ObjectiveTo observe the efficacy and safety of vitrectomy combined with subretinal injection of alteplase (tPA) and intravitreal injection of Conbercept in the treatment of large area submacular hemorrhage (SMH) secondary to polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV). MethodsA retrospective clinical study. From January to September 2021, 32 eyes of 32 patients with massive SMH secondary to PCV diagnosed in the Affiliated Eye Hospital of Nanchang University were included in the study. Large SMH was defined as hemorrhage diameter ≥4 optic disc diameter (DD). There were 32 patients (32 eyes), 20 males and 12 females. The mean age was (72.36±8.62) years. All patients had unilateral disease.The duration from onset of symptoms to treatment was (7.21±3.36) days. All patients underwent best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination. BCVA examination was performed using the international standard visual acuity chart, which was converted to the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity during statistics. The central macular thickness (CMT) was measured by spectral domain-OCT. The average size of SMH was (6.82±1.53) DD. The logMAR BCVA 1.73±0.44; CMT was (727.96±236.40) μm. All patients were treated with 23G pars plana vitrectomy combined with subretinal injection of tPA and intravitreal injection of Conbercept. At 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, the same equipment and methods were used for relevant examinations before treatment. The changes of BCVA and CMT, the clearance rate of macular hemorrhage, and the complications during and after surgery were observed. BCVA and CMT before and after treatment were compared by repeated measures analysis of variance. ResultsCompared with before treatment, BCVA gradually increased at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, and the differences were statistically significant (F=77.402, P＜0.001). There was no significant difference in BCVA between any two groups at different time points after treatment (P＞0.05). Correlation analysis showed that BCVA at 12 months after treatment was negatively correlated with the course of disease (r=－0.053, P=0.774). One week after treatment, macular hemorrhage was completely cleared in 30 eyes (93.75%, 30/32). The CMT was (458.56±246.21), (356.18±261.46), (345.82±212.38) and (334.64±165.54) μm at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment, respectively. Compared with before treatment, CMT decreased gradually after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant (F=112.480, P＜0.001). There were statistically significant differences in different follow-up time before and after treatment (P＜0.001). The number of treatments combined with Conbercept during and after surgery was (4.2±1.8) times. At the last follow-up, there was no recurrence of SMH, retinal interlamellar effusion and other complications. Conclusion Subretinal injection of tPA combined with intravitreal injection of Conbercept is safe and effective in the treatment of large SMH secondary to PCV, and it can significantly improve the visual acuity of patients.
ObjectiveTo observe and compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase or urokinase in the first-ever acute ischemic stroke patients arriving at the hospital 3.5-4.5 h after onset.MethodsClinical data of patients with acute ischemic stroke treated in Shihezi People’s Hospital between January 2019 and October 2020 were prospectively collected. The National Insititutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on the 7th day and the 90th day, the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score and the Blessed Behavior Scale (BBS) score on the 90th day, and symptomatic bleeding within 36 h after thrombolysis were analyzed and compared between the patients receiving alteplase threatment (the alteplase group) and the ones receiving urokinase treatment (the urokinase group).ResultsTotally 96 patients were treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Among them, 58 patients received alteplase threatment and 38 received urokinase treatment. The difference in NIHSS, mRS, or BBS scores between the two groups before treatment was not statistically significant (P>0.05). On the 90th day after treatment, the NIHSS, mRS, and BBS scores of the alteplase group were 3.59±3.73, 2.26±1.26, and 15.33±8.28, respectively, and those of the urokinase group were 5.95±4.88, 3.00±0.87, and 20.37±11.80, respectively; the differences between the two groups were all statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the rate of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage between the two groups within 36 h after treatment (P>0.05). Multiple linear regression analyses showed that the treatment method was related to the NIHSS score on the 7th day, the NIHSS score on the 90th day, the mRS score on the 90th day, and the BBS score on the 90th day (P<0.05), the history of heart disease was related to the mRS score on the 90th day (P<0.05), and the income was related to the BBS score on the 90th day (P<0.05).ConclusionFor the hyperactue ischemic stroke, the overall effect of alteplase treatment may be better than that of urokinase treatment.
ObjectivesTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of plasminogen activator assist external ventricular drainage in cerebral hemorrhage.MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, CBM and WanFang Data databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of plasminogen activator assist external ventricular drainage in cerebral hemorrhage from inception to March 2019. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 23 RCTs involving 1 560 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that, compared with the blank control or placebo, the addition of plasminogen activator urokinase after puncture and drainage could improve the clinical efficacy (RR=1.36, 95%CI 1.26 to 1.47, P<0.000 01), shorten removal time of hematoma (MD=?3.37, 95%CI ?3.89 to ?2.85, P<0.000 01), reduce postoperative re-bleeding rate (Peto OR=0.30, 95%CI 0.18 to 0.51, P<0.000 01), reduce the incidence of intracranial infection (Peto OR=0.47, 95%CI 0.25 to 0.87, P=0.02), and reduce mortality (Peto OR=0.45, 95%CI 0.27 to 0.76, P=0.003). The differences were statistically significant between two groups.ConclusionsCurrent evidence shows that the combination with urokinase can improve curative effect of hypertension cerebral hemorrhage patients with external ventricular drainage. In reducing hemorrhage, intracranial infection and mortality, urokinase also has great curative effect. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are required to verify above conclusions.
Objective To compare the efficacy of reteplase and ateplase in the treatment of acute massive pulmonary thromboembolism ( PTE) in emergency. Methods From January 2005 to December 2009,42 patients with acute massive PTE were treated by intravenous thrombolysis with reteplase or ateplase. The thrombolysis efficacy, bleeding incidence and mortality were measured. Results In the reteplase group, the emergency thrombolysis effective rate was 88. 9% among 18 patients. Mild bleeding occurred in 3 patients,moderate bleeding in 1 patient, and 2 cases died in hospital. In the ateplase group, the emergency thrombolysis effective rate was 75% among 24 patients. Mild bleeding occurred in 3 patients, moderate bleeding in 2 patients, and 3 cases died in hospital. The thrombolysis effective rate, bleeding incidence and mortality had no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion Both the reteplase and ateplase thrombolysis therapy are safe and effective in the treatment of acute massive PTE, but reteplase thrombolysis therapy is more convenient in emergency.
