ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of lamividine (LAM) combined with adefovir (ADV) versus entecavir (ETV) for lamivudine-resistant (LAM-R) hepatitis B in renal transplant recipients.
MethodOutpatients and inpatients of lamivudine-resistant kidney graft recipients with chronic hepatitis B admitted to West China Hospital and the People's Hospital of Santai County during Jan 2007 to Mar 2012 were divided into A group (LAM+ADV) and B group (ETV). And the level of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), level of serum creatinine, HBV serological markers and HBV-DNA load were compared by SPSS 16.0 software.
ResultsA total of 15 patients were included. The mean age was 36.7±6.6 years old, the majority of patients were male. After treatment for 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 48 weeks, 96 weeks, no significant differences were found between two groups in liver function normalization rates, the HBV-DNA negative conversion rates and serum creatinine level.
ConclusionsLAM add-on ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy were both safe and effective in LAM-R kidney transplants with CHB, but the load of HBV-DNA in some patients were still positive at the endpoint. Elevated serum creatinine level may occur in some patients who treated with ADV. Consequently, for HBsAg-positive kidney transplantation patients, those anti-HBV drugs that are more effective, safer and less resistant may be better in the beginning of treatment.
Objective To assess the efficacy of lamivudine in patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B.Methods MEDLINE, SCI, Current Content Connect, The Cochrane Library, and Chinese Biomedical Database were searched from the beginning to September 2005, and the references of eligible studies were manually screened. R.andomized controlled trials comparing lamivudine with non-antiviral interventions （ placebo, no treatment and standard care ） in patients with chronic hepatitis B were eligible for inclusion. Two investigators independently assessed the quality and extracted the data. Heterogeneity was examined by Chi-square test. Fixed and random effect meta-analysis were used to pool the data. Subgroup analyses were used in treatment course. Results Eleven R.CTs were included （ n = 1 237 ）. All reported the effect of lamivudine （100 mg/d） , and one of them included lamivudine （25 mg/d）. The treatment duration of 52 weeks and less than 26 weeks were reported in eight and three RCTs, respectively. Six RCTs adequately applied randomization, while other five RCTs were not reported in detail. Four RCTs adequately enforced allocation concealment, five RCTs enforced blinding bitterly. The others were not reported in detail. It was found by meta-analysis that, compared with the control, lamivudine （100 mg/d, 52 W） could significantly clear HBeAg [42.6% vs. 13% , RR 3.20, 95% CI （2.33, 4. 38）] and clearHBVDNA [71.78% vs. 20, 36%, RR3.42, 95%CI （2.80,4.19）], normalize ALT [65% vs. 34.9%, RR1.91, 95%CI （1.64,2.21）], achieve HBeAgseroconversion [16.1% vs. 7.29% , RR2.12, 95%CI （1.24,3.80） ] and histology response [57. 9% vs. 26.2%, RR 2. 17, 95% CI （ 1.67,2.81 ） ] ; Lanfivudine （100 mg/ d, 12 W） could effectively clear HBV DNA [ 50.7% vs 3.92% , RR 8.68, 95% CI （1.72,43.74 ） ] , but was not effective in loss of HBeAg, HBeAg seroconversion and normalization of ALT, Lamivudine （25 mg/d） could effectively clear HBV DNA [97.7% vs. 22.2% , RR 4.41, 95% CI （2.86,6.79） ] and improve histology response [59.3% vs. 30% , RR1.98, 95% CI （1.31,2.99 ） ], but was not effective in HBeAg seroconversion. Conclusions Lamivudine （100 mg/ d） is effective in clearing HBV DNA and HBeAg, normalizing ALT and achieving HBeAg seroconversion.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of lamivudine (LAM) plus adefovir (ADV) versus entecavir (ETV) monotherapy for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients.
MethodsWe electronically searched databases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 12, 2013), CBM, CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data from their inception to December 2013, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies of LAM+ADV versus ETV for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Two reviewers independently screened literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.2 software.
ResultsA total of 13 RCTs and 5 cohort studies involving 1 336 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses of RCTs showed that:there were no significant differences between the LAM+ADV group and the ETV group in the negative rates of serum HBV-DNA (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.91 to 1.10, P=0.94), HBeAg (RR=0.90, 95%CI 0.70 to 1.17, P=0.43), serum ALT recovery rate (RR=0.97, 95%CI 0.90 to 1.05, P=0.45) and serum HBeAg conversion rate (RR=0.71, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.24, P=0.22) at the 48th week. The results of meta-analyses of cohort studies showed that:there were no significant differences between the two groups in the negative rates of serum HBV-DNA (RR=1.37, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.06, P=0.13) and serum ALT recovery rate (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.87 to 1.12, P=0.87), but the ETV group had higher serum HBeAg conversion rate (RR=0.24, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.79, P=0.02).
ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the efficacy of LAM+ADV is similar to ETV at the 48th week for LAM-resistant chronic hepatitis B patients. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To investigate the prevention of HBV reinfection in the perioperative period of liver transplantation on HBV-related diseases． Methods Published papers were collected and reviewed． Results HBV-related diseases were the main indications of liver transplantation．The prevention for HBV reinfection affects the survivals remarkably. Nowadays, a lot of medication have been used in the prevention of HBV reinfection， and the therapeutic regimens were different from each other. Conclusion Liver transplantation is an effective treatment for HBV-related disease． Appropriate prevention of HBV reinfection in the perioperative period of liver transplantation is important for the survivals of patients．
Objective To assess the effectiveness and safety of combination therapy of zidovudine and lamivudine (ZDV+3TC) for preventing mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV. Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was conducted using the methodology of The Cochrane Collaboration. PUBMED, EMBASE, CINAHL, AIDSearch, AIDSLINE, AIDSTRIALS, The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2007), AIDSDRUGS, AIDSinfo, CRD (Center of Review and Dissemination) databases and three Chinese Databases (CBM, CNKI, VIP) were searched from their establishment to 31 May 2007. We also searched documents of governmental and non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and the proceedings of relevant conferences, including the International AIDS Conferences, and the annual Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections. RCTs assessing the effects of ZDV+3TC for preventing MTCT were included. Trial selection, quality assessment and data extraction were done by two reviewers independently. Different opinions were resolved by discussion with a third party. Meta-analyses were conducted using The Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 4.2.9 software. Results Three studies in breastfeeding populations were included. One trial (PETRA, 1797 participants) found that ZDV+3TC decreased the risk of transmission by 35%-65% within 15 months compared with placebo. However, there was no evidence that ultra-short course ZDV+3TC (during labor) decreased the risk of transmission, compared with placebo. The safety of different courses of ZDV+3TC and placebo were similar (Pgt;0.05). Another trial (SAINT, 1317 participants) found that short course ZDV+3TC (from 36weeks gestation to labor) did not significantly reduce HIV infection among children at 8 weeks after delivery, when compared with single dose nevirapine given to the mother and the infant (Pgt;0.05). No significant difference was found in the maternal and infants mortality and side effects of two groups. One small trial (Moodley1998, 20 participants) found no infant infection in both ZDV+3TC and 3TC alone within 2 weeks after birth. Conclusions Long course (from 36 weeks gestation to 1 week after delivery) and short course (from 36 weeks gestation to labor) ZDV+3TC were more effective than placebo in preventing MTCT of HIV in breastfeeding women with a similar safety profile. Short course ZDV + 3TC had similar effects to single dose nevirapine, and long course ZDV + 3TC had similar effects to lamivudine alone.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy of peginterferon alpha (PEG-IFNα) initially combined with lamivudine (LAM) or adefovir (ADV) in treatment of HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.
MethodsWe electronically searched databases including The Cochrane Library (Issue 11, 2014), PubMed, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WanFang Data from inception to December 2014, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about PEG-IFNα initially combined with LAM or ADV for HBeAg-positive CHB. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.2 software.
ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 2031 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: After 48 weeks of treatment, the HBsAg seroconversion rate of the PEG-IFNα plus ADV group was significantly higher than that of the PEG-IFNα monotherapy group (8.6% vs. 0%, OR=7.73, 95%CI 1.53 to 39.05, P=0.01) or the ADV monotherapy group (8.5% vs. 0%, OR=7.75, 95%CI 1.07 to 56.23, P=0.04); and the HBsAg seroclearance rate in the combination therapy group was significantly higher than that of the ADV monotherapy group (10.5% vs. 1.2%, OR=5.56, 95%CI to 2.14 to 14.47, P=0.0004). After 52 weeks of treatment, the HBsAg seroconversion rate of the PEG-IFNα plus LAM group was significantly higher than that of the PEG-IFNα monotherapy group (11.6% vs. 5.6%, OR=2.21, 95%CI 1.04 to 4.72, P=0.04). After 26 weeks of follow-up, no significant differences were found between the combination therapy group and the PEG-IFNα monotherapy group in HBsAg seroclearance rate and HBsAg seroconversion rate (all P values >0.05).
ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that, compared with PEG-IFNα, LAM, or ADV monotherapy, PEG-IFNα plus LAM or ADV could improve the HBsAg seroclearance or seroconversion rate after 48-52 weeks of treatment for HBeAg-positive CHB, but this effect is still limited. Due to the limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
Objective To systematically review the effectiveness and safety interferon-α (IFN-α) combined with lamivudine vs. IFN-α alone in treating children with Hepatitis B. Methods Such databases as The Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMbase, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were electronically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on IFN-α combined with lamivudine in treating children with hepatitis B. Two reviewers screened literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Then, meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software. Results 8 RCTs were included, with comparable baseline. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared to the IFN-α alone group, the combined therapy group had higher negative rates of serum HBV-DNA and HBeAg. There was no significant difference in the positive rate of anti-Hbe and the incidence of adverse reaction between the two groups. Conclusion Current evidence shows that IFN-α combined with lamivudine was more effective than IFN-α alone in treating children’s hepatitis B.
