ObjectiveTo re-evaluate the systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MAs) of the efficacy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement. MethodsThe CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were electronically searched to collect SR/MAs of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement from inception to April 28, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and then assessed the quality of reports, methodological quality, risk of bias, and the strength of evidence quality by using PRISMA, AMSTAR-Ⅱ, ROBIS, and GRADE tool. ResultsA total of 20 SR/MAs were included. The results of the included studies showed that robot-assisted pedicle screw placement was more accurate and had a lower number of complications compared with freehand pedicle screw placement. The quality of reports, methodology, and evidence for pedicle screw placement efficiency in all SR/MAs were low or extremely low, with a high risk of bias. The main reasons included high heterogeneity of included studies, unclear research methods and selection criteria, and missing key reporting processes. ConclusionRobot-assisted pedicle screw placement may have better clinical efficiency than traditional freehand pedicle screw placement. But the quality of relational SR/MAs is low.
Objective To ascertain whether augmentation pedicle screw fixation with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) can enhance the stability of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures of osteoporotic spine. Methods Six fresh frozen female osteoporotic spines (T10-L5) were harvested and an anterior and posterior columnunstable model of L1 was made. Each specimen was fixated with plate and the stability test were performed by flexion, extension, axial rotation and lateral bending. The test of fatigue was done with MTS 858.The tests were repeated after screws were augmented with PMMA. To compare the biomechanical stability of 6 different conditions:○anormal specimens(control), ○bdefectmodel fixed with plate, not augmented and not fatigued, ○cafter fatigued, not augmented, ○dscrews augmented with PMMA, not fatigued, ○e after augmented and fatigued. ResultsIn ○b,○d and ○e conditions, the ranges of motion(ROM) were 6.23±1.56，4.49±1.00，4.46±1.83 inflexion and 6.60±1.80，4.41±0.82，4.46±1.83 in extension. There was no significant difference (Pgt;0.05), they were significantly smaller than those in ○a and ○c conditions (8.75±1.88，1.47±2.25 and 8.92±2.97，12.24±3.08) (Plt;0.01).Conclusion The results demonstrated that augmentation pedicle screws fixation with PMMA can increase the stability of osteoporotic spine.
Objective
To review the progress of the pedicle screw augmentation technique by bone cement.
Methods
Recent literature about the pedicle screw augmentation technique by bone cement was reviewed and analysed. The characters were summarized.
Results
Pedicle augmentation technique includes the augmentation of ordinary solid pedicle screw and hollow pedicle screw. Both types could increase the fixation strength and gain satisfactory clinical results. Bone cement leakage had a certain incidence rate, but most of cases were asymptom.
Conclusion
Bone cement augmentation of pedicle screw is an effective and safe internal fixation for poor bone condition.
Objective
To evaluate the effectiveness of posterior unilateral pedicle screw fixation plus lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of degenerative lumbar instability.
Methods
Between February 2008 and December 2011, 33 patients with degenerative lumbar instability were treated with posterior unilateral pedicle screw fixation plus lumbar interbody fusion, including 14 cases of lumbar disc protrusion with instability, 15 cases of lumbar spinal stenosis with instability, 3 recurrent cases of lumbar disc protrusion at 1 year after discectomy, and 1 case of extreme lateral lumbar disc protrusion. There were 20 males and 13 females with an average age of 47.2 years (range, 39-75 years). The average disease duration was 12.8 months (range, 6-25 months). Single-segment-fixation was performed in 28 cases (L4, 5 in 21 cases, L5, S1 in 6 cases, and L5, 6 in 1 case), and double-segment-fixation was performed in 5 cases (L3, 4 and L4, 5). The clinical results were evaluated by using Oswestry disability index (ODI) and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for low back pain.
Results
Infection occurred in 1 case, and was cured after dressing change; primary healing was obtained in the other patients. Thirty-one patients were followed up 32.3 months on average (range, 15-53 months). Cage displacement occurred in 1 case who received bilateral pedicle screw fixation plus lumbar interbody fusion; no screw breaking, Cage displacement, or pseudoarthrosis was observed in the others. X-ray films showed bone fusion in the other patients except 1 case of bone fusion failure. ODI and JOA score at last follow-up were significantly improved when compared with the ones before operation and at 2 weeks after operation (P lt; 0.05); the improvement rates were 74.0% ± 10.1% and 83.6% ± 9.4%, respectively.
Conclusion
Posterior unilateral pedicle screw fixation plus lumbar interbody fusion is an effective and reliable method for patients with degenerative lumbar instability because it has the advantages of simple operation and less trauma.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness of posterior unilateral transpedicular debridement, bone graft fusion, and pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar tuberculosis.
MethodsBetween January 2009 and January 2013, 97 patients with thoracolumbar tuberculosis were treated with posterior unilateral transpedicular debridement, bone graft fusion, and pedicle screw fixation in 53 cases (group A), and with traditional posterior operation in 44 cases (group B). There was no significant difference in age, sex, disease duration, affected segments, Frankel grade, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), sagittal Cobb angle, visual analogue scale (VAS), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) between 2 groups (P>0.05). The surgery and follow-up results were compared between 2 groups.
ResultsThe patients were followed up 24-60 months. All patients achieved intervertebral bone fusion after operation. The bone graft fusion time of groups A and B was (6.79±1.68) months and (6.89±2.00) months respectively, showing no significant difference (t=-0.251, P=0.802). There was no significant difference in operation time, intraoperation blood loss, and postoperative hospitalization time between 2 groups (P>0.05); the postoperative drainage volume of group A was significantly less than that of group B (P<0.05). The CRP and ESR at 1 year and the VAS score at last follow-up were significantly decreased when compared with preoperative values in 2 groups (P<0.05), but no significant difference was found between 2 groups (P>0.05). The Cobb angle at 1 week and at last follow-up and ODI at 3 months and at last followup were significantly improved in 2 groups (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the time points after operation (P>0.05). At 3 months after operation, the ODI of group A was significantly lower than that of group B (t=-2.185, P=0.027), but no significant difference was found in Cobb angle, Cobb angle loss, and ODI at other time points between 2 groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, the Frankel classification of nerve function was improved 1-2 grades in 2 groups, showing no significant difference between 2 groups (Z=-0.180, P=0.857). No complication of internal fixation breakage or loosening was observed.
ConclusionThe effectiveness of posterior unilateral transpedicular debridement, bone graft fusion, and pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar tuberculosis is satisfactory, with the advantages of less trauma, strong spinal stability, and fast function recovery.
Objective To investigate the effectiveness of computer-assisted and robot-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation for the treatment of reversible atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). MethodsThe clinical data of 42 patients with reversible AAD admitted between January 2020 and June 2023 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed, of whom 23 patients were treated with computer-assisted surgery (computer group) and 19 patients were treated with Mazor X spinal robot-assisted surgery (robot group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, T value of bone mineral density, body mass index, etiology, and preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Dysfunction Index (NDI) between the two groups (P>0.05). The operation time, screw implantation time, intraoperative blood loss, hand and wrist radiation exposure, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. Gertzbein classification was used to evaluate the accuracy of screw implantation. JOA score and NDI were used to evaluate the function before operation, at 3 days after operation, and at last follow-up. At last follow-up, the status of screws and bone fusion were observed by neck three-dimensional CT. Results The operation time and hand and wrist radiation exposure of the computer group were significantly longer than those of the robot group (P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the screw implantation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P>0.05). All patients were followed up 11-24 months, with an average of 19.6 months. There was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the accuracy of screw implantation between the two groups (P>0.05). Except for 1 case of incision infection in the computer group, which improved after antibiotic treatment, there was no complication such as nerve and vertebral artery injury, screw loosening, or breakage in the two groups. The JOA score and NDI significantly improved in both groups at 3 days after operation and at last follow-up (P<0.05) compared to those before operation, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). At last follow-up, 21 patients (91.3%) in the computer group and 18 patients (94.7%) in the robot group achieved satisfactory atlantoaxial fusion, and there was no significant difference in the fusion rate between the two groups (P>0.05). ConclusionComputer-assisted or robot-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation is safe and effective, and robotic navigation shortens operation time and reduces radiation exposure.
ObjectiveTo compare the fixation strength of optimum placed pedicle screw (OS) with re-directionally correctly placed pedicle screw (RS) following a violation of lateral pedicle.
MethodsThirty fresh lumbar vertebrae (L1-5) were obtained from 6 pigs weighing 95-105 kg, male or female. Each vertebra was instrumented with a monoaxial pedicle screw into each pedicle using two different techniques. On one side, a perfect screw path was created using direct visualization and fluoroscopy. A pedicle screw of 5 mm in diameter and 35 mm in length was placed with a digital torque driver (OS). On the other side, a lateral pedicle wall violation was created at the pedicle-vertebral body junction with a guide wire, a cannulated tap, and a pedicle probe. This path was then redirected into a correct position, developed, and instrumented with a 5-mm-diameter by 35-mm-long pedicle screw (RS). For each pedicle screw, the maximal torque, seating torque, screw loosening force, and post-loosening axial pullout were measured. Screw loosening and axial pullout were assessed using an MTS machine.
ResultsMaximal insertion torque was (111.4±8.2) N·cm and (78.9±6.4) N·cm for OS and RS respectively, showing significant difference (Z=3.038, P=0.002). The seating torque was (86.3±7.7) N·cm and (59.7±5.3) N·cm for OS and RS respectively, showing significant difference (Z=2.802, P=0.005). The screw loosening force was (76.3±6.2) N and (53.0±5.8) N for OS and RS respectively, showing significant difference (Z=2.861, P=0.004). The post-loosening axial pullout force was (343.0±12.6) N and (287.0±10.5) N for OS and RS respectively, showing significant difference (Z=2.964, P=0.003).
ConclusionCompared with OS, RS placement after a lateral wall violation shows significantly decreased maximal insertion torque, seating torque, screw loosening force, and post-loosening axial pullout. On this occasion, RS augmentation is a probable option for remediation.
Objective To explore some operative problems of correcting paralytic scoliosis(PS) by using vertebral pedicle screwsrods system. Methods From May 2000 to May 2005, 18 patients with PS were corrected by screwsrods system which were made of titanium alloy.There were 10 males and 8 females, aging from 11 to 26 years. The primary disease included poliomyelitis in 13 patients and myelodysplasia (MS) in 5 patients (2 cases for second correction) with scoliosis of an average 85° Cobb angle (55-125°). The pelvic obliquity was found in all patients with an average 24° angle (355°).Of the 18 patients,3 cases were given perioperative halo-pelvic traction, 2 cases were given vertebral wedge osteotomy and correction and fixation, the other patients were purely underwent the treatment of pedicle screwrods system implants. Fusion segment at operation ranged from 6 to 15 sections, applied screws the most was 16,the fewest was 6. Results There were no wound infections and neurologic complications, all wounds healed by the first intention. Allscoliosis obtained obvious correction (P＜0.001), the correction rate averaged 52.95% (44%-81%); the majority of lumbar kyphosis and pelvic obliquity were apparently corrected. The average clinical follow-up (16 cases) was 21 months(6-36 months),there was no implants failure. One patient with MS had a worse Cobb magnitude, the other patients had no curve progression (P＞0.05). Conclusion The use of vertebral pedicle screwsrods fixation to multiple vertebral bodys and short segment fusion for PS, the treatment method is reliable and the outcome is satisfactory. While performing the correcting operative procedures, the spinal, pelvic and lower extremity deformities and functions should be all considered as a whole.
