Objective
To review the clinical features and trend in antimicrobial resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii (A. baumannii) bloodstream infections.
Methods
Retrospective analysis was performed by collecting data of underlying diseases, potential risk factors, clinical characteristics, blood test results, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health EvaluationⅡ (APACHEⅡ) scores at onset, bacterial resistance to antibiotics and antimicrobial therapy were collected in Hunan Provincial People’s Hospital from January 2010 to June 2016.
Results
There were 114 non-duplicated A. baumannii complex blood isolates identified in this research. All patients had at least one underlying disease and accepted at least one surgery or invasive operation within the past 14 days. Multidrug-resistant A. baumannii (MDRAB) was isolated from 89 (78.1%) patients. Of the 114 strains of A. baumannii, 12.3% were resistant to tigecycline, 55.3% to amikacin and 61.4% to cefoperazone-sulbactam. The overall mortality was 51.8% (59/114). The patients with MDRAB had higher mortality rate than those with non-MDRAB (62.9% vs. 12.0%, χ2=20.268, P<0.001). With higher incidence of being in the intensive care unit, intubation/tracheotomy and increased APACHEⅡ score among patients with MDRAB bacteremia (P<0.05). Compared with subjects treated with tigecycline based regimen, those treated with non tigecycline for multidrug resistantA. baumannii had a higher mortality (64.8% vs. 60.0%) but there was no statistical significance (P>0.05).
Conclusions
The isolated A. baumannii are mainly multidrug resistant and with high mortality. Being in the intensive care unit, increased APACHEⅡ score and intubation/tracheotomy were risk factors for higher mortality among patients with MDRAB bloodstream infection. Tigecycline based regimen doesn’t improve patients’ prognosis.
Objective To explore the vascular access infection (VAI) incidence of hemodialysis patients during the the maximum spread of the COVID-19 epidemic (epidemic period) compared with the corresponding period with no local cases of COVID-19 (control period). Methods A single-center, retrospective study was carried out. Adult patients who underwent hemodialysis at the Department of Blood Purification Center, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University during the epidemic period between December 7, 2022 and February 23, 2023 and the control period between December 7, 2020 and February 23, 2021 were selected. The incidence of local access site infection (LASI) and access related bloodstream infection (ARBSI) in included patients were observed and compared. ResultsA total of 1 401 patients were included. Among them, there were 737 cases during the epidemic period and 664 cases during the control period. There was no statistically significant difference in the age, gender, and duration of catheterization among patients of different periods and pathway types (P>0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the occurrence of LASI between the epidemic period and the control period (χ2=1.800, P=1.180). There was a statistically significant difference in the occurrence of ARBSI between the epidemic period and the control period [χ2=4.610, relative risk (RR)=2.575, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.053, 6.298), P=0.032]. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of LASI and ARBSI at different stages in patients with arteriovenous fistula and unnel-cuffed catheters (TCC) (P＞0.05). There were statistically significant differences in the incidence of LASI [χ2=4.898, RR=3.832, 95%CI (1.058, 13.885), P=0.027] and ARBSI [χ2=7.150, RR=4.684, 95%CI (1.333, 16.460), P=0.005] among non cuffed catheters (NCC) patients at different stages. TCC patients might experience LASI (P<0.05) during the epidemic period and ARBSI (P<0.05) during the control period compared with the arteriovenous fistula patients; both central venous catheterization and NCC patients might experience LASI and ARBSI during the control period (P<0.05). Conclusion Targeting COVID-19 prevention may be associated with the reduction of vascular access infection in hemodialysis patients, in particular in NCC patients.
Objective To investigate the species distribution and antibiotic resistance among the bloodstream infections in intensive care unit ( ICU) . Methods A retrospective analysis was performed to review the microbiological and susceptibility test data of all bloodstream infections in ICU from January 2004 to September 2009. The patterns of antibiotic resistance among the top five bacteria were compared. Results 89 cases of bloodstream infection were detected with 112 strains, including 55 Gram-positive ( G+ ) bacteria( 49. 1% ) , 55 Gram-negative ( G- ) bacteria ( 49. 1% ) , and 2 fungi ( 1. 8% ) . The main pathogens causing bloodstream infection were Burkholderia spp. ( 33, 29. 5% ) , S. epidermidis( 31, 27. 7% ) , Klebsiella pneumoniae ( 7, 6. 3% ) , S. aureus ( 7, 6. 3% ) , S. hominis ( 6, 5. 4% ) , Acinetobacter baumannii ( 6,5. 4% ) , Pseudomonas aeruginosa( 5, 4. 5% ) and S. haemolyticus( 5, 4. 5%) , suggesting that Burkholderia spp. was predominant pathogenic G- bacteria, and coagulase-negative staphylococcus was predominant G+ bacteria. The antibiotic resistance tests demonstrated that isolated G- bacillus was highly sensitive to carbopenem, while vancomycin-resistant G+ cocci were not found. Conclusions Within the latest 5 years,the prevalence of G+ bacteria infection is almost equivalent to G- bacteria in blood stream infection.Coagulase-negative staphylococcus is the mainly G+ bacteria and Burkholderia spp. is predominant in G- bacteria. Carbopenemand glycopeptides still remain to be the first choice.
ObjectiveTo explore the prognostic risk factors of bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii in the hospital, to provide a basis for clinical diagnosis and treatment.MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of patients diagnosed with Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infection in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region People’s Hospital between January 2013 and December 2018. The patients were divided into survival group and non-survival group according to the outcome within 30 days after blood culture was collected. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were used to identify the risk factors of Acinetobacter baumannii bloodstream infections.ResultsA total of 123 patients were included, including 48 in the survival group and 75 in the non-survival group. Third generation cephalosporins [odds ratio (OR)=2.492, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.125, 2.924), P<0.001], carbapenems [OR=1.721, 95%CI (1.505, 1.969), P<0.001], multidrug resistant-Acinetobacter baumannii infection [OR=1.240, 95%CI (1.063, 1.446), P=0.006], post-operation [OR=0.515, 95%CI (0.449, 0.590), P<0.001], mechanical ventilation [OR=1.182, 95%CI (1.005, 1.388), P=0.043], indwelling central venous catheter [OR=0.116, 95%CI (0.080, 0.169), P<0.001], mixed infection or septic shock [OR=3.935, 95%CI (2.740, 5.650), P<0.001], APACHE Ⅱ score (≥15) [OR=5.939, 95%CI (5.029, 7.013), P<0.001], chronic kidney disease [OR=1.440, 95%CI (1.247, 1.662), P<0.001], immune system disease [OR=28.620, 95%CI (17.087, 47.937), P<0.001], use of corticosteroids [OR=0.520, 95%CI (0.427, 0.635), P<0.001], and combined antifungal agents [OR=0.814, 95%CI (0.668, 0.992), P=0.041] were independent factors for predicting the prognosis of patients with bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii.ConclusionsThe third generation cephalosporins, carbapenem, MDR-Acinetobacter baumannii infection, post-operation, mechanical ventilation, indwelling central venous catheter, mixed infection or septic shock, APACHE Ⅱ score (≥15), chronic kidney disease, immune system disease, use of corticosteroids, and combined antifungal agents were independent factors for predicting the prognosis of patients with bloodstream infections caused by Acinetobacter baumannii. In the clinical work, it is needed to carry out timely detection of microbial etiology, timely report, and reasonable treatment.
Objective To explore the overall outcome and its factors of patients with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection (CRPA-BSI). Methods A single-center, retrospective cohort study was carried out. The demographic and clinical data of all emergency patients and inpatients in West China Hospital of Sichuan University from 2017 to 2021 were collected. Firstly, the prognosis of patients with CRPA-BSI was compared with those with carbapenem-sensitive Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection (CSPA-BSI). Then Cox regression was used to analyze the factors affecting the prognosis of CRPA-BSI patients. Results A total of 53 patients with CRPA-BSI and 175 patients with CSPA-BSI were enrolled, and they were 1∶1 matched according to the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (aCCI) to control for confounding factors. When aCCI was similar, the incidence of poor prognosis in CRPA-BSI patients was significantly higher than that in CSPA-BSI patients [41.5% vs. 18.9%; relative risk=2.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.16, 4.19), P=0.011]. The median length of hospital stay in the CRPA-BSI group was 3 d longer than that in the CSPA-BSI group but the difference was not statistically significant (29 vs. 26 d, P=0.388). With regard to prognostic factors, univariate Cox regression analyses showed that the highest temperature ≤39℃ (P=0.014), hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases (P=0.011), days of central venous catheterization (P=0.025), days of indwelling urinary catheters (P=0.037), adjustment of medication duration according to drug sensitivity results (P=0.015) and Pitt bacteremia score (P=0.007) were related to the poor prognosis of CRPA-BSI patients. Multiple Cox regression analysis showed that hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease [hazard ratio (HR)=3.434, 95%CI (1.271, 9.276), P=0.015] and Pitt bacteremia score [HR=1.264, 95%CI (1.057, 1.510), P=0.010] were independently associated with poor outcome in CRPA-BSI patients. Conclusions The prognosis of CRPA-BSI patients is worsen than that of CSPA-BSI patients. Hepatobiliary and pancreatic diseases significantly increase the risk of poor outcome in CRPA-BSI patients. Pitt bacteremia score is a predictor of prognosis in patients with CRPA-BSI.
Objective To explore the risk factors of catheter-associated bloodstream infections ( CRBSI) in intensive care unit ( ICU) of primary hospital. Methods A total of 623 patients with central venous catheters were recruited in the study. 60 of themsuffered fromCRBSI served as an observation group and other 563 cases without CRBSI served as control. Univariate analysis was used to scan possible risk factors. Then logistic regression analysis was used to exclude the confounding factors. Results The overall incidence rate of CRBSI was 9. 63% ( 60 /623) . There were significant differences in APACHE score, type of catheter, location of catheter, duration of central venous catheter, intravenous nutrition, use of steroid, times of intubation, urgent intubations, nutritional status, diabetes, and MODS between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that higher APACHE score, double-lumen catheter, femoral vein catheter, catheter indwelling more than two weeks, intravenous nutrition, intubation more than 2 times, and emergency intubation were risk factors of CRBSI. Conclusions Higher APACHE score, double-lumen catheter, femoral vein catheter, catheter indwelling more than two weeks, intravenous nutrition, intubation more than 2 times, and emergency intubation were major risk factors of CRBSI in ICU of primary hospital.
