ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical effects of laparoscopic hiatus reconstruction with Bard Crurosoft patch associated with Nissen fundoplication in elderly patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). MethodsFrom July 2006 to July 2009, 22 consecutive elderly patients （≥65 years） with GERD underwent laparoscopic hiatus reconstruction associated with Nissen fundoplication， 10 of them underwent laparoscopic Crurosoft patch hiatus reconstruction (hiatus diameter≥5 cm in 2 patients， lt;5 cm in 8 patients) and 12 underwent laparoscopic simple sutured hiatus reconstruction (hiatus diameter≥5 cm in 2 patients， lt;5 cm in 10 patients). Intra and perioperative data including symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, dysphagia, and respiratory complications), functional evaluations (esophagogastroscopy, manometric evaluations in lower esophageal segment, and 24 h pH-monitoring values) were compared and analyzed. ResultsPatients in 2 groups had similar preoperative values in demographics, symptom scores, functional evaluations, as well as operative data except for mean operative time. Three-month and 1-year follow-up after operation, the results of symptoms scores and functional evaluations of patients in 2 groups compared with preoperative values wear improved （Plt;0.05）, but symptoms scores and functional evaluations of patients in patch group were evaluated to demonstrate more significant improvement than suture group （Plt;0.05）. In suture group, the results of 3 months after operation were better than 1 year after operation, with statistically significant difference （Plt;0.05）. Two patients underwent postoperative intrathoracic immigration of wrap in suture group, but this complication did not happen in patch group （Plt;0.05）. ConclusionsLaparoscopic hiatus reconstruction with Bard Crurosoft patch associated with Nissen fundoplication is a safe and effective treatment for elderly patients(≥65 years) with GERD.
ObjectiveTo investigate therapeutic effect and influence on survival of complete laparoscopic transesophageal hiatus approach approach and transabdominal combined thoracotomy approach in treatment of Siewert type Ⅱesophageal gastric junction adenocarcinoma (AEG).MethodsFrom January 2012 to December 2014, the patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG were collected in the Department of General Surgery (Gastrointestinal Surgery) of Weifang People’s Hospital, then who were designed into a transabdominal group and transabdominal combined thoracotomy group according to the operative approach method. The intraoperative and postoperative statuses were compared between these two groups.ResultsIn this study, 142 patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG were included, 83 in the transabdominal group and 59 in the transabdominal combined thoracotomy group. There were no significant differences in the baseline data such as the gender, age, preoperative histological differentiation, TNM stage, etc. between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the transabdominal combined thoracotomy group, in terms of the operation time, the volumes of intraoperative blood loss and blood transfusion, and the proportion of patients with blood transfusion were better (P<0.05); the postoperative hospitalization time, time to use analgesics, time of the first activity out of bed, and time of removed electrocardiographic monitoring were also earlier (P<0.05); the numbers of lymphadenectomy and metastatic lymph nodes were less (P<0.05) in the transabdominal group. But there was no significant difference in the rate of lymph node metastasis between the two groups (P>0.05). The total incidence of complications in the transabdominal group was lower than that in the transabdominal combined thoracotomy group (χ2=9.871, P=0.002). The median survival time was 39 months in the transabdominal group and 34 months in the transabdominal combined thoracotomy group. The survival had no significant difference between the two groups by the Kaplan-Meier analysis (χ2=0.281, P=0.596). The result of multivariate analysis showed that the TNM stage and lymph node positive rate were the independent factors influencing the survival of the patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG.ConclusionsAccording to results of this study, it is safe and effective for patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG to adopt a complete laparoscopic transabdominal approach. For elderly patients with poor cardiopulmonary function who can not tolerate transthoracic surgery, it could reduce postoperative complications and improve safety.
Congenital deformities of the diaphragm include (1) Hiatus hernia; (2) Congenital diaphragmatic hernia; (3) Eventration of deaphragm. Fifty-one cases were seen by the authors in the past 30 years. Each type of the pathologic feature and the experiences in the surgical repair were suggested in this paper. Choice of an appropriate surgical procedure on the basis of its pathoanatomic and pathophysiologic features was emphasized in order to enhance the efficacy of treatment.
ObjectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RAS) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in hiatus hernia repair. MethodsPubMed, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, Web of Science, VIP, and Wanfang databases were searched to collect literature comparing the efficacy and safety of RAS and CLS for hiatus hernia repair published from their inception to November 7, 2023. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies, and RevMan 5.4.1 software was used for meta-analysis. ResultsA total of 15 retrospective cohort studies with 18239 patients were finally included. The NOS scores of the included literature were all≥7 points. Meta-analysis results showed that RAS was superior to CLS in terms of postoperative complications as the primary outcome [OR=0.56, 95%CI (0.42, 0.77), P<0.01]. There was no statistical difference between the two methods in terms of average operation time [MD=?0.74, 95%CI (?12.99, 11.51), P=0.91], average intraoperative blood loss [MD=?24.47, 95%CI (?54.80, 5.87), P=0.11], intraoperative complications [OR=0.76, 95%CI (0.29, 2.01), P=0.58], average postoperative hospital stay [MD=?0.24, 95%CI (?0.75, 0.27), P=0.36], postoperative GERD score [MD=?0.04, 95%CI (?0.41, 0.33), P=0.81], and 30-day readmission rate [OR=0.60, 95%CI (0.30, 1.20), P=0.15]. The cost of CLS surgery was less than that of RAS [SMD=1.59, 95%CI (1.16, 2.01), P<0.01]. ConclusionRAS has comparable efficacy and safety to CLS in hiatus hernia repair.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effect and prognosis of laparoscopic patch repair of esophageal hiatal hernia.MethodsFrom October 2014 to January 2019, 100 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease undergoing laparoscopic esophageal hiatus hernia repair were randomly divided into the patch group and the non-patch group. All patients underwent laparoscopic repair of esophageal hiatal hernia plus fundoplication (Nissen’s method). On that basis, the patients in the patch group used special mesh for esophageal hiatal hernia repair, while the ones in the non-patch group did not. All the patients were followed up for a long time. The operative effect, postoperative complication rate, recurrence rate, and satisfaction rate of the patients between the two groups were compared.ResultsA total of 98 patients were successfully followed up for more than one year, including 68 in the patch group and 30 in the non-patch group. One year after surgery, the differences between the patch group and the non-patch group in the improvements of reflux attack, heartburn, dysphagia, and food intake were statistically significant (P<0.05); there was no significant difference between the patch group and the non-patch group in satisfaction rate (82.4% vs. 73.3%, P>0.05); the differences in recurrence rate (2.9% vs. 26.7%) and incidence of dysphagia (47.0% vs. 6.7%) between the patch group and the non-patch group were statistically significant (P<0.05).ConclusionFor the patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease caused by esophageal hiatal hernia, the laparoscopic repair of esophageal hiatal hernia + Nissen fundoplication on the basis of reasonable selection of special mesh for esophageal hiatal hernia can obtain satisfactory clinical effect.
Objective To investigate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic operation of gastric and gastroesophageal junction diseases. Methods Between May 2004 and June 2009, 59 patients with gastric and gastroesophageal diseases were treated laparoscopically. The operative methods and maneuvers were evaluated and perioperative interventions, complications and efficacy of patients were analyzed. Results All operations were successfully completed laparoscopically except for one patient with gastric cancer who required a conversion to open surgery. No short-term complications occurred in all cases. No port transplant metastasis occurred for the patients with gastric cancer after an average of 36 months (1-60 months) follow-up. One patient died of liver metastasis 12 months after operation. The 3-year survival rate was 93.3% (14/15). Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery of the gastric and gastroesophageal junction diseases is feasible and safe with minimal invasiveness, which is worth popularizing.
ObjectiveTo compare the clinical efficacy of different surgical approaches for Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction (AEG). MethodsThe clinical data of the patients with Siewert type Ⅱ AEG who received sugeries in the Department of Thoracic Surgery of Gansu Provincial People's Hospital from August 2014 to December 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the surgical approach: a transabdominal group (transabdominal diaphragmatic esophageal hiatus approach) and a combined group (thoracoabdominal combined with right thoracic approach). Perioperative clinical data and postoperative follow-up data were collected to compare the short- and long-term efficacy of the two groups. Results A total of 87 patients were enrolled. There were 48 patients (31 males and 17 females, with an average age of 60.85±8.47 years) in the transabdominal group, and 39 patients (25 males and 14 females, with an average age of 61.13±8.51 years) in the combined group. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in the baseline indicators such as gender, age, tumor size and stage (P>0.05). Compared with the combined group, the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative bed rest time, postoperative total drainage volume were shorter or less, and the visual analogue scale score on the 3rd day after surgery were lower in the transabdominal group (P<0.05). However, the total number of lymph nodes dissected, the number of thoracic lymph nodes dissected and the number of positive thoracic lymph nodes in the combined group were larger than those in the transabdominal group, and the differences were statistically significant (P=0.001). The median survival time in the combined group and transabdominal group was 25.85 months and 20.86 months, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate of the combined group was higher than that of the transabdominal group (46.2% vs. 38.9%, χ2=5.995, P=0.014). However, there was no statistical difference between the two groups in the postoperative catheter time, esophageal and gastric resection margin distance, number of abdominal lymph nodes dissected, number of positive abdominal lymph nodes, or incidence of postoperative complications (P>0.05). ConclusionFor patients with Siewert type Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction, thoracoabdominal combined with right thoracic approach is safe and effective, and has advantages in thoracic lymph node dissection, bringing more benefits to the patients, so it is recommended to be popularized in clinical practice.
