Objective To assess the benefits and harms of routine primary suture (LBEPS) versus T-tube drainage (LCHTD) following laparoscopic common bile duct stone exploration. Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs were electronically searched from the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2010), PubMed (1978 to 2010), EMbase (1966 to 2010), CBMdisc (1978 to 2010), and CNKI (1979 to 2010); and the relevant published and unpublished data and their references were also searched by hand. The data were extracted and the quality was evaluated by two reviewers independently, and the RevMan 5.0 software was used for data analysis. Results Four studies including 3 RCTs and 1 quasi-RCT involving 274 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that compared with LCHTD, LBEPS was better in shortening operation time (WMD= –17.11, 95%CI –25.86 to –8.36), abdominal drainage time (WMD= –0.74, 95%CI –1.39 to –0.10) and post-operative hospitalization time (WMD= –3.30, 95%CI –3.67 to –2.92), in lowering hospital expenses (WMD= –2 998.75, 95%CI –4 396.24 to –1 601.26) and in reducing the complications due to T-tube such as tube detaching, bile leakage after tube drawing, and choleperitonitis (RR=0.56, 95%CI 0.29 to 1.09). Conclusion LBEPS is superior to LCHTD in total effectiveness for common bile duct stone with the precondition of strictly abiding by operation indication. Due to the low quality of the included studies which decreases the reliability of this conclusion, more reasonably-designed and strictly-performed multi-centered RCTs with large scale and longer follow up time are required to further assess and verify the efficacy and safety of this treatment.
Objective To discuss the diagnosis value of ultrasonography in hepatorrhexis. Methods The contrast of ultrasonography for 120 cases of hepatorrhexis with operative exploration was made. Results All of the 120 patients were examined with ultrasonography, fragmentation of liver parenchyma in 55 cases, dehiscence of liver parenchyma in 38 cases, liver subcapsular hematoma in 12 cases, and spontaneous rupture of liver cancer in 7 cases. All of the 120 patients were confirmed hepatorrhexis with laparotomy. The positive diagnostic rate of ultrasonography in the hepatorrhexis was 93.3%. Conclusion Ultrasonography is valuable for diagnosing hepatorrhexis and it is one of the important diagnostic approaches.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effect of biliary stent implantation through T-tube lumen and nasobiliary drainage through intrahepatic bile duct in the treatment of biliary leakage after biliary tract exploration.MethodsRetrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of one case of bile leakage after common bile duct exploration admitted to the Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Nanchong Central Hospital in December 2016.ResultsIn this case, the biliary stent was placed in the T-tube lumen and the nasal bile duct was placed in the intrahepatic bile duct for biliary drainage. The guidewire was inserted into the hilum of liver through the tunnel in the T-tube cavity, and nasobiliary drainage was placed to the hilum of liver. In addition, a guide wire was inserted through the T-tube into the duodenum, and a 8.5F plastic stent was placed into the duodenum. One end of the stent was placed in the common bile duct, and the other end was placed in the intestinal cavity for biliary drainage. After drainage, the patient’s bile leakage stopped and the abdominal infection was controlled. Ten days after the biliary stent implantation, the patient was discharged successfully, the T-tube and nasobiliary duct were clamped 20 days after the surgery, and T-tube angiography and abdominal B-ultrasound were performed 2 months later, and it found that the scaffold of the lower common bile duct had fallen off, so removed the T-tube. The patient recovered completely after 2 years of follow-up.ConclusionThe means of T-tube tunnel biliary stent and the nasobiliary duct drainage through the intrahepatic bile duct are effective methods to treat biliary leakage, the operations are simple and easy to operate.
Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of ERCP/S+LC and LC+LCBDE in cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis. Methods A fully recursive literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMbase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in any language. By using a defined search strategy, both the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials on comparing ERCP/ S+LC with LC+LCBDE in cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis were identified. Data were extracted and evaluated by two reviewers independently. The quality of the included trials was evaluated. Meta-analyses were conducted using the Cochrane Collaboration’s RevMan 5.0.2 software. Results Fourteen controlled clinical trials (1 544 patients) were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that: a) There were no significant difference in the stone clearance rate between the two groups (RR=0.96, 95%CI 0.92 to 1.01, P=0.14); b) There were no significant difference in the residual stone rate between the two groups (OR=1.05, 95%CI 0.65 to 1.72, P=0.83); c) There were no significant difference in the complications morbidity between the two groups (OR=1.12, 95%CI 0.85 to 1.55, P=0.48); d) There were no significant difference in the mortality during follow-up visit between the two groups (RD= 0.00, 95%CI –0.03 to 0.03, P=0.84); e) The length of hospital stay in the LC+LCBDE group was shorter than that of the ERCP/S+LC group with significant difference (WMD= 1.78, 95%CI 0.94 to 2.62, Plt;0.000 1); and f) The LC+LCBDE group was superior to the ERCP/S+LC group in the aspects of procedure time and total hospital charges. Conclusion Although there aren’t differences in the effectiveness and safety between the ERCP/S+LC group and the LC+LCBDE group, the latter is superior to the former in procedure time, length of hospital stay and total hospital charges. For the influencing factors of lower quality and astable statistical outcomes of the included studies, this conclusion has to be verified with more strictly designed large scale RCTs.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and effect of treatment of bile duct exploration though hepatic sections instead of spliting common bile duct, cured for hepatolithiasis with bile duct stones.
MethodsClinical data of 122 cases of our hospital were retrospectively reviewed, these patients with left intrahepatic bile duct stone and common bile duct calculi. As control group, during the period from June 2007 to June 2010, in which 64 patients underwent left hepatic lobectomy, common bile duct exploration and T tube drainage. In observation group, 58 patients from June 2011 to December 2013, underwent left hepatic resection combined biliary duct exploration by the liver section stump bile duct. The operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, postoperative hospitalization time, and incidence of complications between the 2 groups were compared.
ResultsCompared with the control group, the postoperative hospitalization time was shortened obviously in observation group patients(P < 0.05), there were no significant difference in operative time and bleeding during operation of 2 groups(P > 0.05), The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower than the control group(P < 0.05). In 122 patients, 105 cases were followed-up(86.1%), the follow-up time was 2 years. Two groups of patients had no stone residual and recurrence.
ConclusionsBile duct exploration by intraoperative liver section is an effective method to treat left hepatolithiasis, it can simplified procedures, shortening the postoperative hospitalization time, and effectively avoid complications caused by common bile duct incision and T tubedrainage.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the changes of the flow parameters before and after the anastomotic port exploration and dredging during coronary artery bypass grafting by using the transit time flow measurement (TTFM).MethodsA total of 167 patients who underwent continuous coronary artery bypass grafting and anastomotic port exploration and dredging surgery in Beijing Anzhen Hospital from 2018 to 2019 were enrolled in this study. There were 136 male and 31 female patients aged 41-82 (58.35±17.26) years. If the probe entered and exited the anastomotic port smoothly, it was recorded as a non-resistance group; if the resistance existed but the probe could pass and exit, it was recorded as a resistance group; if the probe could not pass the anastomotic port for obvious resistance, it was recorded as the stenosis group. In the stenosis group, the grafts were re-anastomosed and the flow parameters were re-measured by TTFM.ResultsA total of 202 anastomotic ports were carried out by exploration and dredging. Among them, 87 anastomosis (43.1%) were in the non-resistance group, and there was no significant change in the blood flow volume (BFV) and pulsatility index (PI) before and after exploration and dredging (6.16±3.41 mL/min vs. 6.18±3.44 mL/min, P=0.90; 7.06±2.84 vs. 6.96±2.49, P=0.50). Sixty-four anastomosis (31.7%) were in the resistance group, the BFV was higher after exploration and dredging than that before exploration and dredging (17.11±7.52 mL/min vs. 4.96±3.32 mL/min, P<0.01), while the PI was significantly smaller (3.78±2.20 vs. 8.58±2.97, P<0.01). Fifty-one anastomosis (25.2%) were in the stenosis group, and there was no significant change in the BFV and PI before and after exploration and dredging (3.44±1.95 mL/min vs. 3.48±2.11 mL/min, P=0.84; 10.74±4.12 vs. 10.54±4.11, P=0.36). After re-anastomosis, the BFV was higher (16.48±7.67 mL/min, P<0.01) and the PI deceased (3.43±1.39, P<0.01) than that before exploration and dredging.ConclusionThe application of anastomotic exploration and dredging can reduce the occurrence of re-anastomosis, and promptly find and solve the stenosis of the distal coronary artery, improve the poor perfusion of distal coronary, and thus improves the prognosis of patients.
Objective To analyze the clinical characteristics associated with hospital infections in patients with common bile duct stones treated by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE), thereby providing a basis for selecting treatment strategies and formulating hospital infection prevention measures for such patients. Methods Patients with common bile duct stones at Jiangsu Provincial People’s Hospital between January 2020 and July 2023 were retrospectively selected and divided into ERCP and LCBDE groups according to their surgical methods. Basic patient data, length of hospital stay, hospitalization costs, perioperative infection-related indicators, and occurance of hospital infections were compared between groups. Results A total of 402 patients were enrolled, with 242 in the ERCP group and 160 in the LCBDE group. Significant differences were noted in smoking, alcohol consumption, history of lung diseases, history of heart diseases, history of cholecystectomy/biliary surgery, presence of cholecystitis, presence of cholecystolithiasis, number of stones, maximum stone diameter, common bile duct diameter, total hospital stay, and total expenses (P<0.05). Twenty-four hours before surgery, except for the neutrophil count, which was slightly higher in the ERCP group than that in the LCBDE group (P=0.043), the infection-related indicators did not differ significantly between the two groups (P>0.05). Twenty-four hours after surgery, the levels of serum white blood cell, neutrophil, and aspartate aminotransferase in the ERCP group were lower than those in the LCBDE group (P<0.05), and the levels of alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyl transferase in the ERCP group were higher than those in the LCBDE group (P<0.05). A total of 179 bile samples were collected and tested, identifying 137 strains of pathogenic bacteria (78 in the ERCP group and 59 in the LCBDE group). In the ERCP group, 42 strains (53.85%) were Gram-negative bacteria, 34 strains (45.59%) were Gram-positive bacteria, and 2 strains (2.56%) were fungi; in the LCBDE group, 33 strains (55.93%) were Gram-negative bacteria and 26 strains (44.07%) were Gram-positive bacteria. No significant difference was observed in the composition of pathogenic bacteria between the two groups (χ2=1.174, P=0.695). Among the 402 patients, 38 cases of hospital infection occurred postoperatively, with an infection rate of 9.45%. The difference in the infection rate between the ERCP group and the LCBDE group were statistically significant (11.98% vs. 5.63%; χ2=4.550, P=0.033). The main sites of infection were bloodstream, lungs, and abdominal-pelvic cavity. Conclusions The predominant pathogens isolated after both ERCP and LCBDE are Gram-negative bacteria. Compared with LCBDE, ERCP has less impact on inflammatory markers, hospital stay, and costs, but has a higher incidence of hospital infections.
