Objective To compare the long-term results of vascularised fibulargraft and simple autologous fibular graft for reconstruction of wrist after distal bone tumor resection.Methods From January 1979 to September2002, 15 patients with wrist defects due to distal bone tumor resection were treated with vascularised fibular graft or simple autologous fibular graft and followed up 1 year. The results were graded with Enneking’s system and evaluated radiographicallyaccording to the “International Symposium on Limb Salvage”. The grade system included limb function, radiological examination and the function of ankle. Results The limb function of 8 patients with vascularised fibular graft restored to 80% of normal function and the bone union was achieved within 6 months. The limbfunction of 6 patients with simple autologous fibular graft restored to 67% of normal function. The bony union was achieved within 6 months in 4 cases with thebone graft less than 5 cm and in the 13th and 16th months in 2 cases with the bone graft more than 12 cm. Conclusion It is suitable to use the headof fibular boneas a substitute for the distal radius. The healing of vascularised fibular graft is very quick and haven’t the bone resorption. So in the procedure for reconstruction and limb salvage after bone tumor resection of distal radius, the free vascularised fibular graft with fibular head is an ideal substitute.
From 1972 to 1990,121 cases of bone tumor were treated by segmental resection of tumor and followed by artifical joint re- placement. All of the prostheses were designed and manufactured by our hospital. One hundred and two cases were followed up for an average of 7.4 years and the curative rate with the affected limbs preserved was 85.28%. The indication, the advantages and disadvantages, the material and the type of artifical joints, and the assessment of functional reconstruction following operation were discussed.
Objective To investigate the clinical application and complicationof the lyophilized small-segment allogeneic bone used in repairing bone defectscaused by benign bone tumor and tumor-like lesions after resection and curettage. Methods From December 1999 to December 2005, 230 patients (156 males, 74 females; age, 5-56years, averaged 32.8 years), who had bone defects caused by benign bone tumors and tumor-like lesions after surgical resection and curettage, were treated by the lyophilized small-segment allogeneic bones. The cavities left by the tumor curettage ranged in size from 1.0 cm×0.8 cm to 10.0 cm×2.0 cm, andthe bone defects were about 1.0 to 3.5 cm in diameter after the localized resection of the bones. According to the bone defect degrees, the autogenous nonvascular iliac bone and the bone allograft (0.5-30.0 g) were implanted, followed by the drainage for 2-3 days and the use of antibiotics to prevent infection. The postoperative systemic and local reactions were observed, and the regular X-ray examinations were performed to observe the bone union. ResultsThere was no significant difference in the allergic reactions, such as postoperative temperature, drained amount, and body swelling, between this kind of transplantation and the autogenous bonetransplantation. The wounds in 196 patients were healed by the first intension.The wounds in 34 patients had extravasate. Among them, the wound was healed by changing dressing in 30cases; the wound had delayed healing in 4, including 3 whose wounds were healedby changing dressing for 3-4 weeks,and 1 whose wound was healed by taking out the implants. The follow-up for 6-60 months (average, 38 months) revealed that all the patients had the allograft unions of the bones within 6-18 months after the transplantation, and only 6patients had recurrence of the tumor (3.0%). Evaluated by the Mankin,Komender and WANG Zhiqiang’s standards, 196 (85.22%) patients were satisfied with their outcomes while the other 34 (14.78%) patients were not satisfied. Conclusion The lyophilized small-segment allogeneic bone has a good compatibility and osteogenesis, when it is used in repairing bone defects caused by benign bone tumor and tumor-like lesions after resection and curettage. So, this kind of bone is a good, convenient and safe material for the bone transplantation. The important factors affecting the allograft union are as follows: the mechanical stability in the recipient region, local blood supply, and management of the bone cavity left by resection and curettage of the bone tumor.
ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of fibular head resection in prosthetic replacement for neoplasms of the proximal tibia in limb salvage surgery.
MethodsBetween July 1999 and March 2013, 76 patients with neoplasms of the proximal tibia underwent tumor resection, prosthetic replacement, and gastrocnemius medial head flap transfer. Among them, 38 patients underwent fibular head resection (group A) and 38 underwent fibular head preservation (group B). There was no significant difference in gender, age, side, tumor classification and stage, and disease duration between 2 groups (P>0.05). The complications and the position of the components were observed, and American society for bone tumors scoring system (MSTS93) was used to evaluate the joint function.
ResultsAll patients were followed up 12-150 months (mean, 87 months). Incision infection occurred in 1 patient (2.63%) of group A and 6 patients (15.79%) of group B, showing significant difference (χ2=3.934, P=0.047). Necrosis of gastrocnemius medial head flap was found in 1 patient of group A and 2 patients of group B. Prosthetic loosening and instability of the knee were observed in 4 and 2 cases of group A and in 6 and 4 cases of group B, respectively. In groups A and B, there were 3 and 5 cases of local recurrence, 7 and 6 cases of distant metastasis, and 8 and 7 deaths, respectively. According to MSTS93, the results were excellent in 23 cases, good in 10 cases, fair in 3 cases, and poor in 2 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 86.84% in group A; the results were excellent in 21 cases, good in 11 cases, fair in 3 cases, and poor in 3 cases, with an excellent and good rate of 84.21% in group B; and no significant difference was found in the excellent and good rate between 2 groups (χ2=0.106, P=0.744).
ConclusionFibular head resection in prosthetic replacement for neoplasms of the proximal tibia in limb salvage surgery is beneficial to intra-operative tissue coverage, and it can reduce trauma by skin transplantation and related complications. Good stability and motion of the joint can be obtained after operation.
ObjectiveTo analyze the effectiveness of unicompartment allografts replacement for reconstructing bone defect after bone tumor resection around knee.MethodsBetween January 2007 and January 2014, a total of 9 patients received unicompartment allografts replacement to treat bone tumor around the knee, including 6 males and 3 females, with an average age of 25.8 years (range, 17-38 years). There were 7 patients with bone giant cell tumor (postoperative recurrence of bone giant cell tumor in 1 case) and 2 patients with chondromyxoid fibroma. The tumors were located at the distal femur in 7 cases and proximal tibia in 2 cases, and the tumors were almost at the lateral limbs. The symptom duration was 2-5 months (mean, 3.2 months). The size of lesion ranged from 6 cm×2 cm to 9 cm×4 cm by X-ray film and MRI; and the metastasis was excluded by CT. The length of the allograft was 8.0-9.2 cm (mean, 8.6 cm).ResultsThe intraoperative blood loss volume was 400-550 mL (mean, 480 mL); and 0-3 U of erythrocyte was transfused after operation. The continuous exudate of incision occurred in 1 patient, and cured after 3 months; the other incisions healed primarily at 2 weeks after operation. All patients were followed up 3-10 years (mean, 6 years). No operation area infection, allograft bone poor healing or rupture was found. At 1 year after operation, the knee range of motion was 90-110° (mean, 100°); the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score was 24-29 (mean, 26). Low density area (osteolysis) was found in 6 allografts; no articular surface collapse, hairline fracture, or fracture was found in patients; callus formation was observed in the contact surface between the allograft and the host bone, and the cortical bone showed good continuity.ConclusionUnicompartment allografts replacement can provide good support and function in terms of bone tumor resection, and achieve good effectiveness by biological reconstruction.
ObjectiveTo explore the effectiveness and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for bone tumors, so as to provide a reference for clinical decision.
MethodsPubMed, EMbase, The Cochrane Library, CNKI and VIP databases were systematically searched for clinical effectiveness and safety studies of HIFU for bone tumors up to August 2014. Study selection, data extraction and quality assessment were applied independently by two reviewers, and then RevMan 5.1 software was used for conducting meta-analysis. If the data cannot be synthesized, the research outcome was described with a qualitative analysis.
ResultsA total of 10 case series including 257 patients (157 males, 100 females) were included. The current evidence indicated that overall survival rates for all primary bone malignancy at 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year were 89.8%, 72.3%, 60.5% and 50.5%, respectively. For the patients with clinical stage Ⅱb, the rates were 93.3%, 82.4%, 75% and 63.7%, respectively. For those with clinical stage Ⅲ, the rates were 79.2%, 42.2%, 21.1% and 15.8%, respectively. The local recurrence rate of HIFU for bone tumors was 7% to 9%, and recurrences at 1-, 2-, 3- and 5-year were 0%, 6.2%, 11.8% and 11.8%, respectively. The amputation rate was 2% to 7%. The adverse reaction rate was 27.2% (70/257), and among them the main was mild skin burn (21/257, 8.2%), followed by I degree burns (16/257, 6.2%), nerve damage (10/257, 3.9%) and fracture (6/257, 2.3%).
ConclusionHIFU provide an alternative choice for patients with bone malignancy, with a certain effectiveness and safety. However, high-quality, large-scale randomized controlled trials or cohort studies which may focus on vary kinds of tumors, clinical stage and site of lesions are urgently needed, so that clinicians can use sufficient evidence for their clinical decision-making.
OBJECTIVE To manufacture adriamycin-porous tricalcium phosphate (A-PTCP) ceramic drug delivery system (DDS) as a possible method for bone defect treatment after bone tumor operation. METHODS A-PTCP DDS was made from putting adriamycin into PTCP. Thirty rabbits were divided randomly into group A(24 rabbits) and group B(6 rabbits). A-PTCP was implanted in the greater trochanter of the right femur in group A. Adriamycin were injected into veins in group B. Muscle around A-PTCP and plasma were taken out at different period. Adriamycin concentrations in muscle and plasma were measured by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS A-PTCP could gradually release adriamycin over 10 weeks. Adriamycin concentrations in the muscle were higher than that in plasma. CONCLUSION A-PTCP may be a new method for repairing bone defects after bone tumor operation.
Objective To discuss the reconstructive method of the bone defect after resection of the upper extremity bone tumor and to assess the outcome of the autograft to reconstruct the bone defect after the bone tumor resection. Methods From August 1998 to March 2004,16 patients aged 7~45 years suffering from bone tumor of the upper extremity were treated with the wide resection of the bone tumor and the reconstruction of the bone defect by the autograft. The following diagnoses were confirmed by pathological examination:Ewing’s sarcoma and osteosarcoma of theproximal humerus in 1 patient each; Ewing’s sarcoma of the distal humerus in 2 patients;giant cell tumor in 8 patients, highgrade chondrosarcoma in 2, malignant fibrohistiocytoma in 1; and osteosarcoma in 1 of the distal radius. Substitution of the proximal humerus with the clavicle was performed in 2 patients, andthedistal humerus with the fibula in other 2 patients. Of the 12 patients with tumor in the distal radius, 1 was reconstructed with autograft of the iliac bone and 11 with autograft with the fibula. The functional outcome was evaluated by the MSTS score. Results The follow-up for 36 and 12 months respectively revealed that in the 2 patients undergoing the autograft with the clavicle in the proximal humerus, good shoulder functions of flexion and extension were obtained although the function of abduction was poor, with the MSTS scores of 23 and 22 respectively. In the 2 patients undergoing the autograft with the fibular in the distal humerus, good elbow function and bone union were observed according to the followup for 3 and 4 months respectively, with the MSTS scores of 24 and 19 respectively. Of the 12 patients undergoing the autograft in the distal radius, 11 had an excellent or good function with no complication, with the average MSTS score of 22.6 (ranging from 18 to 27), accordingto the follow-up for 6-75 months; only 1 had no bone union 10 months after operation and lost the follow-up afterwards. Conclusion Reconstruction ofthe bone defect with the autograft after the wide resection of the upper extremity bone tumor is an ideal and reliable method for some suitable patients, especially for some children.
Objective To evaluate the shortterm efficacy of osteoarticular allografts in the limb salvage of the proximal tibia. Methods From 1998 to 2003, 15 patients (7 males, 8 females; aged 14-56 yr, average 33) with bone tumor of the proximal tibia underwent osteoarticular allografts, among whom 7 had progressive giant cell tumor without any previous chemotherapy; 8 had malignant tumor with previous chemotherapy, including 6 patients with osteosarocoma, 1 with spindle cell sarcoma, and 1 with malignant fibrous histiocytoma. According to the Enneking system, the patients were classified into ⅠB (7 patients), ⅡA (2 patients), and ⅡB (6 patients). All the patientsunderwent the marginal resection with an allograft (average length 12 cm, range6-16 cm) implanted. Results The follow-up for an average of 21 months (range,3-58 months) revealed that among the 8 patients with malignant tumor of the proximal tibia undergoing chemotherapy, 5 had union of the bone, 3 had no union of the bone; among the 3 patients, 2 had a complication of infection and 1 had a local recurrence. All the 3 patients underwent amputation at the lower part of the femur. According to the Mankin score, 2 patients had a perfect result, 2 good, 1 fair, and 3 poor, with a 50% effectiveness rate. Among the 7 patients with progressive giant cell tumor at the upper part of the tibia, none had infection or local recurrence, but 2 hadnonunion of the bone and 2 had joint instability, aided by the kneeaidingsystem. According to the Mankin score, 3 patients had a perfect result, 2 good,and 2 fair, with a 71% effectiveness rate. Conclusion The osteoarticular allograft of the proximal tibia has many advantages in spite of a relatively highrate of complications, and it is the limb salvage of choicefor the progressivebenign or malignant bone tumors of the proximal tibia.
ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical outcome of application of joint prosthesis in limb salvage treatment of mildmalignant tumor at the articular ends of femurs, with severe osteolysis. Methods The treatment of 15 cases of mildmalignant tumor at the articular ends of femurs with severe bone destruction, from 1978 to 1999, was reviewed. There were 10 cases of giant-cell bone tumor and 5 cases of chondrosarcoma, among which there were 5 cases at the stage ofⅠA, 9 cases at ⅠB, and 1 case at ⅡA, with 4 cases at the proximal end and 11cases at the distal end. The tumor was totally removed, with a massive bone defect left at the foci, and then the prosthesis replacement was performed to reconstruct the articular joint. All of the 15 patients were followed up for 9 monthsto 20 years, 4 years and 3 months on average, before clinical evaluation. Results All of the wound healed well, with primary healing. Local relapse occurred in one case and the patient died of lung metastasis; the amputation of the replaced knee joint was performed in one case due to severe infection after trauma; radiograph showed there was slight sunk of the prosthesis in 2 cases after replacement. The other 11 cases recovered well with satisfactory function. Conclusion The limb salvage treatment of mildmalignant tumor at the articular ends of femurswould be available, especially for those with massive bone destruction, when the tumor is removed by whole and rationally marginal resection, followed by properlyutilization of prosthesis and general post-operative exercise.
