Objective To evaluate whether jejunal interposition pouch (JIP) reconstruction is an ideal procedure of digestive tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy. Methods Ninetyfour patients after total gastrectomy had randomly divided into two groups, JIP group 42 cases and RouxenY pouch (RYP) group 52 cases. The gastrointestinal function improvement in body weight and nutritional parameters (serum albumin, hemoglobin level, and serum protein) were compared 1 year after surgery for the two groups. Results The nutritional condition of JIP group and RYP group after operation had improved (P＜0.01); and the condition of JIP group with fewer symptom problems demonstrated much more better than standard RYP group （P＜0.01）. Conclusion JIP that could obtain partly compensatory function after total gastrectomy is an ideal reconstruction.
Objective To assess the influence of different digestive tract reconstruction on the blood glucose of gastric antral cancer patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods The clinical data of 51 cases of gastric antral cancer with type 2 diabetes treated radical surgery in this hospital from January 2006 to January 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were divided into three groups according to the different digestive tract reconstruction methods：BillrothⅠ anastomosis group （n=14）， BillrothⅡ anastomosis group （n=28）， and Roux-en-Y anastomosis group （n=9）. The indexes were analyzed and compared among three groups：① The levels of fast blood glucose （FBG） and 2h postprandial blood glucose （PG2h） were detected before operation and on 1 month and 6 months after the operation；② The level of glycated hemoglobin （HbA1c） was detected before operation and 6 months after the operation；③ The diabetes control was observed. Results The FBG and PG2h levels in the BillrothⅠ anastomosis group detected on 1 month and 6 months after the operation were not statistically different from those detected before the operation （P＞0.05）. The FBG and PG2h levels in the BillrothⅡanastomosis group and Roux-en-Y anastomosis group detected on 1 month and 6 months after the operation were significantly lower than those before the operation respectively （P＜0.05）. The FBG and PG2h levels in the BillrothⅡ anastomosis group detected on 1 month and 6 months after the operation were not statistically different from those in the Roux-en-Y anastomosis group respectively （P＞0.05）， but which were markedly lower than those in the BillrothⅠ anastomosis group， the differences were statistically significant （P＜0.05）. The HbA1c levels in the BillrothⅠ anastomosis group detected before the operation and on 6 months after the operation were not statistically different from each other （P＞0.05）. The HbA1c levels in the BillrothⅡ anastomosis group and Roux-en-Y anastomosis group detected on 6 months after the operation were markedly lower than those before the operation and the difference was statistically significant （P＜0.05）. On 6 months after the operation， the HbA1c levels in the BillrothⅡanastomosis group and Roux-en-Y anastomosis group were markedly lower than those in the BillrothⅠ anastomosis group and the differences were statistically significant （P＜0.05）；the HbA1c level was not statistically different between the BillrothⅡ anastomosis group and the Roux-en-Y anastomosis group （P＞0.05）. The total curative effects in the BillrothⅡ anastomosis and Roux-en-Y anastomosis groups were significantly better than those in the BillrothⅠ anastomosis group （P＜0.05）. Conclusion According to our limited clinical data， BillrothⅡ anastomosis and Roux-en-Y anastomosis for gastric antral cancer patients with type 2 diabetes may be the best surgical approach.
Objective To summarize the research progress of digestive tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer. Methods The domestic and international published literatures about digestive tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer were retrieved and reviewed. Results More and more attention had been paid to the postoperative quality of life after total gastrectomy in gastric cancer， and the most related factor for postoperative quality of life was the type of digestive tract reconstruction. The pouch reconstruction and preservation of enteric myoneural continuity showed beneficial effects on clinical outcomes. Current opinion considered the pouch reconstruction might be safe and effective， and was able to improve the postoperative quality of life of patients with gastric cancer. However， the preservation of duodenal pathway didn’t show significant benefits. Conclusion The optimal digestive tract reconstruction after total gastrectomy is still debating， in order to resolve the controversies， needs more in-depth fundamental researches and more high-quality randomized controlled trials.
ObjectiveTo investigate the ideal digestive tract reconstruction method for radical distal gastrectomy (DG).
MethodsClinical and follow-up data of 862 patients with gastric cancer who underwent DG in Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases of The Fourth Military Medical University from January 2010 to January 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. According to reconstruction methods, patients were divided into three groups:Billroth Ⅰ group (B-Ⅰgroup), Billroth Ⅱ (B-Ⅱ)+Braun group (B-Ⅱ+Braun group), and Roux-en-Y group. In order to reduce the difference of clinicopa-thological characteristics, Gmatch method was used to select patients basing on gender, age (±5 years), tumor size (±1 cm), pT staging, and pN staging. The perioperative data, recent (30 days after surgery) complications, gastroscopic results over one year, and postoperative survival rate were compared respectively among the 3 groups.
Results① Perioperative indexes. The operative time, postoperative hospitalization, and semi liquid diet time were significantly different among 3 groups (P < 0.050). As compared with B-Ⅱ+Braun group and Roux-en-Y group, B-Ⅰ group had a significantly shorter operative time (P < 0.012 5), and there was no significant difference between B-Ⅱ+Braun group and Roux-en-Y group (P > 0.012 5). As compared with B-Ⅱ+Braun group, B-Ⅰ group had a significantly shorter semi liquid diet time (P < 0.012 5), but there was no significant difference between B-Ⅱ+Braun group and Roux-en-Y group, as well as Roux-en-Y group and B-Ⅰ group (P > 0.012 5). As compared with B-Ⅰ group and B-Ⅱ+Braun group, Roux-en-Y group had a significantly longer postoperative hospitalization (P < 0.012 5), and there was no significant difference between B-Ⅰ group and B-Ⅱ+ Braun group (P > 0.012 5). ② There was no significant difference in recent complications between Roux-en-Y group (12.5%, 4/32), B-Ⅱ+Braun (6.2%, 2/32), and B-Ⅰ group (3.1%, 1/32), P=0.495. ③ Results of endoscopic examination over 1 year after radical DG showed that there was significant difference among 3 groups (P < 0.050). Compared with B-Ⅰ group and B-Ⅱ+Braun group, the rates of reflux gastritis, bile reflux, and reflux esophagitis of Roux-en-Y group were all lower (P < 0.012 5), but there was no significant difference between B-Ⅰ group and B-Ⅱ+Braun group (P > 0.012 5).④ The 3-year survival rates of Roux-en-Y group, B-Ⅱ+Braun group, and B-Ⅰ group were 70.0% (21/30), 73.3% (22/30), and 75.0% (24/32) respectively, and there was no significant difference in the survival situation (P=0.911).
ConclusionsThe effect of Rouxen-Y anastomosis on resisting gastrointestinal reflux is remarkable. B-Ⅰanastomosis has the advantages of more simple operation, faster recovery, and more similar to the physiological structure. Thus, B-Ⅰ anastomosis and Roux-en-Y anastomosis are recommended for digestive tract reconstruction in DG.
Objective To explore the optimal technique for digestive tract reconstruction of proximal gastrectomy. Methods Fifty-nine patients who underwent proximal subtotal gastrectomy during June 2004 and January 2007 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were divided into 2 groups according to the styles of reconstruction: one group with gastroesophagostomy (GE group) and the other with accommodation double tract digestive reconstruction of jejunal interposition (GIE group). The reconstruction of GIE group was to interposite a continuous 35 cm jejunum between the gastric stump and the oesophagus, which detail had been reported in our previous literature. The quality of life in 2 groups were evaluated and compared. Results No patient died and there was no anastomotic leakage, dumping syndrome and moderate or severe anemia occurred during perioperative period. There was no significant difference of the following indexes of nutrition between 2 groups 1 month and 6 months after operation: the value of weight, RBC, Hb, Alb, PNI and the indexes versus the preoperative ones (Pgt;0.05), for the exception of the indexes of RBC (P=0.006), Hb (P=0.001) in 1 month after operation versus the preoperative ones. The abdominal and the reflux esophagitis symptoms in GIE group were milder than those in GE group (Plt;0.001). The Visick scoring: most of the GIE group were gradeⅡ (74.2%), and grade Ⅲ (64.3%) in the GE group. There was no delay of the first time of adjuvant chemotherapy in GIE group (Pgt;0.05), and the surgical time was (0.35±0.13) h more than that of GE group (P=0.01). Conclusion The accommodation double tract digestive reconstruction of jejunal interposition for proximal subtotal gastrectomy may be safe and feasible by decreasing residual cancer cells and improving the quality of life of patients with proximal gastric carcinoma who underwent such surgical procedure.
Objective
To summarize recent progress of three types of basic digestive tract reconstruction methods after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.
Methods
Recent domestic and international literatures about three types of basic digestive tract reconstruction methods after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer were collected and analyzed.
Results
Of the three types of basic digestive tract reconstruction methods, BillrothⅠanastomosis had the most obvious advantage compared to BillrothⅡanastomosis and Roux-en Y anastomosis, but it was limited by tumor' size. The performance of BillrothⅡanastomosis was relatively easier but its complication risk was higher. Roux-en-Y anastomosis was superior in body weight control and treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and had a wider indication than the other two types of methods. The modified uncut Roux-en-Y anastomosis was easier to perform under laparoscopic surgery.
Conclusions
Each method of the three types of basic digestive tract reconstruction methods after distal gastrectomy has its own superiority and indication. Therefore, the choice of digestive tract reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy should be case by case.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of Roux-en-Y reconstruction with isolated pancreatico-jejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
MethodsSystematically literature search was performed through PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, VIP, and CNKI from the earliest to November 30, 2015. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) comparing outcomes of Roux-en-Y reconstruction with isolated pancrea-ticojejunostomy and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy were searched. The data were applied meta-analysis by RevMan 5.3.
ResultsSeven trials were involved, two RCTs including 367 patients and five CCTs including 431 patients. Meta-analysis result showed that there was no statistic significant difference in pancreas fistula between Roux-en-Y reconstruction with isolated pancreaticojejunostomy and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy.
ConclusionRoux-en-Y reconstruction with isolated pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy is not superior to conventional pancreaticojejunostomy regarding pancreatic fistula rate or other relevant outcomes.
