Mitral regurgitation (MR) is one of the most common valvular heart diseases, imposing a significant economic burden on society. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR), as an emerging therapeutic strategy for MR, is expected to fill the gap in the treatment of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in the future. This article reviews the progress of TMVR clinical research both domestically and internationally in the past two years and analyzes the current challenges faced by TMVR research, such as mitral valve anatomy, device access transition, valve design, and mitral valve calcification. Finally, the prospects of mitral valve product research are discussed.
Objective To review the methods of metacarpal and phalange lengthening and to point out the problems at present as well as to predict the trend of development in the field. Methods Domestic and abroad l iterature concerning the methods of metacarpal and phalange lengthening in recent years was reviewed extensively and thoroughly analyzed. Results At present, there are many methods to treat the short finger disabil ity, but the methods of metacarpal and phalange lengthening have an advantage, which include closed osteotomy lengthening, callus-lengthening, and modified Il izarovmethod. Each surgical method has its advantages and l imitations. However, the part of osteotomy, the length and speed, and the postoperative compl ications etc. have been disputed. Conclusion The modified Il izarov method has the advantages of simple operation, minimal invasion, and less compl ications, but the long-term results of each treatment method are unknown and need more further studies.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (Apixaban, Rivaroxaban, or Dabigatran) after joint replacement.MethodsCNKI, WanFang Data, VIP, CBM, PubMed, EMbase and The Cochrane Library databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on new oral anticoagulants after joint replacement from inception to October, 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed risk of bias of included studies, and then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 13 RCTs were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that compared to Enoxaparin, the new oral anticoagulant significantly reduced the incidence of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (RR=0.60, 95%CI 0.46 to 0.78, P<0.000 1) and symptomatic DVT (RR=0.40, 95%CI 0.28 to 0.58, P<0.000 1), while the incidence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE) during treatment (RR=0.91, 95%CI 0.59 to 1.39, P=0.65) and mortality (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.40 to 1.76, P=0.99) were not reduced. Major bleeding (RR=1.05, 95%CI 0.81 to 1.35, P=0.72) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding events (RR=0.99, 95%CI 0.73 to 1.33, P=0.94) with new oral anticoagulants were not statistically different from Enoxaparin.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that new oral anticoagulants can effectively reduce the incidence of DVT in patients after joint replacement without increasing the risk of adverse events such as bleeding. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify the above conclusions.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of gefitinib versus pemetrexed as second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
MethodsDatabases including PubMed, The Cochrane Library (Issue 4, 2016), EMbase, CNKI, VIP and WanFang Data were searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about gefitinib versus pemetrexed as second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC from inception to April 2016. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies. Then meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.
ResultsA total of 11 RCTs involving 1 005 patients were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: the rate of progression free survival (PFS) in the gefitinib group was superior to the pemetrexed group (HR=0.59, 95%CI 0.47 to 0.73, P<0.000 01). However, there were no significant differences between two groups in overall response rate (RR=1.28, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.90, P=0.22), disease control rate (RR=0.92, 95%CI 0.77 to 1.12, P=0.41) and the rate of overall survival (HR=0.75, 95%CI 0.56 to 1.01, P=0.05). The incidences of skin rash (RR=8.72, 95% CI 3.65 to 20.84, P<0.000 01) and diarrhea (RR=2.87, 95% CI 1.29 to 6.38, P=0.01) were significantly higher, but the incidences of neutropenia (RR=0.12, 95%CI 0.05 to 0.26, P<0.000 01) and fatigue (RR=0.46, 95%CI 0.30 to 0.72, P=0.000 6) were lower in the gefitinib group than those in the pemetrexed group.
ConclusionGefitinib shows more superiority to pemetrexed, and it can be used as the second-line drug for advanced NSCLC． Due to the limited quality and quantity of included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
An 82-year-old male was hospitalized complaining of dyspnea for 1 year and aggravating for 2 weeks. He had been treated in other hospitals for several times due to such situation and his symptom could be relieved by diuretics. After admission, he was diagnosed as severe aortic stenosis with extremely low left ventricular contractile function; transthoracic echocardiography showed a left ventricular ejection fraction of only 16.1%. He was classified as a typical case of severe aortic stenosis with “low transaortic velocity and low transaortic gradient” since the transaortic velocity being 2.36 m/s and transaortic gradient being 22/14 mm Hg (1 mm Hg=0.133 kPa). Dobutamine-stress echocardiography suggested that the patient’s left ventricular reserve function was extremely poor and the potential benefits of valvular surgery were finite as the former data being 2.59 m/s and 27/16 mm Hg respectively. In consideration of progressive exacerbation of the patient’s symptoms, we eventually conducted transcatheter aortic valve replacement surgery with the support of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. His symptoms such as dyspnea disappeared after the surgery and clinical parameters had also got a significant improvement.
ObjectiveTo develop and validate a Nomogram for predicting severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing immunotherapy based on clinical features and inflammatory indicators. MethodsA total of 423 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with immunotherapy between January 2023 and January 2025 at Tianjin Fourth Center Hospital and Tianjin Cancer Hospital Airport Hospital were enrolled. Patients were divided into a severe irAEs group (≥grade 3, n=76) and a non-severe irAEs group (n=347), then randomly allocated into training and validation cohorts (7:3 ratio) . Clinical data, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and interleukin-6/C-reactive protein (IL-6/CRP) levels were collected. Independent risk factors for severe irAEs during immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC were identified through logistic regression analysis, and a nomogram model was constructed accordingly. The discriminative ability, accuracy, and clinical utility of the model were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). ResultsAmong the 423 included patients [274 males, 149 females, aged 44-78 (60.77±5.91) years], the overall incidence of irAEs was 57.92% (245/423), with severe irAEs occurring in 17.97% (76/423). Multivariate analysis revealed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score ≥2, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression [tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50%], combination therapy regimen, low NLR values, and high IL-6/CRP ratio were independent risk factors for severe irAEs during immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC (P<0.05). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.948 [95%CI (0.912, 0.985)] in the training cohort and 0.946 [95%CI (0.917, 0.976)] in the validation cohort. Calibration curves and DCA demonstrated good consistency and clinical net benefit of the model. ConclusionThe nomogram integrating clinical features and inflammatory markers effectively predicts the risk of severe irAEs in advanced NSCLC patients receiving immunotherapy, exhibiting excellent discrimination, calibration, and clinical practicality.
