ObjectiveTo compare the clinical recovery and immune response between laparoscopic-assisted and open D2 gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer.
MethodsThe clinical data of 53 patients with advanced gastric cancer from January 2012 to October 2013 were studied prospectively. According to random number table, patients were randomly divided into laparoscopic-assisted group(LA group, n=27) and open operation group(OO group, n=26). Operative time, blood loss, time to passage of flatus, time to resume soft diet, after bed time, postoperative hospital stay, and number of retrieved lymph nodes were compared respectively between the two groups. The changes in CD3, CD4+, CD8+, IgG, IgA, IgM, and CRP were examined respectively by using flow cytometry and immunoturbidimetric assays on the preoperative day 1, and on the postoperative day 1 and 7.
ResultsThe operative time was longer significantly in LA group than that in OO group(P < 0.05). The mean blood loss, the first flatus time, after bed time, and postoperative hospital stay in the two groups were all different statistically(P < 0.05), and all were better in LA group. However, the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes and the time to resume soft diet were not significantly different in the two groups(P > 0.05). On the day 1 and 7 after operation, the CD3, CD4+, and CD8+ significantly decreased as compared with those preoperatively in two groups(P < 0.01, P < 0.05). On the day 1 after operation, the levels of IgG, IgA, and IgM significantly decreased as compared with those preoperatively in two groups(P < 0.05). Those immunoglobulin in LA group recovered to close to the level before surgery, but in OO group sustained lower level(P < 0.05). On the day 1 and 7 after operation, CRP level significantly increased as compared with those preoperatively in two groups(P < 0.01, P < 0.05). Those changes of above index were not significantly different between the LA group and OO group on the day 1 after operation(P > 0.05). All index recovered gradually in the two groups on the day 7 after operation and were better in LA group(P < 0.05, except IgA).
ConclusionLaparoscopic radical gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer resulted in a quicker clinical recovery and a lesser depression to the perioperative cellular and humoral immune function.
Through searching and evaluating the evidence on advanced prostate cancer, we found that different types of androgen deprivation had similar effect, and immediate androgen deprivation had survival benefit. For the patient with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, therapies including mitoxantrone, prednisone, docetaxel and surmine were more effective. Strontium-89 provided more effective pain relief than external beam radiation. And bisphophonate had no effect. Antiandrogen withdrawal suggested prostate specific antigen would decline, but the clinical outcome wasn’t reported.
ObjectiveTo investigate the association between the stress-induced hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) and all-cause, cardiovascular, and diabetes-related mortality in patients with advanced cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome, and to evaluate the value of SHR as an independent prognostic marker. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study used data from the 1999–2018 U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). A total of 2 135 patients with advanced CKM (stages 3 and 4) were included. Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression models were applied to assess the relationship between SHR and mortality outcomes. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was employed to explore potential non-linear associations. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify possible effect modifiers. ResultsOver a mean follow-up of 248 months, 674 all-cause, 198 cardiovascular, and 31 diabetes-related deaths occurred. Elevated SHR was significantly associated with diabetes-related mortality (HR=3.48, P<0.001) in a dose-response manner. SHR exhibited a U-shaped relationship with both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (non-linearity P<0.001), indicating increased risk at both low and high SHR levels. Subgroup analyses revealed that sex, BMI, and hyperlipidemia significantly modified the association between SHR and diabetes-related death. ConclusionSHR is an independent predictor of mortality risk in patients with advanced CKM syndrome, particularly for diabetes-related death. These findings support the integration of SHR into risk stratification of high-risk CKM populations and provide a basis for metabolic stress-targeted interventions.
Objective To assess the prevalence of malnutrition in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria, analyze its associated factors, and explore the adverse effects of malnutrition on advanced NSCLC patients in multiple aspects. Methods Patients with NSCLC who were hospitalized for the first time in the Department of Oncology, Shangjin Hospital, West China Hospital, Sichuan University between January and December 2021 were retrospectively selected as the study objects. Malnutrition assessment was carried out in all patients according to GLIM criteria, and the current situation and related factors of malnutrition were analyzed. The Barthel index scale was used to compare the daily activity ability between the malnourished group and the non-malnourished group, the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-Core 30 scale was used to compare the quality of life between the two groups, and the adverse reactions of the two groups were compared by the hospital information system course records. Results According to GLIM diagnostic criteria, 134 of 285 patients (47.0%) were diagnosed with malnutrition. The results of binary multiple logistic regression analysis showed that age [60-69 vs. <60 years old: odds ratio (OR)=2.323, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.277, 4.397); ≥70 vs. <60 years old: OR=10.816, 95%CI (4.185, 27.959)], previous medical history [OR=2.740, 95%CI (1.313, 5.717)], and albumin level [OR=0.905, 95%CI (0.848, 0.965)] were associated with malnutrition in patients with advanced NSCLC (P<0.05). The daily activity ability and quality of life in the malnourished group were significantly worse than those in the non-malnourished group (87.57±12.48 vs. 91.82±6.77, P<0.05; 76.22±11.52 vs. 83.96±9.75, P<0.05), and the incidence of adverse reactions in the malnourished group was higher than that of the non-malnourished group (50.7% vs. 31.8%, P<0.05). Conclusions The prevalence of malnutrition in patients with advanced NSCLC is high, and advanced age, previous medical history and albumin are related factors of malnutrition in patients with advanced NSCLC. Combined malnutrition may have adverse effects on mobility, quality of life and adverse effects of anti-tumor therapy in advanced NSCLC patients.
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal perfusion chemotherapy (HIPC) in treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.Methods The Meta-analysis was applied to analyze 8 randomized controlled quantitative studies published at domestic and abroad. These patients treated by HIPC after radical operation with colorectal cancer were included for the treatment group, and those treated only by radical operation with colorectal cancer for the control group. Relative risk (RR) of outcome variable of 3-year and 5-year survival rate and safety between the two groups were compared. Results There were 8 selected literatures, including 1 501 cases, in which 765 cases for treatment group, and 736 cases for control group. RR of 5-year survival rate of the total patients was 2.39 (95% CI: 1.66-3.45). RR of 3-year survival rate of the total patients was 2.13 (95% CI: 1.45-3.13). The results demonstrated that HIPC could improve 5-year and 3-year survival rate, and sensitivity analysis confirmed the conclusions more reliable. The security was described in 5 literatures, the available information showed smaller potential security issue. Conclusions HIPC after radical operation of advanced colorectal cancer can increase 5-year and 3-year survival rate of patients, improve the prognosis of patients. Whether patients with increased incidence of postoperative complications related to the HIPC is no clear-cut conclusions for lack of related research.
ObjectiveTo systematically review the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer.MethodsPubMed, EMBase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI, WanFang Data and VIP databases were electronically searched to collect randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer from inception to October 13th, 2017. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias of included studies, then, meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan 5.3 software.ResultsA total of 4 RCTs involving 2 524 patients were included. The results of meta-analysis showed that: compared with placebo combined with endocrine therapy, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy could improve the median progression free survival rate (RR=0.53, 95%CI 0.47 to 0.60, P<0.000 01) and the objective response rate (RR=1.67, 95%CI 1.47 to 1.91,P<0.000 01). While there was no statistical difference in clinical benefit rate (RR=0.59, 95%CI 0.75 to 1.19,P=0.64). In terms of adverse reactions, CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy had higher rates of neutropenia (RR=49.76, 95%CI 26.85 to 90.21, P<0.000 01), leukopenia (RR=48.69, 95%CI 18.74 to 133.61,P<0.000 01), fatigue (RR=3.11, 95%CI 1.37 to 7.08,P=0.007) and anemia (RR=2.96, 95%CI 1.61 to 5.42, P=0.000 3). There were no significant differences between two groups in nausea, diarrhea and decreased appetite.ConclusionCDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy for the patients with advanced breast cancer can improve median progression free survival and objective response rate, while increase the incidence of adverse events such as neutropenia, leukopenia, fatigue and anemia. Due to limited quality and quantity of the included studies, more high quality studies are needed to verify above conclusion.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intraoperative mesenchymal chemotherapy with 5-FU implants in radical gastrectomy of advanced gastric cancer. Methods From January 2008 to September 2009， 102 patients with historically proven advanced gastric cancer were enrolled in our department and were allocated to undergo either radical gastrectomy and intraoperative mesenchymal chemotherapy with 5-FU implants 800 mg（treatment group， n=51）， or radical gastrectomy alone （control group， n=51）. The postoperative complications and recurrence rate between two groups were compared. Results There were no significant differences on the volume of abdominal cavity drainage， count of white blood cells， albumin level， and gastrointestinal adverse events between the two groups （P＞0.05）. After a median follow-up of 28 months， the local recurrence rate was lower among patients in treatment group than that in control group （16.3% vs. 39.1%， P＜0.05）， the survival rate of 3-year was higher in treatment group than that in control group （85.8% vs. 67.3%， P＜0.05）. Conclusions Compared with the control group， there are no significant adverse reactions on patients with advanced gastric cancer who were implanted fluorouraci1 implants during operation， which can reduce local recurrence rates and improve the survival rates.
Objective To study the long-term effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on advanced breast cancer. Methods The CAF neoadjuvant chemotherapy 〔CTX 500 mg/m2（1st day, 8th day), 5-FU 500 mg/m2（1st day, 8th day), and ADM 30 mg/m2 (1st day) every 3 weeks〕 was carried out in 31 breast cancer patients (stageⅢ,Ⅳ) for 2 cycles before operation, compared with 30 patients (stage Ⅲa) whose therapies were never done and operations could be feasible. Results The overall response rate was 87.1%(27/31). The stages of 19 patients among 31 (61.3%) declined (6 patients to stage Ⅲa, 8 to stageⅡb, 4 to stageⅡa, 1 to stage 0, 1 to complete response and none to pathological complete response). The diseasefree survival time of the patients was 56.3 months which was obviously longer than that of the patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (43.5 months, P＜0.05). The 5-year diseasefree survival rate of the patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy was 38.7% which was a little higher than that (33.3%) of the patients without the chemotherapy, and the two groups had no significant difference. Conclusion The neoadjuvant chemotherapy can reduce the stages of patients with advanced breast cancer, obviously prolong the diseasefree survival time of patients, and reduce or delay recurrence or metastasis.
Objective To assess the efficacy, safety and dosage regimen of docetaxel in patients with non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CBM, CNKI, VIP and etc to collect controlled trials which involved docetaxel as the second-line treatment of NSCLC. Two reviewers evaluated the quality of included trials independently. The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 4.2 was used for meta-analyses. Results Eight randomized controlled trials were included, all of which didn’t mention the blinding methods. Compared with best supportive care (BSC), the docetaxel group showed longer time to progression (10.6 vs. 6.7 weeks, Plt;0.001) and longer median survival (7.0 vs. 4.6 months, P=0.047), as well as greater 1-year survival (37% vs. 11%, P=0.003). Patients treated with docetaxel showed higher incidence of hematologic toxicity than those treated with BSC. Meta-analyses of different docetaxel dosage regimens (1-week vs. 3-week) showed that there were no statistical differences in terms of disease control rate, response rate or 1-year survival; but the incidence of hematologic toxicity of 1-week regimen was lower than that of 3-week regimen, and no statistical difference was noted in the incidence of non-hematologic toxicity between the two regimens. Conclusion Docetaxel as the second-line chemotherapy for NSCLC significantly improved survival compared with BSC. Two dosage regimens of docetaxel had no difference in efficacy, but some differences in hematologic toxicity. Thus, if serious hematologic toxicity occurs, the 3-week treatment regimen of docetaxel could be replaced by 1-week treatment regimen.
Objectives To evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of combined induction therapy of interferon (IFN) with chemotherapy for survival of the patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by meta-analysis. Methods All clinical trials of addition of IFN plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone for induction therapy to advanced NSCLC patients in MEDLINE (1966-2006), EMBASE (1984-2006.1) and The Cochrane Library (Issue 1,2006) were identified. The references of related studies and Education Books of ASCO and ESMO meeting were handsearched. The quality of included trials was evaluated. Data were extracted by two reviewers independently with a designed extraction form. RevMan 4.2.7 software was used for data analysis. Results Five randomized controlled trials involving 360 patients were included. The pooled result of 3 studies showed that IFN plus chemotherapy induction treatment did not improve 1-year survival rate with RR 0.76, 95%CI 0.46 to 1.26. The pooled result of 5 studies showed that IFN plus chemotherapy induction treatment did not improve response rate with RR 1.40, (0.83 2.34). The pooled result showed that IFN plus chemotherapy induction treatment might significantly increase leukopenia and thrombocytopenia with RR 2.61,95%CI1.70 to 3.99) and RR 4.78,95%CI 1.87 to 12.19 respectively . Conclusion Insufficient data exists to state whether IFN plus chemotherapy induction treatment can improve 1-year survival rate and response rate. IFN plus chemotherapy may increase occurrence of leucopenia and thrombocytopenia. Further studies are warranted.
