ObjectiveTo explore the effect of continuous nursing on lung transplant patients at home based on humanistic care. MethodsAccording to hospitalization order, patients who received lung transplantation in our hospital from January 2016 to October 2020 were divided into a control group and a nursing group. The control group was treated with routine lung transplantation education and regular follow-up after discharge, and the nursing group received humanistic care during follow-up, health education at discharge, cultural exchange activities, and home care plans. After discharge, the self-management ability at home, medication adherence and satisfaction of home care between the two groups were campared. ResultsA total of 60 patients were included in the study. There were 23 patients in the control group, including 16 males and 7 females, with an average age of 58.70±11.00 years. There were 37 pateints in the nursing group, including 25 males and 12 females, with an average age of 57.90±13.20 years. The scores of self-management ability at home of the nursing group (self-concept 27.41±2.37 points vs. 21.78±3.54 points; self-care responsibility 20.73±1.63 points vs. 16.83±2.79 points; self-care skills 41.46±3.77 points vs. 28.26±4.11 points; health knowledge level 57.95±4.10 points vs. 44.87±5.79 points) were higher than those in the control group (all P＜0.05). The medication adherence (7.47±0.46 points vs. 6.87±0.28 points) and satisfaction of home care (23.80±1.20 points vs. 20.50±1.90 points) in the nursing group were higher than those in the control group (both P<0.05). ConclusionContinuous nursing based on humanistic care for lung transplant patients can effectively improve the self-management ability, medication adherence and nursing satisfaction of patients after discharge.
In order to promote the development of lung transplantation nursing in China, and to provide patients with comprehensive, safe, scientific and standardized surgical nursing, thoracic surgery experts and nursing experts from medical institutions qualified for lung transplantation were convened for extensive consultation. This consensus was developed in accordance with the principles of evidence-based medicine and based on the published best evidence in Chinese and English. This consensus aims to solve the potential problems in nursing cooperation in lung transplantation surgery to the greatest extent, and provide a scientific and standardized nursing cooperation plan for lung transplantation surgeries.
Objective To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of single and bilateral lung transplantation in the treatment of end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Chinese and English databases were searched by computer, including PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, EMbase, CNKI, Wanfang database, VIP database and CBM. Case-control studies on single lung transplantation or bilateral lung transplantation for COPD were collected from the inception to July 31, 2022. We evaluated the quality of the literature via Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). All results were analyzed using Review Manager V5.3 and STATA 17.0. Results A total of 8 studies were included covering 14076 patients, including 8326 patients in the single lung transplantation group and 5750 patients in the bilateral lung transplantation group. NOS scores were≥6 points. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical difference in the postoperative 1-year survival between the two groups (P=0.070). The 2-year survival rate (P=0.002), 3-year survival rate (P<0.001), 5-year survival rate (P<0.001), overall survival rate (P＜0.001), postoperative forced expiratory volume in one second/predicted value (P<0.001), postoperative forced vital capacity (P<0.001), and postoperative 6-minute walking distance (P=0.002) were lower or shorter than those in the bilateral lung transplantation group, the postoperative intubation time (P=0.030) was longer than that in the bilateral lung transplantation group. Bilateral lung transplantation group showed better surgical results. There was no statistical difference in the mortality, obliterative bronchiolitis, length of hospitalization, primary graft dysfunction, or postoperative adverse events (P>0.05). Conclusion Bilateral lung transplantation is associated with better long-term survival and postoperative lung function compared with single lung transplantation. In-hospital mortality and postoperative complications are similar between them.
Lung transplantation has been proved to be an effective treatment after more than forty years of fast development, while more than 4000 cases of lung transplantation performed globally each year. Recently, lung transplantation in China has been advanced rapidly, and the number of transplants has increased year by year. Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine team has been recognized to play a crucial role in lung transplantation. It has an irreplaceable role and status in promoting lung transplantation, improving the preoperative evaluation of lung transplantation and the maintenance of donors, and carrying out perioperative management, as well as long-term follow-up. Lung transplantation is a systematic project, requiring the perfect cooperation and collaboration of team members and contributing to recipients’ recovery.
Objective To identify and analyze risk factors for acute renal failure (ARF) following lung transplantation and to develop a predictive model. Methods Data for this study were obtained from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, encompassing patients who underwent unilateral or bilateral lung transplantation between 2015 and 2022. We analyzed both preoperative and postoperative clinical characteristics of the patients. A combined approach utilizing random forest and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was employed to identify key factors associated with the incidence of ARF post-transplantation, based on which a nomogram model was developed. The predictive performance of the constructed model was evaluated in both training and validation sets, using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC) metrics to verify and compare model effectiveness. ResultsA total of 15 110 lung transplantation patients were included in the study, consisting of6 041 males and 9 069 females, with a median age of 62.00 years (interquartile range: 54.00 to 67.00). The analysis revealed statistically significant differences between postoperative renal dialysis and non-dialysis patients regarding preoperative lung diagnosis, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), mechanical ventilation, preoperative ICU treatment, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, infections occurring within two weeks prior to transplantation, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score, waitlist duration, double-lung transplantation, and ischemia time (P<0.05). Five key variables associated with ARF after lung transplantation were identified through random forest and LASSO regression: recipients’ eGFR, preoperative ICU treatment, ECMO support, bilateral lung transplantation, and ischemia time. A nomogram model was subsequently established. Model evaluation demonstrated that the constructed predictive model achieved high accuracy in both training and validation sets, with favorable AUC values, confirming its validity and reliability. ConclusionThis study identifies common risk factors for ARF following lung transplantation and introduces an effective predictive model with potential clinical applications.
