Objective To investigate the relationship between graded spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury and somatosensory evoked potentials(SEP),neurologic function score（NFS）and the histopathological changes of spinal cord. Methods Forty rabbits were randomized and equally divided into 4 groups: shamoperation group, ischemia for 30min, 45min and 60min groups. The spinal cord ischemiareperfusion injury model was created by occlusion of the abdominal aorta in rabbits. SEP was monitored before ischemia,5,10minutes after ischemia, 15, 30 minutes, 1,2, 24 and 48 hours after reperfusion. NFS was evaluated at 6,12,24 and 48 hours after reperfusion.The pathological changes of spinal cord were observed after reperfusion 48 hours. Results The pathological characters with mild,moderate and severe spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury could be simulated by declamping after 30， 45 and 60 minutes infrarenal aorta crossclamping. SEP amplitude returned to normal after reperfusion 15 minutes（Pgt;0.05）and SEP latency returned to normal after reperfusion 30 minutes（Pgt;0.05）during mild spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury.SEP amplitude returned to normal after reperfusion 30 minutes（Pgt;0.05）and SEP latency returned to normal after reperfusion 60 minutes（Pgt;0.05）during moderate spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury. SEP latency increased and SEP amplitude decreased during severe spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury,compared with other groups, there were significant differences in SEP latency and SEP amplitude by clamping the infrarenal aorta for 60min（Plt;0.01）. With graded spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury, compared with shamoperation group, spinal cord ischemiareperfusion groups had significant differences in NFS（Plt;0.01）. Conclusion SEP is much quicker in the recovery of amplitude than latency during spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion. SEP is a sensitive and accurate index for spinal cord function during ischemia/reperfusion injury. SEP monitoring spinal cord ischemia/reperfusion injury during operation provides experimental basis for clinical application.
Objective To observe the effects of epidural anaesthesia (EA) and general anaesthesia (GA) on the changes of plasma epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods Thirty patients undergoing elective LC were randomly divided into GA group (n＝15) and EA group (n＝15). The concentrations of plasma NE and E were measured at the following phases: before anaesthesia, before introducing pneumoperitoneum, during pneumoperitoneum, and at the end of operation. Results In EA group, the concentrations of NE weren′t significantly different at each phase, the concentrations of E significantly increased before and during pneumoperitoneum (Ｐ＜0.05) and returned to the baseline at the end of operation (Ｐ＞0.05). In GA group, the concentrations of NE and E didn′t change significantly before pneumoperitoneum, but increased during pneumoperitoneum (Ｐ＜0.05) and E didn′t return to the baseline at the end of operation (Ｐ＜0.05). The E concentrations of EA group was higher than that of GA group before pneumoperitoneum, but the NE concentration of EA group was lower than that of GA group during pneumoperitoneum (Ｐ＜0.05). Conclusion Both groups has significant stress reaction, but the stress reaction of EA group is weaker than that of GA group during LC.
To investigate the protective effect of propofol on ischemia/reperfusion induced spinal cord injury in rabbits and its influence on excitatory amino acid (EAA). Methods Sixty New Zealand white rabbits weighing 2.0-2.5 kg, half males and half females, were selected. The infrarenal circumaortic clamping model was used. And 6 mL/kg different fluids were continuously infused through a catheter into the aorta distal to the clamping site at a speed of 12 mL/(kg?h) during the 30 minutes ischemia period. According to the different infusing l iquids, the rabbits were randomized into 6 groups(n=10 per group): group A, normal sal ine; group B, 10% intral ipid; group C, propofol 30 mg/kg; group D, propofol 40 mg/kg; group E, propofol 50 mg/kg; group F, propofol 60 mg/kg. At 0, 6, 24, and 48 hours after reperfusion, neurologic outcomes were scored on a Tarlov scale system. At 48 hours after reperfusion, the number of normal neurons in the anterior spinal cord was counted, and concentration of EAA in the lumbar spinal cord was measured by high performance l iquid chromatography. Results The neuroethological score was better in groups C, D, E and F than that of groups A and B (P lt; 0.05), the score of group E was the highest (P lt; 0.05), and there was no significant difference between group A and group B (P gt; 0.05). The number of normal neurons in the anterior spinal cord of groups C, D, E and F was greater than that of groups A and B (P lt; 0.05), and group E was greater than groups C, D and F (P lt; 0.05). The concentration of EAA in groups A, B, C, D, E and F was greater than that of normal tissue, the group E was the lowest (P lt; 0.05), the groups A and B were the highest (P lt; 0.05), and there was no significant difference between group A and group B (P gt; 0.05). Concentrations of glutamate and aspartic acid were negatively correlated to normal neuron numbers in the anterior spinal cord and neuroethological scores 48 hours after reperfusion, and the corresponding correlation coefficient was — 0.613, — 0.536, — 0.874 and — 0.813, respectively (P lt; 0.01). Conclusion Propofol can significantly inhibit the accumulation of EAA in spinal cord and provide a protective effect against the ischemia/reperfusion injury induced spinal cord in rabbits.
