Objective To study the effect of recombinant growth hormone (rhGH) on improvement of liver function and liver regeneration in animal and patients after hepatectomy. Methods The liver cirrhosis model of SD species mouse was set up, then the mouse were randomly divided into experiment group and control group, then 30%-40% liver of all the models were resected, rhGH was used by hypodermic injection (0.2-0.4ml/100g) in experimental group, and the equal dose of N.S. were given in control group every day. Then liver function, arterial blood ketone body ratio(AKBR), and the regenerated liver/body weight ratio (RL/W) were determined, histopathology of the cirrhosis with microscope and electron microscope and the mitotic index (MI) of liver cell on 7, 14 and 28th day after operation were observed. Clinically,39 hepatectomized patients were randomly divided into experiment group and control group, liver function, PA， Glu, RI and AKBR were measured preoperatively and on 1, 7,14th day after operation. Postoperative clinical course were also compared between the two groups. Results In the animal experiment group, as compared with the control group, AKBR was obviously higher (P＜0.01), seruim level of total protein and PA were increased faster (P＜0.05), and RL/W was higher. The mitotic index of liver cell was increased faster on 14th day, the numbers of regenerated liver cell with double nucleus and rough endoplasmic reticulum were higher in 14 and 28th day. In the clinical experiment group, as compared with the control group, serum total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase were lower on 7 and 14th postoperative day (P＜0.05). Serum albumin, PA, Glu, RI and AKBR were higher on 7, 14th postoperative day (P＜0.05). Conclusion Both experimental and clinical study show that the rhGH can promote liver regeneration and improve liver function after hepatectomy.
Objective To evaluate the effect of pulse dye-densitometry by indocyanine green test (PDD-ICG)on the assessment of hepatic function reserve. MethodsSeventy-five hepatic carcinoma patients aimed to accept hepatectomy from March 2007 to February 2008 at West China Hospital were prospectively included in this study.Patients were grouped by dysfunction grade of hepatic function and the indexes before operation were compared.Furthermore, patients were grouped by K and R15 value to compare the moderate and severe liver dysfunction ratio, respectively. ResultsSixty cases manifested slight liver dysfunction,12 cases manifested moderate liver dysfunction,and 3 cases manifested severe liver dysfunction(the latter was took into moderate group due to the cases were too few).The difference of Child-Pugh score and common liver function examination indexes such as PT and INR before operation was not significant betweentwo groups(P＞0.05).ButPDD-ICG experiment indexes(K and R15)were remarkable different betweentwo groups(P＜0.05).The patients were divided into two groups according to K and R15 value,respectively.The rate of moderate and severe liver dysfunction was significant different between K＜0.158/min groupand K≥0.158/min group(47.1% vs. 12.1%,P＜0.05),and likewise moderate and severe liver dysfunction was significant different between R15≤10% group and R15＞10% group(15.9% vs.41.7%,P＜0.05）. ConclusionPDD-ICG is an effective and easyto evaluate hepatic function reserve of patient undergone hepatectomy.Therefore,it may give clinical instruction to predict and avoid the liver dysfunction after operation.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted hepatectomy (RAH) versus traditional laparoscopic hepatectomy (TLH) for hepatic neoplasms.MethodsDatabases including PubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, WanFang Data and CBM databases were electronically searched to collect cohort studies about the RAH vs. the TLH for liver neoplasms from inception to December 10th, 2016. Two reviewers independently screened the literatures, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. And finally, a meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 17 studies involving 1 389 patients were included. The meta-analysis results showed that: compared to TLH group, RAH group was associated with more estimated blood loss (WMD=39.56, 95%CI 4.65 to 74.47, P=0.013), longer operative time SMD=0.55, 95%CI 0.29 to 0.80, P<0.001), and later in the first nutritional intake time (SMD=1.06, 95%CI 0.66 to 1.45,P<0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the length of hospital stay, conversion to laparotomy, intraoperative blood transfusion, resection rate of tumor margin, complications and 90-day mortality between the two groups.ConclusionCurrent evidence indicates that TLH is superior to RAH in terms of operative time, intraoperative blood loss and the first nutritional intake time, but there are no statistically significant differences in the primary outcomes, suggesting that RAH and TLH have similar efficacy and safety for hepatic neoplasms. Due to the limitation of quality and quantity of the included studies, the above conclusions need to be verified by more high-quality research.
ObjectiveTo study clinical practical value of multimode imaging technique in precise hepatectomy for huge hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of patients with huge HCC who underwent precise hepatectomy in Yuebei People’s Hospital from Jan. 2018 to Dec. 2020 were collected. The three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction, 3D visualization, 3D printing, and augmented reality (AR) were used to guide preoperative evaluation, surgical planning, and surgical navigation. The liver function indexes, surgical mode, operative time, intraoperative bleeding, volume of resected liver, postoperative hospitalization, and complications were analyzed. ResultsThere were 23 patients in this study, including 18 males and 5 females, with (56.8±8.1) years old. The virtual tumor volume assessed by multimodal imaging technology was (865.2±165.6) mL and the virtual resected liver volume was (1 628.8±144.4) mL. The planned operations were anatomical hepatectomy in 19 patients and non-anatomical hepatectomy in 4 patients. The actual operation included 17 cases of anatomical hepatectomy and 6 cases of non-anatomical hepatectomy, which was basically consistent with the results of AR. The operative time was (298.4±74.5) min, the median hepatic blood flow blocking time was 20 min, and the intraoperative bleeding was (330.4±152.8) mL. Compared with preoperative levels, the levels of hemoglobin and albumin decreased temporarily on the first day after operation (P<0.05), and then which began to rise on the third day and basically rose to the normal range; prothrombintime, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase increased transiently on the first day after operation (P<0.05), then which began to decline to the normal levels. There were no serious operative complications and no perioperative death. The median follow-up time was 18 months, the tumor recurrence and metastasis occurred in 3 cases. ConclusionFrom preliminary results of this study, it could improve surgical safety and precision of hepatectomy for huge HCC by preoperative precise assessment and operation navigation in good time of multimode imaging technology.
ObjectiveTo compare efficacy of laparoscopic or open hepatectomy in benign liver tumors patients with different difficult operations. MethodsAccording to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the patients with benign liver tumors who underwent hepatectomy in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from September 2014 to March 2021 were collected. The enrolled patients were assigned into low, medium, and high difficulties by the Hasegawa liver resection surgical difficulty score model, then the patients were matched by propensity score matching. The liver function and inflammatory indexes, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, total hospital stay, postoperative complications, and hospitalization expenses of patients with benign liver tumors after laparoscopic (laparoscope group) or open (open group) hepatectomy were compared. ResultsA total of 209 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled in this study. According to the Hasegawa criteria, there were 59, 89, and 61 patients with low, medium, and high difficulties respectively. After 1∶1 propensity score matching, 18, 34, and 14 patients in the laparoscope group and open group were matched respectively. There were no statistic differences in the baseline data between the laparoscope group and open group (P>0.05). ① For the patients with low and medium difficulties, compared with the open group, the different values of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, white blood cell count, and neutrophil percentage were lower (P<0.05), the intraoperative bleeding and total hospital stay were less or shorter (P<0.05), and the albumin were higher (P<0.05) in the laparoscope group. There were no statistic differences in these indexes among the patients with high difficulty (P>0.05). ② Compared with the open group, the operative time of the laparoscope group was shorter in the patients with low difficulty (P<0.05) and longer in the patients with high difficulty (P<0.05), and there was no statistic difference in patients with medium difficulty (P>0.05). ③ The postoperative complications had no statistic differences between the two groups for the patients with low and high difficulties (P>0.05), while which in the laparoscope group were lower than in the open group for the patients with medium difficulty (P<0.05). ④ The hospitalization expenses of the laparoscope group was higher than the open group for the patients with high difficulty (P<0.05), while which had no statistic differences between the two groups for the patients with low and medium difficulties (P>0.05). ⑤ The total hospital stay of the laparoscope group was shorter than the open group (P<0.05) no matter which difficult operation.ConclusionsAccording to results of this study, laparoscopic hepatectomy has more obvious advantages as compared with open hepatectomy for patients with low or medium difficulty, which could greatly shorten hospital stay and accelerate rehabilitation of patients. Even for patients with high difficulty, laparoscopic hepatectomy still shows an advantage of shortening hospital stay.
