ObjectiveTo explore the clinical significance of anterior median approach combined with lateral approach to the elbow joint in the treatment of terrible triad of the elbow.MethodsWe retrospectively collected the data of 63 cases who used the anterior median approach of the elbow joint combined with the lateral approach (group A, n=36) or the medial and lateral approach of the elbow (group B, n=27) in the treatment of terrible triad of the elbow between March 2014 and July 2019. The operation time, postoperative complications, and postoperative Mayo score of the elbow were compared between the two surgical approaches.ResultsThe operation time of group A and group B was (93.78±7.78) and (106.93±10.35) min, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The patients in both groups completed operations successfully, without vascular or nerve injury. All the wounds healed by first intention. No redislocation or reoperation occurred. Ten months after operation, there was no significant difference in the excellence rate of Mayo score of the elbow (83.3% vs. 85.2%) or postoperative complication rate (16.7% vs. 14.8%) between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionThe anterior median approach of the elbow joint combined with the lateral approach and the medial and lateral elbow approach for the treatment of terrible triad of the elbow are equivalent to the postoperative elbow function recovery. The operation time of the former is shorter than that of the latter, and the anterior approach reveals the coronal process intuitively and sufficiently. In the case that there is no medial ligament injury, the anterior median approach of the elbow joint combined with the lateral approach can be preferred.
