【摘要】 目的 探討乳突根治術后耳內窺鏡換藥與常規換藥相比是否具有優勢。 方法 2003年3月-2008年10月對89例共89只耳行開放式乳突根治術患者按隨機數字表法隨機分為試驗組及對照組，試驗組45例45只耳采用耳內窺鏡換藥，對照組44例44只耳常規換藥；分別觀察試驗組和對照組的干耳人數及干耳的時間，計算干耳率及干耳的平均時間。 結果 試驗組45只耳中42只干耳，干耳率93.3％；對照組44只耳中40只干耳，干耳率90.9％。兩組比較差異無統計學意義（Pgt;0.05）。試驗組42例干耳患者平均干耳時間為術后（50.8±13.4） d，對照組40例干耳患者平均干耳時間為術后（60.7±12.2） d；兩組比較，差異有統計學意義（Plt;0.001）。 結論 中耳乳突根治術后耳內窺鏡下換藥與常規換藥相比不能顯著提高干耳率，但能有效縮短干耳時間。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the application of otoendoscope in dressing change after mastoidectomy. Method Between March 2003 and October 2008, 89 patients (89 ears) underwent mastoidectomy in Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University and in Department of Otolaryngology, Nuclear Industry 416 Hospital of Chengdu. The patients were randomly divided into two groups by simple randomization (trial group and control group). Forty-five patients in the trial group underwent the dressing change under otoendoscope, while 44 patients in the control group under the routine method. The ear drying rate and the ear drying time in the two groups were observed. Results The ear drying rate was 93.3% (42 dry ears)in the trial group, and was 90.9% (40 dry ears) in the control group; the difference between the two groups was not significant (Pgt;0.01). The ear drying time was (50.8±13.4) days in the trial group and was (60.7±12.2) days in the control groups; the difference between the two groups was significant (Plt;0.001). Conclusion Dressing change under the otoendoscope after mastoidectomy may not improve the ear drying rate but can shorten the ear drying time.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the effect of Dexmedetomidine (Dex) on postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) of Chinese patients undergoing abdominal surgeries.
MethodsWe searched databases including PubMed, Web of Science, CNKI, CBM, VIP and WanFang Data from inception to April 2015, to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about evaluating the effect of Dex on POCD of Chinese patients undergoing abdominal surgeries. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then, RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis.
ResultsA total of 8 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that:compared with the control group, the MMSE scores of the Dex group were higher after surgeries in the first day (MD=1.46, 95%CI 0.98 to 1.95, P<0.000 01), the second day (MD=2.46, 95%CI 2.11 to 2.81, P<0.000 01), the third day (MD=1.81, 95%CI 0.37 to 3.25, P=0.01) and the seventh day (WMD=2.03, 95%CI 1.64 to 2.43, P<0.000 01).
ConclusionCurrent evidence shows that the usage of Dex during abdominal surgeries can reduce the incidence of POCD in Chinese patients. Due to the limited quantity and quality of included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of laparoscopic magnetic compression cholangiojejunostomy (LMCCJ) with laparoscopic hand-sutured cholangiojejunostomy (LHSCJ). MethodsA retrospective case-control study was performed. From January 2019 to May 2022, 37 patients, who underwent laparoscopic treatment in this hospital, were enrolled in this study. There were 16 cases in the LMCCJ group and 21 cases in the LHSCJ group. The demographic information, procedure time to complete bilioenteric reconstruction, postoperative hospital stay, operative complications, magnets expulsion time, and follow-up results were collected and analyzed. ResultsThere were no statistical differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, composition of primary diseases, preoperative total bilirubin, and preoperative common bile duct diameter between the two groups (P＞0.05). The outer diameter of the magnets was (10.50±0.97) mm, the expulsion time of the magnets was (49.69±37.58) d, and the expulsion rate of the magnets was 100% (16/16). There was no intestinal obstruction or gastrointestinal perforation caused by the retention of the magnets. The procedure time to complete bilioenteric reconstruction in the LMCCJ group was statistically shorter than that in the LHSCJ group [(11.31±3.40) min vs. (24.81±3.40) min, t=11.96, P＜0.01]. There was no statistical difference in the total bilirubin level at the first week after surgery between the two groups (U=142.0, P=0.80). The postoperative hospital stay in the LMCCJ group was longer than that in the LHSCJ group [(28.31±14.11) d vs. (16.19±7.56) d, t=3.36, P＜0.01]. During the perioperative period, there was no bleeding or biliary infection in the two groups, but one case of biliary leak in the LHSCJ group. In all 37 patients were followed-up for (548.8±259.2) d. During the follow-up period, the incidence rates of biliary intestinal anastomosis stenosis, tumor recurrence, and mortality had no statistical differences between the two groups (P＞0.05). ConclusionFrom the results of comparative analysis in this study, it can be concluded that LMCCJ is not only safe equally, but also easier and less time-consuming as compared with LHSCJ.
ObjectiveTo study the expressions of microRNA-221 (miR-221) and the protein of phosphatase and tension protein homologue (PTEN) in the proximal and distal stumps after sciatic nerve injury in rats and their correlation with the repair of peripheral nerve injury, so as to provide a new target for clinical diagnosis of peripheral nerve injury.MethodsNinety-six male Sprague-Dawley rats of SPF grade were selected to establish sciatic nerve injury models. Twenty-four rats were sacrificed at 0 (immediately after operation), 1, 4, and 7 days after operation. The proximal and distal sciatic nerve fragments were taken under aseptic conditions. The expression of miR-221 was detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR, and the expression of PTEN protein was detected by Western blot and immunofluorescent staining. The relationship between miR-221 and PTEN was verified by dual-luciferase reporter gene. At the same time, the ultrastructure of nerve stump was observed by transmission electron microscopy.ResultsThe results of real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR, Western blot, and immunofluorescence staining showed that the relative expression of miR-221 in the proximal and distal stumps increased gradually with time, and the relative expression of PTEN protein decreased gradually, and the differences between different time points after operation were significant (P<0.05). At 1, 4, and 7 days after operation, the relative expression of miR-221 in proximal stump was significantly higher than that in distal stump, and the relative expression of PTEN protein in proximal stump was significantly lower than that in distal stump (P<0.05). Dual-luciferase reporter gene suggested that PTEN was the target for miR-221. Transmission electron microscopy observation showed that the normal morphological structure was observed at 0 day after operation, and the proliferation of Schwann cells and degeneration of axons and myelin sheaths gradually increased with time. There was no significant difference between proximal and distal stumps at 1 day after operation. At 4 and 7 days, Schwann cells proliferated more in proximal stump than in distal stump, and the degeneration of axons and myelin sheaths was less.ConclusionAfter sciatic nerve injury in rats, the up-regulation of the miR-221 expression targets the down-regulation of PTEN expression, which results in the difference of expression levels of miR-221 and PTEN in proximal and distal stumps. This phenomenon may play a role in promoting nerve repair after peripheral nerve injury.
Objective
To compare the difference in efficacy of early precut of pancreatic duct sphincter and pancreatic duct stent placement in the prevention of pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during high-risk patients.
Methods
A prospective study was conducted on 61 eligible patients who underwent ERCP treatment in Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery of The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University and Xianyang Hospital of Yan’an University, from November 2016 to November 2017. All cases were randomly divided into early pancreatic sphincterotomy group (n=30) and pancreatic duct stenting group (n=31) . The success rate of intubation, intubation, and incidence of complication were compared.
Results
There was no significant difference in the success rate of the first intubation between the 2 groups (P=0.580), but the intubation time of the early pancreatic sphincterotomy group was shorter than that of the pancreatic duct stenting group (P=0.007). In the early pancreatic sphincterotomy group, there was 1 case of post-ERCP pancreatitis, 1 case of biliary tract infection, and 1 case of postoperative bleeding. In the pancreatic duct stenting group, there was 1 case of post-ERCP pancreatitis, and 2 cases of biliary tract infection. No severe complications such as perforation or severe acute pancreatitis occurred in both 2 groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of total complications and specified complication (included post-ERCP pancreatitis, biliary tract infection, and postoperative bleeding) between the 2 groups (P>0.05).
Conclusions
Thereis no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative pancreatitis after early precut of pancreatic duct sphincter and pancreatic duct stenting placement in patients with high-risk, but intubation time of early precut of pancreatic duct sphincter method is shorter than the pancreatic duct stenting placement method.
