目的 探討經腹部彩色多普勒超聲(腹部超聲)聯合高頻超聲診斷良性膽囊息肉樣病變的價值。 方法 回顧性分析2008年1月-2011年11月121例腹部超聲聯合高頻超聲檢查提示為良性膽囊息肉樣病變、且有手術病理檢查結果的患者資料進行對照,以此評價經腹部超聲聯合高頻超聲對良性膽囊息肉樣病變的診斷準確性。 結果 121例術前經腹部超聲聯合高頻超聲診斷為良性膽囊息肉樣病變的患者,手術后病理檢查結果示膽固醇息肉62例(51.24%),炎性息肉27例(22.31%),腺瘤6例(4.96%),腺癌3例(2.48%),膽囊結石14例(11.57%),腺肌癥3例(2.48%),囊壁腺體結構紊亂3例(2.48%),黏膜下層軟結節3例(2.48%)。經腹部超聲聯合高頻超聲與手術后病理對比檢查,其診斷符合率為78.51%(95/121),誤診率為21.49%(26/121)。 結論 經腹部超聲聯合高頻超聲檢查對良性膽囊息肉樣病變診斷準確性較高,可為臨床預防膽囊癌前病變提供依據。Objective To investigate the value of abdominal color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) combined with high-frequency ultrasonography (HFU) diagnosing benign polypoid lesion of gallbladder (B-PLG). Methods A total of 121 patients with B-PLG diagnosed by CDU combined with HFU between January 2008 and November 2011 were randomly selected. All of the patients underwent the surgery and had the record of surgical pathological examination results, which were compared with the results of the ultrasonography in order to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of CDU combined with HFU for B-PLG. Results In 121 patients with B-PLG diagnosed by CDU combined with HFU before the surgery, cholesterol polyp was found in 62 (51.24%), infective polyp was found in 27 (22.31%), adenoma was found in 6 (4.96%), adenocarcinoma was found in 3 (2.48%), gallstones was found in 14 (11.57%), adenomyosis was found in 3 (2.48%), the wall structure gland disorder was found in 3 (2.48%), and submucosal soft nodules was found in 3 (2.48%) after the surgical pathological examination. Coincidence rate between CDU combined with HFU diagnosis and surgical pathological diagnosiswas 78.51% (95/121), and the misdiagnosis rate of CDU combined with HFU was 21.49% (26/121). Conclusion The accuracy of CDU combined with HFU diagnosing B-PLG is high, which can help to prevent precancerous lesion of gallbladder cancer.
【摘要】 目的 評價舒林酸治療結直腸息肉的有效性和安全性。 方法 計算機檢索PubMed、Cochrane Iibrary、Embase、SCI、CNKI、萬方、維普、CBM數據庫。按Cochrane系統評價的方法評價納入研究質量,并進行Meta分析。 結果 共納入7個隨機對照試驗(RCT),共235例患者。Meta分析結果顯示舒林酸治療腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)在有效率、息肉消失率方面與安慰劑比較,差異無統計學意義(Pgt;0.05);治療散發性結腸腺瘤性息肉病(SCAP)在有效率、息肉消失率、腺瘤直徑變化方面與安慰劑比較,差異有統計學意義(Plt;0.05);舒林酸的不良反應多為消化道癥狀,與安慰劑比較差異有統計學意義(Plt;0.05)。 結論 系統評價結果顯示舒林酸對于家族性FAP的療效尚不確切,而對SCAP有一定的療效。【關鍵詞】結直腸息肉;舒林酸;有效性;不良反應;系統評價【Abstract】 Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of sulindac on colorectal polyps. Methods The literatures were searched from several databases including PubMed,Cochrane Iibrary,SCI,CNKI,Wanfang,VIP,and CBM. The quality of the researches was evaluated according to Cochrane systematic reviews, and the Meta analysis was performed. Results Seven RCT were enrolled with a total of 235 patients. Meta analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the effective rate and polyps disappearance rate of FAP between the two groups (Pgt;0.05). There were significant differences in the effective rate, polyps disappearance rate and size of adenomas between the two groups (Plt;0.05); the most common adverse event was the symptoms of digestive tract which differed much from that in the placebo group (Plt;0.05). Conclusion The therapeutic effect of sulindac on FAP is not sure, but it is effective on SCAP.