Graphene and its derivatives have good physical and chemical properties and biological properties, which can promote stem cell proliferation and osteogenic differentiation, and it has antibacterial properties and drug release property. Therefore, it has broad application prospects in the field of orthopedic biomaterials. This paper mainly introduces the research progress of graphene nanocomposite materials applied in the aspects of bone tissue engineering scaffold, bone repair, bone graft materials, etc. in order to provide desirable information for the future application basis and clinical research.
ObjectiveTo summarize the related research progress of antibacterial modification of orthopaedic implants surface in recent years. Methods The domestic and foreign related literature in recent years was extensively consulted, the research progress on antibacterial modification of orthopaedic implants surface was discussed from two aspects of characteristics of infection in orthopedic implants and surface anti-infection modification. Results The orthopaedic implants infections are mainly related to aspects of bacterial adhesion, decreased host immunity, and surface biofilm formation. At present, the main antimicrobial coating methods of orthopaedic implants are antibacterial adhesion coating, antibiotic coating, inorganic antimicrobial coating, composite antimicrobial coating, nitric oxide coating, immunomodulation, three-dimensional printing, polymer antimicrobial coating, and “smart” coating. Conclusion The above-mentioned antibacterial coating methods of orthopedic implants can not only inhibit bacterial adhesion, but also solve the problems of low immunity and biofilm formation. However, its mechanism of action and modification are still controversial and require further research.
Objective To develope a modified surgical lavage tube to improve the efficacy of the treatment of orthopaedic postoperative infection. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 126 patients who received the pulsed lavage therapy with side-hole double valve lavage tube between March 2005 and March 2010. There were 98 males and28 females, aged 19-63 years (mean, 35 years). The infected sites included femur in 61 cases, tibiofibula in 46 cases, humerus in 12 cases, and patella in 7 cases. The lavage tube obstruction and defluvium, secondary infection of drainage opening, and wound heal ing were observed during treatment. Results No lavage tube defluvium occured during the lavage in all cases. Lavage tube obstruction occurred in 68 cases, edema at the peri pheral tissue was caused by obstruction in 9 cases; secondary infection at the lavage and drainage opening in 10 cases, which were cured after corresponding treatment. All cases achieved wound healing by first intention within 2 weeks. Lavage tube and drainage opening were closed within 1 month. All patients were followed up 1-5 years (mean, 18 months) with no recurrence. Conclusion Pulsed lavage therapy with side-hole double valve lavage tube can obviously improve the efficacy of the treatment of orthopaedic postoperative infection, so it is an effective modification to convention lavage.
ObjectiveTo compare the effect of problem-based learning (PBL) and traditional teaching method (lecture-based learning) on clinical practical teaching of orthopedic surgery.
MethodsBetween May 2012 and December 2013, 55 orthopedic interns were chosen to be divided into two groups: PBL group (n=29) and traditional lecture group (control group, n=26). Case report and examination on a completion of orthopedic surgery were used to assess the teaching outcomes.
ResultsPerformance differences in content of presentation and capability of answers to questions were significant between PBL group and the traditional group in the report test (P<0.05). The test scores of case analysis examination in PBL group were significantly higher than those in the traditional lecture group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in other types of questions (P>0.05).
ConclusionThe participants in PBL group have performed significantly better in culturing clinical thinking and comprehensive analysis, competence and in no circumstance did they perform worse than traditional lecture method.
Mixed reality technology is new digital holographic imaging technology that generates three-dimensional simulation images through computers and anchors the virtual images to the real world. Compared with traditional imaging diagnosis and treatment methods, mixed reality technology is more conducive to the advantages of precision medicine, helps to promote the development of medical clinical application, teaching and scientific research in the field of orthopedics, and will further promote the progress of clinical orthopedics toward standardization, digitization and precision. This article briefly introduces the mixed reality technology, reviews its application in the perioperative period, teaching and diagnosis and treatment standardization and dataization in the field of orthopedics, and discusses its technical advantages, aiming to provide a reference for the better use of mixed reality technology in orthopedics.
ObjectiveTo re-evaluate the systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MAs) of the efficacy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement. MethodsThe CNKI, VIP, WanFang Data, SinoMed, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were electronically searched to collect SR/MAs of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement from inception to April 28, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and then assessed the quality of reports, methodological quality, risk of bias, and the strength of evidence quality by using PRISMA, AMSTAR-Ⅱ, ROBIS, and GRADE tool. ResultsA total of 20 SR/MAs were included. The results of the included studies showed that robot-assisted pedicle screw placement was more accurate and had a lower number of complications compared with freehand pedicle screw placement. The quality of reports, methodology, and evidence for pedicle screw placement efficiency in all SR/MAs were low or extremely low, with a high risk of bias. The main reasons included high heterogeneity of included studies, unclear research methods and selection criteria, and missing key reporting processes. ConclusionRobot-assisted pedicle screw placement may have better clinical efficiency than traditional freehand pedicle screw placement. But the quality of relational SR/MAs is low.
ObjectiveTo explore the application of clinical pathway in patients undergoing orthopedic day surgery.MethodsPatients who were scheduled for orthopedic treatment at Day Surgery Department of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from May to October 2020 were selected as the clinical pathway group, and all of them were managed by clinical pathway. Patients who were scheduled for orthopedic treatment at Day Surgery Department of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University from May to October 2019 were selected as the routine group, and all of them were managed by conventional clinical methods. The general conditions of patients, physicians’ work efficiency, medical costs and medical quality were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe clinical pathway group included 246 patients, and the routine group included 391 patients. There was no significant difference in gender, age or disease distribution between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the routine group, the clinical pathway group had obvious advantages in terms of average time spent by a physician in issuing a medical order each time [(5.64±3.29) vs. (2.12±1.05) min], average number of revisions per physician’s order (1.40±0.24 vs. 0.38±0.19), rate of filing medical records within 3 days (90.28% vs. 97.97%), hospital costs [(7462.10±1035.01) vs. (6252.52±1189.05) yuan], drug costs [(652.21±88.53) vs. (437.17±108.20) yuan], length of stay [(1.23±1.04) vs. (1.02±0.18) d] and delayed discharge rate (7.93% vs. 2.03%), with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of unplanned reoperation rate, unplanned rehospitalization rate, or patient satisfaction (P>0.05).ConclusionCompared with routine clinical management, clinical pathway management can improve work efficiency, reduce medical cost and improve medical quality more effectively in the implementation of orthopedic day surgery, which has very positive effects and is worthy of promotion and application.
ObjectiveTo analyze the risk factors of acute wound infection in orthopedic patients.
MethodsA retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 576 orthopedic patients in accordance with the inclusion criteria between July and October 2012. There were 345 males and 231 females, aged 18-95 years (mean, 44 years). Single factor analysis was used for related factors, and logistic regression analysis of multi-factors for risk factors of acute wound infection.
ResultsWound infection occurred in 73 of 576 patients (12.7%). Single factor analysis showed that the influence factors were gender, education, smoking history, nutritional status (hemoglobin, red blood cell count, serum albumin, and total serum protein), blood glucose level, shock history, wound situation (characteristics, multiple injuries, and cleaning), type of injuries, the time of trauma handling, antibiotic use, whether to stay in ICU, wound pain score, drug analgesia, patient controlled analgesia, and dressings and cleaning solution choice. The logistic regression analysis showed that the gender, time of trauma handling, blood glucose level, wound pain score, dressing choice, and wound characteristics were the risk factors of acute wound infection (P<0.05).
ConclusionTo achieve the best results in clinical prevention of infection, these risk factors (gender, the time of trauma handling, blood glucose level, wound pain score, dressing choice, and wound characteristics) should be considered well.
ObjectiveTo investigate the current situation of orthopedic quality control and management in county-level regional general hospitals in Guangdong, and to provide a scientific basis for further standardizing the procedures of orthopedic quality control and management in county-level regional general hospitals and continuously improving the work of provincial orthopedic quality control center.MethodsFrom June 2019 to July 2020, online and offline questionnaire survey and field survey were used to investigate the quality control and management of orthopedic departments in 22 county-level regional general hospitals in Guangdong.ResultsAmong the overall scores of the surveyed hospitals, the highest score was 96.5, the lowest score was 72.0. There were 6 hospitals with a total score of “excellent” (accounting for 27.3%). The “facilities and equipment” and “medical quality” of the surveyed hospitals were relatively valued. Taking Guangzhou, the capital of Guangdong as the center, the districts and counties were divided into the east, the south, the west and the north regions, and the difference in overall scores of orthopedics among the four regions was statistically significant (F=6.299, P=0.004). The unqualified rates of department setting, key technology development, average hospitalization days of representative diseases, equipment allocation, personnel allocation, department management and building layout were relatively high, which were 77.3%, 63.6%, 45.5%, 40.9%, 40.9%, 36.4% and 36.4%, respectively. Most hospitals had set up special debridement rooms in orthopedic department (95.5%), and the management and monitoring of the use of antibacterial drugs was mostly reasonable (90.9%). In terms of the level of orthopedic medical treatment, only 3 hospitals with sufficient key technologies reached the standard, accounting for 13.6%, and only 7 hospitals reached the standard of scientific research capacity, accounting for 31.8%. In terms of quality control, the numbers of hospitals with qualified medical record sampling (72.7%), perfect management and supervision mechanism (86.4%) and quality management team in departments (77.3%) were the least. In addition, among the investigated hospitals, beds were in short supply in orthopedic departments, with 12 hospitals accounting for 54.5% being deducted; 16 hospitals (72.7%) were deducted for unqualified doctor-patient ratio and 11 hospitals (50.0%) were deducted for unqualified nurse-patient ratio.ConclusionsThe overall level of orthopedics construction and management in the surveyed hospitals is uneven. The medical professional and technical level is insufficient. It is difficult to meet the practical needs, and there is an imbalance in the ratio of medical personnel. In the future, it is necessary to strengthen the quality control of orthopedic medical care, strengthen the medical technology training of county-level regional general hospitals and increase the medical and health resources and capital investment, so as to improve the quality control of county-level regional general hospitals.
