ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of rehabilitation exercise on exercise tolerance and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with non-acute coronary syndrome (non-ACS) after interventional therapy.MethodsA total of 102 patients with coronary heart disease and non-ACS in our hospital from December 2018 to June 2019 were selected and randomly divided into a control group (n=51, 30 males and 21 females with an average age of 56.1±4.8 years) and a trial group (n=51, 34 males and 17 females with an average age of 55.1±4.9 years). The control group received routine treatment, while the trial group received regular supervised rehabilitation exercise on the basis of routine treatment. Patients were followed up for 6 months to compare the differences in cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, blood lipid, fasting blood glucose), 6-minute walking distance (6MWD), adverse lifestyle changes and treatment compliance between the two groups after treatment.ResultsThe difference of 6MWD between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). In the trial group, 6MWD increased after intervention compared with that before intervention, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Comparison of total cholesterol (TC), high density liptein cholesterol (HDL-C), low density liptein cholesterol (LDL-C) and fasting blood glucose in the trial group before and after intervention showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The differences in TC, HDL-C and LDL-C in the control group before and after intervention were statistically significant (P<0.05). It was statistically significant in dietary compliance rate, smoking cessation rate and alcohol cessation rate between the two groups (P<0.05); the differences in the dietary compliance and drug compliance of the trial group before and after intervention were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionRegular supervised rehabilitation exercise can significantly improve the exercise tolerance and cardiovascular risk factors of non-ACS patients after coronary intervention treatment, so as to improve the quality of life and long-term prognosis of non-ACS patients, which is worthy of clinical application.
Objective To compare the effect and degree of satisfaction of different analgesic interventions for tubes of pericardium and mediastinum removal after cardiac surgery. Methods From December 2017 to June 2018, 94 patients undergoing open heart cardiac surgery with tubes of pericardium and mediastinum were allocated randomly into three groups including a group A (32 patients), a group B (35 patients), and a group C (27 patients). In the group A, intravenous Dezocine was given as analgesics. In the group B, intravenous Dezocine plus oral ibuprofen were given. In the group C, interventions of group B plus specific nursing guidance were given. With the help of visual analogue scale (VAS), scores of pain during and after the tubes removal were collected. The degree of satisfaction and other adverse effects were also recorded. Results The VAS scores and fading time of pain in the group B were significantly lower than those of the group A (P<0.017). The score of sleeping was better in the group B as well. The VAS scores and fading time of pain in the group C were also significantly lower than those of the group A, and the scores of mood, activity as well as degree of satisfaction were all higher than those in the group A (P<0.017). The scores of activity and degree of satisfaction in the group C were higher compared with the group B (P<0.017). Conclusion Combination of intravenous Dezocine and oral ibuprofen seems to be more effective than each individual. Professional and specific nursing guidance could increase the degree of satisfaction for chest tube removal after cardiac surgery.
