1. <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"></ol></div>

        <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
      2. <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
        <em id="8sgz1"></em>
        <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"><mark id="8sgz1"></mark></ol></div>

        <button id="8sgz1"></button>
        west china medical publishers
        Keyword
        • Title
        • Author
        • Keyword
        • Abstract
        Advance search
        Advance search

        Search

        find Keyword "小切口" 96 results
        • 小切口松解治療伸直型膝關節僵直

          【摘 要】 目的 總結小切口松解治療伸直型膝關節僵直的臨床效果。 方法 2004 年3 月- 2007 年1 月,采用小切口松解治療伸直型膝關節僵直34 例。男26 例,女8 例;年齡18 ~ 58 歲。病程8 ~ 36 個月。病因:骨折30 例,交叉韌帶損傷3 例,滑膜損傷1 例。術前膝關節平均屈曲35°。患者均采用膝關節外側弧形小切口松解粘連,術后24 h 即進行CPM 機鍛煉。 結果 患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合。34 例獲6 個月~ 2 年隨訪。膝關節屈曲均達90° 以上,股四頭肌肌力正常,無髕前皮膚壞死發生。按劉國輝等療效評定標準,優25 例,良8 例,中1 例,優良率97%。 結論 小切口松解治療伸直型膝關節僵直創傷小,可早期行膝關節功能鍛煉,術后并發癥少,關節功能恢復好,是治療伸直型膝關節僵直的一種較好方法。

          Release date:2016-09-01 09:10 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • 小切口重瞼成形術的臨床體會

          目的 探討小切口重瞼成形術的臨床效果。 方法 2011年9月-2012年6月,按三點切開法設計重瞼線,在內中外重瞼線上各作約5 mm長的小切口,掏剪瞼扳前眼輪匝肌及外側切口部分臃腫的脂肪組織,按切開重瞼的方法,用6-0尼龍線帶提上瞼肌腱膜將傷口縫1~2針。 結果 對13例行小切口重瞼成形術的患者, 隨訪3~6個月,重瞼外形均自然,無嚴重并發癥。 結論 本術式創傷小、恢復快、效果穩定,是一種值得推廣的手術。

          Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • COMPARATIVE STUDY OF POSTEROLATERAL CONVENTIONAL AND MINIMALLY INVASIVE TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY

          To compare the cl inical effect of total hi p arthroplasty (THA) using posterolateral conventional or minimally invasive incision. Methods From January 2007 to November 2007, 38 patients (41 hi ps) were treated with minimally invasive THA (mini-incision group), and 15 patients (15 hi ps) underwent conventional THA (conventional incision group). Mini-incision group: 23 males (25 hi ps) and 15 females (16 hi ps) aged (53.2 ± 15.5) years old; body mass index (BMI) was 23.4 ± 3.3; there were 20 cases (20 hips) of femoral neck fracture, 2 cases (2 hips) of primary osteoarthritis, 14 cases (16 hips) of stage III or IV aseptic necrosis of the femoral head, 2 cases (3 hips) of ankylosing spondyl itis involving hip joint; Harris hip score was 47.7 ± 5.5 and the course of disease was (4.5 ± 4.3) years. Conventional incision group: 7 males (7 hips) and 8 females (8 hips) aged (54.8 ± 10.8) years old; BMI was 26.1 ± 5.1; there were 8 cases (8 hips) of femoralneck fracture, 1 case (1 hip) of primary osteoarthritis, 5 cases (5 hips) of stage III or IV aseptic necrosis of the femoral head, 1 case (1 hip) of ankylosing spondyl itis involving hip joint; Harris hip score was 51.2 ± 4.3 and the course of disease was (3.8 ± 3.7) years. There were no statistically significant differences between two groups in the general information (P gt; 0.05). Results There were statistical differences between two groups in terms of incision length, perioperative blood loss, drainage volume and blood transfusion volume (P lt; 0.05), and no statistical differences were evident in operative time, abduction angle and the anteversion angle of acetabular cup (P gt; 0.05). All incisions healed by first intention and no early postoperative compl ications occurred. Two groups were followed for 12-22 months (average 18.3 months). All patients walked without the crutch at 2-3 months after operation. The Harris score of the mini-incision group and the conventional incision group 6 months after operation was 88.6 ± 3.6 and 85.8 ± 3.3, respectively, indicating there was no significant difference between two groups (P gt; 0.05), but there was significant difference between before and after operation (P lt; 0.05). Conclusion Compared with conventional THA, the minimaly incisive using posteroplateral approach THA has the merits of mini invasion, sl ight hemorrage, short hospital stay, minor compl ication, convenient management of femoral head and accurate prosthesis location. However, strict attention should be paid to operative indications.

          Release date:2016-09-01 09:07 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety Between Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Thyroidectomy and Conventional Open Thyroidectomy in The Treatment of Thyroid Carcinoma Without Lymph Node Metastasis: A Meta-Analysis

          Objective To systematically evaluate the effectiveness and safety of minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT) and conventional open thyroidectomy (COT) in treatment of thyroid carcinoma without lymph node metastasis. Methods Databases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2015), WanFang, CBM, VIP and CNKI were searched to collect the randomized controlled trails (RCTs) and non-RCTs about MIVAT and COT in treatment of thyroid carcinoma without lymph node metastasis. The retrieval time was from inception to October 2015. The studies were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criterias, and the data was extracted and the quality of studies was evaluated by 2 reviewers independently. Then the Meta-analysis was conducted by using RevMan 5.2 software. Results A total of 13 non-RCTs involving 3 083 cases were included. The results of Meta-analysis showed that: compared with COT group, operative time of MIVAT group was longer (MD=31.36, 95% CI: 27.68-35.03, P<0.05), hospital stay (MD=-0.16, 95% CI: -0.28--0.04, P=0.01) and length of scar (MD=-1.51, 95% CI: -1.63--1.39, P<0.05) of MIVAT group were shorter, but there was no significant difference in the incidences of transient hypocalcemia (OR=1.29, 95% CI: 0.93-1.78, P=0.13), transient laryngeal nerve palsy (OR=1.42, 95% CI: 0.93-2.17, P=0.11), hemotoma (OR=1.21, 95% CI: 0.64-2.29, P=0.56), recurrence (OR=0.61, 95% CI: 0.28-1.33, P=0.22), number of retrieved central lymph nodes (MD=-0.10, 95% CI: -0.98-0.78, P=0.82), and the size of tumors (MD=-0.02, 95% CI: -0.06-0.02, P=0.39) between the 2 groups. Conclusion MIVAT is safe and feasible in treatment of thyroid carcinoma without lymph node metastasis when its indications are strictly controlled.

          Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • 鎖定加壓鋼板微創治療Pilon 骨折

          目的 總結Pilon 骨折采用微創小切口顯露關節面、鎖定加壓鋼板(locked compression plate,LCP)內固定的手術治療效果。 方法 2006 年12 月- 2009 年4 月收治Pilon 骨折104 例,采用微創小切口顯露關節面,填充自體骨或人工骨,恢復關節面平整及骨折的對位對線,經皮插入LCP 內固定治療。其中男73 例,女31 例;年齡21 ~ 74 歲,平均47.5 歲。閉合性骨折83 例;開放性骨折21 例,其中Gustilo Ⅰ型13 例,Ⅱ型8 例。骨折按AO 分型:43-B2 型20 例,43-B3 型19 例,43-C2 型37 例,43-C3 型28 例。受傷至手術時間6 h ~ 14 d,平均7.8 d。 結果 術后發生切口感染4 例,經換藥后愈合;余切口均Ⅰ期愈合。104 例均獲隨訪,隨訪時間12 ~ 28 個月。X 線片示骨折均達臨床愈合,愈合時間為4 ~ 10 個月,平均7 個月。無鋼板松動、斷裂、螺釘拔出及再骨折等并發癥發生。術后3 個月參照Mazur 等的評價標準對踝關節功能進行評價,獲優69 例,良26 例,可7 例,差2 例,優良率91.3%。 結論 采用微創小切口顯露關節面,經皮插入LCP 內固定治療Pilon 骨折,療效確定。

          Release date:2016-09-01 09:03 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • 自發性氣胸兩種手術方式的對比觀察

          【摘要】 目的 比較腋下小切口與常規后外側切口手術治療自發性氣胸的臨床療效。 方法 將2006年5月-2010年1月收治的64例自發性氣胸患者,按手術時間和患者自身對手術的選擇性隨機分為腋下小切口手術組(A組,34例)和常規后外側切口手術組(B組,30例)。兩組患者性別、年齡、單雙側、病程等一般資料比較差異無統計學意義(Pgt;0.05),具有可比性。兩組均采用肺大皰切除修補術及壁層胸膜機械性摩擦。 結果 兩組術后切口均Ⅰ期愈合,無切口感染等并發癥發生。兩組隨訪時間均為3~24個月,平均12.6個月;術后6個月時均無復發。A組手術時間、術中出血量、術后引流量、術后住院時間、住院費用方面均明顯優于B組,差異有統計學意義(Plt;0.05)。 結論 兩種手術方法均安全,但與常規后外側切口比較,腋下小切口具有手術時間短、創傷小、恢復快、住院費用低等優點。

          Release date:2016-09-08 09:27 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Application Experience of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Small Incision Cholecystectomy for Gerontal Patients

          目的 比較腹腔鏡膽囊切除術(LC)與小切口膽囊切除術(MC)在老年患者中的臨床效果,以指導臨床選擇應用。 方法 回顧性分析筆者所在醫院2010年7月至2013年7月期間行LC(LC組,n=109)及MC(MC組,n=111)的老年患者的臨床資料,比較2組術中和術后相關指標的差異。 結果 LC組和MC組患者的手術時間〔(45.72±6.14)min比(40.67±6.02)min〕、術中出血量〔(10.18±3.31)mL比(11.13±2.93)mL〕、住院時間〔(9±5)d比(10±5)d〕及總并發癥發生率〔28.4%(31/109)比31.5%(35/111)〕比較差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05);但LC組患者的術后疼痛程度輕、胃腸道功能恢復時間短〔(46.3±10.5)h比(71.4±9.8)h〕、住院費用較高〔(8 010±450)元比(4 800±680)元〕、切口感染發生率較低〔0(0)比15.3%(17/111)〕、肺部感染發生率較高〔17.4%(19/109)比9.9%(11/111)〕,P<0.05。 結論 LC對老年膽囊結石或膽囊炎患者具有更好的臨床效果;但對心肺功能異常者,尤其是不能耐受全麻和氣腹的患者選擇MC更為合適,所以臨床上應視患者具體情況加以選擇。

          Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • 小切口與腹腔鏡保膽取石術治膽囊結石的效果觀察

          目的比較小切口保膽取石術與腹腔鏡保膽取石術在治療膽囊結石中的療效。 方法選取2007年8月-2012年6月收治的膽囊結石患者140例,分為研究組(n=80,采取小切口保膽取石術)及對照組(n=60,采取腹腔鏡保膽取石術),對比分析兩組的臨床療效。 結果手術時間、出血量、腸道恢復時間、住院時間、中轉開腹率、結石殘留率、結石復發率、術后并發癥、鎮痛藥使用等方面,兩組差異均無統計學意義(P>0.05)。研究組與對照組平均住院費用分別為(5 014.8±670.4)、(7 852.5±954.6)元,研究組明顯低于對照組,差異有統計學意義(t=-20.659,P<0.001)。 結論小切口保膽取石術與腹腔鏡保膽取石術都是微創、安全、療效確切的保膽取石手術方式,應根據患者的實際情況選擇合適的手術方式。小切口保膽取石術的優點在于無需價值高昂的設備、術者不需要專門培訓、適應證廣、住院費用相對較低、簡單易學,更值得在基層醫院推廣。

          Release date: Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • Curative effect of mini-incision common vertebral pedicle screw internal fixation on thoracoclumbar fractures without neurological injury

          Objective To explore the short-term therapeutic effect of mini-incision common vertebral pedicle screw internal fixation on thoracoclumbar fractures without neurological injury. Methods The data of 61 patients with thoracolumbar fractures without neurological injury treated with mini-incision common vertebral pedicle screw internal fixation (the mini-incision group, n=32) or percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (the percutaneous group, n=29) from February 2014 to January 2016 was retrospectively collected and analyzed. Total incision length, operation time, blood loss, fluoroscopy times, postoperative bed rest time, hospitalization costs, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), vertebral Cobb angle of correction, and accuracy rate of screw placement were compared between the two groups. Results All the patients were followed up for 6 to 24 months with a mean of 13.4 months. There were no complications such as incision infection and neurovascular injury except for 2 screws breakage in one patient in the percutaneous group. In the mini-incision group, the average total incision length was longer than that in the percutaneous group [(7.33±0.53) vs. (6.38±0.44) cm], while the average operation time was shorter than that in the percutaneous group [(62.66±4.75) vs. (72.93±5.09) minutes]; the differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). In the mini-incision group, the average frequency of fluoroscopy was fewer [(5.63±0.61)vs. (19.07±1.60) times] and the average hospitalization costs was lower [(23.3±1.5) thousand yuan vs. (39.5±1.6) thousand yuan] than those in the than that in the percutaneous group; the differences were statistically significant (P<0.001). No significant difference was found in blood loss, postoperative bed rest time, VAS score, ODI, vertebral Cobb angle of correction, and accuracy rate of screw placement between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusions Mini-incision common vertebral pedicle screw internal fixation for thoracoclumbar fractures without neurological injury has the advantages of short operation time, less fluoroscopy times, low hospitalization costs and high fixation strength. It may obtain a good short-term effectiveness.

          Release date:2017-12-25 06:02 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        • 小切口膽囊切除術26例

          目的 探討小切口膽囊切除術的療效。 方法 2007年7月-2009年6月對26例小切口膽囊切除術進行回顧分析。 結果 切口長度4~6 cm,平均手術時間60 min。平均術后住院5 d,26例全部治愈,無術中膽道損傷、術后出血、膽漏及切口感染發生。 結論 小切口膽囊切除術安全可行,創傷小,恢復快,痛苦輕,住院費用低,具有良好的應用價值。

          Release date:2016-09-08 09:49 Export PDF Favorites Scan
        10 pages Previous 1 2 3 ... 10 Next

        Format

        Content

          1. <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"></ol></div>

            <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
          2. <em id="8sgz1"><label id="8sgz1"></label></em>
            <em id="8sgz1"></em>
            <div id="8sgz1"><ol id="8sgz1"><mark id="8sgz1"></mark></ol></div>

            <button id="8sgz1"></button>
            欧美人与性动交α欧美精品