Objective To assess reduction of adverse drug reaction incidence in patients with colorectal cancer receiving Jianpi herbs combined with chemotherapy. Methods The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing Jianpi herbs combined with chemotherapy were searched through CBMdisc, CJFD, Wangfang Data and PubMed. The search was updated to September 2007. Software RevMan5, provided by Cochrane Library, was used to perform meta-analysis. Results Six RCTs were identified in this systematic review. All the methodology quality of the enrolled RCTs was gaded C. The pooled analysis showed that Jianpi herbs combined chemotherapy significantly reduced the incidences of grade I and grade II leucopenia [grade I with RR= 0.50 and 95%CI (0.31 to 0.80); grade II with RR= 0.37 and 95%CI (0.21 to 0.66)], grade II nausea and vomiting [RR= 0.51, 95%CI (0.31 to 0.84)] compared with routine chemotherapy. There was no statistical difference in reduction of neurotoxicity between the two groups. Conclusion The methodological quality of the RCTs using Jianpi herbs combined with chemotherapy on treating colorectal cancer should be improved. Based on this systematic review, Jianpi herbs combined with chemotherapy may reduce the incidence of mild to moderate adverse drug reaction, such as leucopenia and nausea and vomiting, in patients with colorectal cancer. Well-designed RCTs are needed in the future.
Objective To improve the knowledge of lung injury induced by rituximab. Methods Clinical data of 5 lymphoma patients with lung injury caused by rituximab chemotherapy were analyzed. Results Five patients received chemotherapy including rituximab, and had fever, cough and dyspnea after 3 to 5 chemotherapy cycles. Chest CT showed bilateral diffuse interstitial infiltrates. All 5 cases experienced hypoxemia or respiratory failure. Clinical symptoms were improved 3 to 5 days after the treatment of glucocorticoids, and pulmonary lesions were significantly alleviated 1 to 2 weeks after the treatment. According to the literature, the incidence rate of lung injury caused by rituximab was 0. 03% to 4. 9%, which has increased recently. Conclusions With the comprehensive application of rituximab, lung injury caused by this drug is not rare. The good prognosis depends on early diagnosis and treatment by further recognition of the side effect of rituximab.
Objectives To systematically evaluate the clinical characteristics of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) caused by Shuanghuanglian Injection (SHLI) and to provide reference for post-market evaluation and clinical application of SHLI. Methods We searched electronic databases such as the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI, 1979.1-2009.9), the Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-text Database (VIP, 1989.1-2009.9), and the Chinese Biomedical Disc (CBMdisc, 1978.1-2009.9). ADR cases were analyzed according to occurrences categorized. Available data was assessed using the Chi-square test including relative ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Different medicine combinations and comparisons between SHL powder injection and SHL injection were calculated using the statistical software Stata 9.1. Results (1) A total of 452 articles were included with a total of 2 799 ADR cases reported. Case reports were the main design type of included literature, which accounted for 84.51%. According to 31165 cases of SHLI treatment and 1 013 corresponding ADRs, the incidence of SHLI ADR was calculated as 3.25%. (2) The ratio of male to female in the reported ADR cases was 1.13?1. (3) Allergy to Penicillin, which accounted for 13.38% of the total cases, was at the top for past allergic history, followed by sulfonamides and asthma (2.68%). (4) In terms of disease treated respiratory disease accounted for 91.75% of all cases of SHLI ADRs, followed by digestive diseases (5.17%), and urinary diseases (1.11%). (5) Penicillins were the most common combination choice with SHLI, and such combination showed higher ADR risk than SHLI used alone [RR=3.14, 95%CI (2.58, 3.81)]. (6) Multiple systems/organs were involved in SHLI ADRs, and were ranked downwards according to proportion as: skin, digestive system, general reactions, respiratory system, nervous system, cardiovascular system, local reactions, urinary system, hematologic system and others. (7) According to the WHO ADR Classification Criteria, ADR cases were divided into four grades. There were 6.36%, 5.48%, 45.62%, and 2.12% cases of Grade Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ and Ⅳ , respectively. And the prognoses of the rest 52.42% cases were reported unclearly. (8) All cases of death were caused by allergic shock, except for one, which was caused by myocardial infarction induced by pain at the injection site. The fastest ADR case occurred 1 minute after being injected. (9) There was a remarkable difference (Plt;0.05) in the rate of ADR caused by SHLI in power form (2.25%) and as a solution (4.14%). Conclusion The clinical manifestations of ADRs caused by SHLI mainly include skin allergic reactions and gastrointestinal reactions. There is an increased risk of ADR induced by combined uses of SHLI and other drugs, especially antibiotics. Compared to the solution, the powder has lower ADR occurrence and higher safety with statistical significance. We propose strengthening management and surveillance on SHLI from manufacturing to application, and improving the level of the risk management for post-market drugs.
In phase II clinical trial of Compound Prescription of Huangyaozi (Dioscorea bulbifera L.), 7 cases out of 37 developed (18.92%) impairment of liver function. As a result, the ethic committee required researchers to report all data of safety of the drug and have all subjects rechecked about their liver function so as to provided reasonable evidence for the scientifical evaluation of the relationship between the drug and the adverse event and the succedent suspending of the clinical trial.
Objective While reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADR) and adverse drug events (AE) following Chinese medicine injection (CMI) is becoming more common, the reporting quality is of concern. Methods A checklist about the reporting quality of ADR/AE was set up, and the ADR/AE reporting of Herba Houttuyniae injection was chosen as an example. Electronic databases Chinese Journal Net (CJN) (1994-2009) and Chinese Science and Technological Journal Net (VIP) (1989-2009) were searched for target literature. Results Based on our search strategy, 210 articles were included, with 175 articles reporting single or several cases of ADR/AE following Herba Houttuyniae injection (type I report). There were 7 reports from regional or national ADR monitoring centers (type II report), and 28 summary reports from a single hospital or medical center (type III report). All 210 papers mentioned ‘adverse effect,’ ‘safety’ or related meaning words in their titles, but 199 articles did not have abstract. Patient demographic characteristics were not fully reported in these articles. In type I articles, only 97 cases (43.11%) mentioned whether patients had or did not have a history of allergies, while 128 cases (56.89%) in Type II papers and Fourteen (50%) type III papers, did not mention allergic history of patients. Only three articles (3/210, 1.43%), all of them type I, mentioned the syndrome type in Chinese medicine. None of the papers gave clear indications of the type and grade of ADR/AE of patients. Most papers did not report details of the CMI procedure, such as the drug company, product serial number, or the drug’s validity period. Data about the occurrence time and management of ADR/AE was also inadequately reported. Conclusion and recommendations The current reporting format of ADR/AE in clinical CMIs is not standardized. Much fundamental information of ADR/AE following CMI is therefore missing. A standard reporting format for ADR should be developed, and should include the following: 1) a title mentioning adverse effects and safety; 2) a structured abstract including adequate information about the patient and the disease treated, the drug used, the specific ADR/AE, physician response to the ADR/AE, and result of management; 3) demographic characteristic of the patients (gender, age, etc.); 4) clinical characteristics of patients (disease, syndrome, etc); 5) allergic history of patients; 6) diagnosis and syndrome based on Chinese medicine theory; 7) detailed information about the Chinese materia medica intervention (the manufacturer of the drug, series number, valid dates, dosage, route of administration, menstruum, dripping speed, etc.); 8) concomitant drug use; 9) time and symptoms of ADR/AE; 10) type and grading of ADR/AE; 11) physiological systems affected by ADR/AE; 12) specific treatment and prognosis for ADR/AE; 13) evidence of the cause and effect of ADR/AE; 14) any other possibility of ADR/AE. Also, a ADR/AE registration system should be established.
Objective To evaluate the safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) versus azathioprine (AZA) for rejection after renal transplantation. Methods We searched MEDLINE (1966 to Jun. 2004), EMBASE (1984 to Jun. 2004), The Cochrane Library (Issue 2, 2004) and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM, 1979 to Jun. 2004). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing MMF with AZA for rejection after renal transplantation were included. The quality of included studies such as randomization, blinding, allocation concealment was evaluated and meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 4.1.1 software. Results Twenty-Four RCTs comparing MMF (2 g/day or 3 g/day) with AZA for rejection after renal transplantation were identified. The digest system morbidity of MMF group was higher than that of AZA group. The incidence of vomiting, bellyache and diarrhea of MMF 3 g/day group was statistical by higher than that of AZA group (P＜0.05). The cytom egalovirus (CMV) infection morbidity of MMF 3 g/day group during 6 months, 1 year and 2 years follow-up was higher than AZA group with statistical difference, but for MMF 2 g/day group, this difference was only seen during 1 year follow-up. Leukopenia incidence of MMF 3g/day group was higher than AZA group with statistical difference, but this difference was not seen in MMF 2 g/day group. Thrombocytopenia incidence of MMF 3 g/day group was lower than AZA group with statistical difference. For skin carcinoma morbidity, no statistical difference was found among MMF 3 g/day, MMF 2 g/day and AZA groups. Conclusions Compared with AZA, MMF represents higher digest system side-effects incidence, higher morbidity of leucopenia and CMV infection and lower incidence of thrombocytopenia. The dose-response relationship of adverse drug reaction is found.
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of metformin for metabolic syndrome. Methods We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, China Biological Medicine Database, VIP, and CMAC up to the year of 2007. Handsearches and additional searches were also conducted. Randomized controlled trials of metformin for metabolic syndrome were included. Two reviewers independently extracted data from eligible studies and evaluated the quality of included studies. Meta-analysis was performed for the results of homogeneous studies by The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 4.2.9. Results Six trials involving a total of 2442 patients with metabolic syndrome were included. Meta-analysis was not performed due to the apparent heterogeneity. Metformin, compared with placebo, exhibited more favorable effects in reducing the proportion of patients with metabolic syndrome (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.60), the proportion of patients with low HDL-c (RR 1.61, 95%CI 1.16 to 2.23), wide waist circumference (RR 1.64, 95%CI 1.06 to 2.55), and high FPG (RR 1.55, 95%CI 1.17 to 2.05). Metformin was also more effective in improving FPG and insulin sensitivity. The addition of metformin to atenolol plus nitrendipine was superior to atenolol plus nitrendipine alone in reducing the proportion of patients with high TG (RR 5.57, 95%CI 1.56 to 19.84), abdominal obesity (RR 14.47, 95%CI 3.34 to 62.61), and IGT (RR 16.51, 95%CI 6.06 to 45.0). Compared with low-fat diet therapy, metformin was superior in improving FPG, 2-hour postload plasma glucose, and insulin sensitivity. No differences were observed between metformin and acarbose in the reduction of TG and FPG, but metformin was less effective than acarbose in improving 2-hour postload plasma glucose. No adverse drug reactions were reported. Conclusion Metformin has beneficial effects in reducing the incidence of high FPG, IGT, and abdominal obesity. It also proved beneficial in reducing the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and increasing insulin sensitivity. The therapeutic effects of metformin on blood pressure, obesity, and lipid profile are uncertain. There is insufficient evidence to recommend the use of metformin in the treatment of metabolic syndrome due to low methodological quality, small sample size, and limited number of trials. More high quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials are required.
Objective
To investigate the method and effect of continuous improvement of adverse drug reaction (ADR) monitoring in a major public hospital’s cooperating branch hospital.
Methods
PDCA cycle management was used to continuously improve the quality of ADR monitoring. ADR report network platform was established in the fourth quarter of 2014; ADR report specification training for the medical personnel was held in the first quarter of 2015; a examine mechanism was built in the second quarter of 2015. The quality and quantity of ADR monitoring before and after the PDCA cycle management were analyzed.
Results
ADR report timeliness conform to the requirements increased from 45.5% (from the first to third quarter of 2014) to 98.1% (from the fourth quarter of 2014 to the second quarter of 2015); accurate ADR types checking, normal name writting, and complete process description increased from 68.6%, 65.7%, 8.6% (from January 2014 to Frequency 2015) to 92.9%, 96.4%, 85.7% (from March to June 2015); the quantity of ADR report was obviously improved.
Conclusion
Learning from public hospital’s experience and considering its own condition in ADR monitoring, cooperating branch hospital utilizes PDCA cycle management which could continuously improve the ADR monitoring.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of glimepiride for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods We searched the literature from PubMed, Ovid (All EBM Reviews), CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM and other databases. Evaluating the quality of the study according to Cochrane systematic reviews, Meta-analysis was performed for the results of homogeneous studies by The Cochrane Collaboration’s software RevMan 5.0, and the heterogeneous data conducted a descriptive qualitative analysis. Results Six RCTs included in the analysis and Meta-analysis was not performed due to the insufficient data (for the median or standard deviation). Six RCTs are multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. The results showed that glimepiride groups to reduce glycosylated hemoglobin, lower fasting and postprandial blood glucose, postprandial plasma insulin enhance the efficacy were statistically significant differences (Plt;0.05) compared to placebo groups. Four studies informed the impact of fasting plasma insulin (FI) and 3 studies showed that the glimepiride groups improving the fasting plasma insulin (FI) were statistically significant differences (Plt;0.05), but 1 study showed the two groups had no significant difference (Pgt;0.05). All studies showed minor adverse reactions of glimepiride. Conclusion Glimepiride can reduce the glycosylated hemoglobin, lower the fasting and postprandial blood glucose, improve fasting and postprandial plasma insulin for type 2 diabetes patients, and have minor adverse reactions. In a word, glimepiride is an effective and security sulfonylureas drug.
Objective Qin Kai Ling injection (QKL) is made upon traditional Chinese medicine formulation “An Gong Niu Huang Wan”, is widely used to treatment a lot of diseases. This review aims to assess the safety of QKL. Methods We searched Chinese databases CNKI, VIP from 1987 to April 2009. Two authors extracted the data. Results Totally 1 486 cases were included in this review. We unable to answer the question about the incidence of adverse drug reaction/adverse event (ADR/AE) induced by QKL due to absence of total numbers of producing and market information. It was estimated based on the limited data that the possibility of ADR/AE by using QKL should be low. We found some ADR/AE may induced by incorrect use of QKL, such as used in infants, and some incompatibility drugs were used together with QKL, four patients died in private clinics or patient’s home. We unable to distinguish the ADR or AE based on the poor reported data. Conclusion Current weak evidence shows that QKL has a low risk of ADR/AE. The use of QKL in some ADR/AE cases may be questionable. The reporting of ADR/AE needs to be much improved based on “Recommendation for reporting traditional Chinese medicine adverse drug reaction”.
