Objective To evaluate and select essential medicine for the treatment of cerebral circulation insufficiency by means of evidence-based approaches based on the burden of disease for township health centers located in the eastern, central and western regions of China. Methods By means of the approaches, criteria, and workflow set up in the second article of this series, we referred to the recommendations of evidence-based or authority guidelines from inside and outside China, collected relevant evidence from domestic clinical studies, and recommended essential medicine based on evidence-based evaluation. Data were analyzed by Review Manager (RevMan) 5.1 and GRADE profiler 3.6 to evaluate quality of evidence. Results (1) Five clinical guidelines on transient ischaemic attack/ischaemic stroke were included, all of which were evidence-based clinical guidelines. (2) In total, there were 13 medicines (of five classes) listed in these guidelines. (3) We offer a b recommendation for aspirin as essential medicine for cerebral circulation insufficiency and a weak recommendation for warfarin, clopidogrel, heparin, paracetamol, insulin, normal saline and glucose/dextrose. We made a recommendation against tPA, GPⅡb/Ⅲa and antibiotics according to WHOEML (2011), NEML (2009), CNF (2010), other guidelines and the quantity and quality of evidence. (4) Recommended medicines have been marketed in China and their prices were affordable except Clopidogrel’s. (5) Some results of domestic low-quality studies indicated that recommend medicines were safe and effective, which had significant differences compared to high-quality evidence from foreign studies. Further studies were needed to be confirmed. Conclusion (1) We offer a b recommendation for aspirin and a weak recommendation for warfarin, clopidogrel, heparin, paracetamol, insulin, normal saline and glucose/dextrose. We make a recommendation against tPA, GPⅡb/Ⅲa and antibiotics. (2) There is lack of high-quality evidence from relevant domestic studies, especially on long-term safety and pharmacoeconomic evidence. (3) We propose that more studies should be carried out on the safety, special efficacy and pharmacoeconomic of Chinese medicine, Chinese medicinals and medicine with special efficacy. Besides, we also compare recommended medicine with those of the same class and construct Level 1 to 2 systems of preventing and treating cerebral vascular diseases.
