ObjectiveTo compare and evaluate the effect and quality of T-tube drainage and bulit-in-tube drainage plus primary suture after laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). MethodsA clinical trial was taken in 79 cases with T-tube drainage (control group) and 62 cases with built-in-tube drainage (observation group). The treatment success rate, incidence of complications, bilirubin recovered time, length of stay, recuperation time, and treatment cost were measured and compared between the two groups. ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in treatment success rate, incidences of complications, and bilirubin recovered time of patients （Pgt;0.05）, while length of stay, recuperation time, and treatment cost of patients in observation group were significantly less than those in control group （Plt;0.05）. ConclusionsBuilt-in-tube drainage plus primary suture after LC and common bile duct exploration could achieve the same therapeutic effect as the traditional T-tube drainage with less length of stay, recuperation time, and treatment cost.
目的 對比引流管固定器與傳統固定方法在膽道術后患者“ T ”管固定中的效果。 方法 2012年2月－5月，將102例膽道術后留置“ T ”管的患者，按住院號隨機分為試驗組（52例）和對照組（50例），試驗組在傳統固定方法的基礎上加用引流管固定器固定“ T ”管，對照組采用傳統的方法固定“ T ”管，觀察比較兩種固定方法的效果。 結果 試驗組“ T ”管固定良好，無松動和脫落情況發生，僅5例患者存在“ T ”管周圍有疼痛刺激，兩組比較差異有統計學意義（P＜0.05）。 結論 采用引流管固定器固定“ T ”管能防止“ T ”管的松動和脫落，減輕患者“ T ”管周圍的疼痛，且便于醫護人員的觀察和操作，值得臨床推廣使用。
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of metal supported multi-sided versus ordinary ultra-fine drainage tube in the uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) lower pulmonary lobectomy. MethodsFrom January 2021 to June 2022, the clinical data of patients who underwent uniportal VATS lower lobectomy in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. According to the different types of ultra-fine drainage tubes used in the surgery, the patients were divided into an experimental group (using multi-sided hole 10F ultra-fine drainage tubes with metal support) and a control group (using ordinary 12F ultra-fine drainage tubes). The clinical data of the two groups were compared. ResultsA total of 190 patients were enrolled, including 108 males and 82 females. There were 90 patients in the experimental group aged 56.60±10.14 years; and 100 patients in the control group aged 57.07±11.04 years. The incidences of postoperative lung infection and pleural effusion in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The postoperative visual analogue scale score, the need to adjust the chest drainage tube after the surgery, the need for chest puncture after the surgery, the time of postoperative chest tube removal, and the hospitalization cost were statistically different (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in the length of postoperative hospital stay or the incidences of postoperative lung leakage, arrhythmia, and atelectasis complications (P>0.05). ConclusionCompared with the ordinary ultra-fine drainage tubes, multi-sided hole ultra-fine drainage tubes with metal support can reduce the incidences of lung infection and pleural effusion complications after the uniportal VATS lower lobectomy, reduce the pain and economic burden, which can be applied in the uniportal VATS lower lobectomy.
Objective To investigate the curative effect of peritoneal drainage tube fixation with titanium clamp in 210 patients during laparoscopic operations. Methods The clinical data of 210 patients with peritoneal drainage fixation via titanium clamp during laparoscopic operations in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Results In 210 patients, drainage tube placement lasted for 5-20 d with an average of 8.5 d. No complications such as drainage tube drifting, position changing or obstructed drainage occurred, and all the patients were successfully extubated. Conclusion During laparoscopic operations, the method that drainage tube fixed with titanium clamp is simple with reliable drainage results, affirmed curative efficacy and obviously decreased operative complications, which is worthy of clinical practice and generalization.
Objective
To explore the effect of 16F gastric tube on pain relief in postoperative lung cancer patients.
Methods
A total of 118 lung cancer patients were treated with radical resection of lung cancer in our hospital between January 2015 and May 2016. The patients were assigned into two groups: a 16F gastric tube group (16F group, 60 patients, 30 males and 30 females at age of 41-73 (52.13±7.83) years and a 28F drainage tube group (28F group, 58 patients, 25 males and 33 females at age of 45-75 (55.62±4.27) years. Clinical effects were compared between the two groups.
Results
There was no statistical difference in drainage time (4.47±1.03 dvs. 4.24±1.16 d, P=0.473), drainage amount (560.37±125.00 mlvs. 656.03±132.45 ml, P=0.478), incidences of pneumothorax (5/60 vs. 2/58, P=0.439), pleural effusion (6/60 vs. 3/58, P=0.522), and subcutaneous emphysema (3/60 vs. 1/58, P=0.635) between the two groups (P>0.05). The pain caused by the drainage tube in the16F group was less than that in the 28F drainage tube group with a statistical difference (F=4 242.996, P<0.001). The frequency of taking analgesics in the 16F group was significantly less than that in the 28F group (12/60vs. 26/58, P<0.001).
Conclusion
The effects of draining pleural effusions and promoting lung recruitment are similar between the 16F group and the 28F group. However, the wound pain caused by 16F gastric tube is significantly less than that by 28F drainage tube.
