OBJECTIVE: To investigate the variation of neurotrophic factors expression in spinal cord and muscle after root avulsion of brachial plexus. METHODS: Forty-eight Wistar rats were involved in this study and according to the observing time in 1st day, 1st week, 4th week, 8th week, and 12th week after avulsion, and the control, were divided into 6 groups. By immunohistochemical and hybridization in situ assays, the expression of nerve growth factor (NGF) on muscle, basic fibroblast growth factor(bFGF) and its mRNA on the neurons of corresponding spinal cord was detected. Computer image analysis system was used to calculate the result. RESULTS: After the root avulsion of brachial plexus occurred, expression of NGF increased and reached to the peak at the 1st day. It subsided subsequently but was still higher than normal control until the 12th week. While expression of bFGF and its mRNA increased in the neurons of spinal cord and reached to the peak at the 1st week. Then it dropped down and at the 12th week it turned lower than normal control. CONCLUSION: After root avulsion of brachial plexus, neurotrophic factors expression increase on target muscle and neurons of corresponding spinal cord. It maybe the autoregulation and may protect neuron and improve nerve regeneration.
The results of nerve transposition for root avulsion of brachial plexas in 21 cases were reported. The methods of the nerve transposition were divided into four groups as followings: By transfer of phrenic nerve, accesory nerve, the motor branches of cervical plexus and intercostal nerves in cease; By transfer of phrenic nerve, accessory nerve and the motor branches of cervical plexus in 6 cases; By transfer of phrenic nerve and accessory nerve in 9 cases, and by transfer of phrenic nerve or the motor branches of cervical plexus or intercostal nerve in 5 cases. During operation, in 1 cases variation of the brachial plexus was found. Injury to the subclavian artery occurred in 4 cases and they were repaired, which is good for the blood circulation of the upper arm and nerve regeneration. Nineteen cases were followed up with good results. The overall excellent and good rate was 73.7%. It was considered that transposition of nerve should be a routine operation for the treatment of root avulsion of brachial plexus and the accompanied arterial injury should be repaired at the same time during operation, and the latter would be advantageous to enhance functional recovery of nerve.
Objective To investigate the results of two stage multiple nerves transfer for treatment of complete brachial plexus root avulsion. Methods Eight patients with complete brachial plexus avulsion, aging 18-38 years andwith a mean 6 months interval of injury and repair, were surgically treated with the following procedures. One stage surgical procedure was that the contralateral C7 never root was transferred to the ulnar nerve, the phrenic nerve to theanterior division of upper trunci plexus brachialis and the accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve. Two stage surgical procedure was that the ulnar nerve was transferredto the median nerve , the intercostal nerves to the radial nerve and the thoracodorsal nerve. Results All patients were followed upfrom 13 months to 25 months(21 months on average), muscle reinnervation was observed in all patients. Return of muscle power of M3 or better are regarded as effective. The effective recovery results were 75% in musculocutaneous nerve, 37.5% in suprascapular nerve, 37.5% in radial nerve, 75% in thoracodorsal nerve and 62.5% in median nerve. In sensory recovery of the median nerve, 4 patients obtained S3, 3 patients S2 and 1 patient S1. Conclusion Two stage multiple nerves transfer for treatment of root avulsion of brachial plexus can achieve better motor function results and is safe and effective. The procedure should be recommended for treatmentof root avulsion of brachial plexus in selected patients with complete brachial plexus root avulsion, especially in young patients with a short interval between injury and repair. It isone of the alternative options.
Objective To observe the recovery of the sensory and motor function of the repaired l imb and the impact on the healthy l imb function after contralateral C7 nerve root transposition for treating brachial plexus root avulsion injury. Methods Between August 2008 and November 2010, 22 patients with brachial plexus root avulsion injuries were treated with contralateral C7 nerve root transposition. All patients were male, aged 14 to 47 years (mean, 33.3 years). Total brachialplexus root avulsion was confirmed by preoperative cl inical examination and electrophysiological tests. In 22 cases, median nerve was repaired in 16 cases, radial nerve in 3 cases, and musculocutaneous nerve in 3 cases; primary operation was performed in 2 patients, and two-stage operation was performed in 20 patients. The sensory and motor functional recovery of the repaired limb was observed after operation. Results Twenty-one patients were followed up 7-25 months (mean, 18.4 months). In 16 cases of contralateral C7 nerve root transposition to the median nerve, wrist flexors reached more than M3 in 10 cases, while finger flexors reached more than M3 in 7 cases; sensation reached more than S3 in 11 cases. In 3 cases of contralateral C7 nerve root transposition to the musculocutaneous nerve, elbow flexors reached more than M3 in 2 cases; sensation reached more than S3 in 2 cases. In 3 cases of contralateral C7 nerve root transposition to the radial nerve, wrist extensor reached more than M3 in 1 case; sensation reached more than S3 in 1 case. Conclusion Contralateral C7 nerve root transposition is a good procedure for the treatment of brachial plexus root avulsion injury. Staged operation is one of important factors influencing treatment outcome.
ObjectiveTo evaluate the methods and effectiveness of contralateral C7 nerve root and multiple nerves transfer for the treatment of brachial plexus root avulsion.
MethodsBetween June 2006 and June 2010, 23 patients with brachial plexus root avulsion were treated. There were 20 males and 3 females, aged 17 to 42 years (mean, 27.4 years). The time from injury to operation was 4 to 12 months (mean, 5.9 months). In 16 patients having no associated injury, the first stage procedure of contralateral C7 nerve root transfer and accessory nerve transfer to suprascapular nerve or phrenic nerve transfer to anterior upper trunk was performed, and the second stage procedure of the contralateral C7 nerve root transfer to median nerve and intercostal nerve transfer to axillary nerve was performed. In 4 patients having phrenic nerve and accessory nerve injuries, the first stage procedure of the contralateral C7 nerve root transfer and second stage procedure of the contralateral C7 nerve root transfer to median nerve and musculocutaneous nerve were performed. In 3 patients having hemothorax, pneumothorax, and rib fractures, the first stage procedure of the contralateral C7 nerve root transfer and accessory nerve transfer to suprascapular nerve, and the second stage procedure of the contralateral C7 nerve root transfer to median nerve and musculocutaneous nerve were performed. The British Medical Research Council (MRC) sensory grading (S0-S4) and modified muscle strength grading standard (M0-M5) were used for comprehensive assessment of limb and shoulder abduction, elbow/biceps muscle strength, flexor wrist and finger muscle strength and median nerve sensory recovery.
ResultsTwenty-three patients were followed up 3-4.5 years (mean, 3.4 years). At 3 years after operation, the shoulder abduction reached 0-82°(mean, 44°). In 16 patients having no associated injuries, the shoulder abduction was more than 30°in 13 cases, and was more than 60°in 3 cases; in 3 patients having hemothorax, pneumothorax, and rib fractures, the shoulder abduction was more than 30°; and in 4 patients having phrenic nerve and accessory nerve injuries, the shoulder abduction was 0°. The muscle strength of elbow/biceps was M3 or more than M3 in 9 cases, was M1-M2 in 8 cases, and was M0 in 6 cases; the muscle strength of flexor wrist or finger was M3 or more than M3 in 7 cases, was M1-M2 in 11 cases, and was M0 in 5 cases. Median nerve sensory recovery was S3 or more than S3 in 11 cases, was S1-S2 in 7 cases, and was S0 in 5 cases. After 3 years, affected limb had locomotor activity in 11 patients, affected limb had activities driven by the contralateral latissimus dorsi muscle contraction in 12 patients.
ConclusionContralateral C7 nerve root and multiple nerves transfer is a good method to treat brachial plexus root avulsion.
Objective To investigate the survival effect and reaction mechanismsof motor neurons after reimplantation of the avulsed root into the spinal cord,and to observe the survival and differentiation in the spinal cord after brachial plexus roots avulsion. Methods Thirty adult Wistar rats were randomly devided into the control group and the experimental group (n=15). Laminectomy of C4-6 was performed via a posterior approach. The ventral and dorsal roots of C5,6 were both avulsed from the spinal cord outside the dura mater and within the vertebral canal.For the experimental group, the ventral root of C6 wasreimplanted into the ventralhorn under microscope. The dorsal root was left. The ventral and dorsal roots of C5 were placed inside the nearby muscles. For the control group, the ventral and dorsal roots of both C5 and C6 were placed inside the nearby muscles. At 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 weeks postoperatively, the C6 spinal cord was stained with HE. The changes of the number and morphology of motor neurons were observed onHEstained sections. The C6 spinal nerve root was stained with silver nitrate, andthe regeneration of nerve fiber was observed. Results All rats were recovered well and their wounds were healed at primary stage. The gross observation showed that the avulsed nerve roots in control group adhered to adjacent muscles, however the one in experimental groups which had been implanted into spinal cord adhered to scar tissues and were not separated from spinal cord. At each time point postoperatively, the HEstained transverse sections showed that the number of motor neurons decreased significantly with soma swollen and atrophied, Nissle bodies decreased or disappeared. The survival rates of motor neurons in the control group were 60.9%±5.8%,42.3%±3.5%,30.6%±6.1%27.5%±7.9% and 20.4%±6.8% respectively;in the experimental group,the survival rates were 67.1%±7.4%,56.3%±4.6%,48.7%±8.8%,44.2%±5.5% and 42.5%±8.3% respectively. The survival rates of motor neurons in the experimental group was higher than those in the control group at all time points,showing statistically significant difference(Plt;0.01).At 12 weeks postoperatively, thesilver nitrate stained specimen from the C6 nerve root showed regeneration of the motor neurons in the ventral horn into the reimplanted nerve root through axon in the experimental group,but the degeneration of the nerve fiber appeared and the number of the myelinated nerve fiber decreased in the control group. Conclusion Through reimplantationof the avulsed ventral nerve root into the ventral horn, degeneration of the motor neurons in the ventral horn can be reduced. After reimplantation of avulsed nerve root, there is axonal regrowth of motor neurons into the spinal nerve root and regeneration of the myelinated nerve fiber also appears.
Objective To investigate the quantity and distribution of motor fiber of rat’s C7 nerve root. Methods Motor fiber quantity and section area in the main nerves of the upper extremity and the fascicles of C7 in 30 SD rats were analyzed.Results Fascicles and certain amount (207) of motor fibers from the anterior division of C7 were distributed to musculocutaneous nerve and median nerve, the orientation of these fibers were not clear. The ones (323) from posterior division were to the axillary, radial, and dorsal thoracic nerves, thus the orientation of these fascicles was relatively definite. Conclusion Thedistribution of the motor fibers and fascicles in the divisions of C7 in rat is similar to human beings, so rat is a relatively good model for the study of selective C7 nerve root transfer.
ObjectiveTo investigate the management strategies of clavicular fracture combined with brachial plexus injury and its effectiveness.
MethodsBetween January 2006 and January 2012, 27 cases of clavicular fracture combined with brachial plexus injury were treated. There were 18 males and 9 females, aged 18-42 years (mean, 25.3 years). The causes of injury were traffic accident in 12 cases, falling from height in 10 cases, bruise in 3 cases, machinery injury in 2 cases. According to the Robinson classification, the clavicular fractures were rated as type Ⅰ in 2 cases, as typeⅡin 20 cases, and as type Ⅲ in 5 cases; there were 12 cases of total brachial plexus root avulsion injury, 10 cases of bundle branch injury, and 5 cases of hematoma formation and local nerve compression or injury. The injury to operation time was 6 hours to 14 days (mean, 4 days). Brachial plexus injury was repaired by epineurium neurolysis, nerve anastomosis, or nerve transposition after the exploration of the plexus; and fracture was fixed after open reduction. Sensory grading standard (S0-S4) by UK Medical Research Council (MRC) was used to evaluate the recovery of sensory function, and muscle strength grading standard (M0-M5) by MRC to evaluate the innervating muscle strength.
ResultsThe incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 18-36 months (mean, 26.3 months). All fracture achieved cl inical healing at 12-17 weeks (mean, 15 weeks). No complication of loosening or breakage of internal fixation occurred. The patients had no pain of shoulder in abduction. At 18 months after operation, the shoulder abduction was more than or equal to 60° in 8 cases, 30-60° in 8 cases, and less than 30° in 11 cases. The recovery of biceps muscle strength was more than or equal to M3 in 18 cases and less than M3 in 9 cases; the recovery of wrist flexion or flexor muscle strength was more than or equal to M3 in 13 cases and less than M3 in 14 cases. The sensory function recovery of median nerve was S3 in 14 cases, S1-S2 in 9 cases, and S0 in 4 cases. The shoulder abduction, elbow and wrist flexor motor function did not recover in 2 patients with total brachial plexus root avulsion injury.
ConclusionIt is beneficial to the recovery of nerve function to early repair of the brachial plexus injury by exploration of the plexus combined with open reduction and fixation of clavicular fractures, the short-term effectiveness is good.
Objective〓〖WTBZ〗To assess treating results of functional reconstruction of irrecoverable partial injury of brachial plexus and to improve the function ofinjured upper extremity. Methods Seventiy-nine cases with irrecoverable partial injury of brachial plexus were treated in transfer of muscle (tendon) or by fuctional anthrodesis (fixation of tendon) from January 1984 to June 2003. According to the evaluation criterion by American Shoulder and Elbow, Hand Association,all patients were followed up in motion of reconstructive joint and daily activities after operation for 1 year to 19 years. The effect of the operation was comprehensively scored and evaluated. Results Final results in 54 caseswere as follows: 30 patients with good results, 19 patients with fair results, and 5 with poor results. The results demonstrated some points as follow: ①if the shoulder was instable, athroedesis of shoulder would be a better choice;②the flexion of the elbow joint should be only reconstructed with the dynamic reconstructive methods. The reconstruction of flexion of elbow by transfer of pectoral major muscle was more effective than that by transfer of flexor carpi ulnaris muscle; ③the dynamic reconstruction of extension of digital and carpi was better than that of flexion of digital and opposition function of the thumb; ④the supination of the forearm was effectively reconstructed by transfer of flexorcarpi ulnaris muscle. Pronation teres muscle should be studied more in reconstruction of supination function of the forearm.
ObjectiveTo study the feasibility of using propofol and remifentanil for reduction of shoulder joint dislocation in the conscious elderly patients, and compare its efficacy with brachial plexus block anesthesia.
MethodsSeventy elderly patients (American Sociaty of Anesthesiologist physical statusⅠ-Ⅱ) who underwent shoulder dislocation reduction in our hospital between August 2011 and December 2013 were randomly divided into two groups, each group having 35 cases. Patients in group A received brachial plexus nerve block anesthesia downlink gimmick reset, while patients in group B received the use of remifentanil-propofol and lidocaine compound liquid intravenous drop infusion for anesthesia downlink manipulative reduction. After successful anesthesia, two groups of patients were treated with traction and foot pedal method (Hippocrates) to reset. We observed the two groups of patients in the process of reduction, and recorded their hemodynamic changes, reset time, discharge time, postoperative satisfaction, intra-operative memory, breathing forgotten (breathing interval was longer than 15 seconds) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, and then comparison was made between the two groups.
ResultsPatients in both the two groups successfully completed manipulative reduction. Compared with group A, patients in group B had more stable hemodynamic indexes during the process of reduction, shorter reduction time, better anesthesia effect and higher postoperative satisfaction degree, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in terms of time of leaving the operation room between the two groups (P>0.05). VAS score was higher in group A than that in group B (P<0.05). The occurrence of intra-operative memory amnesia and breathing forgotten phenomenon existed in part of the patients after operation in group B, but they did not occur in patients in group A.
ConclusionRemifentanyl propofol-lidocaine compound fluid can be safely used in conscious elderly patients for shoulder joint dislocation reconstructive surgery, and it functions quickly with complete analgesia and stable hemodynamic indexes.