Commissural misalignment of biological valve and autologous valve during transcatheter aortic valve replacement may affect the filling of coronary artery, reduce the feasibility of redo-aortic valve intervention and damage the valve function, which will adversely affect long-term prognosis of patients. Some studies have obtained achievement by changing the axial direction of valve and using individualized computer simulation technology to improve the alignment technology. However, there are still many unknown problems about the impact of commissural misalignment on patients, and accurate commissural alignment techniques still need to be further explored. This article systematically expounds the possible impact of commissural misalignment between biological valve and autologous valve in transcatheter aortic valve replacement, possibly effective accurate commissural alignment techniques and related research progress.
Objective To summarize the short-term results of valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve implantation (ViV-TAVI) in the treatment of bioprosthetic valve failure after aortic valve replacement. Methods We reviewed the clinical data of patients who underwent ViV-TAVI from 2021 to 2022 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University. The valve function was evaluated by echocardiography before operation, immediately after operation and 3 months after operation. The all-cause death and main complications during hospitalization were analyzed. Results A total of 13 patients were enrolled, including 8 males and 5 females with a mean age of (65.9±8.5) years, and the interval time between aortic valve replacement and ViV-TAVI was (8.5±3.4) years. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons mortality risk score was 10.3%±3.2%. None of the 13 patients had abnormal valve function after operation. The mean transvalvular pressure gradient of aortic valve was decreased (P<0.001), the peak flow velocity of aortic valve was decreased (P<0.001), and the left ventricular ejection fraction was not changed significantly (P=0.480). There were slight perivalvular leakage in 2 patients and slight valve regurgitation in 3 patients. Three months after operation, the mean transvalvular pressure difference and peak flow velocity of aortic valve in 12 patients were significantly decreased compared with those before operation (P≤0.001). Conclusion This study demonstrates that ViV-TAVI for the treatment of bioprosthetic valve failure after aortic valve replacement is associated with favorable clinical and functional cardiovascular benefits, the short-term results are satisfactory.
ObjectiveTo investigate the influence of mechanical and biological valves on clinical benefits of elderly patients with valvular heart disease.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 280 elderly patients with valvular heart disease treated by valve replacement between 2008 and 2014 year. The patients were divided into two groups by tendency score matching including a group A with biological valves and a group B with mechanical valves. Finally, there were 96 patients in each group. There were 43 males and 53 females at age of 64.41±6.52 years in the group A, 44 males and 52 females at age of 64.07±6.20 years in the group B.ResultsThe bleeding rate of skin and mucosa of the group B was significantly higher than that of the group A (P<0.05). There was no statistical difference in mortality within 30 days after operation, all-cause mortality, re-hospitalization rate, re-valve replacement rate, combined atrial flutter/atrial fibrillation ratio, drug use, incidence of cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, new peripheral vascular embolism and visceral hemorrhage, heart function (NYHA) classification, the cumulative survival rate of all the patients during follow-up (P=0.63), or the cumulative survival rate of the patients with no thrombus/hemorrhage (P=0.75) between the two groups (P>0.05).ConclusionMechanical valve replacement and bioprosthetic valve replacement in the treatment of valvular heart disease in the elderly can achieve similar clinical benefits and both have clinical application value.
Heart valve replacement is the major surgical treatment of severe valvular diseases. Due to the durability and reoperation-free, mechanical valves are widely used. Bioprosthesis valves became popular recently because of long service life and no demand for lifelong anticoagulation. However, how to choose the appropriate prosthetic heart valves, especially the application of bioprosthesis valves for patients at 55 to 65 years is still a major problem. This review focuses on more effective and scientific basis for rational choice of mechanical and bioprosthesis valve.
Objective To investigate the biological and biomechanical characteristics of acellular porcine aortic valve with dye mediated photo oxidation so that a new and better bioprosthetic valve materials can be obtained. Methods Thirty porcine aortic valves were divided into three groups with random number table. Acellular valves (n=10) were stabilized by dye mediated photo oxidation in dye mediated photo oxidation group; acellular valves (n=10) were stabilized by glutaraldehyde in glutaraldehyde group; and acellular valves (n=10) were acellularized only in acellular valves group. Thickness, appearance, histology, water content, shrinkage temperature, breaking strength and soluble protein level of acellular porcine aortic in three groups were tested respectively. Results There were light blue, soft, flexible and unshrinking valves in dye mediated photo oxidation group. Compared to valves in glutaraldehyde group, valves in dye mediated photo oxidation group had lighter thickness（0.26±0.09mm vs. 0.38±0.08mm，Plt;0.05）, more water content（86.30%±4.03% vs. 71.10%±3.23%，Plt;0.05）, and lower shrinkage temperature （76.30±0.70℃ vs. 87.70±0.30℃，Plt;0.05）; while these indexes had no statistically significant differences compared to those in acellular valves group. At the same time, compared to valves in acellular valves group, valves in dye mediated photo oxidation group had more breaking strength（17.33±2.65 mPa vs. 9.11±0.95 mPa，Plt;0.05） and lower soluble protein level（0.039%±0.013% vs. 0.107%±0.024%，Plt;0.05）; while these indexes had no statistically significant differences compared to those in glutaraldehyde group. Conclusion Acellular porcine aortic valve stabilized by dye mediated photo oxidation has nice biological and biomechanical characteristics.
Along with the coming of aged society, the prevalence of heart valvular disease is significantly increasing, and the use of bioprosthetic valves for treating patients with severe valve disease has increased over the last two decades. As a consequence, a growing number of patients with surgical bioprosthesis degeneration is predicted in the near future. In this setting, valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic/mitral valve replacement (TAVR/TMVR) has emerged as an alternative to redo surgery. A deep knowledge of the mechanism and features of the failed bioprosthetic heart valve is pivotal to plan an adequate procedure. Multimodal imaging is fundamental in the diagnostic and pre-procedural phases. The immediate and mid-term clinical and hemodynamic results have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of ViV techniques, but the development of these techniques faces several specific challenges, such as coronary obstruction, potential post-procedural mismatch and leaflet thrombosis. This article reviews the current status and prospects of ViV-TAVR technology in the treatment for biological valve degeneration, and suggests that ViV-TAVR should be promoted and implemented in existing medical centers with good surgical aortic valve replacement experience, so as to provide better treatment for patients.
Objective To analyze the medium-and long-term r esults of tricuspid valve replacement(TVR), to summarize the experience in opera tive therapy for tricuspid valve disease. Methods From January 1998 to May 2006, sixty seven patients had undergone TVR. The etiology was rheumatic disease in 25 cases, congenital disease in 37 cases, degenerative disease in 1 case, infective endocarditis in 3 cases, a nd cardiac tumor in 1 case. All operations were performed under general anesthes i a and by cardiopulmonary bypass. Bioprostheses was replaced in 28 patients, whil e mechanical valve was replaced in 39 patients. Associated procedure included mi tral valve replacement in 13 cases, mitral valve replacement and aortic valve replac ement in 12 cases, repair of ventricular septal defect in 1 case, repair of atri al septal defect in 1 case, and radioablation of atrial fibrillation in 3 case s. Results The operative mortality was 11.94% (8/67)，among these patients , 6 cases died of serious heart failure,1 case died of ventricular fibrillation, 1 case died of multi organ failure. During follow-up, 1 patient died of biopro thesis dysfunction 1 year after the operation, 1 patient died of cerebral emboli s m 6 years after the operation. Through statistical analysis, it showed that the mortality of TVR in rheumatic tricuspid valve disease was higher than that in co ngenital tricuspid valve disease ［5.56%（2/36）vs. 24.00% (6/25); χ2=4.425 , P=0.036］; the mortality in second time operation was higher than that in first time operation ［30.00%（3/10）vs. 8.77% (5/57);χ2=3.646，P=0.033 ］; while there was no significant difference in immediate and long-term result s with different choice of bioprosthetic or mechanical valve in TVR (χ2=0.002 , P=0.961). Conclusion Operative an d follow-up mortality is high in the TVR, valve replac ement is the last selection for the treatment of serious tricuspid disease, appr opriate operative technique and perioperative therapy is the key for success o f the operation.
Biological valves can lead to structural valve degeneration (SVD) over time and due to various factors, reducing their durability. SVD patients need to undergo valve replacement surgery again, while traditional open chest surgery can cause significant trauma and patients often give up treatment due to intolerance. Research has shown that as an alternative treatment option for reoperation of thoracic valve replacement surgery, redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement for SVD is safe and effective, but still faces many challenges, including prosthesis-patient mismatch, high cross valve pressure difference, and coronary obstruction. This article aims to review the strategies, clinical research status and progress of redo-transcatheter aortic valve replacement in SVD patients.
