Objective To investigate the most suitable anaesthesia method for the tension-free herniorrhaphy.Methods A total of 422 unilateral inguinal hernia cases from 2002 to 2005 were collected and randomly divided into the local anaesthesia group and epidural anaesthesia group. Observation indices and some relative data, such as operative duration, date of ambulation, date of foodintake, length of hospital stay, operation-correlated complications, anaesthesia complications, usage rate of ancillary drug, satisfactory rate for anesthesia, cost of hospitalization, were included and recorded in the questionnaire, and all the patients who took the tension-free herniorrhaphy were asked to answer it as the follow-up research. Results It was found that the occurrence of postoperative anaesthetic complications, the cost of hospitalization, length of stay of local anaesthesia group were significantly less than those of epidural anaesthesia group, and the date of moving and the date of foodintake were also significantly earlier than those of the other group (P＜0.05). However, there was no significant difference of operative duration, postoperative recovery situation and the satisfactory rate between two groups (P＞0.05).Conclusion The local anaesthesia is suitable for most of the tension-free herniorrhaphy, and it may be used as the conventional anaesthetic method.
Objective To observe the effects of epidural anaesthesia (EA) and general anaesthesia (GA) on the changes of plasma epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Methods Thirty patients undergoing elective LC were randomly divided into GA group (n＝15) and EA group (n＝15). The concentrations of plasma NE and E were measured at the following phases: before anaesthesia, before introducing pneumoperitoneum, during pneumoperitoneum, and at the end of operation. Results In EA group, the concentrations of NE weren′t significantly different at each phase, the concentrations of E significantly increased before and during pneumoperitoneum (Ｐ＜0.05) and returned to the baseline at the end of operation (Ｐ＞0.05). In GA group, the concentrations of NE and E didn′t change significantly before pneumoperitoneum, but increased during pneumoperitoneum (Ｐ＜0.05) and E didn′t return to the baseline at the end of operation (Ｐ＜0.05). The E concentrations of EA group was higher than that of GA group before pneumoperitoneum, but the NE concentration of EA group was lower than that of GA group during pneumoperitoneum (Ｐ＜0.05). Conclusion Both groups has significant stress reaction, but the stress reaction of EA group is weaker than that of GA group during LC.
Objective To evaluate the influence of combined general and epidural anesthesia on the prognosis of patients undergoing cancer surgery. Methods Such database as PubMed, OVID, EBSCO, The Cochrane Library and CNKI were searched, and other relevant journals and references of the included literature were also hand searched from 1986 to 2011. Two evaluators independently screened the studies in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted the data and assessed the methodology quality. RevMan 5.0 software was used for meta-analyses. Results Seven studies involving 2 513 patients were included. The results of meta-analyses showed that compared with the single general anesthesia, the combined general and epidural anesthesia had no significant differences in postoperative recurrence and metastasis rate (OR=0.71, 95%CI 0.44 to 1.17, P=0.18). Based on the following four factors i.e. category of cancer, time of follow-up, having preoperative metastais or not, and patients’ age, the sensitivity analysis showed significant differences in the postoperative recurrence and metastasis rate between the two anesthesia methods were found in the group of patients at or above 64 years old and the group with follow-up equal to or less than two years (OR=1.46, 95%CI 1.00 to 2.14, P=0.05; OR=1.55, 95%CI 1.06 to 2.26, P=0.02; respectively). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the groups of patients with colorectal cancer or without preoperative metastasis (OR=1.00, 95%CI 0.62-1.61, P=0.99; OR=1.26, 95%CI 0.86 to 1.86, P=0.23; respectively). Conclusion Compared with single general anesthesia, the combined general and epidural anesthesia cannot reduce the recurrence and metastasis rate for cancer patients, and has no marked improvement in prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer or without preoperative metastasis, but it obviously decreases the probability of forward recurrence and metastasis for the patients at or above 64 years old and the patients with follow-up equal to or less than two years.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the arthroscopic treatment effectiveness of popliteal cyst excision in combination with debridement of the knee under local anesthesia by comparing with continuous epidural anesthesia.
MethodsBetween June 2002 and January 2013,145 patients with popliteal cyst underwent arthroscopic popliteal cyst excision in combination with debridement of the knee under local anesthesia (local anesthesia group).In addition,51 patients with popliteal cyst were treated with the same surgery under continuous epidural anesthesia between February 2000 and August 2005 served as control group.No significant difference was found in gender,age,side,disease duration,or cyst size between 2 groups (P>0.05).Then,anesthesia time,analgesia effect,anesthesia satisfaction,operation time,bleeding volume,and anesthesia complication were compared between 2 groups.The guidelines of Rauschning and Lindgren were used to assess the effectiveness,and recurrence rate was recorded.
ResultsAll incisions healed primarily,no neurological or vascular injury was found.The patients were followed up 1 year and 1 month to 8 years (mean,3.7 years) in local anesthesia group,and 8 years to 13 years and 7 months (mean,10.8 years) in control group.Local anesthesia group had shorter anesthesia time,higher visual analogue scale (VAS) score,shorter operation time,and lower bleeding volume (P<0.05) than control group.Anesthesia satisfaction was reduced in local anesthesia group,but there was no significant difference (χ2=0.071,P=1.000).The anesthesia complication incidence of control group (15.7%,8/51) was significantly higher than that of local anesthesia group (0) (P=0.000).Recurrence was found in 12 patients of local anesthesia group (curative ratio 91.7%) and in 5 patients of control group (curative ratio 90.2%),showing no significant difference (χ2=0.111,P=0.774).According to the guidelines of Rauschning and Lindgren,there were 131 cases of grade 0,13 cases of grade I,and 1 case of grade Ⅱ in local anesthesia group,and 37 cases of grade 0,12 cases of grade I,and 2 cases of grade Ⅱ in control group; significant differences in grading were shown between at pre- and post-operation in 2 groups (Z=-10.683,P=0.000; Z=-6.385,P=0.000),and between 2 groups at post-operation (Z=-3.145,P=0.002).
ConclusionCompared with under continuous epidural anesthesia,arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cyst excision under local anesthesia can obtain better results.Under local anesthesia,the condition of nerve and vessel can be timely and dynamically observed.Arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cyst excision in combination with debridement of the knee has the advantages of less trauma,lower recurrence rate,and satisfactory results.
【摘要】 目的 評價撫觸對硬膜外麻醉穿刺疼痛的影響及效果。 方法 2009年1-12月，將485例行硬膜外麻醉穿刺患者隨機分為撫觸組（術中行撫觸干預）和對照組（常規護理），觀察兩組患者的穿刺程度、穿刺時間。 結果 撫觸組患者疼痛程度、穿刺時間較對照組有明顯改善，且差異有統計學意義（Plt;0.01）。 結論 撫觸可降低應激引起的硬膜外麻醉穿刺患者的疼痛程度，保持穿刺體位從而縮短穿刺時間，有利于麻醉操作順利進行。【Abstract】 Objective To evaluate the effect of touching on alleviating the pain in patients undergoing epidural anesthesia puncture. Methods A total of 485 patients who underwent epidural puncture from January to December 2009 were randomly divided into two groups: 259 in touching group and 226 in control group. In the touching group, the patients were touched and consoled while undergoing epidural puncture. The pain extent and time of puncture were observed and recorded. Results The level of pain and time of puncture were obviously alleviated and shortened in the touching group and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant. Conclusion Touching could reduce the stress and pain caused by epidural puncture, which may lead to maintain the puncture position and thereby shorten the puncture time. It helps to finish the narcotic operation favorably.
Objective
To compare the effects of epidural anesthesia with intubated anesthesia in the postoperative recovery of patients with thoracoscopic resection of lung bullae.
Methods
Sixty patients (53 males, 7 females, aged 16-65 years) undergoing thoracoscopic resection of unilateral pulmonary bullae in our hospital from December 2014 to December 2015 were randomly divided into two groups: a group A (epidural anesthesia group) received thoracic epidural block combined with intraoperative interthoracic vagus nerve block; a group B (general anesthesia group) received general anesthesia with double lumen endobronchial intubation and pulmonary sequestration. Postoperative anesthesia-related complications and postoperative recovery were recorded.
Results
Both of the two anesthesia methods could meet the requirements of operation. The patients with the vocal cord injury and sore throat in the group B were more than those in the group A. The difference was statistically significant in the incidence of sore throat (P<0.01) . Arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) in the group A was significantly higher than that of group B before lung recruitment (P<0.01). Compared with the group B, the group A had less visual analogue scale (VAS) score (P<0.05), earlier activity and feeding, less postoperative ICU and hospital stay (P<0.01).
Conclusion
Epidural anesthesia combined with intraoperative interthoracic vagus nerve block can meet thoracoscopic bullectomy surgery requirements with few complications and fast postoperative recovery.
Objective To explore anesthetic quality of epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia applied for surgery of rectal cancer. Methods One hundred and seventy-eight patients who were diagnosed as rectal cancer and received operation in the Central Hospital of Bazhong City from June 2010 to June 2012 were included retrospectively. These patients were divided into two groups according to the type of anesthesia， and the patients who received general anesthesia only were defined as group A， the patients who received epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia were defined as group B. The anesthetic quality and anesthetic adverse reaction were observed in two groups. Results The differences of baseline characteristics in two groups were not significant （P＞0.05）. The difference of anesthetic quality in two groups was not significant （P＞0.05）. In terms of anesthetic adverse reaction， the incidence rate of hypertension， hypotension，tachycardia， or postoperative nausea and vomiting of the group B was significantly lower than those of the group A （P＜0.05）. The incidence rate of bradycardia， premature ventricular contractions， or time of gastrointestinal function recovery had no significant differences （P＞0.05）. There was no nerve dysfunction of lower limb in two groups. Conclusion Epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia applied for surgery of rectal cancer as compared with general anesthesia only not only has the same anesthetic quality， but also has obvious advantages in decreasing anesthetic adverse reaction.
