ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TFTAVR) under local anesthesia (LA) and general anesthesia (GA). MethodsElectronic databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang and CBM were searched to collect randomized controlled trial and cohort studies on clinical outcomes of TFTAVR under LA and GA from inception to September 2020. Two authors independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the quality of studies, and a meta-analysis was performed by using Stata 16.0 software. ResultsA total of 30 studies involving 52 087 patients were included in this study. There were 18 719 patients in the LA group and 33 368 patients in the GA group. The results of meta-analysis showed that the in-hospital all-cause mortality rate [RR=0.65, 95%CI (0.45, 0.94), P=0.021], 30-day all-cause mortality rate [RR=0.73, 95%CI (0.62, 0.86), P＜0.001], 30-day stroke [RR=0.82, 95%CI (0.68, 0.98), P=0.025], cardiac arrest [RR=0.50, 95%CI (0.34, 0.73), P＜0.001], ICU stay time [RR=?6.86, 95%CI (?12.31, ?1.42), P=0.013], and total hospital stay time [RR=?2.02, 95%CI (?2.59, ?1.45), P＜0.001] in the LA group were all better than those in the GA group. There was no significant difference in the in-hospital stroke [RR=0.83, 95%CI (0.69, 1.00), P=0.053], in-hospital myocardial infarction (MI) [RR=1.74, 95%CI (0.43, 7.00), P=0.434], or 30-day MI [RR=0.77, 95%CI (0.42, 1.42), P=0.404] between the two groups. ConclusionLA provides a safe and effective way to induce sedation without intubation, and may be a good alternative to GA for TFTAVR.
Objective To determine the efficiency and safety of dexmedetomidine in general anesthesia. Methods Trials were located through electronic searches of the PubMed, EBSCO, OVID, Springer, Foreign Journals Integration System, CNKI, CMBdisk (from the date of establishment of the databases to April 2008). Bibliographies of the retrieved articles were also checked. Result A total of 25 trials involving 1 241 patients were included. The Meta-analysis showed: dexmedetomidine reduced peri-operative heart rate and blood pressure, reduced the occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomitting [RR=0.57, 95%CI (0.38, 0.84)], postoperative agitation [RR=0.29, 95%CI (0.17, 0.51)], shivering [RR=0.45, 95%CI (0.29, 0.68)], increase the occurrence of bradycardia [RR=2.16, 95%CI (1.58, 2.95)], hypotension [RR=2.97, 95%CI (1.42, 6.18)]. Dexmedetomidine reduced administration of thiopental, isoflurane and fentanyl, while there was no difference in muscle relaxant. Dexmedetomidine showed no difference in emergency time compared with the control group. As a result of low incidence of adverse reaction, dexmedetomidine showed superior in discharge time [WMD15.17, 95%CI (3.87, 26.46)]. Conclusions The limited current evidence shows that dexmedetomidine is better in maintaining the hemodynamic balance; reducing occurrence of nausea, vomiting, agitation and shivering; and reducing doses of anesthetics. In emergency time, dexmedetomidine shows no difference except discharge time.
Objective To systematically review the impacts of general anesthesia using sevoflurane versus propofol on the incidence of emergence agitation in pediatric patients. Methods Such databases as PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2012), CNKI, CBM, WanFang Data and VIP were electronically searched from inception to December 2012, for comprehensively collecting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the impacts of general anesthesia using sevoflurane versus propofol on the incidence of emergence agitation in pediatric patients. References of included studies were also retrieved. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 9 RCTs involving 692 children were included, of which, six were pooled in the meta-analysis. The results of meta-analysis showed that: a) after anesthesia induction using sevoflurane, intravenous propofol maintenance was associated with a lower incidence of emergence agitation compared with sevoflurane maintenance (RR=0.57, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.84, P=0.004); and b) patients anesthetized with total intravenous propofol had a lower incidence of emergence agitation compared with total inhalation of sevoflurane (RR=0.16, 95%CI 0.06 to 0.39, Plt;0.000 1). Conclusion The incidence of emergence agitation after general anesthesia using sevoflurane is higher than that using propofol. Due to the limited quantity and quality, the application of sevoflurane should be chosen based on full consideration into patients’ conditions in clinic.
【摘要】 目的 評價腦電雙頻指數（BIS）監測全身麻醉深度的準確性及實用性。 方法 2007年10月-2009年10月擇期行腹腔鏡膽囊切除手術的40例ASAⅠ或Ⅱ級患者隨機平均分為A、B組，兩組均采用丙泊酚、瑞芬太尼誘導和維持。A組以BIS值判斷麻醉深度并指導調整用藥，B組根據經驗調整用藥，使BIS值維持在50±5、MAP和HR維持在基礎值±20%范圍內。常規監測收縮壓（SBP）、舒張壓（DBP）、心率（HR）和BIS，計算用藥總量，記錄蘇醒時間；誘導期進行改良警覺/鎮靜（OAA/S）評分，評價BIS對全身麻醉手術期間麻醉深度的監測和指導意義。 結果 麻醉期間，B組SBP、DBP、HR和BIS波動明顯大于A組（Plt;0.05）；A組的蘇醒時間（7.5±2.5） min明顯短于B組（9.8±3.9） min（Plt;0.05）；拔管后，A組躁動、嗜睡、惡心、嘔吐患者少于B組；A組無1例發生手術中知曉，B組1例發生手術中知曉。 結論 BIS可動態反映大腦生理功能的變化，有助于臨床判斷全身麻醉深度，指導麻醉用藥。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the accuracy and practicality of bispectral index (BIS) used in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Methods Forty patients of ASA class Ⅰ or Ⅱ were randomly divided into group A and B,20 patients in each group. Anesthetic depth was judged and anesthetics was administered by BIS monitoring (being kept in 50±5) in group A or based on the experience of anesthetist in group B. After anesthesia induction, target propofol and remifentanil concentrations were adjusted to maintain the MAP, HR within the range of ±20% of preinduction values. Systolic pressure (SBP), distolic pressure (DBP), HR, SpO2 and BIS were monitored. Awake time and anesthetic consumption were recorded. Results The changes of SBP, DBP, HR and BIS were less in group A than those in group B (Plt;0.05).Awake time was shorter in group A than that in group B and restlessness drowsiness, nausea and vomitting after extubation were less in group A than those in group B. No awareness patient during operation was seen in group A, but one patient suffered from awareness in group B. Conclusion BIS monitoring can dynamicly reflect cerebral physilological function during general anesthesia and is helpful in judging anesthesia depth and directing the administration of anesthetics.
ObjectiveTo explore the risk factors for death within 7 days after admission in trauma patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia, and provide evidence for predicting the outcomes of those patients and guidance for clinical practices.MethodsThe basic information and perioperative data of trauma patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia between January 1st 2019 and December 31st 2020 were collected from the Hospital Information System and the Anesthesia Information Management System. Patients who died within 7 days after admission were assigned into the case group and the others were assigned into the control group, and then propensity-score matching method was used based on age, sex, and injury types. Univariate analyses and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis were used to identify the risk factors for death within 7 days after admission in these patients.ResultsThere were 2 532 patients who met the inclusion criteria, of whom 96 patients with missing follow-up information were excluded, and 2 436 patients remained for the study. After propensity-score matching, there were 19 patients in the case group and 95 patients in the control group. The result of multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the coma state at admission [odds ratio (OR)=9.961, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.352, 73.363), P=0.024], perioperative body temperature<36℃ [OR=23.052, 95%CI (1.523, 348.897), P=0.024], intraoperative mean arterial pressure<60 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa) [OR=12.158, 95%CI (1.764, 83.813), P=0.011], serum calcium concentraion<2.0 mmol/L [OR=33.853, 95%CI (2.530, 452.963), P=0.008], and prothrombin time [OR=1.048, 95%CI (1.002, 1.096), P=0.042] increased the risk of death within 7 days after admission.ConclusionThe coma state, coagulopathy, perioperative hypothermia, intraoperative hypotension, and hypocalcemia are 5 independent risk factors for death in trauma patients after surgery under general anesthesia.
【摘要】 目的 比較靶控誘導后Shikani喉鏡、Macintosh直接喉鏡和GlideScope?視頻喉鏡插管時的應激反應。 方法 選取2008年12月-2009年2月期間ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ級、擬于全身麻醉下行擇期顱內占位病變切除術的患者30例，隨機分為Shikani喉鏡組（S組）、Macintosh直接喉鏡組（M組）與GlideScope?視頻喉鏡組（G組）。靶控異丙酚和瑞芬太尼誘導，分別采用上述3種喉鏡行經口氣管插管。記錄患者的心率、血壓，計算心率收縮壓乘積（RPP）。 結果 3組插管時間、心率、血壓和RPP比較差異無統計學意義（Pgt;0.05）。S組和M組插管后心率、血壓及RPP均較插管前顯著升高（Plt;0.05），而G組插管后的心率、60~300 s時的收縮壓、平均動脈壓和RPP與插管前比較，差異無統計學意義（Pgt;0.05）。 結論 3種喉鏡進行經口氣管插管時具有相似的血流動力學反應，GlideScope?視頻喉鏡更有利于循環穩定。【Abstract】 Objective To compare the hemodynamic responses of orotracheal intubations with GlideScope? videolaryngoscope, Macintosh direct laryngoscope, and Shikani optical stylet after target-controlled-infusion (TCI). Methods Thirty patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status Ⅰ-Ⅱ, scheduled for elective intracranial mass lesion surgery under general anesthesia were randomly allocated equally to Shikani optical stylet group (group S) Macintosh laryngoscope group (group M), and GlideScope? videolaryngoscope group (group G). After the patients became unconscious by TCI induction of propofpol and remifentanil, the endotracheal intubation were carried out through above three laryngoscope. The heart rate (HR), blood pressure and rate pressure product (RPP) were recorded. Results The differences of intubation time, HR, blood pressure and RPP in three groups were not statistically significant (Pgt;0.05). After intubation, the HR, blood pressure and RPP of group S and M were obviously higher than those before intubation (Plt;0.05); while there was no obvious change on the HR, systolic pressure at 60-300 s, mean arterial pressure and RPP of group G compared before intubation (Pgt;0.05). Conclusions There are similar hemodynamic responses in the three laryngoscope. GlideScope? is more advantageous to cycle stability.
Objective To explore the emergence agitation resulting from postoperative indwelling urethral catheters in patients of thoracic surgery.
Methods In this prospective cohort study, we recruited 140 patients who were scheduled for thoracic surgery under general anesthesia in West China Hospital from January through April 2014. These patients were divided into two groups including a control group and a trial group with 70 patients in each group. The patients in the control group had indwelled urethral catheter routinely. The catheter removed after the surgery at operation room in the trial group. Intraoperative urinary volume, emergence agitation (EA) occurrence, postoperative urinary retention, and urethral irritation were recorded.
Results There was no statistical difference in postoperative urinary retention rate between the control group and the trial group (1.43% vs. 2.86%, P=0.230). However, the urethral irritation rate in the control group was significantly higher than that in the trial group (12.86% vs. 0.00%, P=0.012) . And there was a statistical difference in adverse event rate (2.86% vs. 0.00%, P=0.039) between the two groups. There was a significantly higher incidence of urethral irritation in male patients (20.51%, 8/39) than female patients (3.23%, 1/31, P=0.033).The rate of EA in the control group was significantly higher than that in the trial group (28.57% vs. 12.86%, P=0.010). There was a significantly higher EA rate in the patients who had urethral irritation by postoperative indwelling catheters compared with those without indwelling catheters (45.00% vs. 12.86%, P=0.043).
Conclusion This study suggests that postoperative EA is a result from urethral irritation than local pain, and the EA rate can be decreased by removal of catheter before anaesthetic recovery.
