ObjectiveTo compare postoperative efficacy of thoracoscopic partial pneumonectomy with or without thoracic drainage tube postoperatively.MethodsThe PubMed, Wanfang database, CNKI and Web of Science from January 2000 to August 2020 were searched by computer to collect randomized controlled studies (RCT), cohort studies and case-control studies on the efficacy of chest drainage tube placement versus no placement after thoracoscopic partial pneumonectomy. Two reviewers independently screened articles and extracted data to evaluate the risk of literature bias. Meta-analysis was performed with RevMan software.ResultsA total of 15 articles were included, including 1 RCT and 14 cohort studies. A total of 1 524 patients were enrolled, including 819 patients in the test group (no postoperative chest drainage tube group) and 705 patients in the control group (postoperative chest drainage tube group). Compared with the control group, the length of hospital stay in the test group was shorter (MD=–1.3, 95%CI –1.23 to –0.17, P<0.000 01) and the incidence of postoperative pneumothorax was higher (RD=0.06, 95%CI 0.01 to 0.10, P=0.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in operation time (MD=–2.37, 95%CI –7.04 to 2.30, P=0.32), the incidence of postoperative complications (RR=2.43, 95%CI 0.79 to 1.80, P=0.39), the reintervention rate of postoperative complications (RD=0.02, 95%CI=–0.00 to 0.04, P=0.05), postoperative subcutaneous emphysema (RD=0.02, 95%CI –0.01 to 0.06, P=0.20) and the incidence of postoperative pleural effusion (RD=0.04, 95%CI –0.00 to 0.09, P=0.10) .ConclusionCompared with the patients with chest drainage tube placement after thoracoscopic partial pneumonectomy (the control group), the test group can shorten the hospital stay. Although the incidence of postoperative pneumothorax is higher than that of the control group, the operation time, incidence of postoperative subcutaneous emphysema and in-hospital complications, and reintervention rate of in-hospital complications are not statistically significant between the two groups. Therefore no chest drainage tube may be placed after partial pneumonectomy.
ObjectiveWe aimed to further investigate the feasibility of using small bore chest tubes or even without chest tube insertion after da Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery.
MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed initial 70 patients between September 12, 2014 and March 30, 2015 as a control group at the department of thoracic surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, and proposed four schemes. There are 31 males and 39 females with mean age of 57.1±9.8 (ranged from 30-80 years). We applied those four schemes for the last 30 patients as an experimental group. There are 12 males and 18 females with mean age of 58.8±8.1 (ranged 42-73 years).
ResultsThe days in hospital after surgery ranged 2-25 days and there was no severe complication. After the surgery, the pain scores of the trial group are lower than that of the control group. And the schemes 1 and schemes 2 of trial group reduced significantly than the control group (P<0.05). There is no significant difference of the rate of the complication caused by poor drainage between the trial group and the control group (P>0.05). But the pain score after surgery is lower than that of the control group (P<0.05).
ConclusionOptimizing thoracic drainage strategy after da Vinci robot-assisted thoracic surgery is safe, possible and helpful to relieve postoperative pain.
ObjectiveTo observe the impacts of initial therapy on clinical outcome of patients with community-acquired thoracic infection by retrospective analysis.
MethodsClinical data of acute community-acquired thoracic infection patients who met the British Thoracic Society diagnostic criteria were collected. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether adequate initial antibiotic therapy and pleural effusion drainage were performed, namely an adequate group (31 patients) and an inadequate group (17 patients). Clinical manifestations, inflammatory markers, hospital stay and hospital costs were analyzed between the two groups.
ResultsFor age, gender, infection sites, and coincident diseases, there were no significant differences between the two groups. Compared with the inadequate group, temperature of the adequate group was significantly decreased, especially on hospital day 5, 6, 7[(37.4±0.1)℃ vs. (38.3±0.2)℃, P < 0.001; (37.4±0.1)℃ vs. (37.9±0.1)℃, P < 0.05; (37.4±0.1)℃ vs. (38.1±0.2)℃, P < 0.01]. The level of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in first week was also significantly reduced in the adequate group[(123.1±13.8) mg/L vs. (182.7±25.3) mg/L, P < 0.05]. However, there were no differences in white cell counts, percentage of neutrophils, or erythrocyte sedimentation rate between the two groups in six-week follow-up. The adequate group had shorter hospital stay[(25±4) days vs. (34±4) days, P < 0.05] and lower hospital costs[(28 367±3 328) yuan vs. (43 334±7 134) yuan, P < 0.05] compared with the inadequate group.
ConclusionsThe initial therapy with appropriate antibiotics and effective thoracic drainage can significantly decrease the temperature and CRP of patients with thoracic infection, as well as the cost of hospitalization and the length of stay. Our study reveals that the temperature which is lower than 37.5℃ on the 5th day of therapy and the CRP in the first follow-up week are sensitive predictors of initial treatment effect, which may be helpful to guide the following therapeutic strategies.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect of different drainage modes on the postoperative thoracic drainage after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for radical resection of lower lung carcinoma.MethodsA total of 183 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received biportal thoracoscopic anatomical lower lobectomy combined with mediastinal lymph node dissection in the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from August 2017 to August 2019 were enrolled, including 113 males and 70 females, aged 31-77 (56.5±6.4) years. The patients were randomly divided into three groups, including an anterior axillary line group, a mid-axillary line group and a modified anterior axillary line group. Clinical efficacy of the three groups was compared.ResultsNo significant difference among these three groups in terms of gender, age, surgical site, pathological type, pathological staging, postoperative chest wall subcutaneous emphysema, postoperative pain score, and postoperative hospital stay was found (P>0.05). There were significant differences among the patients in terms of postoperative pleural effusion, re-insertion of chest tube or aspiration, total liquid quantity of thoracic drainage, drainage time and chest wall incision stitches time (P<0.05). The anterior axillary line group had higher risk of postoperative pleural effusion than the other groups (P<0.05). The occurrence of postoperative pleural effusion and rate of reposition of chest tube or aspiration were significantly reduced in the modified anterior axillary line group (P<0.05).ConclusionChest drainage tube with large diameter (24F) in the 5th intercostal space of the anterior axillary line combined with another micro-tube (8.5F) in the 7th or 8th intercostal space of the inferior scapular angle line can shorten drainage time to reduce postoperative pain, reduce the occurrence of postoperative pleural effusion, and shorten the time of surgical incision stitches.
ObjectiveTo explore the factors that affect the drainage time of da Vinci robot lung cancer surgery, to analyze the coping strategies, and to provide a basis for shortening the drainage time of patients after surgery and speeding up the patients' recovery.MethodsThe clinical data of 131 patients who underwent da Vinci robot lung cancer surgery at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command from January 2019 to October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 68 were males and 63 were females, with an average age of 59.84±9.66 years. According to the postoperative thoracic drainage time, the patients were divided into two groups including a group A (drainage time≤ 5 days) and a group B (drainage time >5 days). Univariate analysis and logistic multivariate regression analysis were used to analyze the factors that may affect postoperative drainage time, and the correlation between different influencing factors and thoracic drainage time after da Vinci robot lung cancer surgery.ResultsLogistic multivariate analysis showed that age≥60 years (P=0.014), diabetes mellitus (P=0.035), operation time≥130 min (P=0.018), number of lymph node dissections≥15 (P=0.002), and preoperative albumin<38.45 g/L (P=0.010) were independent factors affecting the drainage time of da Vinci robot lung cancer surgery.ConclusionFor elderly patients with diabetes mellitus during the perioperative period, blood glucose should be actively controlled, reasonable surgical strategies should be formulated to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the operation, while reducing intraoperative damage and shortening the operation time. After the operation, patients should be guided to strengthen active coughing, expectoration and lung expansion. Thereby it can shorten drainage time and speed up the recovery of patients after operation.
ObjectiveTo investigate the correlation between the postoperative day 1 (POD1) drainage volume and postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). MethodsThe clinical data of 254 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing thoracoscopic lobectomy at our department from January 2014 to June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. According to whether there were PPCs after operation, patients were divided into a PPCs group (51 patients, 33 males and 18 females, aged 65.2±7.3 years) and a non-PPCs group (203 patients, 110 males and 93 females, aged 62.4±8.2 years). The correlation between POD1 drainage volume and PPCs was analyzed. ResultsThe POD1 drainage volume in the PPCs group was significantly more than that in the non-PPCs group (337.5±127.4 ml vs. 208.7±122.9 ml, P=0.000). The result of regression analysis showed that POD1 drainage volume was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of PPCs. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) analysis showed that POD1 drainage volume of 265 ml was the cut-off point to predict PPCs. The rate of PPCs in the group of POD1 drainage volume less than 265 ml was significantly lower than that in the group of drainage volume more than 265 ml (8.3% vs. 43.0%, P=0.000). ConclusionThe POD1 drainage volume is closely related to the occurrence of PPCs, which can be used to predict the occurrence of PPCs.
ObjectiveTo compare clinical results between single and double chest tube applications after lung cancer resection, and explore the role of single chest tube in postoperative fast track recovery.
MethodNinety-three patients with lung cancer who underwent lobectomy between March and December of 2009 in West China Hospital of Sichuan University were included in this study. All the patients were divided into a single-tube group including 46 patients (39 males and 7 females) with their age of 58.4±9.5 years, and a double-tube group including 47 patients (32 males and 15 females) with their age of 58.2±9.0 years. Drainage amount, duration, postoperative hospital stay, and incidences of pneumothorax and pleural effusion after removal of chest tubes were compared between the 2 groups.
ResultsThe percentage of patients undergoing complete video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) of the double-tube group was significantly higher than that of the single-tube group, and the percentage of patients undergoing thoracotomy of the double-tube group was significantly lower than that of the single-tube group (P < 0.05). Drainage amount of the double-tube group was significantly larger than that of the single-tube group (824.4±612.5 ml vs. 510.7±406.7 ml, P < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in drainage duration, postoperative hospital stay, the incidences of subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, pleural effusion or re-insertion of chest drain between the 2 groups (P > 0.05).
ConclusionClinical results of single chest tube is better than or equivalent to those of double chest tubes after lung cancer resection, and drainage duration of single chest tube application might be shorter.
