Peripheral artery disease (PAD) of the lower extremities, which poses a major challenge in the field of global public health, has seen a rising trend in its incidence and disability rate year by year. With the continuous innovation of new diagnostic techniques, imaging evaluation methods, and treatment strategies, profound changes have taken place in the diagnosis and treatment paradigm in this field. Based on the “European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Asymptomatic Lower Limb Peripheral Arterial Disease and Intermittent Claudication” issued by the European Society for Vascular Surgery in 2024, we systematically reviewed the relevant international guidelines in recent years and conducted horizontal comparisons. Combining with the latest clinical research evidence, we conducted an in-depth analysis from the perspective of evidence-based medicine on the strategic evolution, technical key point updates, and clinical evidence levels of endovascular treatment for lower extremity PAD. The aim is to provide an evidence-based medical basis for clinical decision-making.
ObjectiveTo investigate the impact of anatomical variations of the isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA) on clinical outcomes and imaging outcomes in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection (TBAD) who underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair. MethodsThe clinical data of patients with TBAD in West China Hospital, Sichuan University from January 2016 to December 2023 were collected, and the differences of clinical outcomes and imaging outcomes between patients with and without ILVA were compared. ResultsBased on the inclusion criteria and the result of propensity score-based matching, 82 patients with TBAD were included, including 17 patients with ILVA (ILVA group) and 65 patients without ILVA (control group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the radiological and surgical information (P>0.05). The median time of the follow-up for these 82 patients were 37 months, during which there were no significant differences in aortic-related death, aortic event, stroke, adverse aortic remodeling, type Ⅰ A endoleak, and retrograde progression between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the re-intervention rate [HR=2.56, 95%CI (1.55, 8.11), P=0.03] and the incidence of type Ⅱ internal leakage [OR=1.36, 95%CI (1.08, 2.11), P=0.04] in the ILVA group were higher. ConclusionsNo significant differences were observed for ILVA patients in terms of serious adverse events such as aortic-related death and retrograde progression, comparing with the patients with normal aortic arch. However, the patients with ILVA were more susceptible to complications such as reintervention and type Ⅱ endoleak, which warranted the necessity of intensive postoperative follow-up for these patients.
ObjectiveTo summarize the diagnosis, surgical management, and outcomes of one case of complex unilateral renal artery aneurysm repaired by in situ open surgery. MethodThe clinical data of a patient with complex renal artery aneurysm admitted to the Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University in December 2021 who underwent in situ open surgery were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsThe patient was a middle-aged (41 years old) female with a left renal artery aneurysm detected on physical examination. The renal artery three-dimensional CT imaging showed that the aneurysm was large in size and complex in anatomical structure; the aneurysm was located at the renal hilum, demonstrating multiple outflow tracts and close proximity to renal parenchyma and the ureter. Surgical management included in situ aneurysm resection combined with renal artery branch reconstruction and great saphenous vein bypass grafting. The operation duration was 5 h and the intraoperative urine output was 250 mL, and the intraoperative blood loss was about 400 mL. Four units of erythrocyte suspension, 200 mL of autologous recycled blood, and 400 mL of plasma were transfused during the operation. The results of the 36-month postoperative follow-up showed that the reconstructed renal arterial branches and the bridging vessel had satisfactory blood flow, and renal function was unaffected. ConclusionsThe results of this case suggest that in complex renal artery aneurysms involving multiple branches, in situ resection of the aneurysm followed by revascularization and main renal artery bypass grafting to restore flow is safe and feasible, and the long-term prognosis is good. However, it should be emphasized that the anatomy of renal artery aneurysms should be evaluated in detail preoperatively to determine the method of in situ revascularization. The results of the study also need to be further validated by larger samples and multicenter studies.
ObjectiveTo summarize the research progress of relationship between distal landing zone geometric and outcomes of endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm. MethodsThe domestic and foreign literature on the accumulation of the impact of proximal and distal landing zone geometric morphology on clinical outcomes, the evaluation methods for related complications of proximal and distal landing zones, preventive measures for adverse outcomes related to the geometric morphology of the distal landing zone, and the pathophysiological mechanisms of complications related to the distal landing zone were retrieved to make an review. ResultsThe irregular geometric morphology of the proximal landing zone was closely associated with adverse events following EVAR. The morphology of the distal landing zone was actually more complex than that of the proximal zone, and the measurement methods for its parameters were also more complicated. Common methods used in the literature for studying landing zones included the centerline distance method, the minimum distance method, and the landing area method. Primary preventive measures for adverse outcomes related to the geometry of the distal landing zone included increasing radial support force and contact area, using endostaples, and extending the landing zone. In addition to anatomical factors, the distal landing zone was also influenced by various pathophysiological factors. ConclusionsThe morphology and related pathological changes of the distal landing zone significantly impact the clinical outcomes following EVAR for abdominal aortic aneurysm. However, current research on the distal landing zone is limited. Future studies should focus on developing new technologies and methods to improve the evaluation and management of the distal landing zone, thereby reducing the complications after EVAR, enhancing the success rate of the surgery, and improving patient survival quality.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical features of the retroperitoneal paralangliomas.
MethodClinical data of 34 patients with retroperitoneal paragangliomas who underwent surgery in our hospital between January 2005 and January 2015 were enrolled, all patients diagnosed by pathological examination.
ResultsClinical manifestation: hypertension (n=4) and headache (n=1) were the main symptoms in all 5 patients with functional tumor. Abdominal distension (n=14) or abdominal pain (n=11) were the initial symptoms in patients with nonfunctional tumor, gastrointes-tinal obstruction was observed in 1 patient, the other 3 patients were diagnosed accidently among the 29 patients with nonfunctional tumors. Blood and urine catecholamines increased notly in 5 patients with functional tumor, increased mildly in 2 patients with nonfunctional tumor; and remained at a normal level in the other patients. All the 34 patients underwent surgery, 4 patients with nonfunctional tumors who suffered from vessel wrapped needed tumor resection combining with main vessel resection or reconstruction, 1 of the 4 patients presented with vascular wall invasion. Two patients presented with lymph-vascular invasion of patients didn't received vessel resection or reconstruction. The mean value of diameter of these tumors was (9.5±5.1) cm (3.5-18.5 cm). Twenty four tumors had complete capsule, the other 10 had partial capsule; 32 tumors were well differentiated, and other 2 patients had apparent strange nucleus. Among the 34 patients, G1 tumors were confirmed in 14 patients and G2 tumors were confirmed in 20 patients. All the 34 patients were followed up with a mean value of follow-up time of 52 months (1-105 months). During the follow-up period, 6 patients suffered from recurrence and 6 patients died. The 1-year and 5-year survival rates were 86.0% and 81.5%, respectively.
ConclusionsRadical resection may be the only measure to cure retroperitoneal paragangliomas. Tumor combining with vascular resection or reconstruction provide a chance for patients with ‘unresectable tumors’.
Objective
To discuss feasibility and effectivity of intraoperative ultrasound (US) during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for abdominal aortic aneurysm.
Methods
A radiographic contrast nephropathy patient of abdominal aortic aneurysm and left internal iliac artery aneurysm was treated by EVAR without iodine contrast media assisted by US. Then summarized the data of this patient.
Results
The precise placement of the stent-graft was performed for abdominal aortic aneurysm. The left internal iliac artery aneurysm was successfully treatment with the stent-graft and coils. Intraoperative Ⅱ type endoleak from inferior mesenteric artery and Ⅰ b type endoleak from right iliac stent were identified by using US. The operative duration was 120 min and the blood loss was only 20 mL. Ⅱ type endoleak was still detected and the Ⅰ b type of endoleak was loss on postoperative a week.
Conclusion
Intraoperative US-assisted EVAR in patients with infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm represents a new option for intraoperative visualization of aortoiliac segments required as proximal or distal fixation zones and identification of endoleaks, especially in those patients with contraindications for usage of iodine-containing contrast agents.
ObjectiveTo assess whether the geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) of elderly patients can be used as an evaluation index for complications after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA).MethodsA total of 265 patients with EVAR who received abdominal aortic aneurysm between January 2011 to December 2017 were included in this study from West China Hospital of Sichuan University. All patients included in this study were subrenal arterial AAA. Statistical analysis of clinical data was performed. The value of GNRI in evaluating postoperative complications of EVER patients was evaluated.ResultsOf the 372 patients, 158 were included in the GNRI abnormal group (GNRI≤98), and 214 were included in the normal group (GNRI>98). Univariate analysis showed that the age (P=0.04), drinking (P=0.04), serum albumin level (P<0.001), BMI (P<0.001), GNRI (P=0.004), and stroke (P<0.05) were risk factors that affects postoperative complications of AAA. Multivariate analysis showed that preoperative GNRI [HR=0.687, 95%CI: (0.487, 0.968), P=0.032] abnormality was one of the risk factors affecting postoperative complications of AAA.ConclusionFor patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm, the GNRI is one of the important indicator for predicting postoperative complications.
