【Abstract】ObjectiveTo explore the appropriate surgical management of the primary hepatocellular carcinoma with hypersplenism. MethodsOf 67 patients who has primary hepatocellular carcinoma with hypersplenism, 17 cases had hepatectomy combined with splenectomy, 7 cases had hepatectomy only, and the other 43 patients were treated with hepatic artery embolization and splenic artery embolization. ResultsThe symptoms of hypersplenism disappeared and the hemogram became normal 30 d after operation in 17 patients who had hepatectomy combined with splenectomy, but worsened in 7 patients who only had simple hepatectomy and 6 cases of those patients were treated with splenic artery embolization 3-7 months after operation. In 43 patients treated with hepatic artery embolization and splenic artery embolization, 79%（34/43）had improved hypersplenism symptoms and the hemogram became normal. ConclusionThe treatment of primary hepatocellular carcinoma with hypersplenism should be strived for hepatectomy combined with splenectomy. If the liver mass cannot be resected, hepatic artery embolization and splenic artery embolization should be chosen.
Objective To compare the difference of the changes of platelet counts after splenectomy between the patients with splenic rupture and patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, and to analyze the possible reasons and clinical significance. Methods The platelet count of 47 splenic rupture patients and 36 cirrhosis patients who had been carried out splenectomy from July 2008 to December 2009 in our hospital were counted, and the differences in platelet count and it’s change tendency of two groups were compared. Results In the splenic rupture group，the platelet count of all 47 patients increased abnormally after operation, the maxlmum value of platelet count among 300×109/L-600×109/L in 6 cases，600×109/L-900×109/L in 21 cases，and above 900×109/L in 20 cases. In the cirrhosis group，the maxlmum value of platelet count after operation was above 300×109/L in 26 cases，100×109/L-300×109/L in 8 cases，and below 100×109/L in 2 cases. The difference of maxlmum value of platelet count in the two groups had statistic significance（P=0.00）. Compared with the cirrhosis group, the platelet count increased more significant and decreased more slow in splenic rupture group（P＜0.05）.The abnormal days and rising range of platelet count were higher in patient with Child A than Child B and C（P=0.006，P=0.002）. Conclusions The change of platelet count after operation in splenic rupture group was obviously different from cirrhosis group because of the difference of the liver function and body situation of patients. To patients with splenic rupture or cirrhosis, appropriate treatment based on the platelet count and liver function could obtain good therapeutic effect.
Objective
To investigate safety, feasibility, and future direction of laparoscopic splenectomy.
Method
The latest progress and new achievements of laparoscopic splenectomy in the world were analyzed and summarized.
Results
At present, the laparoscopic splenectomy mainly included the completely laparoscopic splenectomy, hand assisted laparoscopic splenectomy, gasless laparoscopic splenectomy, single hole laparoscopic splenectomy, or robot assisted laparoscopic splenectomy. The completely laparoscopic total splenectomy had become the most common surgical procedure in the clinical treatment due to the reliable curative effect, less injury, and rapid recovery, the partial splenectomy was one of the precise treatments for the benign splenic lesions. The hand assisted laparoscopic splenectomy was widely used in the giant spleen, it could reduce the exposure difficulty, effectively deal with the intraoperative hemorrhage, and reduce the risk of surgery. The robot assisted laparoscopic splenectomy was one of the minimally invasive operations, the system with three-dimensional high definition vision and flexible robotic arm overcame the limitations of traditional laparoscopic two-dimensional display, could precisely complete the operation and achieve the accurate treatment.
Conclusions
Laparoscopic splenectomy has some advantages of less operative injury, less pain, and rapid recovery, it’s safety and feasibility have been proved. We should strictly grasp indications and contraindications for laparoscopic splenectomy, appropriate surgical methods should be selected for specific splenic diseases to achieve the best curative effect. Remote control and precision operation will be a direction of development in future.
ObjectiveTo explore the effect of partial splenic embolization on splenectomy plus devascularization of esophageal and gastric vein.
MethodsTwenty three cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension combined the hypersplenism (partial splenic embolization group), who received partial splenic embolization in our hospital from June 2010 to June 2015, as well as 30 cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension combined the hypersplenism without undergoing partial splenic embolization in the same period (non-partial splenic embolization group), were collected retrospectively. All patients underwent splenectomy plus devascularization of esophageal and gastric vein. Comparison of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion volume, postoperative total flow of abdominal drainage tube, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time, hospital stay, and the incidence of complication was performed.
ResultsThe operation time[(3.56±0.70) h vs. (1.78±0.28) h], intraoperative blood loss (900 mL vs. 250 mL), intraoperative blood transfusion volume (800 mL vs. 200 mL), postoperative total flow of abdominal drainage tube (450 mL vs. 150 mL), postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time[(43.38±18.68) h vs. (27.60±12.39) h], hospital stay (12 d vs. 7 d), and incidence of incision infection[34.8% (8/23) vs. 10.0% (3/30)] of partial splenic embolization group were all higher or longer than those corresponding indexes of non-partial splenic embolization group (P < 0.05). All patients of 2 groups were followed up by telephone visit for 6-58 months, and the median was 28-month. There was no recurrence of gastrointestinal hemorrhage during the follow-up period.
ConclusionsSplenectomy is more difficult, and maybe has more intraoperative blood loss and complications for cirrhosis patients with portal hypertension combined the hypersplenism, who received partial splenic embolization ever. For these patents, the recovery time is longer. We should make choice of partial splenic embolization or splenectomy directly according to the patients' situation, to implement individualized treatment, so we can make the biggest benefit for patients.
ObjectiveTo explore perioperative management model of ABO-incompatible liver transplantation. MethodsThe clinical data of ABO-incompatible caderveric liver transplantions without urgency performed in our center from July 2006 to May 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. Four patients had received an ABO-incompatible graft: AB to O in three, AB to A in one. All the cases were diagnosed as end-stage liver disese, one of them was primary hepatocellular carcinoma. ResultsFour survived to now （11 to 19 months） without severe infections and acute rejections. Two experienced coagulative disturbance and one of them had a second exploration. One developed acute renal failure and recovered with help under continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. All the cases were given 20 mg basiliximab two hours before revascularization and on day 4 after operation respectively. Splenectomy was performed in three, intravenous immunoglobulin was given in all more than seven days. Isohemagglutinin titers were basically stable and not relevant to the clinical manifestations. Antibiotic prophylaxis and immunosuppression protocol was same as the ABO compatible transplants except a 3-month-delay for steroid withdrawal. ConclusionABO-incompatible liver transplantation could be performed with appropriate perioperative management, such as basiliximab induction, splenectomy, intravenous immunoglobulin administration, and routine immunosuppression.
【Abstract】Objective To explore the effect and indication of splenectomy in liver transplantation. Methods From January 2001 to April 2006, 260 patients underwent piggyback orthotopic liver transplantation (PBOLT), and 28 patients had undergone combined PBOLT and splenectomy (splenectomy group). These patients were compared to 56 randomly selected non-splenectomy patients from the same transplant period, meaningly two controls were selected for every non-splenectomy case. Two groups were analyzed with respect to rate of infection and survival rate, as well as biopsy-proven acute allograft rejection within 30 days after transplantation. Results Rate of infection in the splenectomy group was higher than that in the non-splenectomy patients (85.7% vs 55.4%, P＜0.05). Acute rejection and survival rates in the splenectomy group were lower than those in the non-splenectomy patients (3.6% vs 14.3%, P＜0.05; 46.4% vs 82.1%, P＜0.05). Conclusion Concomitant splenectomy with PBOLT has a significantly higher patient mortality rate; it is mainly due to its septic complications. At present, unless there is a certain indication for splenectomy, this procedure is not recommended.
