As an essential tool for clinical practice, the clinical practice guidelines have been continuously completed and the quality of the guidelines has been improved. However, there are still issues in updating the guidelines and recommendations. This article introduces the living guideline formulation method, through dynamic monitoring, timely inclusion of new evidence, and living update of recommendations, etc. to improve the timeliness of clinical guidelines. The article aims to provide methodological references for the timely transformation of evidence and the update of guidelines.
Upper gastrointestinal tract cancers originating in the esophagus or esophagogastric junction constitute a major global health problem. On February 28, 2023, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) released the clinical practice guidelines for esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancer (version 1.2023). This article will interpret the main updates related to the treatment and follow-up in this version compared to the version 5.2022, in order to provide the Chinese clinicians a better basis and reference for the diagnosis and treatment of the diseases.
With the rapid development of medicine and the emergence of new evidence, the formulation of living guidelines is significant in guiding clinical practice and providing timely and effective references for clinical workers. This article summarizes the status of living guidelines, and puts forward thoughts and suggestions on the challenges and opportunities of the development of living guidelines, in order to promote the development of living guidelines and provide a reference for guideline developers and users.
The Standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD) 2015 is a revision of the STARD 2003 on the checklist and flow chart, on the basis of the new evidences of potential bias and applicability, to better guide the application of diagnostic test in clinical practices. Currently, the interpretation and application in China is still based on STARD 2003. This review will describe the application status of the original version and introduce the updated standards for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies.
Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a disease with heterogeneous manifestations in patients who have manifest or latent psoriasis. It comprises both musculoskeletal and non-musculoskeletal manifestations. Active chronic PsA is often accompanied by cardiovascular, psychological and metabolic complications. Although the quantity of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) indicated for PsA has increased, clinicians still require some guidance in decision-making. Based on the latest evidence-based research results, the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) in 2019 developed the recommendations for the pharmacological management of PsA updated in 2015 with new recommendations. This paper interprets the update contents of the guideline to provide references for the clinical treatment of PsA.
This article interprets the version 3. 2018 of NCCN guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Compared with the version 9. 2017 of the guidelines, the new version has been updated based on the latest evidence-based evidence, laying the emphasis on genotyping and targeted therapy, and standardizes the principles of pathological evaluation and molecular detection, systematically recommends treatment after resistance to targeted therapy, and specifies the population with driver gene alterations for immunotherapy. All of which could guide clinical practice with higher efficacy more precisely.
The American Heart Association (AHA) released the 2017 American Heart Association Focused Update on Adult Basic Life Support and Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality (2017 AHA guidelines update) in November 2017. The 2017 AHA guidelines update was updated according to the rules named " the update of the guideline is no longer released every five years, but whenever new evidence is available” in the 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care. The updated content in this guideline included five parts: dispatch-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), bystander CPR, emergency medical services - delivered CRP, CRP for cardiac arrest, and chest compression - to - ventilation ratio. This review will interpret the 2017 AHA guidelines update in detail.
The accuracy of the clinical prediction model determines its extrapolation and application value. When the prediction model is applied to a new setting, the differences between the new population and the initially modeled population in terms of study time, population characteristics, region, and other factors could lead to a reduction in its predictive performance. Calibrating or updating the prediction model with appropriate statistical methods is important to improve the accuracy of the prediction model in new populations. The model updating methods mainly include regression coefficients updating, meta-model updating and dynamic model updating. However, due to the limitations of meta-model updating and dynamic model updating in practical applications, the regression coefficient updating method is still the most common method in model updating. This paper introducd several types of model updating methods, the regression coefficients updating methods for two common clinical prediction models based on Logistic regression and Cox regression, and provide corresponding R codes for reference of researchers.
Objective To compare the national essential medicines list (EML) and national essential insurance medicine list (EIML) of China with that of the WHO, so as to provide reasonable evidence for the adjustment of new EML and EIML of China. Methods The similarities and differences in the selection, updating, categories, subcategories and the amounts of medicines in the EML and EIML of China and the WHO EML were compared and analyzed. Results There are some differences among the three lists in selecting principles, updating of medicines .The latest version of WHO EML (version in 2007) has 27 categories, including 340 medicines; China EML (version in 2004) has 23 categories and 773 western medicines, containing 23 categories and 225 (66.17%) similar medicines of WHO EML, which accounts for 29.11% of EML of China. China EIML (version in 2005) has 23 categories and 1 031 western medicines, containing 22 categories and 227 (66.76%) of WHO EML, which accounts for 22.02% of EIML of China. China EIML was developed based on China EML. There is little difference in selecting, updating, categories of medicines. Conclusion The difference was obviously found in medicine selection, updating and categories between China EML, EIML and WHO EML. We suggested that our national EML and EIML should be more reasonably selected and updated base on the principals of WHO EML.
In order to provide more standardized guidance for the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in China and to achieve the World Health Organization’s goal of “eliminating viral hepatitis as public health threats by the year 2030”, the Hepatology and Infectious Diseases Societies of the Chinese Medical Association organized experts to update the guideline for the prevention and treatment of CHB, emphasizing more extensive screening for hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers in the general population and more active antiviral treatment for HBV-infected patients. This article introduced and studied the key update points of the new guideline.
