Objective To investigate the clinical characteristics, risk factors and perioperative outcome of prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) in elderly patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods The data of elderly patients receiving CABG in the Nanjing First Hospital from January 2013 to June 2019 were collected. All patients were divided into a control group and a PMV group according to whether ventilation time≥24 h.The clinical characteristics and risk factors of PMV were compared between the two groups. Variables were 1∶1 balanced through propensity score matching (PSM) and perioperative outcomes of two groups was analyzed. Results Finally 956 patients were collected, including 187 in the PMV group and 769 in the control group. There were 586 males and 370 females aged 70-94 (74.3±3.5) years. Compared with the control group, the PMV group had higher rates of smoking, preoperative renal impairment, intraoperative blood transfusion and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) implantation, worse cardiac function, lower glomerular filtration rate and ejection fraction, larger left atrial diameter, longer cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in other clinical data between the two groups (P>0.05). Binary multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that females, smoking, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, left ventricular ejection fraction≤56.0%, cardiopulmonary bypass time>106.0 min, IABP implantation and intraoperative blood transfusion were independent risk factors for PMV in elderly patients. After PSM, there were 146 patients in the control group and the PMV group, respectively. The PMV group had longer ICU stay and length of hospital stay and more drainage volume compared with the control group (all P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in perioperative mortality or other complications between the two groups (all P>0.05). ConclusionThere are a lot of factors associated with PMV of the elderly patients undergoing on-pump CABG. In order to establish a complete and formal PMV prediction model, clinicians can make a further step of assessment according to perioperative elements, and improve the prognosis of such patients.
ObjectiveTo retrospectively analyze the causes and risk factors of unplanned extubation (UE) in cancer patients during peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) retention, so as to provide references for effectively predicting the occurrence of UE. Methods27 998 cancer patients who underwent PICC insertion, maintenance and removal in the vascular access nursing center of our hospital from January 2016 to June 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. General information, catheterization information, and maintenance information were collected. The Chi-squared test was used for univariate analysis, multivariate analysis was used by binary unconditional logistic regression. They were randomly divided into modeling group and internal validation group according to the ratio of 7∶3. The related nomogram prediction model and internal validation were established. ResultsThe incidence of UE during PICC retention in tumor patients was 2.80% (784/27 998 cases). Univariate analysis showed that age, gender, diagnosis, catheter retention time, catheter slipping, catheter related infection, catheter related thrombosis, secondary catheter misplacement, dermatitis, and catheter blockage had an impact on UE (P<0.05). Age, diagnosis, catheter retention time, catheter slipping, catheter related infection, catheter related thrombosis, secondary catheter misplacement, and catheter blockage are independent risk factors for UE (P<0.05). Based on the above 8 independent risk factors, a nomogram model was established to predict the risk of UE during PICC retention in tumor patients. The ROC area under the predicted nomogram was 0.90 (95%CI 0.89 to 0.92) in the modeling group, and the calibration curve showed good predictive consistency. Internal validation showed that the area under the ROC curve of the prediction model was 0.91 (95%CI 0.89 to 0.94), and the trend of the prediction curve was close to the standard curve. ConclusionPatients aged ≥60 years, non chest tumor patients, catheter retention time (≤6 months), catheter slipping, catheter related infections, catheter related thrombosis, secondary catheter misplacement, and catheter blockage increase the risk of UE. The nomogram model established in this study has good predictive ability and discrimination, which is beneficial for clinical screening of patients with different degrees of risk, in order to timely implement targeted prevention and effective treatment measures, and ultimately reduce the occurrence of UE.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy (HFNC) in post-extubation intensive care unit (ICU) patients.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang, VIP Databases were searched for all published available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cohort studies about HFNC therapy in post-extubation ICU patients. The control group was treated with conventional oxygen therapy (COT) or non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV), while the experimental group was treated with HFNC. Two reviewers separately searched the articles, evaluated the quality of the literatures, extracted data according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. RevMan5.3 was used for meta-analysis. The main outcome measurements included reintubation rate and length of ICU stay. The secondary outcomes included ICU mortality and hospital acquired pneumonia (HAP) rate.ResultsA total of 20 articles were enrolled. There were 3 583 patients enrolled, with 1 727 patients in HFNC group, and 1 856 patients in control group (841 patients with COT, and 1 015 with NIPPV). Meta-analysis showed that HFNC had a significant advantage over COT in reducing the reintubation rate of patients with postextubation (P<0.000 01), but there was no significant difference as compared with that of NIPPV (P=0.21). It was shown by pooled analysis of two subgroups that compared with COT/NIPPV, HFNC had a significant advantage in reducing reintubation rate in patients of postextubation (P<0.000 01). There was no significant difference in ICU mortality between HFNC and COT (P=0.38) or NIPPV (P=0.36). There was no significant difference in length of ICU stay between HFNC and COT (P=0.30), but there had a significant advantage in length of ICU stay between HFNC and NIPPV (P<0.000 01). It was shown by pooled analysis of two subgroups that compared with COT/NIPPV, HFNC had a significant advantage in length of ICU stay (P=0.04). There was no significant difference in HAP rate between HFNC and COT (P=0.61) or NIPPV (P=0.23).ConclusionsThere is a significant advantage to decrease reintubation rate between HFNC and COT, but there is no significant difference in ICU mortality, length of ICU stay or HAP rate. There is a significant advantage to decrease length of ICU stay between HFNC and NIPPV, but there is no significant difference in ICU mortality, reintubation rate or HAP rate.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy of lidocaine injected prior to tracheal extubation in preventing hemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in general anesthesia.MethodsPubMed, Ovid, Web of Science, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy of lidocaine administrated prior to extubation in preventing hemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation in patients undergoing general anesthesia from inception to October, 2018. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 and Stata 13.0 software.ResultsA total of 10 RCTs involving 525 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with control group, lidocaine could reduce mean arterial pressure in 5 min after extubation (MD=–5.10, 95%CI –9.41 to –0.79, P=0.02), weaken the increase in systolic blood pressure caused by extubation from the moment before extubation to 5 minutes after extubation (before extubation: MD=–7.22, 95%CI –10.34 to –4.11, P<0.000 01; at extubation: MD=–14.02, 95%CI –19.42 to –8.62, P<0.000 01; 1 minutes after extubation: MD=–15.82, 95%CI –22.20 to –9.45, P<0.000 01; 3 minutes after extubation: MD=–12.55, 95%CI –20.36 to –4.74, P=0.002; and 5 minutes after extubation: MD=–12.05, 95%CI –20.35 to –3.74, P=0.004), and weakened extubation-induced increase in diastolic blood pressure at extubation (MD=–9.71, 95%CI –16.57 to –2.86, P=0.005). In addition, lidocaine inhibited heart rate in all time points except the moment of before and at 10 minutes after extubation.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that lidocaine can inhibit the increase in blood pressure and heart rate caused by extubation at certain times. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify above conclusions.
Objective
To investigate the appropriate indication about removing abdominal drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Method
The clinical data of 156 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy in our hospital from January 2014 to June 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups, with 76 patients in the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) group and 80 patients in the control group according to the type of indications about removing abdominal drainage. The time of removing abdominal drainage, hospital stay, incidence of postoperative complications, and readmission rate during 30 days after surgery were compared between the2 groups.
Results
Compared with the control group, the time of removing abdominal drainage 〔(6.2±2.5) dvs. (10.8±2.2) d,P<0.001〕and hospital stay〔(11.8±3.4) dvs. (15.7±3.6) d,P<0.001〕 of the ERAS group were both shorter, incidence of abdominal infection was lower〔1.3% (1/76)vs. 10.0% (8/80), P=0.020〕 , but there was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula 〔18.4% (14/76) vs. 21.3% (17/80)〕 , delayed gastric emptying〔1.4% (1/76) vs. 7.5% (6/80)〕 , and the readmission rate during 30 days after surgery〔5.3% (4/76) vs. 3.8% (3/80)〕 , P>0.05.
Conclusions
Indications about removing abdominal drainage after pancreaticoduodenectomy by authors are safe.
Tracheotomy is a commonly used measure in clinical rescue of critically ill patients, and it has an important impact on the survival outcome of patients. The time of extubation directly affects the recovery process of the patient. This article reviews the research progress of extubation management of tracheotomy patients at home and abroad, and mainly summarizes and elaborates from four aspects, including the role of the multidisciplinary team in tracheostomy management, where tracheostomy patients are extubated, conditions for extubation in tracheotomy patients, and wound care after extubation in tracheotomy patients. The purpose is to provide a reference for the selection of extubation timing and extubation management for patients with tracheotomy, to improve the success rate of extubation and improve the quality of life of patients.
