ObjectiveTo explore the protective effects of abdominal paracentesis drainage (APD) on pancreatitis-associated liver injury in the early phase of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). MethodsOne hundred and fourteen consecutive patients with SAP, admitted to the General Hospital of Western Theater Command from January 2015 to January 2021, were included in this retrospective study. The patients were divided into the APD group (n=61) and the non-APD group (n=53) based on whether they underwent APD treatment within 72 h of admission. The variables including baseline data, liverfunction tests, inflammation indexes, severity scores and other variables of the two groups were statistically analyzed. ResultsThe hospital mortality in the APD group was lower than that in the non-APD group (8.2% vs. 22.6%, P=0.031). These severity scores (including APACHE Ⅱ score, Ranson score and modified Marshall score) and inflammation indexes (including C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor-α) in the APD group were all lower than those in the non-APD group (P<0.05). In terms of liver function related indexes, the levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), total bilirubin (TBIL), and direct bilirubin (DBIL) after treatment in both two groups were significantly lower than those before treatment (P<0.05). The levels of ALT, AST, TBIL and DBIL after treatment in the APD group were lower than those in the non-APD group (P<0.05), and the levels of prealbumin and albumin after treatment in the APD group were higher than those in the non-APD group (P<0.05), but there were no significant differences in the levels of alkaline phosphatase, GGT and 5′ -nucleotidase after treatment in the two group (P>0.05). ConclusionFor SAP patients with ascitic fluid, application of APD can attenuate liver injury and improve liver function in the early stage of SAP.
Objective
To observe and evaluate the efficacy of continuous drainage with intravenous catheter in the treatment of breast abscess infected by methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and to explore the best treatment methods.
Methods
Sixty cases of breast abscess infected by MRSA were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into continuous drainage group and puncture drainage group according to the treatment. Continuous drainage with 14G intravenous catheter and intermittent aspiration with 20 mL syringe were performed to treat the breast abscesses in the continuous drainage group (n=36) and puncture drainage group (n=24), respectively. Meanwhile, sensitive antibiotics were used according to the results of susceptibility test. The therapeutic effects of the 2 groups were compared.
Results
There were no significant differences in baseline data between continuous drainage group and puncture drainage group (P>0.05). There was no significant differences of cure rate between the two groups (P=0.717). Compared with the puncture drainage group, the continuous drainage group showed shorter period of time to heal the breast abscess (P=0.001), shorter period of time to control the ache (P=0.038), less punctures (P<0.001) and more daily volume of drainage (P<0.001). No significant differences were found in the period of time to control the fever between the two groups (P=0.127).
Conclusions
Continuous drainage with intravenous catheter can shorten the course of disease, reduce the suffering of patients, reduce the difficulty of hospital infection prevention and control. It’s an ideal choice for the treatment of breast abscess infected by MRSA.
ObjectiveTo analyze the cause of complications for patients with advanced malignant biliary obstruc-tion treated with percutaneous transhepatic implantation of biliary stent (PTBS) and summarize the experiences of comp-lications of the treatment.
MethodThe complications of 59 patients firstly treated with percutaneous transhepatic cholangial drainage (PTCD) then with PTBS in 156 cases of advanced malignant biliary obstruction from January 2010 to January 2013 in this hospital were analyzed retrospectively.
ResultsFifty-nine cases of complications were occurred in 156 cases of advanced malignant biliary obstruction, the incidence was 37.8%, including biliary infection in 26 cases, bile duct bleeding in 17 cases, liver failure in 5 cases, renal failure in 4 cases, acute pancreatitis in 4 cases, stent displa-cement in 2 cases, bile duct perforation in 1 case.Three cases died in 59 patients with complications, 56 cases were improved after symptomatic treatment.
ConclusionPTCD combined with PTBS is a safe and effective treatment of advanced malignant biliary obstruction, the reasonable perioperative management is very important to reduce the occurrence of complications.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of early abdominal paracentesis drainage (APD) in patients with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). MethodsThe PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data, and VIP databases were searched to collect randomized controlled trials and cohort studies on the management of SAP via early APD from inception to December 10, 2022. Two reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. Meta-analysis was then performed using RevMan 5.4 software and Stata 17.0 software. ResultsEighteen studies were included, with a total sample size of 2 685 patients. The meta-analysis showed that early APD could decrease mortality (OR=0.49, 95%CI 0.35 to 0.69, P<0.01) and the incidences of multiple organ failure (OR=0.56, 95%CI 0.45 to 0.71, P<0.01), ARDS (OR=0.54, 95%CI 0.41 to 0.71, P<0.01), and infectious complications (OR=0.72, 95%CI 0.57 to 0.92, P<0.01) and also reduce the need for further interventions and the total cost incurred during hospitalization, reduce the length of hospital stay, and reduce the number of days spent in the intensive care unit. However, there were no significant differences in the incidence of pneumonia, bacteremia, and sepsis between the two groups. ConclusionThe treatment of SAP via early APD, which has high clinical value, could decrease the incidence of multiple organ failure, improve the prognosis of patients, and reduce the associated mortality rate. Moreover, APD does not increase the risk of infection-related complications. Due to the limited quantity and quality of the included studies, more high-quality studies are needed to verify the above conclusion.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of plasminogen activator assist external ventricular drainage in cerebral hemorrhage.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, CBM and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of plasminogen activator assist external ventricular drainage in cerebral hemorrhage from inception to March 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 23 RCTs involving 1 560 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the blank control or placebo, the addition of plasminogen activator urokinase after puncture and drainage could improve the clinical efficacy (RR=1.36, 95%CI 1.26 to 1.47, P<0.000 01), shorten removal time of hematoma (MD=?3.37, 95%CI ?3.89 to ?2.85, P<0.000 01), reduce postoperative re-bleeding rate (Peto OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.51, P<0.000 01), reduce the incidence of intracranial infection (Peto OR=0.47, 95%CI 0.25 to 0.87, P=0.02), and reduce mortality (Peto OR=0.45, 95%CI 0.27 to 0.76, P=0.003). The differences were statistically significant between two groups.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the combination with urokinase can improve curative effect of hypertension cerebral hemorrhage patients with external ventricular drainage. In reducing hemorrhage, intracranial infection and mortality, urokinase also has great curative effect. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.