status after operation, postoperative plasma albumin (Alb), the time of passing gas or stool, the time of oral intake, hospital stay and any postoperative complications were recorded and analyzed. Results There were no significant differences between two groups (Pgt;0.05) in postoperative plasma Alb level, the time of passing gas or stool, postoperative complications rate or hospital stay. However, in the TPN group, the time of oral intake was shorter than that in EEN group (P=0.004). Conclusions Both TPN and EEN are the suitable nutritional methods for patients with gastric cancer after total gastrectomy, and with no detectable difference. For patients with high risk, such as severe malnutrition, naso-intestinal tube should be placed for EEN.
Objective
To explore the pain after discharged in patients with radical total gastrectomy under painless ward management, and to analyze the causes of pain in order to guide the treatment strategy after discharge.
Methods
Retrospective analysis was performed on the pain data of 82 patients who underwent radical total gastrectomy in The First Affiliated Hospital of Air Force Military Medical University from December 2015 to April 2017, and the situation of pain was followed-up at 2 weeks, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months after discharged.
Results
Mild pain occurred in 25 patients at the 2 weeks after discharged; mild pain occurred in 38 patients and moderate pain occurred in7 patients at the first month after discharged; mild pain occurred in 31 patients and moderate pain occurred in 4 patients at the second month after discharged; 19 patients had mild pain at the third month after discharged. There was no significant difference in pain scores between male patients and female patients, <60 years old patients and ≥60 years old patients, patients’ operative time<180 min and patients’ operative time ≥180 min, patients’ intraoperative blood loss<200 mL and patients’ intraoperative blood loss ≥200 mL at the all time points, including the second week, the first, the second, and the third month after discharge ( P>0.05).
Conclusion
Painless ward management can effectively control the degree of pain in discharged patients who underwent radical total gastrectomy.
ObjectiveTo explore feasibility and safety of π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis in totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy (TLTG).MethodThe clinical data of 20 patients who underwent TLTG, admitted in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from January 2018 to December 2018 were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsTLTG with π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis was successfully carried out in all 20 patients. The operative time was (236.0±55.5) min, the π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis time was (25.7±4.8) min, the intraoperative blood loss was (192.0±148.9) mL, the operative incision length was (3.7±0.8) cm. The postoperative pain score was 2.4±1.1, the first flatus time was (3.1±0.9) d, the first postoperative ambulation time was (1.8±0.7) d, the removal time of nasoenteral nutrution tube was (7.4±2.4) d, the liquid diet time was (6.2±1.4) d, the removal time of intraoabdominal drainage tube was (7.8±2.8) d, the postoperative hospital stay was (10.8±3.0) d. There was no death related to the anastomosis in all patients. Two patients developed a little pleural effusion and 1 patient developed lymphatic leakage were cured with conservative treatment. One patient with intraabdominal encapsulated effusion was cured by puncture and drainage treating. There was no postive incisal margin. The length of upper segment of resection form gastric cancer was (2.3±1.7) cm, the maximum tumor diameter was (4.9±2.8) cm, the number of dissected lymph nodes was 27.9±5.6. All patients were followed up 3–15 months. Eight patients underwent endoscopic examination had no obvious anastomosis stenosis and esophageal reflux. Two patients died of tumor recurrence and metastasis witnin one year after operation, and the rest had disease-free survival until the end of follow-up.ConclusionFrom preliminary results of limited cases in this study, π-shaped esophagojejunal anastomosis in TLTG is a technically safe and feasible surgical procedure in treatment of gastric cancer.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of proximal gastrectomy (PG) versus total gastrectomy (TG) for the treatment of Siewert type Ⅱ/Ⅲ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were searched for literature comparing the efficacy and safety of PG and TG for the treatment of Siewert type Ⅱ/Ⅲ AEG. The search period was from database inception to March 2023. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software. ResultsA total of 23 articles were included, including 16 retrospective cohort studies, 5 prospective cohort studies, and 2 randomized controlled trials. The total sample size was 2 826 patients, with 1 389 patients undergoing PG and 1 437 patients undergoing TG. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with TG, PG had less intraoperative blood loss [MD=?19.85, 95%CI (?37.20, ?2.51), P=0.02] and shorter postoperative hospital stay [MD=?1.23, 95%CI (?2.38, ?0.08), P=0.04]. TG had a greater number of lymph nodes dissected [MD=?6.20, 95%CI (?7.68, ?4.71), P<0.001] and a lower incidence of reflux esophagitis [MD=3.02, 95%CI (1.24, 7.34), P=0.01]. There were no statistically significant differences between the two surgical approaches in terms of operative time, postoperative survival rate (1-year, 3-year, 5-year), and postoperative overall complications (P>0.05). ConclusionPG has advantages in terms of intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay, while TG has advantages in terms of the number of lymph nodes dissected and the incidence of reflux esophagitis. There is no significant difference in long-term survival between the two surgical approaches.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of transorally inserted anvil (OrVilTM) for laparoscopic total gastrectomy compared with open total gastrectomy.MethodsRetrospectively summarized the 285 gastric cancer patients from the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between December 2012 and April 2018, of them 156 patients underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy (being reconstructed by OrVilTM) via 129 patients underwent open total gastrectomy. Operation-associated parameters and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe intraoperative blood loss was significantly less, proximal resection margin was significantly longer, and first ambulatory time, time to first flatus, time to fluid diet were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic total gastrectomy group (P<0.05). Whereas the total operative time, esophagojejunostomy time, numbers of dissected lymph nodes, time to remove drainage tube, length of postoperative hospital stay, and morbidity of postoperative complication (including anastomotic leakage, anastomotic stenosis, anastomotic bleeding, celiac and pleural effusion or infection) were not significantly different between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionOrVilTM is a technically safe and feasible surgical procedure for esophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy.
